Male Alienation Rampant in 2024: Female Conscription, Populist Politics and Passport Bros Discover the Anglobitch Thesis

We all agree that a unique ideology dominates the Anglosphere: a warped, sex-negative liberal-puritanism which worships women and all deviant, unnatural forms of sexuality. It hates men (especially heterosexual men) and is ultimately driven by a puritanical hatred of reality itself.

The Anglosphere's reflexive hostility to reality makes it the global stronghold of the Blue Pill, in its purest ideological form. This is especially true of sexuality and gender-relations, which are natural targets for Blue-Pilled Anglo-puritans. Which is why we now have 137 genders; why men are jailed merely for approaching women; why female teachers can abuse Canadian toddlers with total impunity; and why ‘trans women’ are considered a mainstream demographic.

While Anglo tradcons typically describe these conditions as an ‘aberration’, I have always labelled this madness the purest EXPRESSION of Anglo-Saxon cultural values. This is because extreme hostility to natural sexual expression ultimately leads to the worship of deviance.

Ultimately, puritanical fantasism of the type ravaging the Anglo-Saxon world can lead only to societal collapse. Why? Because fantasism prevents both effective adaptation to reality and the capacity for corrective action. And so the US and UK slide ever deeper into sexual dysfunction and social decay, becoming more morally insane with each passing year.

The Anglosphere is also weakening, in a practical sense. This is because defending fantasies takes tremendous mental and physical effort, diverting attention from the natural struggle for existence. Lions or wolves do not have 137 sexualities, misandrist laws and trans rights, because they have more urgent matters to attend. Oddly, the Anglosphere’s wealth and influence have actually fueled its disastrous slide into sexual fantasism.

Not only is the fallout from Blue-Pilled delusion now obvious to all (even women, leftists and Anglo 'conservatives'), the reaction against it is also going mainstream. For over a decade I have preached that Anglo-American men have everything to gain and nothing to lose by fleeing the Anglosphere in pursuit of sex and relationships. This is because the overt misandry of Anglo-American culture (and Anglo women, of course) have effectively forbidden normal interaction between the sexes. 

 

Even the Anglobitch is waking up... go figure.

Although many wise men have already acted on my words, the recent rise of the Passport Bros demonstrates the normalization of my values. The Anglosphere is now so hostile to men who want normal, healthy relationships that even the average clown wants out: 

For many men in the West, the prospect of dating (which hopefully doesn't end in false accusations of harassment), marriage (that doesn't end in divorce, meaning a significant long-term financial loss), and/or siring children (that are hopefully "biologically" theirs), is a significant "risky" proposition. It is for this reason that so many men have simply "opted-out" of the dating & marriage scene and have chosen to go their own way. They have realized both, the toxic nature of the current Western dating /marriage scene, as well as their real options and true value within the global dating /marriage market. Western society’s current social infrastructure is literally on the verge of collapse, and many of these men have had the wisdom and foresight to see this emerging decline and are wisely going elsewhere for better opportunities, more importantly, for a better quality of life.

With the understanding that honest discourse and open dialogue are the key ingredients needed for any productive societal change, we here at the Official Passport Bros.com look forward to positively contributing to the global Passport Bros discussion, discussing important issues that affect Men, connecting with Passport Bros, Digital Nomads, and other influential Blue Book Gentlemen from countries all over the world. We believe that building a supportive "Ex-Pat" economic infrastructure network (which financially helps the various foreign communities resided within) provides the key component needed to establish trust & build long-term relationships within these communities. 

https://www.theofficialpassportbros.com/

I suspect these guys have been studying my writings for inspiration. For example, I invented the concept of the 'digital nomad' back in 2017. 

 

Where it truly all began...

In a similar vein, most of the public want an end to the selective privilege enjoyed by post-feminist women. In the UK, where some form of conscription is being mooted to make up for falling enlistment figures, 72% of the public now think women should be conscripted into the military:

 

Should women be conscripted in the event of a world war?

Were conscription to be introduced, a new question the government would have to grapple with is whether women should be asked to go into the line of fire.

The large majority of the public (72%) say that women should be conscripted. This is comprised of 42% who think they should serve on the exact same basis as men versus 30% who think there should be some restrictions on the roles they can perform (e.g. perhaps not serving in the infantry).

YouGov

 

The fact that mass male alienation from the Anglosphere's institutional misandry has lowered enlistment rates is worth an article in itself, of course.

 

Another expression of popular backlash against the Anglosphere’s slide into madness is the rise of politicians who are normal human beings. Boris Johnson and Donald Trump might be deceitful and incompetent but they are also relatable human beings, not the repressed, cardboard constructs that dominate Anglosphere politics. Bemired in puritanical delusion, the Anglo-American lamestream is completely blind to the fact that ordinary people want leaders of flesh and blood, not joyless eunuchs.

