Thursday, 27 August 2015

Horizontal Pressure, SFC and Overton Window: the Secret Truth behind Anglo Feminism

Was Feminism designed to obviate Men?

Various authorities continually tell us that western women adopted feminism to escape monogamous relationships with beta males in favour of polygamous relationships with alpha males. However, is it really true that most women aspire to liaisons with alpha males? After all, there is an alternative explanation: that women adopted feminism so they could shun men completely.

PUAs and conservative MRAs seem addicted to the notion that 80% of women have sex with the top 10-20% of men. Rather, could it be that many women harbour a puritanical loathing of sex and hate men in general? In this view, the feminist clamour for economic independence was ultimately motivated by a desire to write men out of women’s lives completely – a desire that has been fulfilled, to no small extent. Lower class women have sexually evicted men by marrying the Welfare State; middle class women have sexually negated men by achieving financial autonomy. For the most part, these women do not appear enamored of ‘alpha’ males , at all; they generally seem happy without men in their lives. Men of any kind, that is: alpha, beta or gamma.

The idea that women have comparable sex drives to men is rampant sexual false consciousness combined with wishful thinking. Of course, men want to believe such nonsense; the alternative perspective is too bitter, with too many troubling ramifications. Hence a situation has arisen wherein all men experience enormous ‘horizontal pressure’ to maintain a fa├žade of sexual ease and plenty in their lives. For an adult male, publicly admitting to incel status is like admitting to homosexuality or even paedophilia.

Sometimes it takes a non-Anglo woman to bring a cold splash of rational truth to proceedings: Anglo males are too pussified. Academic Dr Catherine Hakim not only describes the massive sexual gulf between the sexes in her call for legalized prostitution - she also invokes the core tenets of the Anglobitch Thesis:

"Women have equality in the workplace, but they do not have they equality in private relationships,” says Dr Hakim, whose previous book, The New Rules, compared married men to “caged animals”.
“It’s a shocking difference: men are twice as interested in sex as women and it is the same around the world. Surveys show we see the male sex deficit in Sweden, France, Spain, Japan and South America. It is hard-wired into us: men, on average, are more highly sexed than women. You can’t call it biological, as that implies it is animalistic: it allows critics to dismiss it. It’s across all age groups, but as soon as you hit 30, the gap starts growing dramatically. For a lot of women, the decline in sexual interest is closely linked to having children and they just don’t regain it afterwards. But the evidence is it happens as we age even without children”.
Thus Dr Hakim argues older men are drawn to younger women not just for their looks, but for their libidos.
“With a 20-year age gap, you get women who have the same level of sexual interest as men,” she says. “You would expect that as women get richer and more powerful as they get older there would be a strong demand for buying toy boys – but there isn’t."
Dr Hakim claims the root problem is our “sex negative” mindset – and adds it is North European and American feminist academics and journalists who are most resistant to embracing the idea of female sexual liberation through paid-for sex. In the West we still have a problem that sex can be used for recreation,” she says. “All our moral rules are based upon the fact that sexuality and fertility are linked. Even since the contraceptive revolution in the 60s, we still have one set of ethics that are tied to reproductive sexuality. We need to recognise recreational sexuality as a completely separate animal.
"Northern Europe and America – the Anglo Saxon cultures – are profoundly sex-negative, whereas southern Europe, Japan, China are sex positive cultures. It is very difficult to get more than a sour discussion in Britain. I’ve been attacked by women for my views even though Amnesty International have recommended decriminalisation, as have the United Nations."
- Daily Telegraph, August 2015

Pretends to bang models every night...

However, the mainstream media hide this female indifference to recreational sex behind a carefully-maintained smokescreen of ‘Sexual False Consciousness’. By deploying Overton Window (excluding public opinions they deem unacceptable) in all its outlets, the media matrix covertly classifies anyone rejecting SFC as mad, deluded or deviant. As a result, we now have a bizarre situation where the average male’s sexual reality – one or zero partners a year – is viewed as idiomatic or eccentric. And anyone daring to break ranks on these issues is stigmatized as jaundiced and denied a public voice.

Mad but true.

How the 'Mainstream' Media dismisses dissenting perspectives...

The ‘rampant’ female sex drive is a core feature of Anglo-American SFC; and as its primary force, it has to be protected at all costs. In fact, even otherwise sensible MRAs can be vigorous in its defence. Of course, it is nonsense: women are low T creatures with little interest in recreational sex. However, the media's Overton Window invariably labels impartial scientific research on this issue ‘crazy’ or ‘deluded’; denies the obvious link between involuntary celibacy and mass murder sprees by single men; and generally tries to maintain the fiction that all western males are having sex with models three times a day. All this clouds our ability to consider the generic misandry at the core of Anglo-American feminism.

