Saturday, 18 May 2019

The Case of Stephen Curry: Rampant Hyper-Hypergamy in Action

In America, even ugly old boots think they're 'it'

Sometimes we have to get back to first principles.

For me, the first principle of my thought is that Anglo-American culture is essentially puritanical and inherently misandrist, since puritanism reflexively loathes male sexuality. Because of this, Anglo-American feminism has a potent misandrist element which is fairly unique, although it is rapidly spreading via cultural contamination. Anglo feminism is also predictably sex-negative, since sex-negativity raises the scarcity-value of sex. Not only is Anglo feminism antagonistic to prostitution and sex tourism,  the fact that 28% of American men had no sex in 2018 demonstrates that a female 'sex strike' is already in full swing across North America.

Further, Anglo-American feminism receives unstinting support from the cultural establishment, since it shares most of the same goals and values. At a personal level, the mass sexual scarcity reflexively associated with puritanism imbues Anglo-American women with an extreme form of hypergamy which I call 'hyper-hypergamy': an inflated and 'hyperreal' form of hypergamy which no real-world male can ever satisfy. Of course, this is why so many Anglo women 'hold out' for imaginary Sir Galahad figures into late middle-age and fail to reproduce.

In short, Anglo-American women don't like men, alpha or otherwise. Essentially misandrist and homosocial, they view men - all men, however high value - as disposable resources to be dropped as whim or the situation dictates. In the video below, VVS describes a famous basketball player who - despite good looks, height, fame and millions of dollars in the bank - is being derided by his substandard foid for not giving her enough 'attention':



There it is: if Stephen Curry can't satisfy his ageing foid, what chance have ordinary males got? While such Alpha males can attract women in the first place, the hyper-hypergamous Anglobitch hind-brain is never truly satisfied with any man, however high-value; when his lustre fades, the Anglo-American Divorce Courts are ready and waiting. And in the modern Anglosphere, many solvent and personable middle class men are single or even incel, in any case. Which reinforces my main point: at heart, the modern Anglobitch does not want an alpha, high value male: she wants a fantasy figure from Game of Thrones or Tennyson's Morte D'Arthur, someone who doesn't exist. Given this insane gynocentric reality, no wonder all reasonable men are deserting the Anglosphere for love and sex on distant shores.




The Chateau has Fallen

Sad to hear that Chateau Heartiste's famous blog has been shut down by Wordpress. His first mistake was thinking that Anglocunts want short, bald, ugly men with flashy hats instead of hyper-hypergamous fantasy figures or handsome criminals. The whole PUA agenda began to ring false about eight years ago, when even Roissy's fan base began to admit PUA techniques were completely ineffective. MeToo, Timesup and other misandrist agendas were the last nails in its coffin, together with the emergence of Tinder and other dating apps which elevate physical appearance and gift women boundless male attention for free. From that time on, PUA began to be replaced by the Black Pill and my own theories at the cutting edge of Manosphere thought. The old order changeth, and all that.

Roissy's second mistake was turning his anodyne PUA blog into an Alt-Right, white power nexus in the midst of a fierce culture-war for America's future. I personally thought this phase of his operation was infinitely more interesting than his PUA work; it was certainly far more honest and revolutionary. But did he really think the Anglo-American authorities would stand for such revolutionary honesty? The obvious fact is that ((they)) are losing control of the narrative and want North American men back on the plantation. This is why ((they)) are pushing tradcucks like Jordan Peterson to the fore, fools who tell men to 'man up' and become disposable post-divorce cash cows for Anglobitch convenience. Unfortunately for these simps and shills, a whole generation of young men raised on Manosphere wisdom are wise to their nonsense. The horse has bolted: male dissidence is taking off like gangbusters in the US and soon the whole Anglosphere will follow suit. 

So even though his blog is gone, Roissy can take some pride in girding a whole generation of young men with a certain level of insight which will serve them well in the years to come.




Friday, 26 April 2019

The Anglo-American Manosphere: The First Trans-Generational Conversation Between Men Since Prehistory



Studying the contemporary Manosphere, one cannot help noticing that a lot of young men's ideas about women are mature beyond all expectations. When I was young, adult men never spoke to younger men in a serious way. Older men had nothing meaningful to say, it seemed. The mainstream media filled that communication vacuum with its 'Yeah, Yeah, Yeah'  fairy tales about women being perfect angels offering free sex to everybody: little wonder our formative years were so bruising and difficult, continually struggling with these deluded fantasies.

The cucked horseshit we were raised with

Yes, we went round thinking that our young adult lives would be a dizzy reel of ecstatic trysts and love affairs with giving, nubile goddesses: in short, a living James Bond movie. There were a few 'men's rights' publications like Male View in the UK (for which I wrote a few things), though these were hopelessly calling for Tradcuck counter-revolution and the restoration of pre-Boomer gender-relations. In sum, there simply was no elaborate Red Pill toolkit to discuss gender-relations back in the 70's, 80's or 90's; no conceptual shorthand, if you will. Concepts like The Wall, SMV, the Sexual Marketplace, AWALT, Gynocentrism, the various Pills, MGTOW and the rest had simply not been framed. Even I - yes, I - believed that all women were more or less the same in different countries and cultures; that Anglo-American civilisation was not tainted by residual puritanism; and that everyone over 16 was bouncing around in bed with models and film stars. When life did not match these lofty expectations, we thought it was just 'us'; that everyone else was having a great time, an elaborate fiction sustained by the still-potent mainstream media.

Awakened younger men might laugh: but that is simply what mainstream society told us. And at the time, the mainstream media was our only source of information beyond personal experience. Other than celebrities with wildly unrepresentative lifestyles (extensions of the mainstream media, in other words), older men did not really contribute their experience to our lives. They seemed to be from a different and largely irrelevant world of organised religion and unrewarding hyper-conformity; and consequently shunned and ignored. Fathers could not talk meaningfully to their sons about any serious issue; at best, they offered lame-ass advice that meant something when gender-relations (and society in general) were completely different.


When it happened, the all-conquering Internet immediately obliterated this dysfunctional model. For the first time in centuries - in fact, the first time since prehistory or remote antiquity - older men could communicate directly with younger men, sharing their experience in a clear and unobstructed way. With some caveats, the current state of the Manosphere is a direct reflection - indeed, expression - of this 'communication revolution' across generations. In the Manosphere, the physical boundaries that divide different generations of men no longer exist. Like ancient Macedonia, where anyone could speak man to man with his chief and any chief with his king, the Internet is a true democracy. Doubtless the anonymity of the internet helps in this regard. When young men can't see a doddering old sucker, they can listen to his words without prejudice; when older men can't see some shabby NEET, they are far more likely to talk honestly with him.

