Saturday, 27 September 2008

Anglobitch: a Tale of Generations

People ask me continually, why do you retain such optimism in the face of the irascible monster than is Anglo-American feminism? How can you keep so cool in the storm of impending social collapse?

My answer is this: Anglo-American feminism is intimately linked to the left-liberal, neo-Christian collectivism of the Sixties. And that is a dying agenda, because its adherents are literally ‘dying off’. Someone who was 15 in 1960 is 63 today; and time waits for no man. Before too long, the whole Flower Power generation will ‘pushing up daisies’; and then we can erase their sickly legacy for all time. With this in mind, it is vitally important to groom young, intelligent men for the pan-Anglosphere Men’s Movement; for they will carry the future. Fortunately, intelligent young men are those most attracted to our movement, because young women eschew them for thugs – happily creating a sense of sense of sexual grievance they will carry into adulthood (and ultimately power, influence and responsibility). It sounds harsh, but defeating feminists (and Anglo-Saxon women in general) is our primary concern. This is, after all, a war: and as such must be waged with unrelenting harshness: if hatred and anger are our best weapons, so be it.

Liberal assumptions are at the heart of Anglo-American feminism. As President Reagan once said, ‘problems are obstinate’: yet to liberals, the most obstinate problems can be wished away like dreams. For example, the weighty research demonstrating that children reared by lone females are far more prone to crime, failure and dysfunction never engages the liberal-feminist mind; such facts are swept under the liberal carpet, there to geminate in darkness and grow into vast, insoluble issues. Make no mistake: since Anglo feminism achieved hegemonic dominion over the Anglosphere in the late Sixties, there has been an irrevocable decline in public standards. Anglo feminism is at the kernel of all that has failed; and this pernicious influence can be broken down into five core modules:

1.Disruption of the Family – single mother led families produce more dysfunctional children than intact families.

2.Dysgenic Effects – female preference for low IQ thugs and narcissists has lowered population standards to atavistic levels.

3.Male Alienation & Exclusion – Men are increasingly marginalised, their claims ignored, their contributions derided; viewed as walking ATM machines by both women and the State, many are withdrawing their consent from the Anglosphere.

4.Feminization – western societies in general (and the Anglosphere in particular) are increasingly anti-rational and pro-collectivist, anti-scientific and pro-sentiment. This is the direct result of society’s feminization.

5.Population Decline – there are too few children being born in the west – hence the need for immigration to fill the demographic gaps. In itself, this is no bad thing (‘better Poles than Proles’); however, it will make for less stable societies. And the immigrants of today will probably rule the future: since, due to the rise of ‘female partner-choice’ in the west, only the stupidest male indigents get to breed.

Despite all this iniquity, take heart: as the poltroons of the Sixties grey out and die off, their influence will wither. Indeed, liberal hypocrisy has been under attack since the Eighties, when its follies first began to be challenged.

Most of the delusional Sixties ‘outlook’ derives from a specific generational experience. The parents of Baby-Boomers grew up in the poverty of the Thirties, or during the War; consequently, they provided an indulgent environment for their children, to compensate for their own negative experiences. This indulgence gave rise to most of the follies of the Sixties; especially the tendency to deny reality in favour of some pre-conceived, collectivist dream-world. This same tendency lies at the root of Anglo-Saxon matriarchal feminism, mired in double-think and hypocrisy. And when the Sixties die, Anglo feminism will perish also.


  1. Yeah, the Sixties suck. Most overrated decade ever!

  2. "And when the Sixties die, Anglo feminism will perish also."

    Judging by the number of tender young feminist 'sprouts' that are presently pushing up, I wouldn't be TOO sure about that. . .

    Not that feminism ain't gonna croak, BUT. . .

    The process might be a tad more gradual than you appear to be suggesting.

  3. Dude, you're just as deluded as the hippies.

    The rampant misandry of the 60s has only become more covert. The Flower Power generation is dying, but the damage has already been done.