This is your life, according to the  'Mainstream' Media...

The primary goal of feminism has been to liberate women from financial dependence on men. This has resulted in a much higher proportion of men being single, since most women no longer require a male for financial support. Beyond this, female hypergamy in Anglo-Saxon nations has been inflated into generic misandry by Disney fairy tales and celebrity culture – for no man can live up to such unrealistic expectations, whoever he might be.

So, in de facto terms, Anglo-American feminism was designed to eliminate men from women’s lives; moreover, it has been highly successful in achieving this. Women do not seek alphas – they seek a mono-gender society where men do not exist (except, perhaps, as beasts of burden).

Here endeth the lesson.

Females, females, everywhere: the hidden goal of Anglo feminism?


  1. I think it's better explained by that ancient quote in Genesis that women want to rule men but men must instead rule women. After all, women do destroy everything when they have too much influence - themselves and men.

  2. Rookh wrote, "PUAs and conservative MRAs seem addicted to the notion that 80% of women have sex with the top 10-20% of men. Rather, could it be that many women harbour a puritanical loathing of sex and hate men in general?"

    How true that is Rookh, Anglo women do hate men and sex. PUA's constantly say that the top 10 to 20% of men are having sex with 80% of women. I live in the USA and can tell you a lot of women here hate sex and the guys here lie all the time about their "conquests."

    A great deal of men in America are involuntary celibates thanks to the fact that women here have no interest in dating men or having sex with men. I hear PUA guys say that women have just as strong as a sex drive as men do. That is completely false but some men like to live in a fantasy world.

    1. *A great deal of men in America are involuntary celibates thanks to the fact that women here have no interest in dating men or having sex with men. I hear PUA guys say that women have just as strong as a sex drive as men do. That is completely false but some men like to live in a fantasy world.*

      Yes, they prefer to live in a fantasy world because Anglo-American sexual reality is as brutal as a cancer diagnosis. In the recent Ashley Madison hacking case, 95% of the site's users seeking an affair were male and most of the female accounts were FAKE. What more proof do we need that Anglo women have little interest in recreational sex compared to men?

    2. It is not just a fantasy world - it is a lie designed to get men "motivated" to be better - or produce more in society.

      Be Strong, Be Smart. Be Productive - Get Laid - BULLSHIT.

      I strongly believe that the majority of women hate men, and recreational sex.

      The recent Ashley Madison hack is proof of all that - men are in abundance on such sites - most of the female profiles are fakes or duplicates - and there are twice as many angry man-hating lesbians as there are homosexual men.

      Anglo women hate men and they hate sex.

    3. *Be Strong, Be Smart. Be Productive - Get Laid - BULLSHIT.*

      Absolutely right, Richard. Only when the Batman killer James Holmes deviated from 'smart, productive' behavior and started killing people did women show him any interest. Prior to that he was simply invisible to Anglo women. And yet - bit by bit - the fog of SFC is starting to clear, at least for intelligent middle class males in Anglo countries.

    4. Rookh,

      We both know that most Anglo women are notoriously promiscuous - more so than most Anglo men realise. That's part of the reason why they are terrible wives (the other part is because many of them being mid-functioning sociopaths).

      The tendency of AW to consort with disreputable 'bad boys' is well known, for example.

      What I think is happening here is that AW are flocking towards those guys they most identify with ('bad boys'), but most of the time they repress their sex drives. As James Bond alluded to below, this is probably because of the Anglosphere's puritan streak. However, they cannot repress their sex drives forever, so eventually they cannot take it anymore and wind up consorting with ne'er-do-wells (remember Cerys Yemm?).

      So basically a lot of the time they behave like crabbed church ladies, with explosions of promiscuity in-between. IOW, they have sex drives, but being hopelessly dysfunctional individuals, they express such in the most screwed up ways.

      A fellow named Bonecrker explains this quite well - have you heard of him Rookh/Richard?

    5. That's the thing, Rick - because of the puritan reflex, Anglo female sexuality retains a subterranean quality, much like Victorian sexuality. Respectable Anglo women prefer occasionally 'slumming it' with misfits and murderers because they are themselves mildly sociopathic; but also because sexual activity in the Anglosphere retains furtive, illicit associations from the Victorian era.

      No, I have never heard of this Bonecrker.

