tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7803646793315574963.post8148482402698340629..comments2024-03-28T22:02:38.159+00:00Comments on Anglobitch: Does Rape Confound Game? (Part III): Jimmy Savile, King of Soft RapeRookh Kshatriyahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05970184074924214959noreply@blogger.comBlogger25125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7803646793315574963.post-10630952164486261322018-11-20T11:45:43.832+00:002018-11-20T11:45:43.832+00:00I’m happy that you shared this helpful info with u...I’m happy that you shared this helpful info with us<br /><a href="https://www.london--escort.com/" rel="nofollow">London Escorts Agency</a><br />Piotr LAhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03882320988976372331noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7803646793315574963.post-41697397084554933942012-12-31T12:19:47.455+00:002012-12-31T12:19:47.455+00:00This is what Scarecrow calls 'shaming language...This is what Scarecrow calls 'shaming language', right?Rookh Kshatriyahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05970184074924214959noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7803646793315574963.post-20853498247857640662012-12-31T00:33:01.834+00:002012-12-31T00:33:01.834+00:00Thankfully, not only do physhcologists not conside...Thankfully, not only do physhcologists not consider attraction to post-pubescents a pathology, the DSM IV doesn't even define it as a paraphilia!<br /><br />So not only are you wrong, but the medical community would give someone attracted to post-pubescents a clean bill of health! No help needed!<br /><br />However you may need help getting over whatever bizarre fear of sex and males you may have. As clinical Erotophobia is very much a pathology.<br /><br />All the best in 2013, sounds like you'll need it, suicide is never the answer, remember that. :)YBMnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7803646793315574963.post-66665052429113855892012-12-31T00:18:28.486+00:002012-12-31T00:18:28.486+00:00Justin Bieber is 18 - an adult, and two years over...Justin Bieber is 18 - an adult, and two years over the age of consent (is it a coincidence that all men hate Justin Bieber, or is it a deep-seated, gnawing, unspeakable, breathless jealousy?) And I was not 'being obtuse', nor was I being particularly sharp. The law says that a person under the age of 16 is a child - it is perfectly clear, that is all. Sex with a person under 16 is a criminal act. <br /><br />Puberty is not a guide to adulthood or sexual maturity. In fact, sexual abuse can often halt or trigger puberty. Some 8-year-olds now go through puberty. And if you belive it is acceptable to have sex with a pubescent 8-year-old, you really need to seek help before it's too late.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7803646793315574963.post-7084960124770006602012-12-30T23:28:34.288+00:002012-12-30T23:28:34.288+00:00Ahh, "So you're saying X" the strawm...Ahh, "So you're saying X" the strawman, the last idea of the dull mind. Create an opinion, then refute it.<br /><br />An adult desiring a post-pubescent is personally and culturally distasteful to me, not criminal. Including women who masturbate to posters of a 14 year old Justin Bieber.<br /><br />Misinterpret the precise definition of my opinion however you like. The great thing about anglo women is that nobody really cares what you think, and everyone is glad to watch your numbers dwindle into irrelevancy. Apparently, including a large number of your own men, if demographics are any indication.YBMnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7803646793315574963.post-45151050554570200642012-12-30T23:22:40.184+00:002012-12-30T23:22:40.184+00:00Ok, paedo... what you're saying is that people...Ok, paedo... what you're saying is that people who don't want to have sex with children are repressed. That is fucked up! Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7803646793315574963.post-90264656579435683532012-12-30T23:11:26.930+00:002012-12-30T23:11:26.930+00:00"Indeed, most of the young girls he describes..."Indeed, most of the young girls he describes deflowering in his several autobiographies still haven't raised any objections."<br /><br />Firstly, no-one has yet claimed that every single female that was touched by Savile in his lifetime did not consent to it. <br /><br />Secondly, Savile was most probably a psychopath and almost certainly a pathological liar. In all likelihood, those girls who let Savile 'deflower' exist only in his imagination.