 

As this existential gap between the elites and mainstream experience yawns ever wider, expect to see more social unrest, male defection and political upheaval. The old Blue-Pilled ‘everything is perfect’ voices of David Futrelle or Tommy Fleming are irrelevant in the face of Anglosphere dysfunctions like mass male sexlessness and disaffection, normalised sexual deviance and widespread child abuse. The fact that even regular males are voting with their feet in pursuit of foreign women has already marginalized the Blue Pill and its deluded apologists.

 

 

The delights of distant shores...

Hope on Distant Shores Available on Kindle

The Kindle version of 'Hope on Distant Shores: How Awakened Men can Escape the Anglosphere's Toxic Women, Sexual False Consciousness and Institutional Misandry' - the book I have been working on for the past five years - is now available.

On Saturday October 26, I will be running a one-day promotion in which the Kindle version of Hope on Distant Shores can be downloaded free. Of course, the beautiful deluxe paperback version is also available at baseline production cost.

It would also be good if satisfied customers already enriched by Hope on Distant Shores could leave some reviews on Amazon, so it can have a similar impact on the lives of others.

Hope on Distant Shores offers lifestyle guidance to the following groups:

• Men tired of entitled, selfish Anglo-American women
• Men who want a better, safer, more fulfilled life outside the Anglosphere
• Men who do not want to ‘adjust’ to a culture which views them as third class citizens
• Men who do not wish to squander their hard-earned dollars on derisive strippers or punitive divorce settlements
• Men who want slim, warm, attractive women unsullied by sex-negative, misandrist Anglo-American feminism 

When I started this blog ten years ago, it was my intention to create waves and cast shadows across the Internet. I knew my key insight – that Anglo-American culture’s mistrust of male sexual freedom had created an especially misandrist, belligerent form of feminism – demanded global dissemination. Far from being ‘revolutionary’, as conservative Men’s Rights Activists believe, Anglo-American feminism springs right from the frigid heart of Anglo-American civilization. This explains the unstinting support feminism receives from the state in all Anglo-Saxon countries, and why all attempts to resist it have proved so utterly futile. There never was a ‘golden age’ of gender relations in the Anglosphere; the puritanical Anglo-Saxon cultural bloc has been pedestalizing women and vilifying men for centuries.

My first book ‘Havok’ (2009) focused on the condition of gender-relations in the contemporary Anglosphere. My conclusions – which have since taken root all over the English-speaking world, were that residual Puritanism has imbalanced gender-relations in favour of women, reducing Anglo-American males to disposable stooges, walking ATM machines and vilified deviants. Meanwhile the same secular Puritanism has, by sacralising sex as an elusive commodity, set Anglo-American women atop pedestals as exalted goddesses. Despite claiming to be a ‘revolutionary’ movement, Anglo-American feminism is in fact an extension – indeed, amplification of – existing values: Anglo feminism is sex-negative, misandrist and racist, just like Anglo-American society. In this view, conventional Men’s Right’s Activists who invoke ‘tradition’ against Anglo-Saxon feminism are completely deluded: for Anglo feminism springs straight from the Anglosphere’s repressive, puritan soul. Indeed, it will be noted that conservative MRAs have achieved precisely nothing in their 30-odd years of existence. Similarly, the PUA or Pick-up Artist community are merely playing a game they can never win. The puritanical reality of the Anglosphere renders their various ‘approach’ techniques moribund at best and potentially dangerous for men in the #metoo era.

Further, feminism now serves as a smoke screen to disguise the real problems afflicting Anglo-American civilization – namely, socio-economic inequality, corrupt governance and racist policing. Additionally, the Anglo-feminist narrative which presents white women as oppressed outsiders also serves to mask white women’s endemic racism and long-standing affiliation to the Anglo-American establishment. Not only is sex-negative Anglo feminism an exaggerated expression of Anglo-American values, it helps to insulate those values from positive reform.

The movement that emerged from my first book is best called pan-Anglosphere Dissidence: the systematic rejection of repressive Anglo-American values. This rejection is associated with a yearning for the relative sexual freedom waiting outside the Anglosphere. Pan-Anglosphere Dissidence is predictably strongest in the puritanical United States, with its entitled women, institutionalised misandry and fanatic aversion to prostitution. Building on those insights, Hope on Distant Shores offers lifestyle guidance to Anglo-American men who want slim, warm, attractive women unsullied by sex-negative, misandrist Anglo feminism.

