Friday, 29 November 2019

History's Black Swans: Why Societies Which Regulate Female Sexuality Endure

Studying our own tumbledown age with a critical eye, it is easy to think that ancient people were far smarter than we are. Above all, they seemed to understand the reality of female nature much better than we do. Although they cloaked their insight in mystical trappings for the ignorant masses of their own times, the wisest of the ancients definitely seemed to know that allowing women unlimited sexual freedom leads inexorably to the cock carousel, rampant hyper-hypergamy, mass inceldom, the proliferation of Dark Triad genes and  social decay. Most of their laws and customs seemed to focus on strict regulation of female sexuality for this very reason, although it was seldom stated openly.

However, I do not believe the ancients all had Tesla IQs. It just seems that way because the ancient cultures which still exert an influence on our own time were only a small minority of those which ever existed. In truth, the vast majority  of ancient societies died forgotten because they failed to regulate female sexuality; 'successful' ancient societies which restricted female behaviour were unrepresentative Black Swans, not the normative standard. We know very little about the matriarchal Etruscans or Carthaginians compared to the patriarchal, co-alpha Romans who conquered them; and this is because matriarchal societies lose wars, achieve little and leave no imprint on history. This uneven impact on posterity distorts our perception of the ancient past, creating the false impression that all ancient cultures shared the same insights into female nature; in truth, they did not.

The Fall of Carthage: Matriarchies leave little beyond ruins

Doubtless some men in history's successful cultures did have the Tesla IQs necessary to create robust patriarchal memes in the first place; perhaps they studied history or the dysfunctional cultures around them, or simply observed the lower classes in their own societies. Smart men in ancient Greece or Israel must have noticed that their own national underclasses achieved very little compared to social elites, just as in our modern Anglosphere. Modern underclass 'culture' (rap-babble, tabloid newspapers, Netflix, sport) will be forgotten in 40 years, while the upper middle-class academic culture in the STEM departments of elite universities will endure for centuries. That is because upper middle-class culture is still rooted in monogamy and stable family structures, while underclass culture is built on the sociopathic chaos arising from unrestricted female mate choice; that is the only difference.

British Chavs: Underclass Chaos personified

Considered as a whole, the ancients were no smarter or wiser than we are; it just seems that way because we only 'see' the 'successful' patriarchal Black Swan cultures of history.

Friday, 22 November 2019

The Rise and Rise of Anglo-American Lesbianism: Introducing the Vantablack Pill, the Pill Beyond Cope

In an earlier post, I touched on the Dog Pill; the Anglo female's sexual preference for dogs over sub-8 men. In this post, I want to discuss an equally potent factor contributing to mass male sexual disenfranchisement: the Lesbian Pill. Few people in the manosphere grasp how widespread lesbianism actually is; yet it is a major force in the West's ongoing sexual crisis. As ever, the homosociality of the Anglosphere makes it even more common in Anglo-American countries.

The Dog Pill: A Rampant Force across the Anglosphere?
Although lesbianism has a relatively low media profile and receives much less discussion than male homosexuality, the consensus of scholarly opinion is that it is far more widespread. Unlike male homosexuality - largely restricted to the upper and middle classes - women of all social stripes engage in lesbianism:
Do All Women Experiment with Lesbianism at College?
Based on 13,500 responses, almost 10% of women ages 22 to 44 with a bachelor's degree said they had had a same-sex experience, compared with 15% of those with no high school diploma. Women with a high school diploma or some college, but no degree, fell in between. Six percent of college educated women reported oral sex with a same-sex partner, compared with 13% who did not complete high school.
SOURCE: Medical News Today 
Although a little dated (2012), the figures clearly show that homosexual attraction is somewhat more common among females. Almost all studies tend to replicate these findings, showing lesbianism to be far more common than male homosexuality. My own view is that female sexuality remains poorly evolved (conventional psychology misnames this tendency 'sexual plasticity'), since intra-male competition and social dominance simply obviated the 'need' for coherent female preferences for most of human history. When Ghengis Khan co-opted women into his harem, female sexual preference simply did not matter; sexual dissenters were terrorised into submission or simply killed. Moral questions aside, that was how things were.

The steady rise of overt institutional misandry in the Anglo West has eroded the last vestiges of male authority, allowing women to do whatever they please with complete impunity. Released from societal expectations and economic dependence on men by misandrist common law and feminist pseudo-careers, disordered female sexuality is now given free rein across the Anglosphere. Fucking dogs, abusing children and a massive increase in lesbianism are the inevitable results:
Psychologist John Buss estimates that for most of human history, perhaps 2% of women have been lesbian or bisexual. Not any more. Recent surveys of teenage girls and young women find that roughly 15% of young females today self-identify as lesbian or bisexual, compared with about 5% of young males who identify as gay or bisexual.
 SOURCE: Psychology Today
And so we see an obvious cause of the mass male sexual disenfranchisement engulfing the Anglosphere: many women are simply opting out of heterosexual relationships relative to men, leaving a large surplus of sexually disenfranchised males. Why so many otherwise awakened Manosphere commentators cannot see this astonishes even me.
But, as Professor Roy Baumeister at Florida State University and others have shown, sexual attraction in many women seems to be more malleable. If a teenage girl kisses another teenage girl, for whatever reason, and she finds that she likes it—then things can happen, and things can change. If a young woman finds her soulmate, and her soulmate happens to be female, then she may begin to experience feelings she's never felt before. 
Especially if all the guys she knows are losers.
 SOURCEPsychology Today
With typical Boomer gynocentrism and Anglobitch-worshipping self-delusion, the author blames male 'losers' for the increase in lesbianism. He then sails into a diatribe against male 'immaturity', completely ignoring female racism, lookism, heightism and all the other bracing goodies in the hyper-hypergamic package. Of course, admitting the reality of Anglo female hyper-hypergamy would mean actually accepting that Anglo-American women aren't 'perfect': and that is a bridge too far for any Anglo-American academic in the present age of Anglo-cucked degeneracy.

