David Futrelle – King of Sexual False Consciousness

If this guy can't wrangle sex from the Anglobitch, what chance has Futrelle?

In the wake of the Alek Minassian massacre, David Futrelle of Manboobz has been in much demand across the lamestream media. He has written about ‘online misogyny’ in outlets as varied as Glamour Magazine and the NYT. It is interesting how these outlets present him as ‘normal’ and representative – giving the impression he is someone with normal sexual experience: one of ‘us’ as opposed to ‘them’:

Benchmarks of an incel can include feelings of entitlement and resentment, with many feeling like sex is something that’s owed to them. “Some have even demanded that the government provide them with girlfriends and/or prostitutes,” says Futrelle.

Logic would dictate that these men have been consistently trying to find women to have sex with, but Futurelle says that’s not always the case.

“[Many] don't know how and think it's pointless. Incels hate women, but they also hate themselves, and many of them convince themselves they're too ugly or too short to ever be attractive to women," he says.

Glamour Magazine, April 2018 ‘What is an Incel?’

Tellingly, no picture of Futrelle ever appears in these articles. If it did, it would immediately destroy his 'normal' journalistic image by revealing him to be just as ugly and short as the avowed incels he attacks (if not more so).

The sex god that is David Futrelle...

Who is Futrelle trying to kid? He isn’t one of the sexual elite at all; just an ugly little man who has never enjoyed free sex with anyone. His whole 'feminized', cat-loving persona is just a coping mechanism to manage his sexual ostracism by women. As we know, transexualism is a popular mental coping strategy for such ‘loser’ males: if you can’t beat Chad, fuck him.

If Futrelle truly believes Anglo-American women are not grasping, selfish and superficial, why does he not show his picture in Glamour magazine? Because its vapid, pea-brained readership would hate him on sight, that’s why. If he were not wallowing in Sexual False Consciousness and self-delusion, he would immediately join a blog like incels.me instead of pretending to be some well-adjusted, sexually-experienced ‘winner’. Richard Scarecrow of Men-Factor is doing a interesting discussion of the recent Infowars attack on Incels conducted by Paul Joseph Watson. It appears Watson has an Asian girlfriend himself, despite his rabid critique of incel 'losers'. Sounds like yet another severe case of Sexual False Consciousness at work.

Futrelle: the voice of sexual success...!

 

In short, David Futrelle is the uncrowned King of Sexual False Consciousness. While he strives to project an image of heterosexual vigour and normality to the lamestream media, a man with his runtlike stature, blobfish features and flatline testosterone levels can only be a hardcore incel/degenerate himself. And no one is fooled by his self-deceit, not even the lamestream media and its gullible public; and certainly not the hyper-hypergamous females who 'read' Glamour magazine, most of whom would doubtless vomit at the mere sight of his blobfish ass.

Like all things sexual in the Anglosphere, it's all an act.

Joe Buck, eager to emulate the sexual prowess of David Futrelle...

Is Incel New? Tinder, Orwell and the Scourge of Sexual Disenfranchisement

Truth? What is Truth?

In the wake of the Alek Minassian massacre in Canada, the lamestream media has just ‘discovered’ the incel (involuntary celibate) phenomenon.  One question that haunts me is: Is the incel phenomenon new?

There are two broad perspectives on this:

1. Younger men seem to think incel is fairly new and that earlier male generations generically experienced more sex because of socially-imposed monogamy. Also, looks-orientated social media such as Tinder have excluded uglies, manlets and ethnics from the mating market as never before, while boosting female hypergamy to insane levels.

2. Older men broadly think that incels have always existed and that the recent incel explosion is a myth created by social media. That is, that incels have only now been allowed to express their inceldom via social media, creating the illusion that inceldom is new.

A case can be made to support both perspectives. Writing as early as the late 1980s, British crime writer Colin Wilson coined the term 'sexual disenfranchisement' to describe an emergent male sexual underclass which was unduly represented in the ranks of sexual criminals, mass murderers and so forth. His argument was that social status is now stated not through wealth or social status but through sexual prowess, and that unfettered female hypergamy has created a male sexual underclass with nothing to lose. Similarly, Robert A Heinlein in The Moon is a Harsh Mistress (1966) described a lunar colony in which polyandrous line-marriages prevent the inevitable social chaos caused by a surplus of single men. The great George Orwell wrote extensively about male sexual disenfranchisement in Britain and other Western countries, especially in his bleak memoir Down and Out in Paris and London (1933). Some might call these writers fringe thinkers, yet it must be said that people have been pondering these issues since the 1930s; they are clearly not new.

Joe's Chadly efforts fall on stony ground...

On the other hand, there are several new factors which lend credence to the idea that inceldom is a recent phenomenon. Aside from the obvious looks-orientated social media apps like Tinder, some are unexpected.

One would be the rise of genuine multiculturalism (the real thing, not the largely rhetorical 60s upper-middle class variant). A disproportionately high number of modern incels seem to be non-caucasian ethnics, or of mixed race. Back in the day, before the advent of multiculturalism, people were forced to marry within their own ethnic group because of cultural pressures and white racism. Today, those boundaries have slipped and ethnics now have to complete in a wider sexual marketplace. One result of this is that ethnic males are suddenly bottom of the sexual heap, with women of their own race preferring black or Caucasian males over males of their own race. Hence the rise of angry Currycels and Ricecels, and the fact that incel shooters are overwhelmingly ethnics.

In the age of social media, looks clearly matter

Another factor would be the rise of genuine feminism (again, not the upper-middle class 1960s version). Western women now outperform males in education, and most simply do not need men for financial support. They can spawn a child with a handsome Chad or Tyrone and raise it quite happily without having a male around. Female emancipation is really the ultimate expression of female homosociality. Simply put, women no longer need omega nerds to maintain them once they breed.