Unlike Havok, Hope on Distant Shores contains only a few references from ‘canonical’ historians, economists or philosophers. Like Saint Paul or the Buddha, I am fashioning something completely new and a completely new conceptual vocabulary is necessary to contain it. Therefore, most references are taken from the extensive correspondence to my blog which began in early 2018. All the postings of these experienced and learned correspondents, some of them containing over twenty thousand words, are included in a remarkable series of appendices which will doubtless be cited and studied by awakened men for decades to come.

Hope on Distant Shores now available!

Hope on Distant Shores: How Awakened Men can Escape the Anglosphere's Toxic Women, Sexual False Consciousness and Institutional Misandry - the book I have been working on for the past five years - is now available.

Unlike the books and kits of PUA hucksters and con-men, Hope on Distant Shores will be sold without a penny of mark-up profit. The idea is to offer a constructive social critique while providing advice and guidance to men seeking love, sex and relationships outside the Anglosphere. However, it will only be available in paperback; digitisation would grant  free universal access and I do not want to be targeted by the British authorities for promoting 'Hate Speech' and 'terrorism'. Restricting access will somewhat neutralise the risk of such charges.

Hope on Distant Shores offers lifestyle guidance to the following groups:

• Men tired of entitled, selfish Anglo-American women
• Men who want a better, safer, more fulfilled life outside the Anglosphere
• Men who do not want to ‘adjust’ to a culture which views them as third class citizens
• Men who do not wish to squander their hard-earned dollars on derisive strippers or punitive divorce settlements
• Men who want slim, warm, attractive women unsullied by sex-negative, misandrist Anglo-American feminism 

When I started this blog ten years ago, it was my intention to create waves and cast shadows across the Internet. I knew my key insight – that Anglo-American culture’s mistrust of male sexual freedom had created an especially misandrist, belligerent form of feminism – demanded global dissemination. Far from being ‘revolutionary’, as conservative Men’s Rights Activists believe, Anglo-American feminism springs right from the frigid heart of Anglo-American civilization. This explains the unstinting support feminism receives from the state in all Anglo-Saxon countries, and why all attempts to resist it have proved so utterly futile. There never was a ‘golden age’ of gender relations in the Anglosphere; the puritanical Anglo-Saxon cultural bloc has been pedestalizing women and vilifying men for centuries.

My first book ‘Havok’ (2009) focused on the condition of gender-relations in the contemporary Anglosphere. My conclusions – which have since taken root all over the English-speaking world, were that residual Puritanism has imbalanced gender-relations in favour of women, reducing Anglo-American males to disposable stooges, walking ATM machines and vilified deviants. Meanwhile the same secular Puritanism has, by sacralising sex as an elusive commodity, set Anglo-American women atop pedestals as exalted goddesses. Despite claiming to be a ‘revolutionary’ movement, Anglo-American feminism is in fact an extension – indeed, amplification of – existing values: Anglo feminism is sex-negative, misandrist and racist, just like Anglo-American society. In this view, conventional Men’s Right’s Activists who invoke ‘tradition’ against Anglo-Saxon feminism are completely deluded: for Anglo feminism springs straight from the Anglosphere’s repressive, puritan soul. Indeed, it will be noted that conservative MRAs have achieved precisely nothing in their 30-odd years of existence. Similarly, the PUA or Pick-up Artist community are merely playing a game they can never win. The puritanical reality of the Anglosphere renders their various ‘approach’ techniques moribund at best and potentially dangerous for men in the #metoo era.

Further, feminism now serves as a smoke screen to disguise the real problems afflicting Anglo-American civilization – namely, socio-economic inequality, corrupt governance and racist policing. Additionally, the Anglo-feminist narrative which presents white women as oppressed outsiders also serves to mask white women’s endemic racism and long-standing affiliation to the Anglo-American establishment. Not only is sex-negative Anglo feminism an exaggerated expression of Anglo-American values, it helps to insulate those values from positive reform.

The movement that emerged from my first book is best called pan-Anglosphere Dissidence: the systematic rejection of repressive Anglo-American values. This rejection is associated with a yearning for the relative sexual freedom waiting outside the Anglosphere. Pan-Anglosphere Dissidence is predictably strongest in the puritanical United States, with its entitled women, institutionalised misandry and fanatic aversion to prostitution. Building on those insights, Hope on Distant Shores offers lifestyle guidance to Anglo-American men who want slim, warm, attractive women unsullied by sex-negative, misandrist Anglo feminism.

Unlike Havok, Hope on Distant Shores contains only a few references from ‘canonical’ historians, economists or philosophers. Like Saint Paul or the Buddha, I am fashioning something completely new and a completely new conceptual vocabulary is necessary to contain it. Therefore, most references are taken from the extensive correspondence to my blog which began in early 2018. All the postings of these experienced and learned correspondents, some of them containing over twenty thousand words, are included in a remarkable series of appendices which will doubtless be cited and studied by awakened men for decades to come.