Wednesday, 13 December 2017

Buddhism, Alchemy and the Red Pill: Overcoming the Fetters of Sexual False Consciousness



  

It is said that the Samurai refreshed themselves every morning with the thought of death. Similarly, the man striving to escape the misandrist Anglosphere should anoint himself with Red Pill truth every morning. Repeat this mantra ten times: I am not sleeping with models every night

Although there are important differences, a dissident Red Pill mindset has certain links to eastern religions. Like a Buddhist or Hindu, the Red Pilled man awakens from bondage in stages, discarding ever more Blue Pill delusions in order to reach his full awakening. Christianity, with its promise of instant salvation, has little in common with the gradualist Red Pilled worldview. To illustrate the point, there are the ten basic stages of Buddhist enlightenment:


A Stream-enterer (Sotapanna) is free from:

1. Identity view

2. Attachment to rites and rituals

3. Doubt about the teachings

A Once-returner (Sakadagami) has greatly attenuated:

4. Sensual desire

5. Ill will

A Non-returner (Anāgāmi) is free from:

4. Sensual desire

5. Ill will

An Arahant is free from all of the five lower fetters and the five higher fetters, which are:

6. Craving for existence in the material world

7. Craving for existence in the ideal world (heaven)

8. Conceit

9. Restlessness

10. Ignorance



Blue Pill delusions can easily ‘stand in’ for the ‘fetters’ of Buddhism. Among these (in no particular order) would be the idea that Anglosphere countries are inherently superior; that all men are advantaged and all women oppressed; that relationships with Anglo-American women are ‘redemptive’; that moving abroad and starting a new life is impossible; or that true liberation can ever be found within the Anglosphere. The most obstinate Blue Pill fetter is Sexual False Consciousness, which I will address later.

A better spiritual analogy for the Red Pill path is Alchemical Gnosis, a distinctively western approach to achieving psychological wholeness. The three stages of alchemical gnosis, the nigredo, albedo and rubedo, are described thus:

Nigredo – the preparatory stage, the encounter with the self.
Albedo – the marginal or luminal state.
Rubedo – the reddening, uniting the spiritual and the physical in a new mode of consciousness. 


Nigredo, Albedo, Rubedo

If we apply these stages to a dissident male taking the Red Pill, they seem eerily predictive and help to redefine the experience in spiritual terms:

Nigredo means ‘darkening’, and this appropriately describes the Red Pill rage that overcomes many men in the initial stage of their enlightenment. They realize everything they were ever told was a pack of lies, that women are not perfect angels handing out sexual redemption and that the culture they live in is essentially misandrist.

In Red Pill terms, Albedo involves transcending the initial rage and gaining a better understanding of one’s deepest goals and ambitions. This might involve seeking out a foreign relationship or resolving not to die on Anglosphere soil, in the coils of the Matrix; it will be different for different individuals.

Rubedo means ‘reddening’ (appropriately enough, for the final stage of Red Pill enlightenment), the final unification of consciousness. In this state one recognises the various Blue Pill delusions that rule Western society (especially the Anglosphere), the most powerful of which is sexual false consciousness. Once this final hurdle is overcome, the acolyte becomes a Red Pill adept and ready to depart the Anglo-Feminist Matrix without a moment’s regret.


As has already been said, Sexual False Consciousness in the last and most difficult obstacle to overcome on a man’s path to Red Pill enlightenment. Overcoming it involves mastering two levels of delusion: the extrinsic and the intrinsic. The extrinsic aspect incorporates a man’s model of the external world; the intrinsic involves his self-knowledge and understanding. While certain strategies are specific to either level, some can be applied to both. Remaining emotionally detached from Anglo-American women is one of these. Also, exclude all Blue Pilled clowns from your life since such idiots will only bind you to the Matrix by their bad example. As soon as Blue Pill drivel starts falling from the lips of friends, shun them immediately. No other course is possible.