    Women still view us with the same contempt as their feminazi predecessors and that shit ain't changing anytime soon.

    Plus, no matter what, just because the old guard is dying off doesn't mean the young guard won't rise to take their place.

    Just look at

    These young female abortions are the future of feminisms and let me tell you, it is just as strong and powerful as before. Not as popular, no, but just as pervasive.

    The West is fucked, plain and simple.

  4. I'm inclined to agree. When I wrote that article, I was just starting off developing the Thesis. Now, I see that feminism is a tough shoot to uproot - tougher, certainly than I initially thought. It is like a weed in the garden - every time you pull it up, it grows again in another guise. The core problem is, social change is irreversible, because it is a complex, non-linear process. Feminism is like a geni in a bottle, once it was released in the late Sixties it became impossible to erase. Atop this, the core memes of Anglo culture are puritanical and inherently misandrist (that is the core of the Anglobitch Thesis) and this makes coherent anti-feminist action even harder to coordinate within the Anglosphere.

    I now see the position of the MRA movement in the Anglosphere as akin to that of the Confederacy in the American Civil War - as soldiers we are better and more motivated, but we are just crushed under superior numbers and resources. Alternatively, we can 'ready me a weapon, and head for Mexico' - leave the Anglosphere. That is the only remaining option, when a war is lost.

  5. Feminism could be brought to a very quick and sudden death. War. If you look to the past war and conquest has bough abrupt cultural changes to all kinds of societies. At this point in time that seems impossible the West could succumb to an outright total conquest. But time can change things. In a long term historically outlook abrupt changes happen all the time.

    And speaking of war in the West women are constantly portrayed as willing to fight in combat of one sort or another. This does happen on very rare occasions but virtually all the real fighting is done by men. Its entertainment and its a total fantasy the way women are portrayed.

    In a real knock down drag-out fight most women will be completely unwilling to do the actual fighting.

    And one last thing, the worst thing about war can be loosing. In human history women have evolved to be very adaptable. Look to any conquered nation and you will see how fast women switch sides once that society is conquered. And the scorn they will have for the beaten broken men who fought for them.

  6. I was there.

    The Sixties started with the Civil Rights Movement and in many ways was political in nature. It was a minority of students and activists decrying a movement of the country toward totalitarianism. You could get beat up or shot, and if black hung. This aspect of the counterculture contained, wrongly I believe, elements of communism but generally was democratic. The word hippie was created by the press. Haight was a place where the Diggers handed out free food and shelter and you was a refuge for artists and alienated youth. Some nextgen beats from the North Shore joined in. People were completely leaving the system, a dangerous thing, the worst nightmare for the powers-that-be. Countless dollars and media time spent to demonize this type of political activism and to associate it with "hippies."

    Women were still receptacles. Many heard about free love and all that but, unfortunately, this never reached anywhere near the suburbs or middle-class males. It was strictly a tiny subculture unreachable by the majority of wannabes. Women's issues were not a priority. Your Midnight Cowboy article, spot on.

    Enter the drugs. LSD was pumped through the culture, through self-proclaimed gurus like Harvard's Leary and company. This was a major distraction, so they thought, away from the radical politics and a way to demonize certain individuals. All it did was to create a drug culture and a new market. Hence, the drug war. Haight and other major cities were then flooded with hard drugs, mafioso types and gangs. The Black Panthers, who were armed, were wiped out. Why? These were the dudes keeping out the hard drugs and establishing non-government social programs.

    The Women's Liberation blossomed in the wake of failed 60's idealism. By the mid-seventies the King and the Kennedys were dead, the Panthers were gone or in jail, and the anti-war movement unnecessary. The failure of the political activism went up in bong smoke, and cocaine cultures like disco emerged. Flower power turned into useless stoner culture. Out of the ashes feminists marched, disillusioned and angry. This movement failed, producing legions of angry males. It's more complicated than just feminism.