New Book 'Foreign Shores' Nearly Complete!

Some good news – I have almost completed my second book and it should be ready for publication by the end of January. It will be titled:

Foreign Shores: How Awakened Men Can Escape the Anglosphere’s Toxic Women, Sexual False Consciousness and Institutional Misandry

Less conceptual and much more practical than Havok, Foreign Shores is divided into the following sections:

Is the Anglosphere really Puritanical?

Are Anglo-American Women really that Different?

Is Anglo-American Feminism really that Different?

Sexual False Consciousness

Exporting Anglo Feminism

Pan Anglosphere Dissidence

Building a New Life

The reader will see a shift away from abstract argument to more practical advice, especially where this concerns men’s lifestyle issues such as international relocation, travel and economic freedom. Also, Foreign Shores will shift its attention from the Anglosphere countries to the international sphere, showing how Anglo-American feminism is leading a cultural war against cultures presently free of misandry, repression and toxic feminism, and seeking to remould them in its own image.

One Law for Men, No Law for Women: The New Anglosphere Reality

Goddesses Rampant

The endless avalanche of accusations of sexual abuse aimed at men in recent months are powerful proof of the Anglobitch Thesis. In short, Anglo-American culture – with its puritanical hatred of male sexuality – has declared open war on men.  If any further proof were needed of my general argument – that Anglo feminism is New England Puritanism in modern guise – this ‘abuse crusade’ is it.

Traditionalist MRAs continually tell us that there’s one law for women, another law for men. We need to rephrase that: there is indeed one law for men but no law at all for Anglo-American women – especially young, rich, white ones. In the UK, two recent cases have underlined this situation:

A BRAINY Oxford student who stabbed her boyfriend in a cocaine and booze fuelled frenzy is appealing against her suspended sentence. Toff Lavinia Woodward, 24, was spared jail after stabbing Thomas Fairclough in the leg with a breadknife and hurling a laptop, glass and jam jar at him.

Lavinia Woodward was spared prison instead receiving a 10-month sentence, suspended for 18 months. She tearfully mouthed “thank you” to Judge Ian Pringle as he let her off immediate custody.

Woodward, a student at the university's Christ Church college, had been due to be sentenced earlier this year after admitting unlawful wounding, but the judge gave her four months to prove herself and stay out of trouble. He said medical student Woodward was an “extraordinary able young lady” — and a spell in jail would ruin her dream of becoming a heart surgeon.

The judge added: “It seems to me that if this was a one-off.”

At the sentencing hearing he added: “I find you were genuinely remorseful following this event, and although it was against your bail conditions you contacted your partner to fully confess your guilt and deep sorrow at what had happened. “While you are a highly intelligent individual, you had an immaturity which is not commensurate for someone of your age.”

Judge Pringle said Woodward had made a determined effort to rid herself of drug and alcohol addictions. 

The judge’s leniency infuriated justice campaigners, who said offenders from less privileged backgrounds were regularly locked up for similar attacks. Mark Brooks, of the Mankind Initiative charity for male abuse violence victims, blasted the judge’s leniency.

He said: “The comments are unacceptable and out of touch. This is a clear case of severe domestic abuse against a man and the sympathy should be with him. The judge seems to think that domestic abuse, when it is committed by a woman against a man, is not as serious as it rightly is when it is the other way round. This is wrong.”

Following complaints a legal watchdog announced it is examining the judge's conduct. The Judicial Conduct Investigations Office said: “The JCIO can confirm they have received a complaint against His Honour Judge Ian Pringle QC.”

UK Sun, 7 December 2017

Lavinia Woodward: evil Anglocunt

Not to be outdone, another young Anglo female more recently escaped punishment for glassing another woman in the face. Had her victim been male, I doubt the case would have even gone to court:

A catwalk model has escaped jail after glassing a woman for not letting her into the VIP section of a nightclub. Sophia Brogan-Higgins, 22, had smashed a glass into Justina Liutkute’s forehead at The Box in London, a club frequented by Prince Harry, Kate Moss and Emma Watson. The catwalk model then kicked and slapped PC Alistair Skelton before she was dragged away from the scene at 4am on July 21. Judge Susan Baines sentenced her to 20 weeks in jail, suspended for a year, adding that she was ‘completely out of control’ in the club.