The extrinsic aspect is easier to master, especially since the decline of mainstream media. Once, the selfless female angels projected by television, pop music and lifestyle magazines were unassailable icons, offering romantic redemption to lovelorn males the world over. Only since the internet have these gender-deities been effectively challenged – back then, anyone daring to question the assumption that all women are perfect goddesses was labelled insane, stupid or jaundiced (even now, it is hard to challenge these lame rubrics in public). This fake consensus imposed restrictive sexual narratives on the male population, punishing any who dared to ‘break ranks’ and discuss women honestly. In its heyday, even ‘rebellious’ youth culture extolled these gynocentric delusions with Stalinist zeal. For example, rock music projected sexualized women as the norm, without any reference to the frigid and sterile reality. The manosphere allows men to question these myths as never before, however. This is why the Anglo-feminist Matrix is so bent on shutting it down – either neo-masculine, MGTOW or TFL.

As for intrinsic SFC, far more effort is needed to escape it. The final push to freedom proceeds by being totally honest about your sexual situation: become a Red Pill Buddha, completely honest about the sexual aridity of the Anglosphere. Accept that Anglo-American women are typically entitled, snotty and riddled with personality disorders. And accept that nothing will ever change in the Anglosphere, international nexus of gynocentric entitlement. And this is how to finally eliminate SFC from your personality code: total, ground zero honesty, ‘keeping it real’ 24 hours a day.

Internalizing this truth is the purest expression of Red Pill wisdom.




Saturday, 21 October 2017

Why Don’t MGTOWs just GTOW? Because the Anglo-Feminist Matrix won’t Let them!


'Cuba Dave' Sprecker with some of his Conquests

A common question among Anglo feminists and their apologists such as David Futrelle is this: Why Don’t MGTOWS just GTOW? Why not get on with it instead of just blogging about it? In some cases, this is a valid criticism: many MGTOWers (possibly most) are indeed just squalling in the vain hope that some two hundred pounder will take them on. But not all, by any means: ‘Cuba Dave’ Sprecker, for example, washed his hands of Anglo women completely. Knowing their rapacious hypergamy meant little or no action for a humble labourer like himself, he preferred to roam the legal brothels of South America, banging warm and willing whores. A preferable lifestyle to the perma-celibacy he would have doubtless experienced in the States; also, whoring doubtless provided a better life for the girls than forced marriage to a local Pedro. And Sprecker can’t have done much harm to the South American economy, either.

'Cuba Dave' Sprecker in action
  
But Cuba Dave’s happy days came to an abrupt end in 2015 when a controversial Hillary Clinton-inspired ‘anti-trafficking’ law was brought into play. In no time Dave found himself serving a five-year prison term in a Costa Rican jail for ‘promoting sex tourism’ (posting a few pictures of legal hookers on Facebook). Fortunately a local attorney took up his case free of charge and Sprecker was happily acquitted in August 2017.

 
Cuba Dave’s case offers a robust answer to the feminist question: why won’t MGTOWs or gender dissidents just GTOW? Simple: because feminists won’t let them. The Anglo-Feminist Matrix led by vicious harridans like Hillary Clinton and Emma Watson is on a global crusade to prevent men glimpsing – and experiencing – the sexual wonders of lands beyond the Anglosphere. What they want is millions of sexually disenfranchised Anglo males begging for pussy from insolent land whales and toiling on the corporate Plantation for that dubious privilege. Or trapped in Sexual False Consciousness, pretending they are banging models every night. Like the Bounty’s Captain Bligh, the Matrix want its ‘crew’ pulling ropes on a harsh, joyless ship, not enjoying soft kisses on tropic shores. In sum, the last thing they want is men going their own way.

This is yours, American Men... or else

The Clinton Crusade has two prongs. First, it wants to stifle the sexual freedom non-Anglosphere nations enjoy, in order to lock Anglo-American men onto the Plantation. Second, it wants to hide misandrist agendas at home (male school failure, depression, suicide) by focusing on gender-relations in Mozambique, or some other irrelevant issue.