Indeed, the Dog Pill and the Lesbian Pill are so degenerate that they transcend normal Black Pill classification and deserve a new colour classification all their own: VantaBlack . Vantablack is a material developed by Surrey NanoSystems in the United Kingdom and is one of the darkest substances known, absorbing up to 99.965% of visible light (at 663 nm if the light is perpendicular to the material).

Vantablack: the World's Blackest Black

Most Black Pills arise from an individual's personal issues (autism, shortness, ugliness, ethnicity, poverty) and are thus manageable in psychological terms. However, the Lesbian Pill (like the Dog Pill) is infinitely more pernicious since it arises from factors transcending any individual, namely misandrist Anglo-American culture, raw female degeneracy or being born into the post-patriarchal Matrix as a victimised male Xer, Millennial or Zoomer.

Lesbianism and the other VantaBlack Pills are like tsunamis or earthquakes, terrible forces which leave men numb with impotent despair. The blunt fact that many western white women prefer sex with dogs or other women over sub-8 men automatically renders all remediation attempts (other than expatriation, which costs time, money and effort) utterly futile, pre-consigning millions of Western males to sexlessness, childlessness and existential despair.

When the VantaBlack Pill strikes, abandon all cope.

Friday, 15 November 2019

Too Good for Any Man: This is What Hyper-Hypergamy Looks Like

Anglobitch Emma Watson is now officially 'self-partnered'...

Anglobitch icon Emma Watson has been making waves recently with the revelation that she is not single but 'self-partnered':

Approaching a milestone birthday inevitably forces us to evaluate what we've achieved and where we feel we've fallen short — both personally and professionally. In a recent interview with British Vogue, actress Emma Watson said one thing she's made peace with as she nears her 30th birthday is her current relationship status. "It took me a long time, but I'm very happy [being single]. I call it being self-partnered," she said.  
What does that mean, exactly? Carla Marie Manly, a clinical psychologist based in California sees merit the idea. Manly describes the relationship status this way: "self-partnering focuses on the ideal of being happy and complete as a solo individual. A self-partnered person would feel whole and fulfilled within the self and does not feel compelled to seek fulfillment through having another person as a partner." 
That doesn't necessarily mean a self-partnered person doesn't date or never hopes to get married someday. It's that they're taking the time to know themselves first. "To be truly self-partnered, one must often invest a great deal of time and energy on personal development," says Manly. 
Watson isn't the first celebrity to shift what's normally viewed as a negative relationship status into a positive. In 2014, Gwyneth Paltrow used the term "conscious uncoupling" to describe her divorce from Coldplay singer Chris Martin. Why has reclaiming these terms become a trend now? "There’s a big shift in renaming the terms of relationships because there’s also a huge shift towards individuality in younger generations who are no longer wanting to be defined by the standards of traditional generations," explains Travis McNulty, a therapist practicing in Florida.
SOURCE: NBC News, November 2019 

However, Watson isn't 'self-partnered' at all. She is suffering from the Anglobitch condition known to the wise as hyper-hypergamy: the notion that no man on earth is good enough for her. She would rather end up a childless, lonely hag than marry a man and submit to normal womanly duties like child-bearing. Contrary to what some in the Manosphere think, many Anglo-American women think a billionaire with the Rock's body and the face of Chris Hemsworth is still beneath them on the sexual totem-pole. Watson is one of these, although Jodie Foster is another hideous example of the breed. In sum, they think all men are sexualized pieces of dogshit however handsome, rich or intelligent they might be.

Too good for any man?

The following excerpt from my book, Hope on Distant Shores, explains the concept of hyper-hypergamy with specific reference to the Anglosphere's distinctive sex-negativism, misandry and ethno-cultural imperialism:
Another factor one might consider is the high ‘power distance’ or depth of inequality experienced in Anglo-American societies. The Anglosphere is a potent colonial bloc that still bestows considerable status on white Anglo-Saxons in a global context. Anglo media, culture and institutions remain the primary global exports, in ideological terms. The obvious international power of say, Victorian Britain or post-War America surely wrought some heightening effect on female hypergamy in those nations. After all, the ‘hypergamy bar’ is necessarily raised when a country is a great colonial hub with huge international influence and prestige; since the female frame of reference reflexively broadens and deepens in response. In this view, the Anglo female's misandrist hostility is an insane extension of natural hypergamous instincts: almost no male or his offspring is good enough for a female raised in a global superpower. Here is one of my anonymous correspondents on the wider social ramifications of this tendency: 
Feminists in North America are now in the process of formally making sex equal rape, and the man has no defense. So I guess the fertility bearing rate of the Anglosphere is about to drop to 0.5. Oh, except for the Africans, Latino groups, native Americans and of course the Muslims, who ironically enough, actually will mass rape and then impose a real shari'a patriarchy on the stupid Anglobitches who no longer have the protection of the men or more rational women who've all left. North America is toast. Leave while you can (Appendix F, p.240). 
This exalted form of Anglo hypergamy is best called ‘hyper-hypergamy’, female sexual elitism and selectivity carried beyond all rational measure. This is not exclusively associated with the Anglo West's colonial values. Britain and America have lower social mobility rates than other industrial societies, together with wider wealth and power divisions. This must also exert a strong impact on female hypergamy, with a much larger proportion of males being dismissed as potential mates than in progressive, egalitarian societies. 
It must be said that modern romantic life in the Anglosphere has become a form of misandrist eugenics, where women arbitrarily select which males get to breed on the basis of hyper-hypergamous criteria. This even applies to sperm donation, where donors have to pass the most stringent criteria related to intelligence, education, height and health. In sum, fat, ugly Anglo women riddled with personality disorders get to sit in genetic judgement on the gender that created and maintain civilization. Of course, mass abortion is an even more active and deadly expression of eugenic hyper-hypergamy, predictably falling heaviest on the offspring of low status males (which is almost all males in the Anglosphere).