<br /><br />You seem to be a big admirer of this man. I'm guessing that had you met him as a child (under 16 if you didn't already know), you would have let him do some pretty nasty stuff to you - after all, you claim to know a lot about what children want to do with old men. I mean, how else would you think this despite the contrary testimony of the victims of paedophiles? It must come from your own personal experience, right? Pervert.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7803646793315574963.post-59823997397074881662012-12-30T22:56:08.024+00:002012-12-30T22:56:08.024+00:0014 was well within the age of consent outside the ...14 was well within the age of consent outside the sex hating rape obsessed anglosphere and you are being obtuse calling 14 year olds children (pedophilia) I was sexually active at 14 (although not with adults and I find a man in his 30s sexing teens distasteful, i don't think it is anything more than distasteful and is certainly not a crime) and I was fully aware of what I was doing.<br /><br />Get over yourself you repressed weirdo, not everyoe I the world has the same screwed up hatred of males and male sexuality that Anglo women do. Thankfully you are going extinct as more of your men embrace women who treasure male sexuality, not dispise and seek to control it.Ybmnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7803646793315574963.post-76644010787903213942012-12-30T22:44:29.409+00:002012-12-30T22:44:29.409+00:00I'm supposing that you would not apply the ter...I'm supposing that you would not apply the term 'soft rape' to actions performed by Jonathan King on five teenage BOYS in the 1980s...<br />-----------------------------------------------<br />VICTIM 1 told the jury: "It was exciting. He gave me a lift down to Luton and met my parents. For me it was contact with a famous man. It was something to tell my friends". Asked why he had returned about five times over a period of time, he said he had been attracted to the "idea of being famous". <br /><br />Mr King was always very good at telling you he was on television and videos, and how people were always on the look out for kids," <br /><br />Asked why he had not told anyone about the assaults, he said: "I hoped, I suppose as a child, to make something of my life." <br /><br /><br />VICTIM 2, 14 at the time, kept in contact with King and visited his home a further five or six times, when similar sexual activity took place. He said, "I thought he was my friend. I liked the aura. I did not like him buggering me."<br /><br />VICTIM 3, 14 when he met King, was "confused" but felt he could trust King because he was famous, he said, adding: "I blanked it out and we listened to some more music. I was embarrassed by it. It seemed so totally bizarre." <br /><br />King later kept in contact by phone and invited him to London again. <br /><br />On another occasion, he said, King tried to bugger him but he resisted. He was so upset by the assault that King drove him home to Shropshire, advising him not to tell his parents.<br /><br />VICTIM 4, 15 at the time of the attacks, told the jury that King "started talking about the entertainment industry and mentioned names of friends. He mentioned a gentleman named Elton John. There were gold albums on the walls. <br /><br />"He said he could get me some employment ... as an actor. He was waffling on about the industry. I was on my own in London. I did not have any friends. Any companionship or help in establishing oneself would help." <br /><br />VICTIM 5, 15 at the time, visited King's home five or six times over some months.<br />-----------------------------------------------<br /><br />What is clear in all these cases is that children trust and worship celebrities. Men like King and Savile pursue careers in entertainment so that they can gain access to children. And they choose very carefully their victims: the naive, the unwordly, the troubled, the lonely, the unhappy. What ensues after sexual assault is almost always a strong sense of confusion, denial, guilt and fear for the victim. Very often the child victim might feel that he or she owes the perpetrator something for their time. <br /><br />Rookh, your article ultimately incites rape and paedophilia by shifting responsibility to its victims. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7803646793315574963.post-15844750006511641902012-12-18T17:34:50.388+00:002012-12-18T17:34:50.388+00:00I know Thomas Szasz has decried psychiatry as a ra...I know Thomas Szasz has decried psychiatry as a racist pseudo-science. All the same - see a shrink.Rookh Kshatriyahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05970184074924214959noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7803646793315574963.post-88666478328114642822012-12-11T15:52:07.508+00:002012-12-11T15:52:07.508+00:00Hello, Rookh and good article.