And the Manosphere is the direct product of this unprecedented engagement. Out there on YouTube, there are a whole bunch of excellent commentators - VVS, Undead Chronic, The MGTOW Monk or Sandman - and all are young men. For though they face the most misandrist culture in history, no mainstream media exists to gull them into cuckdom: in particular, no coherent youth culture exists. And this curious collision of circumstances has produced men who are infinitely more enlightened than I ever was at their age; and I am now an acknowledged leader of Manosphere thought. In youth, I did not even consider concepts like the Wall, hypergamy, SMV, the Sexual marketplace, misandry, hybristophilia, looks-maxxing, gym-maxxing, sex-negative feminism or all the other issues awakened men now take for granted. Yet these young commentators are mostly 18 to 25 (or younger) and they are fully conversant with all these ideas! Yes, they build their arguments on concepts created and developed by dissident anti-feminists from older generations and modulate them to meet their own needs; but the fact is, these young fellows more or less KNOW what is going on. And they know because they grew up with an exciting, empowering online conversation about the reality of gender relations in the Anglosphere buzzing in their ears; a conversation provided by us. We, by contrast, grew up hearing rock stars, parents and academics telling us that all women are flawless, wonderful angels handing out free sex to everyone. And we only learned Red Pill truth the hard way: through long, hard, bitter experience.

Power to these young fellows; they are surely cutting a lot of crap out of their lives by seeing women for what they really are. Indeed, many older TFLers/MRAs/MGTOWs surely envy their youthful knowledge and insight. Sometimes, though, I worry that these young men have been robbed of their youthful idealism by the Manosphere; they talk and think like divorced guys in their forties and fifties, not youths in their teens and early twenties; and that is hardly natural. But then I watch a MGTOW video about evil Anglobitch feminists like the one below, and know my time building the Manosphere was time well spent:



Sunday, 14 April 2019

The Dog Pill: Ultimate Expression of Anglo-American Sexual Misandry?


Recent research revealing that 28% of American men under 30 have not had sex in a year has shaken America to its foundations. While this statistic is shocking enough, it only scratches the surface of male sexual disenfranchisement. How frequently were other American men having sex and with whom? If - as one strongly suspects - other males were only having sex a couple of times a year, or paying for sex, or engaging in deviant sex of one kind or another, the true proportion of sexually disenfranchised males would be far, far higher than 28% (which is quite high enough).

But those familiar with the Anglobitch Thesis will not be at all surprised by those figures. Residual Anglo-American puritanism (#metoo, #timesup, prohibition of prostitution, institutional and legal misandry) has long been masked under widespread sexual false consciousness (the media-induced delusion that America is sexually liberated at a mass level). However, the rise of the Internet has exposed this lie as never before, revealing the Anglosphere for the repressive and misandrist dump it truly is.

Even the most famous Anglo-American PUA writers - Roosh and Roissy - have come to accept that 'the juice is no longer worth the squeeze' in relation to PUA; that the meagre returns are no longer worth the effort, in other words. This is why these writers have shifted their efforts to promoting alt-right politics, in recent years. So with PUA defunct and male Incel rates soaring across North America - together with the triumph of #metoo and transsexualism - the Anglo-American male's sexual star has never sunk lower.

And the Dog Pill represents the ultimate, hideous expression of the Anglosphere's anti-male animus: the notion that men are less valuable than animals in the sexual hierarchy. Broadly speaking, the Dog Pill is the startling revelation that many (principally white, American) women prefer to have sex with dogs rather than human males:
“When women openly value pets over men, it makes sense why so many of them engage in bestiality.” This is a common rejoinder in conversations about dogpilling, with this particular one coming from the Reddit forum dedicated to Men Going Their Own Way, r/MGTOW.
“Why bother masturbating when you have a loyal sex slave that'll lick your pussy on demand as long as you have peanut butter and can't knock you up when they dick you? It'll probably be openly celebrated soon as the female ‘counterpart’ to MGTOW.” 
Other posts argue that the dogpilling supports the foundations of incel theory – that women won’t have sex with “nice guys” (not really - it shows women don't want sex with human guys in general - RK). One post on r/MGTOW from February tells a story of a friend, Sam, who is classed as a “solid dude”, who walks in on his girlfriend with her “Great Dane tied to her with a big puddle of cum and a jar of peanut butter next to them”.

“Ever since Sam told me about that shit while he was drunk, it totally changed my perspective of women who interact with dogs,” the user wrote. 
On this same post, many people joined in to say they had heard similar stories. “I knew a girl in high school that did this shit… I think a lot of these girls now a days are fucking their dogs,” one user replied. “When man and male dog become interchangeable, society is fucked,” replied another.
SOURCE: New Statesman, 2019

As usual, the mainstream media tries to downplay the extent of the problem. And as usual, the mainstream Anglo media is trapped in its 'all women are perfect' narrative. Yet a cursory glance at the uncensored British 'local' press (which is relatively free of overt political agendas) suggests a widespread Dogpill problem, replete with parties and a whole 'Dogpill culture' embracing many willing female participants and male voyeurs:
Woman who had sex with THREE dogs claimed she didn't know it was wrong: Carol Bowditch was filmed having sex with three different breeds of dog

A pensioner who had sex with three different breeds of dogs claimed she did not realise it was illegal. Carol Bowditch, 64, was filmed having sex with a St Bernard, a black Labrador and an Alsatian. Her activities were exposed as a result of an RAF Police investigation which centred on a man identified as organising a bizarre sex party at which owners watched their dogs having sex with women. Details of the event were later posted on an internet forum specialising in bestiality. Ultimately the investigation led police to visit Bowditch and when her home was searched officers found a dvd and a usb stick which both contained film of her with dogs. Victoria Rose, prosecuting , told Lincoln Crown Court "When the dvd was analysed it was found to contain extreme images. Those images portrayed persons committing penetrative sexual acts with dogs.

Also included were images of this defendant herself carrying out sexual activity. Included was an eight minute and 59 seconds video of Mrs Bowditch engaging in vaginal and oral sex with a St Bernard dog named Oscar. When the defendant was interviewed she admitted she had penetrative sex with dogs. She accepted it had taken place over several years. She was unaware it was illegal. She identified the dogs. She said she had penetrative vaginal sex once with a Labrador and twice with an Alsatian. She recalled she had vaginal and oral sex with a St Bernard."
Carol Bowditch: Dogpilling Anglohag

Miss Rose said that at least eight photographs were found of Bowditch having sex with dogs and 30 moving images. Bowditch, 64, of Evedon, near Sleaford, admitted a charge of having sexual intercourse with an animal between 13 November 2011 and 25 November 2014. She also admitted possession of 37 extreme pornographic images on 21 March 2016. Daniel Galloway, 65, of the same address, admitted aiding and abetting Bowditch to have intercourse with an animal. He also admitted charges of making indecent images of children, possession of a prohibited image of a child, distributing 1,861 indecent images of children and possession of extreme pornography. His sentence was adjourned to a later date.

James Gray, in mitigation, said "She is 64 and has no previous convictions. Both she and Mr Galloway have suffered considerable public humiliation (my heart bleeds - RK). They have been ostracised by their friends and family. They have suffered that added element of punishment which in less salacious cases would not be present."

Bowditch was given a community order with 12 months supervision and a 16 week night-time curfew (i.e. no punishment at all - RK). The maximum she could have faced for having sex with a dog was a two year jail sentence. Judge Michael Heath, passing sentence, told Bowditch "What you engaged in was first of all unlawful and secondly disgusting. I am told that you have received public humiliation as a result of the publicity that this case has attracted. That does not surprise me."