Jodie Foster: The Anglobitch Made Flesh

And there we have it: Watson's ludicrous 'self-partnering' is little more than a trite addendum to the Anglosphere's diabolical agenda of usury, misandry and death.

Friday, 8 November 2019

Making Societal Waves: Female Sexual Fascism is the Anglosphere's Watergate

Anglo-American culture typically strives to hide its own historic crimes (slavery, genocide, oppression) and internal problems (economic inequality, institutional racism and educational dysfunction). Usually, this process involves criticising other cultural blocs, as if the Anglosphere – with its prison-industrial complexdivorce industry and mass male alienation - were somehow perfect. However, mainstream Anglo-American culture also strives to suppress its internal critics. Ever noticed how 'mainstream' male spaces on the internet are heavily censored and policed in order to banish dissent? On the Ask Men website, sexless males are systematically banned by the moderators. Simply by existing, such men are challenging the Anglo-American perception of women as flawless, liberated, semi-divine beings.

However, the Manosphere goes much further: we consistently point out that Anglo-American women are sexually racist and elitist, actively confounding the Anglosphere’s core memes of female infallibility and sexual liberation. By creating societal ‘waves’ of this nature, we are proffering a direct challenge to the Anglosphere’s international image as a transcendent social entity – and such a challenge must be forcefully repressed. This is because exposing the reality of widespread Anglobitch racism or ‘sexual fascism’ not only shreds the key Anglosphere myths of moral supremacy, sexual liberation and female infallibility; it reveals the racist and puritanical roots of Anglo-American civilisation, including its left-liberalism. While Anglo tradcucks spuriously try to link Anglo-American feminism to Marxism, its intellectual DNA – like that of the Anglo left in general – really originates in imperialistic Victorian Christian Evangelism. This is why both Anglo-American feminism and liberalism retain such puritanical memes as sex-negativism, racism and woman-worship, none of which are present in classical Marxism (although neo-Marxists have appropriated them, of course).

With all these troubling memes being exposed and challenged by the Manosphere in general (and the incelosphere in particular), it is any surprise the pan-Anglosphere Deep State is knocking out our strongholds one by one? Such is the inevitable price for creating a cogent counter-narrative to Anglo-American propaganda.

Above all, exposing the reality of female sexual fascism is hugely problematic for the Anglosphere’s imperialist project. If the world at large became aware that white Anglo-American women saw non-white males as disgusting sub-humans unworthy of sex, it would halt the Anglosphere’s globalisation programme in its tracks. As Richard Scarecrow once said, Anglo women exploit sex in the same way hoarders exploit food during a famine; although they have food aplenty, they begrudge undesirable males the smallest sexual morsel. Yet gulled by the myth-peddling Anglo-American media, non-white males around the world honestly think ‘liberated’ Anglo women are clamouring to give them free sex; in reality, the Anglosphere’s mass inceldom falls heaviest on ethnic males.

But of course, exposing this cruel reality would simply create too many ‘waves’ in the global culture for the Anglo-American Deep State to countenance. Such disruptive 'waves' would not only harm its international image; they would also refute the carefully-cultivated Sexual False Consciousness which holds the Anglosphere together like a flimsy old boot lace. Let’s face it: if non-white males in the UK or North America realised Stacy, Sharon or Becky considered them to be sexual untouchables – subhuman pieces of dog shit – there would be spontaneous riots in the streets. Indeed, this ‘forbidden’ knowledge extends to low SMV white males, too. The average blue collar white chump lives in a world of self-deceit, pretending his inceldom is a ‘lifestyle choice’ or temporary ‘dry spell’; but if the scales of Sexual False Consciousness were removed from his eyes, he would immediately join the sexless non-whites at the barricades.

So what is our best course of action?

Simply to keep pumping out our message of truth in the teeth of all resistance. It is obvious that the Anglo-American Deep State and its feminist allies are on the run; and we must KEEP them running with all the might we can muster. These are great times, days of legend, and we are privileged to be living at such an hour. In the end, our relentless truth-saying will provoke our foes into a hysterical counter-stroke – thereby forcing a decisive confrontation between our light and their darkness.

Saturday, 26 October 2019

Knowledge without Nihilism: Introducing the Crimson Pill

Let us consider the various ‘pills’ that rule contemporary Manosphere thought:

The Blue Pill: The world of comforting illusion. In the MRA Manosphere, it has come to mean the fictional ‘mainstream’ narrative that women are all oppressed and all men advantaged, or that only men can be racist or elitist. In the Incelosphere or PUA community, it is synonymous with various romantic delusions: for example, that race, looks or height do not matter to women or that there is ‘someone’ for everybody. The various Blue Pill fictions are promoted to keep the broad masses cocooned in a comforting world of self-delusion, thereby making society function from day to day. Sexual False Consciousness – the absurd fantasy that ‘all’ men are having sex with models every night – is a perfect example of this.