Why are they doing this? Simple: it suits their economic interests. Men toiling away on the corporate Plantation are, like slaves, lucrative assets for the Anglo-American Matrix. If they are trapped by marriage, divorce or children, so much the better. Slave owners in the Antebellum South were not going to free their slaves without a fight, just as slave traders in the British Isles were never going to give up their vile trade without financial compensation. Similarly, the Matrix cannot afford to let guys like Cuba Dave flee the Anglo-American plantation for Latin America’s boundless sexual freedom, because his example would inspire too many men with dreams of escape. No: they had to make an example of him, not unlike a hobbled slave in Antebellum Alabama. 
 
Dave Sprecker with two warm and willing friends

So it is quite obvious that feminists and their apologists don’t really want men going their own way at all, and have even taken decisive legal steps to prevent it. That makes sense: the last thing they want is Anglo-American men shunning entitled land whales (like themselves) for no-strings sex with nubile foreign women. I know various military and police forces monitor this (and other manosphere blogs) almost continuously; if they did not feel threatened by our message, they would simply ignore us. While Anglo-American feminists are always prattling on about separatism and ‘freedom from the patriarchy’, we invariably find them living in houses and cities built by men, using electricity and water provided by men, and ranting against 'the patriarchy' on electronic devices created and devised by men. What they clearly want is to retain those aspects of ‘patriarchy’ they approve of (male divorce slavery, marriage, the Pedestal) while offloading the rest (responsibility, genuine equality and male sexual freedom).

Why don’t they just go their own way, as they have always promised

Thursday, 21 September 2017

Choose Enlightenment: Don’t Die Defending Mud


Porus at the Hydaspes

In the battle of the Hydaspes in 326 BC, Alexander the Great took victory with a brilliant and daring manoeuvre. King Porus’ left wing was lined up on a muddy river bank, expecting the Macedonian right to attack their positions. Instead, Alexander ordered his cavalry to switch flanks in mid-charge, falling instead on the beleaguered Indian right. The Indian left were instantly cut out of the battle, standing like fools while Alexander crushed their right and centre.

Their fatal mistake was in assuming that their muddy patch of river bank had enormous military value. Alexander saw it for what it was – a patch of mud – and not worth fighting for. The crumbling Indian right was a far more valuable military target, a fact which Alexander exploited to full effect. 

Ignoring mud, Alexander triumps

The vast majority of Anglo-American men make exactly the same mistake as Porus’ army: they think their lives are of incredible value, something others want to possess. Blue collar Anglo-chumps are strongest in this conviction, which is fuelled by the lamestream media and sheer stupidity. And nowhere is their self-delusion strongest than on the issue of sexual freedom; dumb schlubs getting no sex from Anglo women will still rush to their defence without a moment’s thought. In short, they are defending mud; standing proud upon a patch of shit of no value to anybody, least of all themselves.

Indeed, such morons will actually lay down their lives for women who consider them expendable chumps. Consider the fate of this young fool from the UK:

Owen Jenkins, 12, died trying to save friend from Nottingham River

A 12-year-old boy "who couldn't swim much" has died after he went into the River Trent to help a struggling friend. Owen Jenkins was described by his family as a "hero" after it came to light he was attempting to help a girl who was having difficulties at Beeston Marina in Nottingham.

Owen's great aunt, Liz Ryan, said he was playing with friends when "he went in the water to save a girl and help her get out".

Explaining that "he couldn't swim much himself", she went on: "We don't know the full story but all we know is that he is a hero. He didn't think of himself."

She added: "They were told not to go - 'don't go playing down the weir' - and obviously that's what they do."