    6. *But American women aren't normal. They have absolutely stopped competing for good men. They go out of their way to devalue them. They freely engage in behaviours that result in the extinction of their lineage. They leave. They refuse to raise their children. They engage in infidelity. They choose disposable partners based on deviant behavior. The reason why women seem to be so scarce is not because they have made themselves unavailable but because they have ceased having any interest whatsoever in extending their female lineage to the next generation. There is a natural consequence for that... extinction. The children of these women grow up powerless and feral, with increasingly lower status. Eventually, their lines will disappear.*

      A brilliant description of the North American situation, right enough. However, Boncrker makes no attempt to explain this desperate situation. I think it is only possible to do so from the standpoint of cultural analysis. However, quite why the Anglo-culture successfully promotes such dysfunctional values over biological imperatives among women is baffling - culture should follow biology, not transcend it. Moreover, this female yearning for long-term genetic extinction should simply not exist, according to evolutionary theory - yet it does. Perhaps women's desires are improperly evolved, as Elliot Rodger argued; and perhaps this truth has only become apparent with the rise of feminism/contraception, which have exposed female desire for the erratic monstrosity it is.

    7. Bonecracker was an MRA who was active a few years ago, enjoyed a following but closed down and hasn't been heard from since. Some of his stuff is archived on some MRA sites.

    8. I think that another dynamic going on in America with SFC is that INCEL men are conditioned to believe that every other man is getting regular sex but themselves. Eliot Rodger and James Holmes thought so; but I'll bet most of the men they shot were really just as INCEL as they were.

    9. Bonecracker probably got married ;-)

      That said, I was quite impressed by some of his old posts. The piece I quoted above describing the abnormal nature of American women is from him.

      Yes, what you say is definitely true about Rodger and Holmes and many others. I recall George Sodini pretty much believed the same thing: that everyone was having sex ten times a day with eighteen-year old models (apart from himself, of course). In fact, Sodini agonized over a guy in his neighborhood receiving weekly visits from a hot young girl; he assumed they were having a torrid affair. After the massacre, she turned out to be the guy's niece or something.

      Such SFC is rampant because both the mainstream media and online PUAs massively exaggerate the levels of recreational sex occurring in Anglo-American countries. Another issue is that the media's Overton Window prevents people from discussing their sexual reality in anything like an objective manner. To do so, in fact, would be courting ostracism or vilification. The situation is like one of Stalin's speeches: the first person to stop clapping gets sent to a labor camp.

    10. Rookh wrote, "Such SFC is rampant because both the mainstream media and online PUAs massively exaggerate the levels of recreational sex occurring in Anglo-American countries."

      How true that is! PUA's exaggerate all the time about how many women they are sleeping with. The mainstream media here in America make it look like every guy in the USA is getting laid every day with women who look like Playboy centerfolds!

      In reality nothing could be further from the truth. Women here in America are puritanical, prudish and very unfriendly towards men. Any guy from an Anglo country who is telling you he gets laid all the time, most likely is lying. Now I know guys who have moved to the Philippines and they tell me the women are very friendly and easy to meet there and getting laid in the Philippines is MUCH easier than it is in America!

  3. Women NOT from Anglo countries have far more interest in sex than women from Anglo countries do. For example, I know guys who have moved to Thailand and the Philippines and they say their sex life is MUCH BETTER than it ever was back in America.

    A guy I used to work with moved to Brazil and he told me he couldn't believe how friendly and sexual the women are in that country. He told me women flirt with him all the time and he gets laid on a regular basis. Back in America, women never flirted with him and he hardly ever got laid.

    I guess if a man from an Anglo country wants to improve his love life and his sex life, he needs to move to a non Anglo country.

  4. Absolutely spot on post Rookh - I've been coming to exactly the same conclusion over the past few years.

    The MSM is constantly feeding us crap about "women's secret desires", "woman and their orgasms", "50 shades of crap" etc. etc. ad nauseam to elicit (I believe) men's prurient interest, drive clicks and sell product. The myth of female sexual enjoyment must be maintained at all costs as it helps to drive society/commerce at large and the millions of poor male schlubs as they trudge round in their harness - the sexual carrot ever out of reach. On a personal level, women are also very keen to maintain the illusion as it is perhaps their only trump card. As a telling aside, one of my sisters told me matter-of-factly some years ago "women don't masturbate" with a faint look of distaste on her face. I believed her - it's always stuck in my mind as a rare bit of honesty on the subject.