Source: Lincolnshire Live, 2017
So there we have it. While Anglo-American women have near total sexual freedom to abuse brute creation, men across the Anglosphere are gelded by #metoo, #timesup and a host of other memes and laws designed to curtail their sexual freedoms. But why should we expect any different? When a culture allows women to do anything, anything will inevitably happen. This is especially true in a culture with reflexive puritanical tendencies to pedestalize women (no matter how base) and vilify men (no matter how noble), such as that of the ailing Anglosphere.

Moreover, is not this burgeoning Anglobitch preference for dogs merely the supreme statement of their demented and all pervasive misandry? As a young American fellow once said to me in the earliest days of the Manosphere: 'These (American) bitches now think they're too good for guys - ANY guys'.

How right he was.



Friday, 12 April 2019

Hope on Distant Shores Available on Kindle




The Kindle version of 'Hope on Distant Shores: How Awakened Men can Escape the Anglosphere's Toxic Women, Sexual False Consciousness and Institutional Misandry' - the book I have been working on for the past five years - is now available.

On Saturday 13th of April, I will be running a one-day promotion in which Hope on Distant Shores can be downloaded for free.

Hope on Distant Shores offers lifestyle guidance to the following groups:
  • Men tired of entitled, selfish Anglo-American women
  • Men who want a better, safer, more fulfilled life outside the Anglosphere
  • Men who do not want to ‘adjust’ to a culture which views them as third class citizens
  • Men who do not wish to squander their hard-earned dollars on derisive strippers or punitive divorce settlements
  • Men who want slim, warm, attractive women unsullied by sex-negative, misandrist Anglo-American feminism 
When I started this blog ten years ago, it was my intention to create waves and cast shadows across the Internet. I knew my key insight – that Anglo-American culture’s mistrust of male sexual freedom had created an especially misandrist, belligerent form of feminism – demanded global dissemination. Far from being ‘revolutionary’, as conservative Men’s Rights Activists believe, Anglo-American feminism springs right from the frigid heart of Anglo-American civilization. This explains the unstinting support feminism receives from the state in all Anglo-Saxon countries, and why all attempts to resist it have proved so utterly futile. There never was a ‘golden age’ of gender relations in the Anglosphere; the puritanical Anglo-Saxon cultural bloc has been pedestalizing women and vilifying men for centuries.

My first book ‘Havok’ (2009) focused on the condition of gender-relations in the contemporary Anglosphere. My conclusions – which have since taken root all over the English-speaking world, were that residual Puritanism has imbalanced gender-relations in favour of women, reducing Anglo-American males to disposable stooges, walking ATM machines and vilified deviants. Meanwhile the same secular Puritanism has, by sacralising sex as an elusive commodity, set Anglo-American women atop pedestals as exalted goddesses. Despite claiming to be a ‘revolutionary’ movement, Anglo-American feminism is in fact an extension – indeed, amplification of – existing values: Anglo feminism is sex-negative, misandrist and racist, just like Anglo-American society. In this view, conventional Men’s Right’s Activists who invoke ‘tradition’ against Anglo-Saxon feminism are completely deluded: for Anglo feminism springs straight from the Anglosphere’s repressive, puritan soul. Indeed, it will be noted that conservative MRAs have achieved precisely nothing in their 30-odd years of existence. Similarly, the PUA or Pick-up Artist community are merely playing a game they can never win. The puritanical reality of the Anglosphere renders their various ‘approach’ techniques moribund at best and potentially dangerous for men in the #metoo era.

Further, feminism now serves as a smoke screen to disguise the real problems afflicting Anglo-American civilization – namely, socio-economic inequality, corrupt governance and racist policing. Additionally, the Anglo-feminist narrative which presents white women as oppressed outsiders also serves to mask white women’s endemic racism and long-standing affiliation to the Anglo-American establishment. Not only is sex-negative Anglo feminism an exaggerated expression of Anglo-American values, it helps to insulate those values from positive reform.

The movement that emerged from my first book is best called pan-Anglosphere Dissidence: the systematic rejection of repressive Anglo-American values. This rejection is associated with a yearning for the relative sexual freedom waiting outside the Anglosphere. Pan-Anglosphere Dissidence is predictably strongest in the puritanical United States, with its entitled women, institutionalised misandry and fanatic aversion to prostitution. Building on those insights, Hope on Distant Shores offers lifestyle guidance to Anglo-American men who want slim, warm, attractive women unsullied by sex-negative, misandrist Anglo feminism.

Unlike HavokHope on Distant Shores contains only a few references from ‘canonical’ historians, economists or philosophers. Like Saint Paul or the Buddha, I am fashioning something completely new and a completely new conceptual vocabulary is necessary to contain it. Therefore, most references are taken from the extensive correspondence to my blog which began in early 2018. All the postings of these experienced and learned correspondents, some of them containing over twenty thousand words, are included in a remarkable series of appendices which will doubtless be cited and studied by awakened men for decades to come.


Monday, 8 April 2019

Women and Sexual False Consciousness Podcast by Male Defender


Sexual False Consciousness Made Flesh

I published an article called 'The Riddle of Female Sexual False Consciousness' on Relampagio Furioso's New Modern Man site in 2017 and 'Male Defender' has done a good podcast of it entitled Herd Instinct and Sexuality. It makes a good addition to my canonical work on Sexual False Consciousness. Male Defender has a great reading voice and makes some witty comments on the article:


Male Defender's article can be read here:

http://www.maledefender.com/women-sexual-consciousness-podcast/

The rest of his site is pretty good, with lots of good links and resources:

http://www.maledefender.com/


Saturday, 6 April 2019

Shadows, Fake-up and Subterfuge: Is the Transsexual Movement a Brilliant Subversion Tactic?


Everywhere one looks, the trans movement is marching on apace across the Anglosphere. Trans rights, trans marches, trans lobbies, trans philosophy, trans everything...

Although the transsexual movement is a defensive response to pan-Anglosphere misandry and heterophobia, it has proved incredibly effective at highlighting the intellectual absurdities and hypocrisy of modern Anglo-feminism. Since feminists think gender is a 'social construct' and completely unrelated to hormones, chromosomes and other organic differences between men and women, they necessarily have to accept the transsexual agenda. However, in doing so they merely highlight the absurdity of their own position: since the practical application of their crazy ideas means hulking rapists undergoing 'transition' now have the right to use female washrooms and changing rooms, merely because they decided they were 'female'  or 'non-binary' during their last jail stint. However, when feminists protest against this insanity they automatically contradict their own anti-essentialist agenda. A brilliant ruse! Either they defend their own ridiculous viewpoint and admit rapists into washrooms, or they invoke reality and transform into oppressive, essentialist gender-fascists of the type despised by the liberal establishment: a pincer movement worthy of Napoleon.