The Red Pill: The world of (often bitter-tasting) reality. In the MRA Manosphere, it has come to mean the suppressed truth that law, healthcare, education and the media all favour women over men in contemporary society. In the Incelosphere  or PUA community, it has led men to pursue a variety of self-maximising strategies in order to trigger the innate (but socially repressed) female desire for psychopathic, socially dominant/indifferent or physically attractive males.

The Black Pill: The world of absolute truth in all its unending and inflexible horror. In the MRA Manosphere, it means rejecting activism for a MGTOW or renegade lifestyle on the fringes of society. In the Incelosphere or PUA communities, it has come to mean that factors like autism, looks, race or height are fixed and unchangeable, and that men who are ‘challenged’ in these areas are doomed to a life of involuntary celibacy. What defines the Black Pill is its immutability,  its nihilistic acceptance that many features of life cannot be changed despite one’s best efforts.

For me, it is obvious that there is truth in both the Black and Red Pills. While certain features of personal identity (looks, height, ethnicity) are fixed and predetermined, other features (economic status, location, culture) are open to manipulation. Therefore, serious and objective thought requires a new pill which integrates the wisdom of both the red and the black: a pill I will call the Crimson Pill.

The Crimson Pill: Accepting that many features of life cannot be changed but focusing solely on those that can, which are typically social or cultural in nature. Winston Wu of Happier Abroad represents the Crimson Piller at his most effective. He recognises the unchangeable features of his existence (shortness and East Asian heritage) but focuses on those he can change (principally, cultural location). As a result, he has been able to forge romantic bonds with several women outside the Anglosphere.

Obviously, the Anglobitch Thesis is in essence pure Crimson Pill: by rejecting or departing the Anglosphere, a man immediately solves the problem of entitled, misandrist, sex-negative, overweight Anglo-American women who use sex to manipulate and exploit men. That is, the Thesis focuses on a factor – namely, cultural location – which can be changed. It does not pretend that every male can looksmaxx to resemble the young Elvis Presley, or that midgets can become giants, or that autistic misfits will ever be the ‘life and soul of the party, or that hunchbacks will ever win female affection with ‘charisma’ or ‘personality’. Rather, it focuses on the one factor which any solvent man can change for the price of a plane ticket: namely, the culture he resides in

I am aware that many in the Manosphere view the Anglobitch Thesis are a ‘cope’, offering false hope to romantically disillusioned (or sexually disenfranchised) Anglo-American men. However, I have never been under the illusion that all women outside the Anglosphere are angels or that marriage is ever a totally risk-free proposition. Simply relocating to another culture will not guarantee romantic success, a happy, stable marriage or any other factor a man might desire for personal fulfilment. No society is perfect, or ever will be.

As the Manosphere has developed in depth and scope, embracing perspectives from a wide range of cultures, unexpected issues have emerged. Foremost of these is the issue of Canadian misandry. In the wake of his 1989 massacre, most observers considered Marc Lepine an anomaly rather than a true gender-warrior. However, as ever more Canadian males snapped and ‘went postal’ in violent revolt against the misandrist culture-war being waged against them, I began to realise that Canada is just as misandrist as the US, UK or Australia, if not more so.  Further, non-Anglosphere cultures with an active or residual puritan element have similar issues with institutional misandry and strained gender-relations. Obvious examples would be  Japan and some parts of the Islamic world

Despite these observations, the personal evidence of my many correspondents demonstrates that leaving the Anglosphere can definitely improve a man’s romantic chances in the absence of obvious physical deformities or extreme psychological disorders.  And when we turn to issues like divorce, the case for Anglo-specific misandry becomes even stronger. Various learned correspondents have demonstrated that the Anglosphere countries are defined  by several legal/cultural features which make it uniquely difficult for men to form healthy, safe or stable relationships.  I have defined these features as the Five Pillars of Anglosphere Dysfunction:

Class Distinction
Social Isolation
Common Law

The Five Pillars are comprehensively described in my most recent book, Hope on Distant Shores. However, the experience of a correspondent who has actually lived and successfully formed relationships outside the Anglosphere sets out the case in plain English:

And the different, more freewheeling attitudes of Europe towards sex and sexuality are truly a lot different, which probably steers the culture sharply away from Anglo-style feminism, even among the feminists there. Before my fiancée joined me in France—and I’ll admit it here, even after we got married—one of the places I loved to go was up In NE Germany. Tbh German, Polish, Czech, Swedish and Finnish girls are sexy as hell in general, something about that Baltic area, and these gorgeous ladies never have hang-ups about being sexy, attracting men, even being nude or out in thongs in public. When you talk to them, many will say they’re feminists, but their coziness and lack of frigidness around being sexual totally changes what feminism means to them. FWIW I see the same kind of thing down in South America when I’ve been there, particularly down in Brazil, which is the one country I would have chosen if I didn’t wind up in Europe. Crazily hot women, independent, often say they’re feminists but it all means something a world away from Anglo feminism. (In Brazil, when a girl says she’s feminist what she really means is she likes to be the one in control in bed). So from that observation I think you guys are right, the way that Anglo feminists have been conditioned to view sex itself as dirty and nasty, a hang-up from our Puritan tradition, may contribute a lot to the nastiness and misandry of US and Anglo feminism.

For the simple price of a plane ticket, any solvent Anglo-American male can simply wash his hands of repression, sex-negative feminism and shrill, overweight women. If that does not increase his romantic chances by several hundred percent, nothing will. By directing all his efforts on a fluid, Red Pill factor - namely, his cultural location - it becomes possible for a Black Pilled man to transform his life for the better.

That is the wonder of the Crimson Pill.