Nottingham Police were called to the lock off Riverside Road at around 6pm on Monday night when Oliver was reported missing. Police divers, three search boats, a helicopter, a drone and more than 30 firefighters from Nottinghamshire and Derbyshire were involved in the search. Hundreds of members of the public also came out, searching until dark when helicopters with infrared cameras were sent out. The body was discovered in the water at around 10pm. Owen's grandmother and her husband said the boy's father spent the whole night sitting by the weir where the tragedy happened.

Lynda Fletcher said: "He was like a giraffe, he was nearly 6ft tall. He was just a friendly giant. Everybody loved him because he was so nice. They loved him because he was so kind and polite."

Sky News, 11 July 2017



And utterly stupid. Predictably, the girl survived while Sir Lancelot perished.

Anglo-American males are also encouraged to defend women’s rights in a more abstract sense (misandrist feminism is an integral part of Anglo-American democracy, after all). Despite equalist rhetoric, it is men who sign up for UN-backed crusades to ‘free’ women from ‘oppressive’ regimes or ideologies. This is the ultimate expression of defending mud: low status men with desultory SMV (Sexual Market Value) risking life and limb for women who wouldn’t give them free sex in a thousand years. Of course, these clowns have been gulled into believing they are banging models every night via the mass hypnosis of Sexual False Consciousness; and that they are defending these (imaginary) pleasures by supporting such escapades. In the final analysis, they are fighting for pipe-dreams no less than their vilified opponents. And long may their folly continue; they would not thank us for enlightenment, anyway.
 
But defending mud afflicts far more men than the Average Frustrated Anglo-Chump. After all, old style MRAs have made defending mud the backbone of their movement. Unfortunately, the post-War beta-stooge lifestyle they extol has simply vanished: socio-economic change means blue collar men can no longer support families or attract even the ugliest women. The result? These old style MRAs are standing proudly on their patches of mud, Bible and spanner in hand, while the few remaining sexualized and attractive Anglo females inundate Death Row killers and gangsters with erotic love letters. Go figure.

Is this really worth dying for?

In some ways, the contemporary male underclass is now the smartest demographic. With no memories of post-war prosperity to cling to, their high-risk/high-reward lifestyle fits the new ‘low trust’ Brazilified Anglosphere perfectly. Unlike the high-prole beta suckers clinging to their Post-War folk memories, the underclass male has chosen a lifestyle relevant to his situation. He knows – or intuits – that women want ‘dangerous’, ‘exciting’ men, not bores clutching spanners and Bibles. He also knows that social conformity offers slim returns to low status males in Anglosphere societies at best, some dumb kids with a low-quality woman. Above all, he grasps that reward does not match investment for any male in a gynocentric society: a shrewish wife can reduce even a billionaire to penury on a whim.

The enlightened man is defined by his steadfast refusal to defend mud in any situation. He is secure in his knowledge that mud is mud, and nothing more. He does not rush to the defence of women who consider him an expendable utility. He does not lose blood advancing Anglo-American gynocentric misandry in foreign lands. He knows blue collar Anglo-chumps are not banging models every night. He knows foreign women are thinner, better-looking and more personable than their Anglosphere counterparts. In sum, he is totally self-aware.

He values himself, not mud.


Would you die for this?

Monday, 31 July 2017

Salman Abedi Update: A Sexually Disenfranchised Killer



Salman Abedi: The Truth is Out

In the immediate aftermath of the Ariana Grande bombing atrocity in Manchester, I made several predictions about the killer:

  • He would be single and sexually disenfranchised 
  • He would have retreated into religion to cope with his sexual disenfranchisement. 
  • He would hold a grudge against ‘liberated’ white girls for not having sex with him.