I'm Brazilian ...Hello, Rookh and good article.<br /><br />I'm Brazilian and I have to say that this country is not so liberated from feminism as you think, although from what I know the situation here is slightly better that in America.<br /><br />Thak you for mentioning the guys at Canal do Búffalo, they do a great job in educating man against the feminist's agenda.Chimeranoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7803646793315574963.post-33830427222478201612012-12-10T04:20:36.465+00:002012-12-10T04:20:36.465+00:00Opus;
Very well said. Really this whole campaign...Opus;<br /> Very well said. Really this whole campaign against Savile resembles more of a mediaeval witch-hunt than anything else, with male sexuality substituted for the 'devil's pact.'<br /><br /> Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7803646793315574963.post-42568243245762489992012-12-10T04:17:24.535+00:002012-12-10T04:17:24.535+00:00Anon1638:
'Paedophilia'---don't make...Anon1638:<br /> 'Paedophilia'---don't make everybody laugh. These women were not 'children' except by the puritanical/feminist standards of the Anglosphere.<br /><br /> Both my grandmothers were married and raising families at the same age of these 'children' supposedly 'molested' by Savile.<br /><br /> In a less sexually repressive culture this 'scandal' would barely even have been noticed.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7803646793315574963.post-61881846423235877042012-12-09T21:06:15.005+00:002012-12-09T21:06:15.005+00:00I am rather unhappy about the use of the term '...I am rather unhappy about the use of the term 'soft rape' for it implies - as is perhaps intended, that all sexual intercourse is 'Rape' which is of course what some virulent Feminazis maintain. I would argue that in a Hobbesian state of nature (which seems to be what is being described) the concept of Rape can have no meaning: rape is essentially a crime against men in civilzation - the sexual possession of what is not the rapers to use as he sees fit, and is a crime not against the woman but against modesty and thus marriagability/female chastity.<br /><br />I don't want to get into the question of Sir Saville (I only met him once) and neither I nor anyone else knows the whole story, but the idea that those Top of the Pops groupies were some sort of victim (as they threw themselves at him) is surely nonsense. He is a scapegoat to assuage our sentimentality towards rapacious young women whom we chose to pretend are innocent children. It seems to come from the same sentimentality that had half the country crying over that slut and adulteress (and traitor) Diana, Princess of Wales.Opusnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7803646793315574963.post-61135722432738319622012-12-06T00:38:40.614+00:002012-12-06T00:38:40.614+00:00Ah, I knew it wouldn't be long before Rookh st...Ah, I knew it wouldn't be long before Rookh started to openly extol paedophilia. Let's not forget most of the children molested by Savile were not seeking celebrity, but instead were effectively cornered in hospitals and various institutions for vulnerable/ troubled children. Basically Savile knew he had to choose children who would not be believed if they came forward - that's why he chose mostly (there was at least one male victim) female children. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7803646793315574963.post-70821090518848219802012-11-26T00:55:58.047+00:002012-11-26T00:55:58.047+00:00wow, I can see why the feminists will have a blue ...wow, I can see why the feminists will have a blue fit at that one. I still don't understand why so many women seem to respond to that kind of thing, but then I weirdly like women and don't much like violence, especially to women. And that's despite my first ever serious girlfriend telling me her favourite sex fantasy was being raped and could I please rape her, or at least simulate it.<br /><br />The success of 50 shades and its ilk being a further case in pont. Although the female comments I have read all seem tor ate the romance of the story as the key pont, and the BDSM etc as titillating fun on the side.davehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08152539031290157680noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7803646793315574963.post-63661135560995652682012-11-26T00:52:17.632+00:002012-11-26T00:52:17.632+00:00As a lady friend of mine put it, many young women ...As a lady friend of mine put it, many young women / girls are gagging for it, especially from a celebrity.<br /><br />Its quite interesting to read radical feminist views of women's sexuality (seems that basically women who have an interest in for example BDSM have been conditioned by the patriarchy and don't know they are being raped. <br /><br />In the radfem view most women don't realise they are conditioned by the patriarchy, because its such a powerful conspiracy we patriarchs perpetrate. Although men are also more stupid then women. But despite our stupidity we manage a grand conspiracy to suborn women. <br /><br />I remember as a student that the then leader of the student union, a woman, declared that all sex between man and woman was rape. <br /><br />My girlfriend came round brandishing a porn mag and suggested we read this and then have sex. Poor thing clearly didn't know I was raping her, and I didn't have the heart to tell her.davehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08152539031290157680noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7803646793315574963.post-52467216055112037992012-11-05T17:29:11.401+00:002012-11-05T17:29:11.401+00:00Santiago