Why Are Some Feminists In The UK Freaking Out About Trans Rights?
The protesters who hijacked and led the London Pride parade over the weekend represent a worrying trend of anti-trans feminism in the UK
While anti-trans sentiment from within the lesbian and feminist communities has continued to be a problem in the United States — anti-trans protesters recently crashed Baltimore Pride — it’s reached particular heights in the United Kingdom. Anti-trans sentiment among feminists here in the UK has long been a problem, inflamed by the popularity of affluent white columnists like Julie Bindel and academics such as Germaine Greer, and taken to dizzying extremes by users of popular online parenting forum Mumsnet. While second-wave feminism has largely lost its luster in the United States, prominent second-wave academics like Greer maintain a strong hold over feminist thought and politics here in the UK. Plus, it seems that all sides of UK media are intent on taking a swipe at trans lives — with even progressive publications like the Guardian giving platform to anti-trans fearmongering. And this isn’t the first time anti-trans bigots have derailed a pride celebration in London, either — they previously attacked London’s Dyke March in 2014 for including a transgender speaker. 
With the GRA consultation set to continue into the fall, the anti-trans protesters holding up Pride in London are surely only the beginning of a new wave of hostility sweeping across the nation toward vulnerable trans communities. In such a heated climate, one would assume that LGBT organizations like Pride in London would take a firm and unequivocal stance in solidarity with the trans community.
Morgan M Page, Buzzfeed, 18th July 2018

The success of transgender athletes renders the feminist perspective even more ridiculous. Again, trans athletes place Anglo feminism into an impossible position: either it acknowledges that gender is not a social or psychological construct, or trans athletes win all the medals. However, such acknowledgement immediately taints feminists as 'gender-fascists':

Trans athletes make great gains, yet resentment still flares: “As soon as they start winning, that’s when the vitriol comes out about how they’re really still a man."
Overall, supporters of increased trans inclusion are heartened by the pace of progress for trans athletes. A growing number of state high school athletic associations in the U.S. enable them to play on teams based on their gender identity, and the NCAA has trans-inclusive guidelines for all its member schools. 
The International Olympic Committee has allowed trans athletes to compete in its affiliated sports since 2003, but until 2016 it required them to first undergo sex-reassignment surgery. Under the new rules, which resemble the NCAA’s guidelines, transgender male athletes can enter men’s competitions without restrictions, while transgender female athletes need to demonstrate that their testosterone level has been below a certain point for at least a year before their first competition.
Associated Press, February 2019 

While we might laugh, this strategic infiltration demonstrates the absurdity and hypocrisy of Anglo-American feminism far more effectively than a million words by Warren Farrell, Angry Harry or the 'old school' Men's Rights crew. The puritanical hostility with which the Anglosphere views men means that MRA arguments are reflexively ignored, however rational or well-evidenced. However, by imitating women these trans males have effectively bypassed institutional misandry and entered the innermost sanctum of Anglo culture, where their views necessarily have to be acknowledged. It is a brilliant Trojan Horse strategy akin to the British Army's infiltration of the Irish Republican Army in Northern Ireland. Despite their skill and motivation, the IRA was eventually unable to function due to the huge numbers of British Army informers infiltrating their ranks.

Unwittingly, the trans movement has opened giant cracks in the edifice of Anglo-American feminism like a wrecking ball. In doing so, it has shown there is more than one way to resist the feminist juggernaut, for those who wish to resist it; subterfuge and infiltration can be far more powerful than debate or argument. Most important, it shows that such resistance can be fun (or at least amusing). One problem with the Manosphere is its relentless lack of humour and over-reliance on rationale; irony and wit are not just equally valid tools of resistance and subversion, but much more enjoyable to deploy.





Wednesday, 3 April 2019

Sexual False Consciousness Rampant: Blue Collar Chumps, Incel Tears and the Great 'Trickle-Down' Delusion


Underclass loser: Doubtless banging models all night...

My concept of Sexual False Consciousness is gathering pace and traction across many different Manosphere channels. Youtube, blogs and other fora are clamouring to discuss the concept. One of the most interesting is VVS, whose latest video makes interesting viewing. In this, he dissects the recent finding that, contrary to the mainstream media myth that the US is a sexual Wonderland, half of all young Americans are now single:


One of the funniest things is the way American cuckservatives ascribe this sexual drought to 'choice' or the re-emergence of 'Christian morality' among the young. The real answer - as we all well know - is the well-described cocktail of residual puritanism, sex-negative feminism, homosociality, misandry, racism and hyper-hypergamy that governs Anglo-American gender-relations. With the rise of social media, the impact of these forces has wrought terminal damage on male-female interaction.

Despite this obvious truth, the mainstream media spin on the study referenced above is riddled with evasion and denial. The usual self-appointed 'experts' are wheeled out to cloud the real issues in time-honoured fashion. Aside from the robust statistical evidence indicating widespread repression and male sexual disenfranchisement is the baffling lack of common sense underpinning these denials. Do mainstream media people really think that the average Joe working a blue collar job is bouncing around in bed with models every night? Given the obvious hyper-hypergamy of most Anglo-American women - and their withering contempt for the bottom 80% of males - is it not entirely obvious that male sexual disenfranchisement is a modern pandemic? A person with Down's Syndrome ought to be able to see that the 'mainstream' narrative - that 'everyone' is having orgies with models all night - is complete nonsense.

Despite feminist claims, there never was a 'trickle-down' of sexual freedom into the male working class; to the contrary, feminism saw low-value males cast into the sexual wilderness. Although they bleat endlessly 'around the houses', social 'scientists' (cough) will never admit the true cause of lower class males' aggression, intolerance, suicide and violent criminality: widespread sexual disenfranchisement. It is entirely obvious that persistent sexual frustration makes blue collar chumps belligerent and sadistic: blue collar racism and homophobia also derive from the same effect.

The 'Mainstream' Media: Hallucination?

Although the Internet is inevitably more honest and objective than the mainstream media, it still contains islands of utter self self-deceit. One of these is the IncelTears Reddit, which boasts insane  levels of Sexual False Consciousness. This bizarre online redoubt spends most of its time critiquing the posts made by avowed incels on the incels.is blog. Yes - this bizarre bunch of omega males and transitioning transsexuals sit around criticising the 'truecels' as if they themselves were enjoying orgies with models on a regular basis! The only difference between the two blogs is Sexual False Consciousness: while the true incels on incels.is accept their sexual disenfranchisement, the IncelTears brigade carefully hide it behind a fake subtext of sexual bounty. This unstated narrative - that everyone is enjoying orgies every night - flickers around nearly all sexual discussion in the mainstream media and those deluded by it. Do these people seriously think that? Are they really that deluded?