Friday, 11 October 2019

Ready for Battle? Why the Globalist Gynocrats have to shut us down - and how we can stop them

In my last post, I pointed out that the 2020's will be a crisis decade for men in the West. It is obvious that a Battle of Pills is approaching. The Blue Pilled establishment in the Anglo West desperately needs awakened men back on the gynocratic plantation or returned to the shackles of Sexual False Consciousness in order to achieve its global empire of sex-negativity, misandry and deviance; and it will do anything to achieve that goal.

Awakened men are starting to be seen as a serious social problem. The authorities in Canada, USA and UK are starting to direct their energies against our subaltern empire of blogs, websites and channels. The closure of the Braincells Reddit, Undead Chronic's Channel and Roissy's blog are three skirmishes in this struggle. Now, the tempo will accelerate: left-liberal 'academics' (feminist shills) already speak of concocting online 'counter-narratives' to neutralise and subvert our message. Obviously, our opponents hope to crush the Manosphere by obliterating all major strongholds of Red/Black Pill wisdom in an online Blitzkrieg that leaves us fatally weakened. In doing so, they also aim to eliminate the movement's intellectually dominant minority; that is, its conceptual vanguard or 'thought-leaders'. Of course, killing off a nation's leaders has been a highly effective military strategy since ancient times.

In The Book of Five Rings, Miyamoto Mushashi laid great stress on choosing favourable ground and conditions for battle. If we consider our own ground and situation, both are fairly favourable. Firstly, we are fighting in digital space rather than physical reality. Although this has certain disadvantages, the digital realm is ideal for a small, determined band of fighters to hold their own against more numerous opponents. Secondly, we hold the initiative; our message is already 'out there' on the Internet, with widespread acceptance among the West's small minority of awakened men. At best, our opponents are firefighting, like doctors trying to contain an aggressive cancer.

So how do we defend ourselves? The first thing that needs doing is securing our strongholds by backing up all the data contained there. My good friend Richard Scarecrow has already done this with all content on my Anglobitch website, which is now safe for all posterity.

The second and more important step is to prepare for a decisive counter-stroke against our opponents. Every Red/Black pilled renegade should have at least nine sock-puppet accounts on their favoured platform; consider these as redoubts to which you can fall back and clone your content if the authorities shut down your blog, channel or website.

The third step is to continue the struggle with renewed grit and determination. Unlike fallen icons like Roissy or Undead Chronic, replicate all your work on an alternative account or platform the instant the authorities close it down.  Not only will they be left utterly confounded, your message will reach an ever greater audience. The Internet is ideal for this, since digital information can be instantly cloned and reinstated. Additionally, infiltrating Blue Pilled misandrist strongholds such as Incel Tears and the tradcuck Daily Mail discussion boards with sock-puppet accounts will bog down the Blue Pill's hegemonic counter-offensive with feint, deception and subterfuge. Simply pointing the average clown to any Black/Red Pilled source containing the words 'scientific' and 'research' will wholly confound them, especially when disguised as a female, transsexual or baffled cuck. The British Army used this 'swamping' strategy against the IRA in Northern Ireland, infiltrating their ranks with informers until they were no longer able to function. The 'Chadfishing' operations undertaken by the incel community are a humorous variant of this approach, although direct infiltration is far more effective.

Thus armed, we are ready for battle.

Thursday, 3 October 2019

Hope on Distant Shores Available on Kindle

The Kindle version of 'Hope on Distant Shores: How Awakened Men can Escape the Anglosphere's Toxic Women, Sexual False Consciousness and Institutional Misandry' - the book I have been working on for the past five years - is now available.

On Saturday October 26, I will be running a one-day promotion in which the Kindle version of Hope on Distant Shores can be downloaded free. Of course, the beautiful deluxe paperback version is also available at baseline production cost.

It would also be good if satisfied customers already enriched by Hope on Distant Shores could leave some reviews on Amazon, so it can have a similar impact on the lives of others.

Hope on Distant Shores offers lifestyle guidance to the following groups:
  • Men tired of entitled, selfish Anglo-American women
  • Men who want a better, safer, more fulfilled life outside the Anglosphere
  • Men who do not want to ‘adjust’ to a culture which views them as third class citizens
  • Men who do not wish to squander their hard-earned dollars on derisive strippers or punitive divorce settlements
  • Men who want slim, warm, attractive women unsullied by sex-negative, misandrist Anglo-American feminism 
When I started this blog ten years ago, it was my intention to create waves and cast shadows across the Internet. I knew my key insight – that Anglo-American culture’s mistrust of male sexual freedom had created an especially misandrist, belligerent form of feminism – demanded global dissemination. Far from being ‘revolutionary’, as conservative Men’s Rights Activists believe, Anglo-American feminism springs right from the frigid heart of Anglo-American civilization. This explains the unstinting support feminism receives from the state in all Anglo-Saxon countries, and why all attempts to resist it have proved so utterly futile. There never was a ‘golden age’ of gender relations in the Anglosphere; the puritanical Anglo-Saxon cultural bloc has been pedestalizing women and vilifying men for centuries.

My first book ‘Havok’ (2009) focused on the condition of gender-relations in the contemporary Anglosphere. My conclusions – which have since taken root all over the English-speaking world, were that residual Puritanism has imbalanced gender-relations in favour of women, reducing Anglo-American males to disposable stooges, walking ATM machines and vilified deviants. Meanwhile the same secular Puritanism has, by sacralising sex as an elusive commodity, set Anglo-American women atop pedestals as exalted goddesses. Despite claiming to be a ‘revolutionary’ movement, Anglo-American feminism is in fact an extension – indeed, amplification of – existing values: Anglo feminism is sex-negative, misandrist and racist, just like Anglo-American society. In this view, conventional Men’s Right’s Activists who invoke ‘tradition’ against Anglo-Saxon feminism are completely deluded: for Anglo feminism springs straight from the Anglosphere’s repressive, puritan soul. Indeed, it will be noted that conservative MRAs have achieved precisely nothing in their 30-odd years of existence. Similarly, the PUA or Pick-up Artist community are merely playing a game they can never win. The puritanical reality of the Anglosphere renders their various ‘approach’ techniques moribund at best and potentially dangerous for men in the #metoo era.