The gulf between what women *really* wan...Santiago<br /><br />The gulf between what women *really* want and the feminist hysteria decrying what women *really* want is fascinating. <br /><br />It is notable that Savile's many 'victims' did not have too many complaints about their treatment at the time. Indeed, most of the young girls he describes deflowering in his several autobiographies still haven't raised any objections.Rookh Kshatriyahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05970184074924214959noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7803646793315574963.post-65538858692928705842012-11-05T15:16:57.948+00:002012-11-05T15:16:57.948+00:00On Friday afternoon I went to a Starbucks in one o...On Friday afternoon I went to a Starbucks in one of the most affluent neighborhoods in Mexico City. I took my coffee and sit next to a table where four upper middle class nice young girls were glued to a video they were watching on a tablet. They were so absorbed that they didn't notice I could over see what they were watching. After watching the video two times, one of the women frantically texted the URL to her contacts. The other girls stayed watching the video over and over again. Hadn't they been in a public place, they would have started masturbating. http://www.iviewtube.com/v/104042/jessica-alba-spanked-(the-killer-inside-me)<br />Santiagonoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7803646793315574963.post-49873019080885422492012-11-02T18:19:14.982+00:002012-11-02T18:19:14.982+00:00*In birds for example, I believe it is the female ...*In birds for example, I believe it is the female which has the shorter sex chromosome, hence the male birds have to look pretty, sing, and dance about.*<br /><br />Some scientists argue that birds' feathers evolved for that very reason - male dinosaurs would use them in their mating displays. The longer their feathers grew and the higher they jumped, the closer they got to flight. In short, birds owe their flying abilities to male 'performance', exactly as you describe. Flight was an unintended consequence of 'female' behaviour by male dinosaurs.Rookh Kshatriyahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05970184074924214959noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7803646793315574963.post-26856963463648883822012-10-27T10:34:38.842+01:002012-10-27T10:34:38.842+01:00As a corollary to the evolutionary differences bet...As a corollary to the evolutionary differences between men and women, consider the difference in size between the XY gender chromosomes.<br /><br />A fema-fuckwit would say that the Male Y chromosome is shorter 'therefore' it is less 'significant'. But we are smarter than that, as we recognize that evolution at the molecular level includes the removal of junk genes; so that smaller is actually more evolved.<br /><br />Consider: chimps have an extra pair of chromosomes compared to humans; and hermit crabs have in excess of 127 chromosomes pairs. Does that mean to the fema-fuckwits, that chimps and crabs are more evolved than feminists, who only have 23 pairs?<br /><br />Of course the more intelligent fema-fascists (they're the ones that tell the fema-fuckits what to think and say) would point out that XX creates a functional woman, whilst YY would be a defective. But the redundancy of the XX female chromosome pair means that many of the genes in women are Lyonised, that is turned off. And presumably they have the advantage of turning off the 'least effective' allele. And of course it is the man that sees, sexually, that advanced allelomorph, and chooses to mate with it; thus advancing the human race according to sexual eugeny.<br /><br />Put simply, it is the bearer of the short sex chromosome that evolves the species via sexual choice. In birds for example, I believe it is the female which has the shorter sex chromosome, hence the male birds have to look pretty, sing, and dance about.JimmyGirohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01548795180321590463noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7803646793315574963.post-41206137583695841862012-10-27T07:04:21.484+01:002012-10-27T07:04:21.484+01:00James Bond:
I also live in America, and wholehea...James Bond:<br /> I also live in America, and wholeheartedly concur. I see otherwise desirable females with dysfunctional, unhygenic louts every day of the week here!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7803646793315574963.post-5166779948058132252012-10-27T06:57:59.778+01:002012-10-27T06:57:59.778+01:00Rookh:
As a collorary to your analysis, I would ...Rookh:<br /> As a collorary to your analysis, I would add that not only did these women offer themselves to Saville; but the current media hysteria and scandalisation is an attempt to exonerate Anglo females and blame their 'exploitation' on the now-deceased Saville. <br /><br /> We see the same dynamic in 'hard rape' (or abuse) cases. In many of these instances, the woman was involved with a male known to be a dangerous and dysfunctional thug. But women are always portrayed as the innocent victims of such men.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7803646793315574963.post-26044491760210103092012-10-27T01:40:11.065+01:002012-10-27T01:40:11.065+01:00Thank you for remember us, i am not from canal do ...Thank you for remember us, i am not from canal do bufalo, but i am following canal do bufalo and your site Dr. Kshatriya, for six months.<br />Sadly Brazil don't remain so liberated. Feminism has growing so powerful, we have a lot of problems, like "lei maria da penha" (brazilian VAWA), indeed feminism is a growing pain in my ass...<br />MSM is overwhelming feminist, also the courts.<br />Congratulations for your book, i am eager to read it.<br />Sorry my poor english,<br />Greetings from Brazil.<br />RM1970rm1970noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7803646793315574963.post-4324863507735388072012-10-27T01:29:10.219+01:002012-10-27T01:29:10.219+01:00Another great article Rookh. I enjoy reading your...Another great article Rookh. I enjoy reading your articles as you describe feminism, female mate choice and why western women prefer thugs over good, educated men.<br /><br />I live in America and what you say about female mate choice is 100% correct. I see young women passing over educated, good men for thugs and high school dropouts. It's amazing what type of men women in anglo countries go for. <br /><br />In anglo countries, nice guys really do finish last! James Bondnoreply@blogger.com