Maybe they are. But here are a few alternative explanations for their studied denial of reality:
  • Maybe people who deny the Anglobitch Thesis are mad? At least, are their views of social reality so deluded as to be hallucinatory? The French philosopher Jean Baudrillard argues that the mainstream media occupy a hallucinatory realm which has no reference to reality. Baby Boomers, women and others still snared in this fantasy world continually confuse it for reality itself. It is interesting that the Manosphere is largely a Generation X, Y and Z phenomenon; perhaps this relates to the fact that the mainstream media has less hold on the young?
  • The Anglosphere is notable for its denial of historical, political, social and (especially) sexual reality avoidance. As I wrote at length in my first book, Havok (2009),  this aversion to reality is a  cultural expression of Anglo-American puritanism. Accepting that life is not ideal for large - in fact, very large - numbers of people means accepting reality; and that is not something the evasive Anglosphere is particularly comfortable with. When the problem is sexual - as is the case with Sexual False Consciousness - the discomfort elicits draconian repression. Hence the tendency to shout down, ridicule or ignore males who openly discuss sexual disenfranchisement - either their own or anyone else's.
  • As a regular poster called Sebastian Hawkes has said, the mainstream media is dominated by unrepresentative males with enormous wealth and power. Is the popular delusion that women are clamouring for sex with everyone largely a product of the casting couch? Also, the fact that much of the sexualized media aimed at women is created by gay men projecting their own sexual fixations onto their female audience, creating the modern pandemic of female sexual false consciousness.
  • Simple fear of breaking ranks and giving voice to truth plays a prominent role. One is reminded of the Emperor's New Clothes: no one dares speak the truth because of social pressure.
  • Maybe SFC is just a by-product of mass stupidity? Most SFC types either study soft, non-STEM subjects or are blue collar chumps - in short, not the brightest tools in the box. In the UK, one person in three cannot divide 65 by 5 with pencil and paper. It may just be that most Anglochumps are just too dumb to see though SFC. If television told them the moon was made of cream cheese, they would most likely believe it.
  • During the 60s and 70s, the Anglo-American masses bought into the notion that the destruction of monogamy would result in a lifelong orgy with thousands of warm, willing females pandering to their every whim. Well, it did: but only if you were a rich, famous, high value male. The Average Joes who cling to SFC will never admit that they were gulled by post-war 'liberation' rhetoric. At best, they cling to a 'trickle down' model of sexual relations; that they will get the dregs of the banquet, at some undisclosed point in their miserable lives. However, the grim reality of female sexual liberation in the Anglosphere is hyper-hypergamy, which almost no 'real' male (not even highly successful ones) can live up to. Accepting that you were duped is hurtful in the extreme; SFC helps men to manage the natural shame of their own naivety, stupidity and sexual failure.
  • Accepting one's own SFC means accepting the reality of female nature. Because men in the Anglosphere nations are raised to pedestalise women due to residual puritanism, it is especially hard for them to accept that women are imperfect
However, media lies and mass self-delusion can only go so far. Given the the arid sexual reality of North American existence, the post-Internet decline of the mainstream media and the rise of our rampant, unregulated Manosphere, the dysfunctional nature of Anglo-American gender-relations can no longer be hidden. The Red Pill will never be 'mainstream' but ever more self-aware, solvent and educated men are deconstructing the Matrix.

Drunken Britscum: Is mass SFC simply a product of low IQ?

Monday, 25 March 2019

Hope on Distant Shores now available!



Hope on Distant Shores: How Awakened Men can Escape the Anglosphere's Toxic Women, Sexual False Consciousness and Institutional Misandry - the book I have been working on for the past five years - is now available.

Unlike the books and kits of PUA hucksters and con-men, Hope on Distant Shores will be sold without a penny of mark-up profit. The idea is to offer a constructive social critique while providing advice and guidance to men seeking love, sex and relationships outside the Anglosphere. However, it will only be available in paperback; digitisation would grant  free universal access and I do not want to be targeted by the British authorities for promoting 'Hate Speech' and 'terrorism'. Restricting access will somewhat neutralise the risk of such charges.

Hope on Distant Shores offers lifestyle guidance to the following groups:
  • Men tired of entitled, selfish Anglo-American women
  • Men who want a better, safer, more fulfilled life outside the Anglosphere
  • Men who do not want to ‘adjust’ to a culture which views them as third class citizens
  • Men who do not wish to squander their hard-earned dollars on derisive strippers or punitive divorce settlements
  • Men who want slim, warm, attractive women unsullied by sex-negative, misandrist Anglo-American feminism 
When I started this blog ten years ago, it was my intention to create waves and cast shadows across the Internet. I knew my key insight – that Anglo-American culture’s mistrust of male sexual freedom had created an especially misandrist, belligerent form of feminism – demanded global dissemination. Far from being ‘revolutionary’, as conservative Men’s Rights Activists believe, Anglo-American feminism springs right from the frigid heart of Anglo-American civilization. This explains the unstinting support feminism receives from the state in all Anglo-Saxon countries, and why all attempts to resist it have proved so utterly futile. There never was a ‘golden age’ of gender relations in the Anglosphere; the puritanical Anglo-Saxon cultural bloc has been pedestalizing women and vilifying men for centuries.

My first book ‘Havok’ (2009) focused on the condition of gender-relations in the contemporary Anglosphere. My conclusions – which have since taken root all over the English-speaking world, were that residual Puritanism has imbalanced gender-relations in favour of women, reducing Anglo-American males to disposable stooges, walking ATM machines and vilified deviants. Meanwhile the same secular Puritanism has, by sacralising sex as an elusive commodity, set Anglo-American women atop pedestals as exalted goddesses. Despite claiming to be a ‘revolutionary’ movement, Anglo-American feminism is in fact an extension – indeed, amplification of – existing values: Anglo feminism is sex-negative, misandrist and racist, just like Anglo-American society. In this view, conventional Men’s Right’s Activists who invoke ‘tradition’ against Anglo-Saxon feminism are completely deluded: for Anglo feminism springs straight from the Anglosphere’s repressive, puritan soul. Indeed, it will be noted that conservative MRAs have achieved precisely nothing in their 30-odd years of existence. Similarly, the PUA or Pick-up Artist community are merely playing a game they can never win. The puritanical reality of the Anglosphere renders their various ‘approach’ techniques moribund at best and potentially dangerous for men in the #metoo era.

Further, feminism now serves as a smoke screen to disguise the real problems afflicting Anglo-American civilization – namely, socio-economic inequality, corrupt governance and racist policing. Additionally, the Anglo-feminist narrative which presents white women as oppressed outsiders also serves to mask white women’s endemic racism and long-standing affiliation to the Anglo-American establishment. Not only is sex-negative Anglo feminism an exaggerated expression of Anglo-American values, it helps to insulate those values from positive reform.

The movement that emerged from my first book is best called pan-Anglosphere Dissidence: the systematic rejection of repressive Anglo-American values. This rejection is associated with a yearning for the relative sexual freedom waiting outside the Anglosphere. Pan-Anglosphere Dissidence is predictably strongest in the puritanical United States, with its entitled women, institutionalised misandry and fanatic aversion to prostitution. Building on those insights, Hope on Distant Shores offers lifestyle guidance to Anglo-American men who want slim, warm, attractive women unsullied by sex-negative, misandrist Anglo feminism.

Unlike Havok, Hope on Distant Shores contains only a few references from ‘canonical’ historians, economists or philosophers. Like Saint Paul or the Buddha, I am fashioning something completely new and a completely new conceptual vocabulary is necessary to contain it. Therefore, most references are taken from the extensive correspondence to my blog which began in early 2018. All the postings of these experienced and learned correspondents, some of them containing over twenty thousand words, are included in a remarkable series of appendices which will doubtless be cited and studied by awakened men for decades to come.