Further, feminism now serves as a smoke screen to disguise the real problems afflicting Anglo-American civilization – namely, socio-economic inequality, corrupt governance and racist policing. Additionally, the Anglo-feminist narrative which presents white women as oppressed outsiders also serves to mask white women’s endemic racism and long-standing affiliation to the Anglo-American establishment. Not only is sex-negative Anglo feminism an exaggerated expression of Anglo-American values, it helps to insulate those values from positive reform.

The movement that emerged from my first book is best called pan-Anglosphere Dissidence: the systematic rejection of repressive Anglo-American values. This rejection is associated with a yearning for the relative sexual freedom waiting outside the Anglosphere. Pan-Anglosphere Dissidence is predictably strongest in the puritanical United States, with its entitled women, institutionalised misandry and fanatic aversion to prostitution. Building on those insights, Hope on Distant Shores offers lifestyle guidance to Anglo-American men who want slim, warm, attractive women unsullied by sex-negative, misandrist Anglo feminism.

Unlike HavokHope on Distant Shores contains only a few references from ‘canonical’ historians, economists or philosophers. Like Saint Paul or the Buddha, I am fashioning something completely new and a completely new conceptual vocabulary is necessary to contain it. Therefore, most references are taken from the extensive correspondence to my blog which began in early 2018. All the postings of these experienced and learned correspondents, some of them containing over twenty thousand words, are included in a remarkable series of appendices which will doubtless be cited and studied by awakened men for decades to come.

Tuesday, 1 October 2019

Incelerando! The impending Anglosphere Crisis: Will the '20s be the Incel Decade?

The Teens (2010-2019) were a decade of great political upheaval in the Anglosphere. Both the US and UK experienced shock election results and dramatic socio-economic upheaval, largely due to years of social dysfunction. Canada and Australia have both spent the past forty years denigrating and marginalising men with boundless misandrist zeal, creating a sizeable 'incel class' of jaundiced males in both countries.

By submitting to residual puritan narratives and declaring informal war on the male sex, the Anglosphere nations are playing a foolish and dangerous game. As the Twenties approach, I am ever more convinced that it will be a decade of unparalleled social instability for the Anglosphere. Any idiot can see that countries with large minorities (or even majorities) of sexless, alienated young men are heading for serious trouble. In particular, the United States and Canada can expect to see weekly mass shootings as incel males with nothing to lose run amok, selecting women - the sexual oppressor class - as their primary targets.

Below, I list some of the factors which will feed this conflagration:

  • Anglo-American misandry. Though many regions are facing an incel crisis, the problem is much worse in the Anglosphere because of its distinctive sex-negative puritanism and sexual racism, which also determine  the sex-negative agendas of Anglo-American feminism. In the Anglosphere there will be no amelioration of misandry or inceldom, just their unremitting expansion. 
  • Avoidance and apathy. The Anglosphere is reluctant to address sexual issues honestly and directly because of its puritan heritage. This means the incel crisis will have to reach critical levels before any action is taken. And by then, the problem will very hard to rectify without resorting to draconian measures.
  • Fraying trust values. Decades of feminism, misandrist policy and male oppression has made the Anglosphere a dry powder-keg ready to explode with sexual repression and resentment. Expect the Anglosphere countries to become ever more like Brazil or Mexico with social disorder, crumbling institutions and casual violence being normalised. 
  • The Flynn Effect. Rising IQs have made the masses far harder to fool with MSM propaganda. Only an absolute idiot still thinks Chinese guys studying STEM are bouncing around in bed with blonde models every night. Female hypergamy, entitlement and racism are now common knowledge to almost everyone with Internet access and two brain cells to rub together.
  • End of social circle. Once, tribal membership of a youth culture meant easy access to members of the opposite sex. With the stealthy replacement of post-War youth culture by hypergamous social media for younger Millennials and Zoomers, such social circle game no longer exists. This will mean ever more single, dangerous and aggrieved young men in the 2020s.
  • Informational threshold. The Internet permits instant sharing of knowledge and opinion, obviating the old model of top-down media indoctrination. In the 80s or 90s the MSM could happily praise Greta Thunberg as a saint without fear of contradiction. However, once social media appears and a certain threshold of informational complexity is passed, the game is up; it is no longer possible for the MSM to peddle its Blue-Pilled Disney fantasies. Perhaps widespread higher education and the Flynn Effect feed this outcome, also. Even the broad masses are beginning to reject Sexual False Consciousness for a more honest narrative. Generation Z will reach adulthood during the next decade, having been raised by an online counter-culture in which the Manosphere is a prominent force. In the 2020s,  expect undiluted Black Pill thought to become commonplace among people under 40. 

Doubtless my astute readers can add many more factors to this list. With these divisive elements already in place, the 2020s promise to be hot indeed. With the MSM in full retreat, Sexual False Consciousness is breaking down rapidly in the face of Black Pill truth and many males are realising their desperate situation. 