‘The situation for people who were simply doing their jobs is unacceptable – your behaviour was simply not acceptable,’ Judge Baines told her. ‘I am prepared to accept that you have mental health issues. Had the court found that the assault was a deliberate, intentional assault, you wouldbe going straight to prison because she [Liutkute] could have been injured very seriously.’

She added: ‘I can tell from what I have read about you that you are an intelligent person. Now I hope that you reflect on your behaviour because it is very serious.’

Defending, Andrew Moxon asked for a sentence which would allow Brogan-Higgins to fly to Cape Town in order to do some work for an animal charity. ‘If she was required to do an RAR [Rehabilitation Activity Requirement], the issue would be that tag wouldn’t work in South Africa,’ he told Westminster Magistrates’ Court. The suspended sentence allowed Brogan-Higgins to go to Cape Town, with the judge adding: ‘I hope the trip to South Africa goes really well and sets you off on a good path.’

Brogan-Higgins was convicted of assaulting Liutkute and PC Skelton after a short trial at Hammersmith Magistrates’ Court last month. Liutkute, a security guard, had told the model she ‘was not allowed in a certain VIP area’ at the Box Nightclub, to which she replied: ‘Bitch, you don’t know how to do your job, don’t touch me because it’s like sexual harassment.’

As Liutkute, 33, started escorting Brogan-Higgins out of the club, the model suddenly punched the victim in the face with a glass in her hand. In a statement the victim said: ‘The lady tried to throw a punch at my face with the hand that she was holding the glass in. She thrusted it with real force.’

She was left with a two-inch wound above her left eye, and had to take two weeks off work after the attack. Then, during police questioning, Brogan-Higgins kicked PC Skelton in the stomach when he tried to stop her wiping Liutkute’s dried blood off her arms. ‘My opinion was that she was trying to wipe her hands and destroy what could be forensic evidence,’ he told the court.

Brogan-Higgins denied assault, and told the court she ‘wasn’t in a fit state’ in the club. Judge Baines ordered her to pay £250 compensation to Ms Liutkute, £50 to PC Skelton, and costs of £920. She was also ordered to serve 100 hours unpaid work, a 15-day rehab activity requirement, and she was banned from The Box for six months.

UK Metro: 12 December 2017

Sophia Brogan-Goggins

 

My heart bleeds. She got banned from The Box for six months after trying to blind somebody with a glass. It is clear that women in contemporary post-feminist Anglo-American society are now completely above the law; the feminist narrative that women are ‘oppressed’ by patriarchy looks increasingly deranged. Young, white women are deities on pedestals in all the Anglosphere countries – they can do no wrong and even if they do, they are never punished for it. As we have seen, these ‘goddesses’ can even stab people with knives and glasses with near total impunity.

The only positive thing to be drawn from these two cases is the popular outrage that swept Britain in the wake of such lenient sentences. While the ‘conservative’ Anglo press predictably tried to present these women as troubled heroines, the masses completely rejected this lame narrative. Maybe the manosphere is having some effect, even if it changes nothing.

Woodward on holiday

Buddhism, Alchemy and the Red Pill: Overcoming the Fetters of Sexual False Consciousness

  

It is said that the Samurai refreshed themselves every morning with the thought of death. Similarly, the man striving to escape the misandrist Anglosphere should anoint himself with Red Pill truth every morning. Repeat this mantra ten times: I am not sleeping with models every night…

Although there are important differences, a dissident Red Pill mindset has certain links to eastern religions. Like a Buddhist or Hindu, the Red Pilled man awakens from bondage in stages, discarding ever more Blue Pill delusions in order to reach his full awakening. Christianity, with its promise of instant salvation, has little in common with the gradualist Red Pilled worldview. To illustrate the point, there are the ten basic stages of Buddhist enlightenment:

A Stream-enterer (Sotapanna) is free from:

1. Identity view

2. Attachment to rites and rituals

3. Doubt about the teachings

A Once-returner (Sakadagami) has greatly attenuated:

4. Sensual desire

5. Ill will

A Non-returner (Anāgāmi) is free from:

4. Sensual desire

5. Ill will

An Arahant is free from all of the five lower fetters and the five higher fetters, which are:

6. Craving for existence in the material world

7. Craving for existence in the ideal world (heaven)

8. Conceit

9. Restlessness

10. Ignorance

Blue Pill delusions can easily ‘stand in’ for the ‘fetters’ of Buddhism. Among these (in no particular order) would be the idea that Anglosphere countries are inherently superior; that all men are advantaged and all women oppressed; that relationships with Anglo-American women are ‘redemptive’; that moving abroad and starting a new life is impossible; or that true liberation can ever be found within the Anglosphere. The most obstinate Blue Pill fetter is Sexual False Consciousness, which I will address later.

A better spiritual analogy for the Red Pill path is Alchemical Gnosis, a distinctively western approach to achieving psychological wholeness. The three stages of alchemical gnosis, the nigredo, albedo and rubedo, are described thus:

Nigredo – the preparatory stage, the encounter with the self.

Albedo – the marginal or luminal state.

Rubedo – the reddening, uniting the spiritual and the physical in a new mode of consciousness. 

Nigredo, Albedo, Rubedo

If we apply these stages to a dissident male taking the Red Pill, they seem eerily predictive and help to redefine the experience in spiritual terms:

Nigredo means ‘darkening’, and this appropriately describes the Red Pill rage that overcomes many men in the initial stage of their enlightenment. They realize everything they were ever told was a pack of lies, that women are not perfect angels handing out sexual redemption and that the culture they live in is essentially misandrist.

In Red Pill terms, Albedo involves transcending the initial rage and gaining a better understanding of one’s deepest goals and ambitions. This might involve seeking out a foreign relationship or resolving not to die on Anglosphere soil, in the coils of the Matrix; it will be different for different individuals.

Rubedo means ‘reddening’ (appropriately enough, for the final stage of Red Pill enlightenment), the final unification of consciousness. In this state one recognises the various Blue Pill delusions that rule Western society (especially the Anglosphere), the most powerful of which is sexual false consciousness. Once this final hurdle is overcome, the acolyte becomes a Red Pill adept and ready to depart the Anglo-Feminist Matrix without a moment’s regret.

As has already been said, Sexual False Consciousness in the last and most difficult obstacle to overcome on a man’s path to Red Pill enlightenment. Overcoming it involves mastering two levels of delusion: the extrinsic and the intrinsic. The extrinsic aspect incorporates a man’s model of the external world; the intrinsic involves his self-knowledge and understanding. While certain strategies are specific to either level, some can be applied to both. Remaining emotionally detached from Anglo-American women is one of these. Also, exclude all Blue Pilled clowns from your life since such idiots will only bind you to the Matrix by their bad example. As soon as Blue Pill drivel starts falling from the lips of friends, shun them immediately. No other course is possible.

The extrinsic aspect is easier to master, especially since the decline of mainstream media. Once, the selfless female angels projected by television, pop music and lifestyle magazines were unassailable icons, offering romantic redemption to lovelorn males the world over. Only since the internet have these gender-deities been effectively challenged – back then, anyone daring to question the assumption that all women are perfect goddesses was labelled insane, stupid or jaundiced (even now, it is hard to challenge these lame rubrics in public). This fake consensus imposed restrictive sexual narratives on the male population, punishing any who dared to ‘break ranks’ and discuss women honestly. In its heyday, even ‘rebellious’ youth culture extolled these gynocentric delusions with Stalinist zeal. For example, rock music projected sexualized women as the norm, without any reference to the frigid and sterile reality. The manosphere allows men to question these myths as never before, however. This is why the Anglo-feminist Matrix is so bent on shutting it down – either neo-masculine, MGTOW or TFL.

As for intrinsic SFC, far more effort is needed to escape it. The final push to freedom proceeds by being totally honest about your sexual situation: become a Red Pill Buddha, completely honest about the sexual aridity of the Anglosphere. Accept that Anglo-American women are typically entitled, snotty and riddled with personality disorders. And accept that nothing will ever change in the Anglosphere, international nexus of gynocentric entitlement. And this is how to finally eliminate SFC from your personality code: total, ground zero honesty, ‘keeping it real’ 24 hours a day.