Sunday, 24 March 2019

The Movie Matrix is not the Anglo-American Matrix: Why the Blue Pill is an Imperfect Analogy for Real-World Self-Delusion



In the Matrix, Neo is famously offered the Red Pill of Truth and the Blue Pill of Illusion. As everyone knows, the Blue Pill means bliss in the Matrix for Neo, however fake and illusory; while the Red Pill means awakening to a terrible truth:

Morpheus: This is the world that you know. The world as it was at the end of the twentieth century. It exists now only as part of a neural-interactive simulation, that we call the Matrix.

Morpheus turns to Neo
Morpheus: You've been living in a dream world, Neo. This...is the world as it exists today.

Morpheus changes the channel on the televison.

The sky is an endless sea of black and green bile. The earth, scorched and split like burnt flesh, spreads out beneath us as we enter the television.


Morpheus : Welcome.....to the desert of the real.


However, the real-world analogy to the Blue Pill is Sexual False Consciousness - false hope and self-delusion without any material or sexual compensation. While the fictional Matrix at least satisfies Neo's basic needs and offers the traitor Cypher boundless sex and status, the real-world Anglo-American Matrix offers the average Blue-Pilled male precisely nothing. He does not even get Cypher's illusory money, women and power. Instead, he kids himself he is getting these things while getting nothing at all: that is the crucial difference.

Does the reader follow me thus far?




So the Blue Pill analogy linking Neo's Matrix to Anglo-American reality is somewhat flawed. Although I am a libertarian, I borrowed the idea of False Consciousness from socialist thinkers like Karl Marx and Antonio Gramsci. Both said something very interesting about the concept they created: because False Consciousness - a kind of mass self-delusion about the nature of reality - is continually refuted by a bitter-tasting reality, its hold over the masses can never be absolute. Despite society's best efforts to indoctrinate the masses via schools, advertising and the legacy media, a seed of revolutionary resistance will always exist. The same is also true of Sexual False Consciousness: however hard a sexually disenfranchised male tells himself he is banging models every night, he is not banging models every night. In fact, the Anglosphere (and especially North America) is a dating and relationship nightmare for men! For this reason, the potential for social revolution and resistance is always present in the real world, unlike Neo's near-flawless Matrix with its myriad sexual and material compensations for compliant participants. 

Is the reader still with me?



Awakened men reading these words threw off the chains of Sexual False Consciousness and all others have the same potential for Awakening: reality itself ensures that. Black men, white men or Asian men all experience the same Anglo-American reality with its misandrist, gynocentric fixations. And however much the ailing lamestream Anglo media claim the Anglosphere is some kind of sexual Shangri La full of kindly, liberated angels offering free sex to everybody, the sterile and oppressive reality of Anglo-American existence demonstrates otherwise.

Because of this, the Anglo-American Matrix and its institutional misandry is at best a provisional government, not an eternal one.


Karl Marx: wrong about most things, not False Consciousness



Tuesday, 19 March 2019

Deluded Shooter - the Target Brenton Tarrant Missed

The Man and his Work

While NZ shooter Brenton Tarrant's manifesto raises some valid points, it completely omits all mention of feminism - especially the overtly misandrist Anglo-American variant of it. This is astonishing, given that Anglo feminism is intimately implicated in all the social ills he enumerates: unrestricted immigration, environmental degradation, mindless consumerism, social collapse, falling white birth rates and much else besides.

Let us break it down:

  • Women, like children, are completely unfit for positions of leadership and responsibility. Yet because puritanical Anglo-American culture exalts them and artificially inflates their abilities, they now occupy far too many leadership roles. Observe everywhere the calamitous results.
  • Because white women abort millions of prospective citizens every year, the western birth rate has slipped below replacement levels. This is obviously most true of white Anglo-American women, who seem to consider killing unwanted children some kind of political statement. 
  • Because Anglo-American women are mindless consumers, their contribution to environmental degradation is vast. In fact, it would be fair to say that western consumerism is built entirely on the Anglo female's vacuous addiction to unnecessary trinkets and branded rags, and the male need to satisfy it in order to gain reproductive access.
  • Because low value women prefer physically robust, sociopathic males with low intelligence (and because feminism has permitted them to pursue such mate choices with full societal support), the quality of the white working population has dipped sharply in recent years. A proud, industrious working class has rapidly been replaced by a drug addicted, idle underclass which has no interest in education, training or work. Check out this documentary, where British workers fail to compete with eastern European workers doing the same jobs. 
  • Because Anglo-American Common Law is uniquely susceptible to feminist manipulation, and because the puritanical nature of Anglo culture inherently exalts women, awakened Anglosphere men now know that misandrist divorce settlements can lead to penury and even jail. This is leading to MGTOW, emigration and other forms of mass male dissidence, causing both white birthrates and white population quality to fall yet further.
  • Because women in a post-feminist and puritanical culture have to be palliated, yet most lack any real ability, a host of ludicrous non-jobs have been artificially created to accommodate their absurd ambitions. These include teaching assistants, social workers, human resource experts, administrators, divorce lawyers, counsellors and other 'human-interest' sinecures that frequently command huge salaries. Not only do these drain the west's ailing economies for no meaningful benefit, the vast student debt associated with such pointless roles is also calamitous for the economy.
  • Because Anglo-American culture is ruled by the residual, secularised dregs of religious puritanism, it not only exalts women but informally hates and criminalises men for being active sexual beings. This is experienced by marginalised males as systematic contempt, exploitation and exclusion in every sphere of life. Male unemployment, mental health issues, suicide rates, addiction problems and social exclusion are viewed as laughable interludes in the feminist-deviant group-hug that is contemporary Anglo-American society. Though Tarrant himself experienced this oppression, he was unable to identify its true origin: his own culture - or at least, the puritan-feminist currents within it.
  • Because Anglo-American culture is ruled by secular puritanism, its culture and institutions hate reality itself. This is why the many social and environmental problems Tarrant describes are never addressed in a rational or honest manner. The cuck-brained Anglosphere prefers infancy to manhood, fantasy to thought and delusion to honesty.
  • Because of secular puritanism and its exaltation of women, their dysfunctional behaviour goes unchallenged and unpunished. Indeed, the Anglo-American world bends over backwards to indulge it at every opportunity in the workplace, in divorce courts, in the media and in society at large.
  • Because Anglo-American women are defined by hyper-hypergamy (an attraction to impossible ideals derived from residual puritanism, colonialism, social media and extreme economic differentiation), vast numbers of Anglo-American men are now sexually disenfranchised and trapped in Sexual False Consciousness or other forms of existential despair. Deprived of masculine function and direction by post-feminist society, low status white males have become incel whipping boys and pariahs for the new gynocentric order. The only redemption offered is 'transition' into a pseudo-female, thereby atoning for the 'crime' of being male in a sex-negative, misandrist culture.
And yet our man Tarrant never mentions feminism once! Is he suffering from Down Syndrome, or something? None of the problems listed in his manifesto is directly connected to 'foreign' elements or conspiracies. All the maladies he lists spring directly from Anglo-American feminism and the institutions which support it. 