All the evidence suggests that Salman Abedi was self-motivated, having planned and executed his attack with little external help. He chose the venue himself, for his own reasons, and was certainly no ISIL puppet. Despite their best attempts to frame the crime in religious terms and deny the killer’s real agenda, the authorities and their lackeys in the ‘elite’ lamestream media have been unable to do so:

The Manchester suicide bomber mostly acted alone in the days before the attack, police have said. Salman Abedi is thought to have purchased the main components for the bomb and assembled it himself before blowing himself up and killing 22 others at the Manchester Arena last week. Greater Manchester Police said they were still working to establish if he was part of a wider network, but believe he was acting alone in the four days leading up to the atrocity.

Daily Telegraph, 31 May 2017

However, an interesting article in the populist Daily Star just before the MSM pulled down the shutters on serious discussion of Abedi’s motivation, revealed the following uncomfortable truths:

Sex-starved Manchester bomber 'wanted revenge against Western girls who rejected him'

JUG-EARED terrorist Salman Abedi targeted an Ariana Grande concert in a twisted revenge attack on pop-mad Western girls who rejected his advances, ex-school pals believe. The gangly killer could not land a girlfriend because of his giant lugs which earned him the nickname 'Dumbo’ after the Disney elephant.

Instead he told pals he paid prostitutes for sex. Rejected by scores of girls in his home city of Manchester he ditched his booze-swigging, pot-smoking student lifestyle and devoted himself to militant Islamism – even confronting an Imam who tried to lecture him on anti-extremism.

Schoolpals reckon his grudge against Western girls could explain why he targeted a gig by US pop star Ariana. Abedi, 22, who was himself a fan of gangsta rap, knew the audience would be packed with legions of the 23-year-old singer’s young girl fans when he detonated his suicide bomb. Seven of his 22 victims were 18 or under – one just eight.

One former pal of Abedi’s from Stretford Grammar School in Manchester – where the killer got nine GCSEs including chemistry – said he was known for the size of his ears and his bad luck with girls.

''They called him Dumbo after the elephant in the Disney film,’’ his pal said. ''He was useless with the girls, man. He just couldn’t get a woman. It used to really wind him up. He always claimed he wasn’t a virgin because he said he’d been with prostitutes in Libya where his family came from. We all thought he was talking c**p. It really got to him that he could never get a girlfriend.

“He was surrounded by all these teens wearing next to nothing on nights out but none of them would look at him twice. He tried to impress by turning up with cider or vodka and crisps and that which he said he’d 'taxed’ from the supermarket - meaning they were stolen. But looking back he probably bought them to try and show off to us.

''In the end he started to pull away from our group and became really withdrawn. He became more religious and said he didn’t like the Western ways any more. We all reckoned it was because he wasn’t having anything like the fun the rest of us were.

''Donald Trump called him a loser this week and that really is what he was. But we never imagined he’d do anything as evil as this. It has left all of us numb. The girls who knew him back in school reckon he picked on Ariana’s fans to get some kind of revenge for all the rejections he got over the years. Why else would he target kids like that?

Daily Star, 27 May 2017

'Dumbo' Abedi: Incel for life
 
The usual Anglo-Saxon fiction that men are all having sex with models every night runs through this article like a thread of shit. In truth, most of Abedi’s erstwhile ‘friends’ were probably just as incel as he was, not ‘having fun’ at all. Such fools seriously think divas like Ariana Grande want sex with low SMV nobodies like themselves, when she actually sees them as disposable pond-life.

However, the story indicates the lengths the pro-feminist MSM will go to quash all perspectives that refute their outmoded narratives. Indeed, we have now reached a stage where only the MSM aimed at a lumpen-proletarian audience (and thus not truly MSM) dare express anything remotely resembling the truth about gender-related issues in the Anglosphere.

Even still, the Daily Star article shunned any serious exploration of Anglo women’s ethnic hypergamy, a telling omission. Speaking bluntly, giving out the absolute truth would simply create too many 'waves' in a feminist dictatorship governed by secular Puritanism. Instead, the Anglosphere prefers to duck reality while the bodies keep piling up and male sexual alienation reaches epidemic proportions. 


Ariana pretending she wants sex with everybody