It does not take a genius to work out what will happen in the next decade; nonetheless, a genius has marked the way for us. In this immortal passage, Shakespeare's Richard III - a hunchbacked proto-incel - describes the damage sexual alienation can wreak on the male personality. Here, the deformed Richard surveys his limited options as a sexually disenfranchised male:

Grim-visaged war hath smooth'd his wrinkled front;
And now, instead of mounting barbed steeds
To fright the souls of fearful adversaries,
He capers nimbly in a lady's chamber
To the lascivious pleasing of a lute.
But I, that am not shaped for sportive tricks,
Nor made to court an amorous looking-glass;
I, that am rudely stamp'd, and want love's majesty
To strut before a wanton ambling nymph;
I, that am curtail'd of this fair proportion,
Cheated of feature by dissembling nature,
Deformed, unfinish'd, sent before my time
Into this breathing world, scarce half made up,
And that so lamely and unfashionable
That dogs bark at me as I halt by them;
Why, I, in this weak piping time of peace,
Have no delight to pass away the time,
Unless to spy my shadow in the sun
And descant on mine own deformity:
And therefore, since I cannot prove a lover,
To entertain these fair well-spoken days,
I am determined to prove a villain
And hate the idle pleasures of these days.

In simpler terms, let the dark times roll...

Tuesday, 24 September 2019

Letter to America: Stop hating men and the shootings will stop


In the wake of recent shooting sprees by angry young American males at Dayton and El Paso, Boomer politicians and the lamestream media are scratching their heads and looking for explanations. To me, the answer is obvious. Like Hannibal, it is my gift to see through the fog of battle to the decisive heart of a given situation and immediately formulate a solution.

The cause of these dreadful events is obvious, and my own thesis explains it: Institutional Misandry. Because of its distinctive puritan heritage, Anglo-American culture reflexively hates men as active sexual beings . This problem is worse in the US not because of 'guns' or mental illness but because it is the most puritanical nation in the Anglosphere, indeed the west. Mass shootings and other forms of male alienation are simply a natural (indeed, legitimate) response to this misandry - an gender war being waged against all men across the Anglosphere, every minute of every day. This blog and my other writings are canaries in the coalmine; had they been heeded, far fewer people would be dead today.

Mass shooter Connor Betts

While American males are jobless, committing suicide, criminalised and being tortured with the lash of sexual disenfranchisement, the cucked authorities expect them to 'man up' to defend a culture which hates them. Meanwhile, women are pandered to in every sphere of American life while not even having to register for the draft. The Anglo-American 'mainstream' doesn't see the problem because they ARE the problem. As middle-class Boomers, they live in a bubble of ignorance about the true state of post-Internet America. At best, they blame the online incel and alt-right communities for mass shootings while failing to acknowledge the naked misandry of American culture or the legitimate sense of grievance this misandry fosters in young American men.

Misandry is now an issue to everyone living in the real world

My message to America? If you want to stop these terrible mass shootings, stop hating men and introduce genuine equality. A good start would be forcing all women to register for the draft. This measure is long overdue and would instantly restore a measure of goodwill to American gender relations. How women can be judges and politicians without have to register is one of the burning scandals of modern American life.

The blunt fact is, unless this scandal of institutional misandry is forcibly reversed, young American men will kill you in ever greater numbers. And they are right to do so; their grievances are entirely legitimate. Since a third of young American men are now incels, they have very little to lose from a genetic or sexual standpoint. Moreover, they have access to military-grade weaponry and are pre-trained in violence by interactive video games.

Quite how the people who run America cannot see the dangers inherent in this volatile situation leaves me baffled. And why they refuse to adopt the solution leaves me even more baffled. Instead of scratching their heads and telling oppressed, sexually-disenfranchised young males to 'man up', join the Army or go to church, these people need to 'man up' themselves and admit their warped misandrist culture is stoking the fires of its own destruction.

Had they listened to me a decade ago, none of this would have come to pass.

Hate men, then wonder why they fight back...

Friday, 30 August 2019

Incelerationism: A New Cultural Strategy

It is entirely plain than Men's Rights Activism has failed men across the Anglosphere. Despite the efforts of Angry Harry, A Voice for Men and all the rest, nothing has improved for men in any Anglosphere country. Women still get all the educational funding, don't have to register for the Draft, literally get away with murder and child abuse with a slap on the wrist, are favoured by unjust quotas, and so on. Only male Transsexuals seem to have made any real advances, largely due to appropriating the hyper-privileged female role in Anglo-American society. Perhaps the time has come to move away from simplistic activism (which has obviously failed) towards a more subtle and underhand style of cultural subversion.

One of the more potent and interesting models of such subversion is Accelerationism.

In its political form, Accelerationism involves striving to worsen existing conditions so western societies become failed states and social rebellion becomes inevitable. It is neither left wing or right wing, more a neutral strategy that can be deployed by any political or cultural movement. For a left-wing Accelerationist, voting Republican or Conservative is preferable to voting Democrat or Labour since right-wing political parties are more likely to shift conditions towards a revolutionary situation than left-wing parties. Similarly, rightists should vote for pro-immigration, left-wing political parties since their policies are more likely to trigger a 'conservative revolution' against mass immigration. The Traditionalist scholar Julius Evola advocated this very approach for 'revolutionary conservatives' as early as the 1950s.

'Let us hasten the end'

Accelerationism can be applied in cultural and military struggles, not just electoral politics. In these areas, the strategy works best by inverting an opponent's strengths. At the Battle of Cannae, Hannibal cleverly exploited the Romans' vast numerical strength and overconfidence to destroy their huge citizen army. By provoking the United States to assert its imperialist agenda in the Middle East, ISIS greatly weakened America's internationalist resolve. In boxing, Muhammad Ali's Accelerationist 'Rope-a-Dope' trick turned George Foreman's youth, confidence and strength against him in Zaire. Similarly, Stalin cleverly manufactured a famine to discredit Russia's Kulaks before exterminating them.