Lot of slogans and culprits - but no mention of feminism




Tuesday, 5 March 2019

Mouse on a Pedestal: Jordan Peterson, Anglocuck Supreme

Jordan Peterson: Anglocuck Supreme

Jordan Peterson - a man who teaches the quasi-science of psychology at declasse Canadian universities - is all the rage among tradcon males across the Anglosphere. His books, televised debates and utterances are extolled as 'revolutionary conservatism', a much needed antidote to the slack minded Social Justice Warriors who presently dominate Anglo academic life.

However, like all Anglo cuckservatives, Peterson is just telling men to return to the plantation. He is just Tommy Fleming lite, a pitiful Anglocuck who thinks men should accept traditional duties while women do as they please; a clown living in the 1950s, telling men to 'man up' and join the ranks of castrated cuckdom in the Anglo-American Matrix. The central problem with his position is that the Anglosphere has moved beyond his tradcon values, never to return. Peterson is still hung up on marriage, 'honour' and fidelity in a world where such things are scorned or ridiculed by women and society at large. Indeed, being an 'honourable man' is now a one-way trip to financial rape in the frivorce courts of the Anglosphere. Here is one of my correspondents, Lawrence, on the reality of the situation in contemporary America:
At one point in my corrections officer job, the incarceration of men for child support and alimony arrears got so bad that a group of us prison guards came to the warden, complaining that we were being unethically ordered to guard men who really weren’t a threat and who should have never been sent to jail. Once imprisoned, they usually lost their professional licenses, their driver’s licenses, became unemployable so they just wound up back there again. The warden just shook his head, he knew how corrupt the system is, how the US family courts, media, politicians, universities, feminists and the prison execs all work hand in glove to profit off the US slave economy fueled by all the husbands and fathers tossed into prison. How it creates sick incentives that encourage divorce and profiteering. (This is another reason the US divorce rate is by far the highest all over the world, so much money is made from it). But the warden knew he was powerless to reform it. Just like we were as guards. The vultures of the Anglosphere want their prison slaves, and husbands and fathers are an easy target.

Like I said, every man in the Anglosphere is a target of this machine, but wealthy American and Canadian men are the hardest hit, because the US legal system gives family court judges wide latitude, which really can’t be appealed, to place arbitrarily high demands on the incomes of men who have been wealthy at any point. This is why Robin Williams committed suicide. At one point he was a very wealthy Hollywood A-lister. But after his two divorces, he was no longer pulling in that kind of money. The family courts didn’t care. They said he once made big money, and in the fantasy unicorn filled land of US family courts, that meant he could just click his feet together and make the same money again. So they made Robin pay out the nose for alimony. By this time he was sick with Parkinson’s Disease he couldn’t make anywhere close to that amount of money, and his lawyer was warning him that prison time was likely coming. So he committed suicide. Here’s another famous case, a guy in New York with same sort of situation, once made a lot of money on Wall Street and became upper class, told to pay alimony every year after that at insane high levels, lost his job in recession== then off to prison when it became impossible.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-08-26/jail-becomes-home-for-husband-stuck-with-lifetime-alimony Brendan Fraser has been hit with a similar judgement, tens of millions of dollars in alimony.

Wealthy men across the US, Canada, UK and the Anglosphere generally are hit hard like this. And yes, a lot of them wind up in prison. The incarceration rate in Canada and the UK isn’t quite as bad, but this happens there too because the misandrist structure of the laws and family courts is as bad as in the USA, and the legal systems share the same insane practice of imprisonment after court-ordered impoverishing of a man. I found this out ironically after I expatriated and was working as a Web and database planner, when my previous experience led prison systems in many countries to contract me to help with their intake software and legal briefing documents. This imprisonment of men for marriage or kids (or in these #metoo days, just for “harassment” that in reality is “any interaction with women”) really is an Anglo phenomenon uniquely. Whatever stupid idiosyncrasies the rest of the West has with feminism, they don’t throw men in prison for this.

The very worst case I saw as a prison guard was a surgeon, yes an American surgeon who was one of the most respectable guys I ever met, hard working, worked until 2 a.m. 6 days a week to save people’s lives. With all the work hours, his wife got “lonely” and started sleeping around, eventually having 2 kids that weren’t even his as he found out later. And then she filed for divorce so she could take the surgeon’s money, blow it on cocaine and stupid luxuries for herself without doing any work herself (that’s the real destination where the “child support” money goes) and sleep around with her favorite Chad of the week, all on her hard working surgeon ex-husband’s money. She won an insanely high judgment in a US family court, millions of dollars in child support and “alimony” that the poor surgeon would have to pay. Since by the court’s judgment, “she should be entitled to maintain the same standard of living after the divorce”, even though this greedy gold-digging Anglobitch is the one who filed for the divorce to steal from her hard-working husband who was actually saving people’s lives. 
After a few years of doing this, and losing his house and his nice car, the poor surgeon threw out his back while helping a patient onto an operating table. He had to cut down his hours as a surgeon, and went to the divorce court asking for a reduction in the support demands, and ask that his lazy, spoiled brat bitch ex-wife get a damn job herself. But the court refused using the same delusion filled imputation bullshit they pull on other ex-husbands, claiming he could somehow make millions of extra dollars using his surgical wizard skills somehow. Which he couldn’t do in reality with his injured back, something the family court judge couldn’t or wouldn’t even try to understand. So then now the alimony and child support were demanding 120% of his income. You see, the family court system will never let you off the treadmill once they target you, especially if you earn a lot of money. Eventually he drained his savings and retirement, couldn’t make the payments at all—and he wound up in the prison where I was a corrections officer. 
The corrupt American family court-media-feminist-academia cultural Marxist-big business-prison industrial complex had worked perfectly to ruin this poor man, and what a prize they had. A dedicated, hard working US surgeon, saving lives every day, drained of his money and reduced to poverty by a gold-digging, spoiled greedy bimbo who divorced him due to his very dedication, had kids with other men to force him to pay bullshit “child support” in addition to never-stopping alimony, his assets taken by his gold-digging ex wife and the state to grease their own corruption, the “child support” in actuality supporting the ex wife’s corrupt, hedonistic lifestyle after divorce. And then the poor surgeon himself made a literal slave in a US prison, stripped of his license and made a perpetual debtor, worked to the bone but never allowed to profit from his own efforts or hard work. That really is how it works in the US family court and prison system. That poor surgeon was the worst case we ever saw, made us so mad we were talking about how we were going to “free the Bastille” and start a revolution ourselves to stop all the corruption, Robespierre style. And free all the innocent men, and even some women, who were imprisoned this way, to feed more slaves to the machine.

Because if you’re an American man, particularly a rich, well to do, middle class or upper class man with skills, saved money, assets, wealth and a good job, that’s what you really are. Fresh meat for the Anglosphere family court meat grinder machine. Like Legal Eagle said, you are literally a slave with marriage or child-bearing in the US or the greater Anglosphere, from that day on, the state and officials have full purview over all your assets and unlimited ability to seize them. Legal Eagle saw this from the legal debate and court side, I saw the horrible result from the prison side, where men were sent after all their assets had been stolen by the family courts and their only further “value” was as slaves to the prison-industrial complex. This shit’s real, guys.