    Conversely, nobody gives a flying fig about men's sexual desires - it gets a total of zero column inches as far as I can see even though most males are horny as hell 24/7.Not only that, but at least in the UK, most media material about sex/emotions is almost without exception curated by women and filtered through their viewpoint (with perhaps the exception of Graham Norton in the Telegraph, but he's gay). What is that about? Why can't men talk openly and freely in the media about their heterosexual reality - it goes back to the point you made re the "Overton Window".

    Movies/TV Programs are also laughable in the way they consistently portray female knicker elastic loosening after 5 minutes with the hero, quite contrary to most men's experience of getting laid which (at least in my case) is often akin to getting a nervous horse into a pen or tickling a trout - a tricky undertaking requiring a lot of focus and persuasion. It's my hunch that women consider giving up sex as some kind of unpleasant and necessary cost they have to bear to move forward, and in many cases they are NOT happy if they consider it's been done at a loss (e.g. if they get dumped afterwards, or they perceive it's just a hookup going nowhere and they misread the signs). As a male, getting laid is almost always a plus, no matter what the outcome. Chris Rock (who has some pretty astute observations about the male/female dynamic) did a funny routine on this:

    "No matter what you do for a woman, if it doesn't end in marriage, it's a waste of time. I don't care what you do for her - you could have got her a job, cured her diabetes, taught her how to read
    but if it's over and you don't marry her, it's like: 'I can't believe I wasted my time with you - I could have been married with diabetes by now' "

    1. What. A. Comment.

      Yes, the Anglo MSM is overwhelming in its uncritical approbation of female opinion/experience, especially in sexual matters. Note how Mylie Cyrus' ridiculous adolescent opinions are never challenged or subjected to critical scrutiny of any kind. Her latest fixation is pan-sexuality: the sexual attraction to well, everything (trees included). Funny how this pan-sexuality never includes guys who drive trucks or sweep the streets, isn't it? Pan-sexuality is just another word for good old female hypergamy, in other words.

      Of course, white Knights and incel blue collar losers invariably get hot under the collar about these hard truths. Why? Because, being stupid and weak, they need the myth of rampant female sexuality to lend hope and meaning to their pointless, empty lives. Challenging the myth of boundless female longing is like denying the Christian his Bible: it robs losers of their primary motivation. Little wonder they get so irate about it.

  5. So, I read the Anti-Feminist's article about Dr, Kathleen Richard wanting to ban sex-robots.

    It provided a link to this article -

    And that article said this...

    "Who, or what, men have sex with is the basis of our civilisation. It is the driving force behind our greatest accomplishments. Men don’t compete for abstract pleasure: they compete to bag the best mate."

    Is it me - or is that a crock of sh*t???

    1. Utter shit. Besides - what business is it of theirs who men have sex with? I always thought the Anglosphere was a nominal democracy, yet it increasingly resembles some Third World dictatorship. Feminists argue that men have always regulated female sexuality for their own ends. Is this mere projection, I wonder? The repulsive femihags of the contemporary anglosphere certainly seem very keen on curtailing male sexual freedoms.

  6. Richard,

    It's a crock of shit - how does one explain the 'chubby-chaser' phenomenon in the Anglosphere if her theory is correct?

    Also, the basis for our civilisation is not so much who MEN choose to have sex with, as they can and do have sex with a large variety of women. It's the WOMEN's choice that influences a civilisation's future outcomes, since they tend to go after the same types of men (at least in the Anglosphere) and they have been the gatekeepers of sex. The Anglosphere's dysfunction increasingly originates from the AW preference for 'bad boys'.

    1. All the patents my name is on - women - or the hope of women - had NOTHING to do with it.

      I invented things because it is my job - and I get money - money I do NOT spend on women.

      How many other inventors will claim the same?

      Did Einstein do what he did in hopes of getting laid? I mean - come on - seriously?

  7. On another unrelated topic, it seems another male has shot up a classroom today. Shades of Adam Lanza, anyone?

    Rookh's post on James Holmes comes to mind - probably another disenfranchised male who has been reduced to a directionless, sexless husk by a misandrist society.

  8. In Singapore unworthy foreigners can just come in unhindered, work for a few years with advantages over local and after that hop back to their home countries.

    Take for example this bitch Rita Moa, who worked for Mediacorp in Audit for a few years and before that in other companies. After cry babying her way to please her bosses whenever there is work problems, she has left to NZ to gleefully enjoy the fruits that the traitor SG government has provided.

    We must have the daftest govermennt in the world which protects foreigners jobs at the expense of locals! Phui!