Internalizing this truth is the purest expression of Red Pill wisdom.

Why Don’t MGTOWs just GTOW? Because the Anglo-Feminist Matrix won’t Let them!

'Cuba Dave' Sprecker with some of his Conquests

A common question among Anglo feminists and their apologists such as David Futrelle is this: Why Don’t MGTOWS just GTOW? Why not get on with it instead of just blogging about it? In some cases, this is a valid criticism: many MGTOWers (possibly most) are indeed just squalling in the vain hope that some two hundred pounder will take them on. But not all, by any means: ‘Cuba Dave’ Sprecker, for example, washed his hands of Anglo women completely. Knowing their rapacious hypergamy meant little or no action for a humble labourer like himself, he preferred to roam the legal brothels of South America, banging warm and willing whores. A preferable lifestyle to the perma-celibacy he would have doubtless experienced in the States; also, whoring doubtless provided a better life for the girls than forced marriage to a local Pedro. And Sprecker can’t have done much harm to the South American economy, either.

'Cuba Dave' Sprecker in action

  

But Cuba Dave’s happy days came to an abrupt end in 2015 when a controversial Hillary Clinton-inspired ‘anti-trafficking’ law was brought into play. In no time Dave found himself serving a five-year prison term in a Costa Rican jail for ‘promoting sex tourism’ (posting a few pictures of legal hookers on Facebook). Fortunately a local attorney took up his case free of charge and Sprecker was happily acquitted in August 2017.

 

Cuba Dave’s case offers a robust answer to the feminist question: why won’t MGTOWs or gender dissidents just GTOW? Simple: because feminists won’t let them. The Anglo-Feminist Matrix led by vicious harridans like Hillary Clinton and Emma Watson is on a global crusade to prevent men glimpsing – and experiencing – the sexual wonders of lands beyond the Anglosphere. What they want is millions of sexually disenfranchised Anglo males begging for pussy from insolent land whales and toiling on the corporate Plantation for that dubious privilege. Or trapped in Sexual False Consciousness, pretending they are banging models every night. Like the Bounty’s Captain Bligh, the Matrix want its ‘crew’ pulling ropes on a harsh, joyless ship, not enjoying soft kisses on tropic shores. In sum, the last thing they want is men going their own way.

This is yours, American Men... or else

The Clinton Crusade has two prongs. First, it wants to stifle the sexual freedom non-Anglosphere nations enjoy, in order to lock Anglo-American men onto the Plantation. Second, it wants to hide misandrist agendas at home (male school failure, depression, suicide) by focusing on gender-relations in Mozambique, or some other irrelevant issue.

Why are they doing this? Simple: it suits their economic interests. Men toiling away on the corporate Plantation are, like slaves, lucrative assets for the Anglo-American Matrix. If they are trapped by marriage, divorce or children, so much the better. Slave owners in the Antebellum South were not going to free their slaves without a fight, just as slave traders in the British Isles were never going to give up their vile trade without financial compensation. Similarly, the Matrix cannot afford to let guys like Cuba Dave flee the Anglo-American plantation for Latin America’s boundless sexual freedom, because his example would inspire too many men with dreams of escape. No: they had to make an example of him, not unlike a hobbled slave in Antebellum Alabama. 

 

Dave Sprecker with two warm and willing friends

So it is quite obvious that feminists and their apologists don’t really want men going their own way at all, and have even taken decisive legal steps to prevent it. That makes sense: the last thing they want is Anglo-American men shunning entitled land whales (like themselves) for no-strings sex with nubile foreign women. I know various military and police forces monitor this (and other manosphere blogs) almost continuously; if they did not feel threatened by our message, they would simply ignore us. While Anglo-American feminists are always prattling on about separatism and ‘freedom from the patriarchy’, we invariably find them living in houses and cities built by men, using electricity and water provided by men, and ranting against 'the patriarchy' on electronic devices created and devised by men. What they clearly want is to retain those aspects of ‘patriarchy’ they approve of (male divorce slavery, marriage, the Pedestal) while offloading the rest (responsibility, genuine equality and male sexual freedom).

Why don’t they just go their own way, as they have always promised? 

Click Picture to meet 'One Helluva Gorgeous Chick'...