And now, in the ugly aftermath of #metto, #timesupand #nameandshamehim, you don’t even have to get married or have a kid in the Anglosphere to become a slave. Any interaction with a women, even something as casual as a glance or an innocent conversation, opens you up to charges of harassment and sexual misconduct. And given that as much as half of young white women in America find even innocent male female interactions to be harassment, you’re in great danger at any moment. Many harassment and misconduct changes now are being assembled by our corrupt legal-prison-industrial complex system to become prosecutable offenses. But even short of that, the witch-burning in social media means that any vague accusation, whether recent or months or years ago, will make you unemployable and a social pariah. You’ll lose your health insurance and ability to earn a living, and then the state will have all kinds of additional ways to brand you a criminal and toss you in jail.
https://kshatriya-anglobitch.blogspot.com/2018/01/the-wardens-tale-why-expatriation-from.html
https://kshatriya-anglobitch.blogspot.com/2018/01/the-wardens-tale-why-expatriation-from_31.html
Peterson tells men 'to be men' - in other words, try to live up to traditional male responsibilities - in a world which despises them, getting nothing but penury and imprisonment in return. Meanwhile, single mothers with four thug-babies live happily on taxpayer handouts across the Anglosphere while Peterson's 'responsible' men foot the bill.

The point is, Anglo conservatives like Peterson have not truly grasped the reality of contemporary gender relations. At heart, they believe we are still living in the pre-feminist era where men are coming home to smiling housewives and discussing the Bible around the kitchen table before a roaring log fire. In truth, the fact that western women are no longer economically dependent on men has entirely obviated those assumptions. With the rise of sperm banks and other post-male reproductive technologies, women don't even need a man to have children. Besides, the Calvinist misandry of the Anglosphere remains unchallenged even while female rights and opportunities advance apace in every sphere - education, the media, reproductive technology and jurisprudence.

This is partly generational; but mainly because Peterson, Tommy Fleming and other 'conservative' Anglocucks are academic fantasists with scant knowledge of contemporary social reality. Boomer academics like him need to leave their post-War ivory towers and do some volunteer work in a hospital or prison to gain some understanding of how the world actually works. Academic Anglocucks like Peterson or Fleming are dangerous because gullible young males listen to their inane opinions, or even base important life-decisions on them. In the 1950s, that was no great problem; in the 21st century, with its #metoo hysteria and no fault divorce-epidemic, such 'advice' should be cursorily dismissed as the rantings of madmen.







Saturday, 2 March 2019

Anglofoids Deface War Memorial Bench with Crude Graffiti

Anglofoid Handiwork...

Conservative Anglocucks like Jordan Peterson and Tommy Fleming are forever telling Anglo-American men that if they 'man up' and 'accept responsibility' then women will respect them. Let's see how this sage advice actually works in reality. Two underclass British foids were so impressed by such White Knighting that they recently desecrated a memorial to World War 1 soldiers:
Two mothers have been slammed for vandalising a bench commemorating World War I heroes while their little children watch on. 
The pair were caught writing their names - 'Shell' and 'Jane' - into wet concrete setting beneath the new memorial bench in Horncastle, Lincolnshire. Locals have branded them 'disrespectful,' an 'absolute disgrace' and 'disgusting' on a local community page on Facebook.
The women can be seen leaning over the cordoned off area at the base of the bench, with one of the little ones watching over, to bend down and scrape their names in. Their prams are standing close by and another child appears to be standing behind one of the women.

The park bench was installed on February 18 according to the Sun, to mark the centenary of the end of WWI. The next day it had been tarnished by the two women. The back of the metal bench shows soldiers and a warhorse silhouetted next to poppies, and the immortal words: 'Lest we forget.' 
Helen Lea initially brought people's attention to the awful act by posting on the Horncastle Community Facebook page.

Julie Goy wrote online: 'I walked past this bench earlier, 12.15 today with my granddaughter who is nearly two and we stood and admired it, she liked the red poppies. It was fine then and no damage. What a dreadful shame, should be ashamed of themselves.' 
Yes, this is how modern Anglo-American women reward and respect the men who 'manned' up and fought for their country: by desecrating their humble memorial. And still the Tradcon clowns wonder why Anglo-American men are withdrawing their consent from society... go figure.

Fat Anglofoids Desecrating the Memorial


Saturday, 23 February 2019

Why do Filicidal, Homosocial, Misandrist and anti-Life Anglo Women Even Exist?



I have been pondering a deep problem: why do Anglo-American women still exist, given their obvious anti-life, anti-male, selfish, homosocial and filicidal (child murdering) tendencies?   It is an interesting question. According to evolutionary theory, misandrist and selfish women with a strong aversion to bearing or raising children should have died out long ago. Yet since they do exist, why do they exhibit such 'unnatural' misandrist and filicidal behaviour?

A thorny riddle indeed. How can grossly unnatural behaviour become normalised among the mass of Anglo-American women in such a short time? Surely such a thing goes against all evolutionary theory? However, these monstrous Anglobitch tendencies are not wholly unnatural, as such. We should rather consider them a perverse caricature of natural female instincts: an extreme and unnatural form of hypergamy.

Unique to the Anglosphere, this 'hyper-hypergamy' is created and sustained by the extreme inequality in Anglosphere countries (where a far higher proportion of males fall into the 'undesirable' bracket) compared to more egalitarian regions. Beyond this, residual repression in Anglo countries inflates women's SMV (Sexual Market Value) to insane levels, creating a seller's market for sex.  The sexless Disneyland tone of the Anglosphere means that all Anglo-American women grow up with impossible fantasies of ideal love as natural expectations. And because of the SMV imbalance, even 300 pound landwhales riddled with STDs think they are 'too good' to breed with solvent, law-abiding, educated men.

She decides whether you're fit to breed, guys...

Finally, the high cultural status of the Anglosphere (with its distinctive colonial heritage) makes the eugenic pressure on Anglo-American men even greater. Average men are not good enough to breed in such an exalted region; instead, low status males and their children are considered disposable trash to either be aborted or denied existence altogether. Of course, the rise of advanced reproductive medicine has gifted women total eugenic control over these decisions. As with so many things, the puritan undercurrents of the Anglosphere have perverted natural female instincts into monstrous caricatures while misandrist Common Law and Anglo empirical machine-culture have armed them with near infinite power to impose them on society at large.



Abortion is the most important manifestation of these hyper-hypergamous tendencies. Killing low-status men's children is a very direct form of eugenics yet is always couched in terms of 'choice'. However, when redefined as an expression of hyper-hypergamy the West's abortion-industry makes a lot more sense. The same can be said of sperm donation and its increasingly stringent demands on donors. Men must be young, healthy, tall, educated and (usually) white if they want to reproduce; while fat, stupid women with clod degrees sit in judgement on the sex who created and maintain all civilisation.

The concept of hyper-hypergamy helps us understand how how - with the help of puritanism, repression, reproductive medicine and high socio-cultural inequality - perversity became normal in just a few decades.