Wednesday, 31 December 2014

Deluded Definitions: ODD and the End of the Anglosphere

Richard Feynman - clearly an ODD candidate

I recently found the following definition of the latest psychiatric fad, Oppositional Defiant Disorder, on the Internet:
ODD is a condition in which a child displays an ongoing pattern of uncooperative, defiant, hostile, and annoying behavior toward people in authority. The child's behavior often disrupts the child's normal daily activities, including activities within the family and at school. 

What Are the Symptoms of Oppositional Defiant Disorder? Symptoms of ODD may include:

  • Throwing repeated temper tantrums
  • Excessively arguing with adults
  • Actively refusing to comply with requests and rules
  • Deliberately trying to annoy or upset others, or being easily annoyed by others
  • Blaming others for your mistakes
  • Having frequent outbursts of anger and resentment
  • Being spiteful and seeking revenge
  • Swearing or using obscene language
  • Saying mean and hateful things when upset

In addition, many children with ODD are moody, easily frustrated, and have a low self-esteem. They also sometimes may abuse drugs and alcohol.
… just like Van Gogh, Richard Feynman, Hart Crane, Edgar Allen Poe and hundreds of other men endowed with Promethean genius. Indeed, defiant opposition to authority is the essence of manhood. A compliant, malleable male is like a wingless eagle, a disgrace to nature.

Vincent Van Gogh: Self-Portrait of Genius

In short, Anglo-American psychiatrists have pathologized normal masculine behaviour as deviant and ‘abnormal’. What further proof do we need that Anglo-Saxon culture, with its puritanical and feminist fixations, is inherently anti-male? Far from being a patriarchy, the Anglosphere is an anti-male matriarchy in all but name. It exalts women because women are sexless and compliant; it detests men because they are virile and individualistic.

Raymond Dart: Scientific Visionary

It is no surprise that all innovation springs from the minds and hands of men. Aside from our greater imagination and intelligence, men are born to defy outworn authority. Copernicus, Newton, Darwin, Raymond Dart – without their ‘oppositional- defiant’ traits, the world would be languishing in medieval ignorance. When the Anglosphere labels the Promethean fire of male genius an ‘illness’, one senses its days on the global stage are numbered. No matriarchy has the innovative potential to survive the white heat of international competition in science, business or technology. Endowed with standardized, malleable minds that lack all originality, women are drawn to authoritarian, tram-track disciplines like psychology or law like moths to a candle-flame. Sadly, such sterile disciplines add little to a nation's strength or prosperity in the longer term.

To conclude, only outright rejection of Anglo-American culture can lead men to freedom and self-actualization. At every level – medical, legal, political – Anglo-American civilization seeks to pathologize and denigrate healthy masculinity. It has, in fact, declared war on men.

Happy New Year.

Copernicus: Defiance made Flesh

Sunday, 7 December 2014

Sweets, and Illusions: Survival Strategies of the Post-Menopausal Anglosphere Female

The PM woman ponders her dwindling options...

The lame-stream Anglo-American media endlessly sings the virtues of female 'empowerment', as if the average woman was a superhuman paragon of multi-tasking intelligence. However, when we observe the ludicrous life-strategies most women adopt after menopause, the reality is very different. Why? Because, beyond their reproductive age, women are essentially worthless. Even White Knights have no use for them. In prehistoric times, we cannot doubt that most women were killed by a blow to the skull after raising their last litter of children. Feminism, Theosophy, finger-painting, husband-beating or handing out sweets on the train: the post-menopausal (PM) female will do almost anything to disguise/obviate her essential worthlessness. Let us now examine these desperation strategies in more depth.


We must suppress male sexuality at all costs!

The big one. Or should I say big two? Feminism and Anglo-American Christianity have an identical fixation on restricting male sexual freedom. Many PM women suddenly immerse themselves in either 'the sisterhood' or tradcon Christian drivel, and for exactly the same reason: both ideologies neutralize the effects of their plummeting SMV by chastising (or seeking to ban altogether) the dynamic, ageless force of male sexuality. Never mind that most prostitutes are happy in their profession, or that sex-trafficking is a myth, or that Anglo-American men should be perfectly free to marry foreign women if they so choose: male sexuality must be reflexively demonized in order to raise the PM woman's ailing SMV. Of course, many unattractive younger women share the same obsessions; but rarely to the same extent or extremity. After all, they still have reproductive potential, even if most men hardly notice it.