The Manosphere version of Accelerationism might best be called 'Incelerationism'. Instead of futile protest, the Incelerationist should welcome sexless males, male alienation and failure because these things bring the end of the misandrist Anglosphere ever closer. Instead of trying to reverse misandry in the Anglosphere, Incelerationists seek to advance it at every turn.

Incelerationism: Is inaction the best action?

But how might these Incelerationist goals might best be achieved? Simply promoting feminism is a problematic strategy, since the Anglosphere authorities might use this to further ostracise dissident men. Similarly, the MGTOW policy of indifference and disengagement also invites self-destruction in an overtly misandrist civilisation. The Transsexual approach - co-opting female status and its manifold advantages - has proved highly effective to its practitioners, although it leaves the average male's ostracised condition largely untouched. Besides, most males simply do not want to live as 'honorary' females (nor should they).

The issues are extremely complex and probably insoluble. As always, leaving the Anglosphere and its reflexive misandry probably remains the prime option for an awakened man. By rejecting Sexual False Consciousness and shunning the futile charade of MRA activism, he lends his weight to the chaos without courting his own destruction.

Friday, 2 August 2019

The Great Adultwork Eye-Opener: Is 'The Wall' just another expression of Sexual False Consciousness?

The Wall: Does it really exist exist in the Anglosphere?

One of the main Manosphere debating points is SMV (Sexual Market Value): in particular, the respective SMVs of men and women in relation to ageing. Broadly speaking, MGTOWs and PUAs maintain that male SMV peaks somewhat later and that this gives men a certain advantage over 'post-Wall' women in adult life. Meanwhile, Incels and TFLers maintain that the Wall is a myth created to palliate the Anglosphere's growing army of sexless men. 

The chart below is widely used to support the MGTOW/PUA/MRA perspective, although it is often cited by both sides of the debate:

An obvious problem with this chart is that Female and male SMVs are clearly not equivalent, even at their respective peaks. Using the same measurement scale, male SMV is at best a 4 relative to the female's 10 because male and female SMV have nothing like the same value. There are very few male escorts catering to women (if any), while thousands of women sell sex to males every day. Moreover, virtually all young women enjoy the benefits of high SMV compared to a tiny minority of males. These objections aside, it does seem fairly obvious that a middle aged woman is far less attractive to men than a 20 year old.

Doesn't it?

When confronted with theoretical disputes like this, my own approach is to seek out evidence. In the case of the Wall, this is not too difficult. The Adultwork prostitution site - the UK's most popular - lists the profiles of 20 000 British escorts and these can be easily searched in terms of age, location and so forth. The results were extremely interesting.

My Adultwork search showed 500 women over 55 successfully selling sex to men in the UK. A further search showed 42 profiles of women over 65 successfully selling sex. By contrast, the few males 'selling' sex at that (or any) age were clearly catering to sexual deviants or simply paying for the services of female escorts (obviously major Sexual False Consciousness at play here). By contrast, almost all the post-55 female escorts were successfully selling sex to a wide range of male 'punters', with feedback to prove it.

Naughty Cougar was still notching up reviews at 70, although she also combined chat and webcamming with her escorting service. Scottish Kat was doing even better. She had 870 reviews (many very recent) and only offered sex to her clients. She is 55, an age with almost zero SMV according to exponents of 'Wall Theory'. At 60, Monica had 181 reviews, all recent sexual encounters. Her profile makes a point of saying she sees no one under 25, although all males over that age are welcome. All these 'ladies' were charging 200 USD (or more) for half an hours' 'work'. So much for The Wall...

Scottish Kat: 870 reviews at the ripe old age of 55 

At 60, Monica does not see males under 25; is the demand too great?

At 70, Naughty Cougar has no problem selling sex to thirsty males.

With all this remunerative exploitation of male sexuality by elderly women, how can MGTOWs and PUAs seriously maintain that women hit some 'Wall' at age 35?  Yes, online sex workers are not representative of all women but these ageing British escorts still make a laughing stock of the whole MGTOW/PUA agenda. There is clearly no Wall when women over 55 can make a full time living selling sex to men, many far younger than themselves, for a handsome profit

Although I must apologise for the sordid nature of this post, even I was staggered at these results. Is the Anglosphere's problem of sexual repression far, far worse than even I envisaged? I am starting to wonder if a large majority of young Anglo-American males get any free sex at all. But if not, why are so many young men buying sex from women old enough to be their grandmothers? If elderly British women have a higher SMV than men in their prime, how much greater is the SMV of females in their teens and twenties? To quote my Millennial friends: Like, what the fuck....

In reality, the 'Rational Male's' SMV chart should look like the one below:

Clearly, discrete male SMV never surpasses female SMV in the UK. Even when female SMV begins to decline at 23, it remains infinitely more powerful than its male counterpart. Indeed, it remains at least twice as high when women reach old age. What conclusions can we draw from this?

First, it is obvious that the distinctive sexual repression of Anglo-American culture artificially raises female SMV to abnormal levels; which is why Anglo-American feminists remain such vociferous opponents of prostitution and all other manifestations of heterosexual freedom. In addition, the Anglosphere's distinctive hyper-hypergamy and institutionalised misandry mean men have almost no sexual value at all in the UK (and by extension, the Anglosphere). In the light of the foregoing discussion, it seems obvious that the best option for Anglo-American men is simply to depart the Anglosphere and seek relationships abroad

Because distant shores are always waiting...

Is this movement completely deluded?