tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7803646793315574963.post5737818065538465356..comments2024-03-18T07:11:44.752+00:00Comments on Anglobitch: Towards a New Pan-Anglosphere ConservatismRookh Kshatriyahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05970184074924214959noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7803646793315574963.post-15673187534902870552018-09-23T12:20:09.217+01:002018-09-23T12:20:09.217+01:00It is funny to watch people try to understand what...It is funny to watch people try to understand what is wrong within themselves which is valid from a vigilancy persepective, completely ignoring the real source of lies and deception that came from outside (Roman Catholicism) due to their lack of vigilancy and remain in a perpetual state of slavery to satanic lies and deception even while claiming to be christians ! . Even when the enemy (Roman Catholicism and its satanic lies) is shown clearly many are afraid to destroy and expose them. Cowards , liars, idolaters, sexually immoral, murderers, occult magicians, vile, will be cast to eternal hell fire - Revelation 21:8.<br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03043662083703268181noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7803646793315574963.post-58520517259929770352010-01-07T23:37:51.888+00:002010-01-07T23:37:51.888+00:00*Once competetion is introduced to women (like pro...*Once competetion is introduced to women (like prostitution for example) it makes women act nicer towards men because they are no longer the only ones who can give men sex. If a guy can just go to a hooker and get his sexual needs met, then the anglobitch needs to change her attitude about men and sex.*<br /><br />That's about the head and the tail of it, sir.Rookh Kshatriyahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05970184074924214959noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7803646793315574963.post-17406516648050355032010-01-07T22:56:58.515+00:002010-01-07T22:56:58.515+00:00Wow, another masterpiece my friend! You have hit ...Wow, another masterpiece my friend! You have hit the nail on the head once again. Once competetion is introduced to women (like prostitution for example) it makes women act nicer towards men because they are no longer the only ones who can give men sex. If a guy can just go to a hooker and get his sexual needs met, then the anglobitch needs to change her attitude about men and sex.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7803646793315574963.post-76543351926477339762010-01-07T03:20:38.781+00:002010-01-07T03:20:38.781+00:00Another excellent read.
It's funny - not too ...Another excellent read.<br /><br />It's funny - not too long ago, I posted something similar on my site:<br /><br />http://www.rip-factor.com/formen/lftrght.html<br /><br />Not as intellectually adept as this, but it does make some similar points.Richardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06935418620317902441noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7803646793315574963.post-84696817433980044412010-01-05T09:24:14.980+00:002010-01-05T09:24:14.980+00:00*The mens movement must not defeat their own purpo...*The mens movement must not defeat their own purpose by eternally recognising or acknowleging the existing female characteriesd overarching mythology by obsessing about feminism or females.*<br /><br />Very true. It also occurs to me that this obsessing over women is very much a feature of matriarchy. If one looks at the Anglo media, women are indeed massively over-represented as icons of desire. The Anglo-American media only presents positive male images when sheer circumstance forces them to - when male bravery, valor and competence transcend all obstacles (for example the 9/11 firemen or Nobel Prize winners). Otherwise, men are covertly presented as weak, pussy-whipped perverts or unmanly fops.<br /><br />The Anglo Men's Movement in its varying forms inheres to this perspective by exaggerating the threat women present. Women are only a threat when traitorous males artificially empower them - otherwise, they are nothing. Men are active, women merely reactive: and how can we fear a negative force?<br /><br />In my opinion, Robert Bly and the mythopoietic Men's Movement deserve credit for their examination of manhood to the exclusion of women. I have read Bly's Iron John recently and have several thoughts on it. It is notable that his mythopoietic imagos of manhood tend to be drawn from ancient cultures, or cultures outside the Anglosphere. He is forced into this, I think, because the contemporary Anglo-Saxon world has so few positive images of manhood to attach his concepts to. The challenge is to redefine manhood beyond the present Anglo archetypes of 'walking doormat' or 'discontented voluptuary', yet still remain existentially valid within post-industrial modernity.Rookh Kshatriyahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05970184074924214959noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7803646793315574963.post-63365645638635404662010-01-05T06:59:26.324+00:002010-01-05T06:59:26.324+00:00ROOSHK We all talk too much about women! Not just ...ROOSHK We all talk too much about women! Not just those men at the spearhead that are preoccupied with game.<br /><br />We all on just about every MRA website and blog talk too much about women. And this is defeative of our purpose.<br /><br />Those named, outed and shamed are supposed to be male, everytime and everywhere by the mens movement pursuing an appropriate political method.<br /><br />And talking exclusively about males good or bad is indeed a correct political method on account of our “searching for male not female archetypes that serve our cause of building a male centred eulogy and a male dominated overarching mythology”.<br /><br />The overarching mythology the mens movement are appropriately to be concerned with building is a male centred, male dominated and male characterised one. The mens movement must not defeat their own purpose by eternally recognising or acknowleging the existing female characteriesd overarching mythology by obsessing about feminism or females.<br /><br />And there has been nothing so much ineffective and impeding to the mens movements cause than its obsessive preoccupation with female archetypes instead of focussing on male archetypes, good or bad. <br /><br />Just ask the Isreali mens rights party whom have not picked up meaningful votes on account of obsessing about females and characterisations of feminism, instead of the males and male characterisations, good or bad.POIUYThttp://www.standyourground.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7803646793315574963.post-51648003486685581492010-01-05T03:56:27.919+00:002010-01-05T03:56:27.919+00:00Rosh,
Roissy has been able to play his “game” so ...Rosh,<br /><br />Roissy has been able to play his “game” so far because he lives in Washington, D. C., a city where women from all over the world are available, and men don’t need to accept the deal offered by anglobitches. Had he lived in a good Christian society deep in the USA, let’s say, Salt Lake City, Utah or Boise, Indiana he hasn’t be so lucky. Anyway, your crusade is different, for the building of a new world. Put me in your list.<br /><br />MosheMoshehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10582055527818608988noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7803646793315574963.post-4650040558261482162010-01-03T16:41:55.184+00:002010-01-03T16:41:55.184+00:00hello,
I very much in agreement with many of the ...hello,<br /><br />I very much in agreement with many of the MRA concepts. But what might surprise you is that I'm coming from a 'hippy' background and still value things like sustainability, independence, organic food, etc. I do lack certain hippy genes though, I eschew 'free love' and I strongly believe in traditional family. I also draw my spiritual inspiration from the Bible, but I'm not really christian... probably closer to Jewish Gnosticism.<br /><br />I like the Whole Earth Catalog but tend to vote republican.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com