In some respects, the whole feminist project is designed to navigate the reality of post-menopausal female worthlessness. By giving women pseudo-education and faux-status, it hopes to neutralize the deleterious effects of their plummeting SMV. We have Pretty White Girl Syndrome, not post-Menopausal Old Boot Syndrome; and, sensing their impending sexual invisibility to men, old or near-old women will believe anything – literally anything – to avoid the SMV scrapheap.Which segues neatly into Strategy 2:


PM woman mastering the regenerative power of crystals

Alternatively, many post-menopausal women latch onto mumbo-jumbo peddled by the post-60s counter-culture. Fake religions like the Qabala. magic crystals. Homeopathy. Chatting to geraniums. Reading tarot cards and tea-leaves. Because lots of PM women share such irrational fixations, UK 'businesswoman' Anita Roddick built a vast fortune pandering to their whims and fancies. Indeed, Roddick created one of the 90's most successful retail chains (The Body Shop) simply by slapping curvy, female-friendly labels on her queasy products.

When menopause strikes, many Earth Mothers also start engaging with the post-everything echo-chamber that is modern art: ape-house paintings and junk-yard sculptures; formless poems scrawled in indigo ink; or turgid, pornographic novels. Funny how PM women never take up physics, engineering or something useful, is it not?

Is this ‘Earth Mother’ persona authentic or just another attempt to avoid being ignored, abused or killed? My guess is the latter. In the hunter-gatherer context, a PM woman with some kind of shamanic presence in the tribe was more likely to survive than a PM woman with no presence at all. Other women would intercede for her; she knew the herbs to trigger abortions; she was their link to the Great Goddess.

In sum, the PM woman's immersion in primitive superstition suggests a huge level of existential insecurity. Stripped of sexual power, despised by even the lowest of men, she throws herself on the mercy of imaginary beings like a savage caught in an earthquake. Sadly, healing crystals and geranium roots cannot boost her lost SMV. For men have no interest in her Coke-can sculptures of Bingu, the Earth goddess; only fresh young pussy.


Eat, eat... only please don't hurt me!

After menopause, it is notable how women start trying to placate everyone. Many an entitled cunt turns forty and suddenly starts handing out sweets to taxi drivers and smiling at passing strangers. Cakes and pastries, pies and Mars bars; her bounty is endless. Remember to treat such women with unmerciful, unprecedented and unrelenting harshness as you pluck the sweets from their hands. Such losers are also good for sport fucking.


Queen of Self-Delusion

The Tradcon Anglo mass-media - at least that aimed at women - remains fixated on the supposed charms of past-prime women. Madonna remains their default icon, a spidery old cunt ugly even in her prime. Because women lack self-awareness, they suck up this delusional nonsense like Dyson hoovers. Even educated middle-class women actually believe that men find ugly old boots with wrinkled tits and desert-dry pussies sexually attractive. Indeed, I found the following article in the Daily Mail this very day:

Madonna and I have a few things in common. We are both 56. We’re hard-working. We have both been addicted to exercise: Madonna to yoga, me to Pilates. Madonna is rumoured to have had plastic surgery to counter ‘gym face’, I have had plastic surgery to counter a lifetime of disappointment.

When I first saw her provocative, vaguely sado-masochistic photo shoot in Interview magazine, I was full of admiration.

Through sheer force of will (and Photoshop, RK) , Madonna looks fitter and prettier than she did at Live Aid in 1985. Any 20-year-old would be lucky to look this good! You go, material girl! She is proving that post-menopausal women are still vibrant, powerful, sexual beings! If Madonna can do it, so can we!

Do PM Anglo-American women actually believe this rubbish? Do they really believe that any heterosexual man in his right mind finds Madonna 'vibrant' or 'sexual'? Do they really think Madonna is more attractive than the average 20-year old? Are they mad? This 'Sexy at 60' nonsense is particularly strong among tradcon PM women with overt misandrist tendencies - in my extensive experience the most unpleasant of all Anglo-American females.

Heads up, PM ladies. Men evolved to find young, thin women with symmetrical features, long legs and large breasts attractive. No matter how hard you kid yourselves, these male preferences are genetically hard-wired and unlikely to change any time soon.


The Best Solution of All...

Just my own suggestion. Since healthy men have no interest in old, ugly PM women, why don't they just kill themselves? We can do quite happily without misandrist feminists, repressive Christians, crazy Earth Mothers and self-deluded old hags. A wise suggestion: unfortunately, most PM women lack the guts to act on it.

Monday, 1 December 2014

Fiona Woolf and the Great MRA Ideas Theft: We’re Not as Marginalized as Feminists Say We Are

Fiona Woolf - voice of the abused and oppressed...

Feminism is usually seen by conservative MRAs as being intrinsically allied with Marxism or socialism. If this were true, however, why we do we see so many feminist/Christian alliances against pornography and prostitution? Clearly, the reality is much more complex.

While Anglo-Saxon feminism pays lip-service to ‘socialism’ and ‘equality’, it is really a smokescreen designed to hide the fact that women of different races or socio-economic strata have divergent interests and concerns. In truth, feminism is designed to gull low-income or minority women into thinking that upper-middle class white women ‘share their pain’. Ridiculous, of course: but such a narrative suits kleptocratic consumer capitalism all too well. Underneath its socialist rhetoric, Anglo-Saxon feminism is racist, repressive and elitist, imbued with puritanical misandry and indeed, contempt for all women outside its charmed circle.

Until recently, with the rise of the Internet, poor women working as servants in the homes of wealthy white women actually believed they shared common cause as the ‘oppressed’ gender.  Indeed, this theme is central to all post-feminist media: that gender is far more important than ethnicity or status. How odd it is that, while the left are quick to identify racism as a fraud designed to fool the masses, they remain blind to the fact that feminism serves exactly the same purpose and uses the exactly same methods. 

With this in mind, it is worth noting that a second woman has been removed from leading the official enquiry into historical child abuse in the UK. Since the death of paedophile entertainer Sir Jimmy Savile three years ago, 'historical child abuse' has become a national obsession. Australian children's entertainer Rolf Harris is currently serving time in prison for historical sex crimes and it seems that the 80s Conservative government (are we seeing a connection here?) not only shelved dossiers on abuse, they also engaged in it. The removed woman in question, the hyper-privileged and wildly unrepresentative Fiona Woolf, is not acceptable to the British public for a number of reasons:

Fiona Woolf finally resigned as chairman of the government’s sex abuse inquiry last night after days of intense pressure over her links to Leon Brittan. But she refused to apologise to abuse victims for failing to make her connections to the Tory peer clear.

Mrs Woolf, a solicitor and Lord Mayor of London, quit hours after victims’ groups said she was unsuitable to run the inquiry, which would be ‘a dead duck in the water’ if she remained. She maintained claims of her links to Lord Brittan were mere ‘perceptions’ and appeared to blame the Press for her downfall.

She attacked ‘negative comment and innuendo’ about her connections to the former Tory Home Secretary, who is at the centre of allegations of an Establishment cover-up of sex abuse claims in the 1980s. Mrs Woolf’s departure is a humiliation for Home Secretary Theresa May after the previous chair of the inquiry, Baroness Butler-Sloss, also had to quit because her late brother Sir Michael Havers was attorney general in the 1980s. It leaves plans for the inquiry in disarray, with Mrs May now beginning a desperate search for a third chairman in only four months since the inquiry was announced.
Daily Mail, 31 Oct 2014

Why is this important?

Because elite women are starting to be seen as members of corrupt, abusive class, not as ‘women’ – the ‘oppressed’ half of humanity.  The entire Anglo-American feminist agenda, with all its absurd assumptions of monolithic female identity, is beginning to disintegrate.

Further proof of this can be found in the systematic theft of our ideas by the mainstream media. British politicians have recently been seen sporting ‘This is what a feminist looks like’ T Shirts. The right-of-centre Daily Mail consequently ran a front page article showing the sweat-shop conditions of non-white workers in sweat shops where these T shirts are produced. The bourgeois, hypocritical nature of Anglo-American feminism is starting to filter down to the lamestream media, at last.

Despite what the academic feminist establishment claims, the Men’s Movement is making real waves in the wider culture. Until recently, the fact that Anglo-American feminism is a racist, elitist movement was seldom discussed outside the Manosphere.  Now, major political and legal decisions are being made that reflect our views. Either we are having a direct effect or, more likely, the public is getting very tired of feminist nonsense spouted by white, upper-middle class women sporting T-shirts made by slave-labourers.

UK politicians with their slave produced feminist T-shirts...

This why Woolf’s expulsion is such a victory for our movement. Two women were elected to head this enquiry because women are generically presumed to be innocent of sexual malfeasance and to share, at least informally, victim status.

Victims of elite child abuse, however, did not see things that way. Woolf, like Butler-Sloss before her, was seen rather as a wildly unrepresentative upper class individual with close affiliations to the abusers and those who covered for them, which ultimately led to her dismissal. She was a close confidante of Leon Brittan, who shelved a detailed dossier on elite child abuse in the 80s.  Her predecessor, Elizabeth Butler-Sloss experienced the same vote of no confidence due to her association with Nigel Havers, Attorney General during the alleged period of child abuse (the early 1980s).

Another upper-class woman with troubling connections

Moreover, Wolf was felt to know ‘nothing’ about child abuse, indicating that simply belonging to the female gender is no longer sufficient to garner public trust.

If that is not a favorable revolution in perceptions of gender, what is?

Woolf: sling yer elitist, racist hook, fuckface...