Another consideration might be increased levels of autism in the population. This is surely not wholly the result of modern over-diagnosis. The fact that people now have children at ever older ages is boosting the number of autistics in the West, and many male incels clearly occupy the autistic spectrum. Many are also from the educated middle class, a trait closely linked to autism in much of the medical literature.

At a general level, older people seem most astonished by the incel phenomenon. This is what one might expect if mass inceldom were simply less common in earlier eras. However, this might be simply because incels from earlier times had no social media platforms to express their experiences (or lack of them). Whatever the truth, this aged pastor seems genuinely baffled by the incel phenomenon:

On the other side, what is the evidence that incels have always been with us?

As we have seen, writers like George Orwell showed that incel males were common in the 1930s. Works like Keep the Aspidistra Flying (1936) prefigured the Anglobitch anti-feminist thesis, showing that women used sex as a manipulative weapon long before the modern era. However, since males of low status typically formed the majority of incels back then, their experiences were largely omitted from books, journalism and academic discourse. While that is still true, today there are countless online platforms where modern incels can express their views and experiences. In other words, incels are not new at all; it just seems that way because earlier incels had no public venting platforms.

Certain criminals claimed incel status long before the Internet era. For example, the 'Son of Sam' David Berkowitz, who shot several courting couples in New York during the 1970s, claimed to be motivated by a desire for revenge against 'normie' society for his incel status. Other murderous 'old' incels include Edmund Kemper and British mass shooter Michael Ryan.

The mainstream Anglo media have gone into freefall since the rise of the Internet. Once, there was a clearly-defined youth culture which forcibly imposed a narrative of 'sexual bounty' on the masses via films, TV shows, magazines and rock music (also known as Sexual False Consciousness). With these restrictive artefacts gone, incel men are now free to discuss their arid sexual reality openly and without shame. 

Classic movies like Midnight Cowboy (1969) suggest that the 60s Anglo-American 'sexual revolution' was largely a myth, anyway. When Joe Buck moves from Texas to NYC to sell sex to the new breed of 'liberated' women, he finds only pink poodles and the sad caresses of lonely homosexuals. Revenge of the Nerds (1984) suggests that high status girls (indeed, all girls) have always shunned Omega nerds for handsome, high status males. In sum, the notion that monogamy forcibly collectivised male sexual access in the post-war era is probably an MRA myth. Equally, the modern incel assumption that a few 'Chads' are having sex with 80% of women is probably shaped by Internet porn and the mainstream media generally.

One Helluva Gorgeous Chick...

Anglo culture is and always has been defined by puritanism/homosociality and white Anglo-American women have always been sexually conservative. In Hollywood versus America (1992), Michael Medved showed that most Americans (over 90%) still aspire to a monogamous heterosexual marriage, for example. Despite the Anglosphere’s sacralisation of recreational sex in recent years, most incels are probably waiting for ‘the one’ in time-honoured fashion, and not unduly unhappy about their situation. And maybe Chad is not having quite as much polygamous sex as the incels imagine (if he even exists at all). 

The Incel crushed under Chad's prowess...

The Anglo Trans Revolution: Co-opting the Female Pedestal

The Anglosphere's LGBTXYZ Fixation Rolls On...

The Anglosphere’s recent ‘progressive’ obsession with transsexuals (especially male transsexuals) is curious. Everywhere one looks, transsexual rights are in the spotlight; they formed a prominent plank of Hillary Clinton’s failed Presidential election campaign, while the UK media obsesses over the issue. I doubt that transsexuals of any kind constitute much more than 0.01% of the Anglo-American population; but listening to the mainstream media, one would think around half were considering 'transition'. But as always in the Anglosphere, nothing is ever what it seems. While ‘trans rights’ seem naturally affiliated to progressive political agendas, they are in some respects the ultimate expression of traditional Anglo-American misandry. After all, what could be more misandrist than transforming men into women? 

Trans: the Anglosphere's madness of the month

Far from threatening the establishment, male transsexuals are in fact the Anglo matriarchy’s ultimate stooges. Transsexuality is not even a sexual orientation - it is a revolt against nature itself. The same hatred of biological reality also defines Anglo feminism, which views sexual intercourse as ‘rape’ and pregnancy as ‘slavery’. In fact, they are no such thing. Placental mammals reproduce by the male injecting sperm into the female’s body; the growing young are nurtured in the womb until the female gives birth to them. Only a sick and deluded mind fuelled by a terrible rage against reality would label these biological facts ‘crimes of oppression’, as Anglo feminists seek to do. As usual, whenever they attempt to ‘stick it to the man’ the feminazis invariably regurgitate the same old puritanical, anti-life themes of traditional Anglo culture.

Stooge for the Anglosphere...

Similarly, while their ‘trans’ protégés consider themselves ‘gender revolutionaries’ they are in truth cheerleaders for the Anglosphere’s institutional misandry. After all, male transsexuals are the ideal of any matriarchy: men who want to be women. No wonder the pan-Anglosphere political and legal authorities are clamouring to rubber stamp ‘trans rights’ legislation. In some respects Anglo transsexuals are like Diaspora Jews: people prepared to subsist in a hostile environment at literally any cost. Transsexuals in Anglo nations have effectively foresworn their very identity as men, or as natural human beings; they have internalized Anglo misandry so completely that they prefer to become sterile women than exist as men.

Of course, the privileged status afforded Anglo women also factors into this decision. It is interesting how some of the male incel community are opting to ‘transition’ into transsexuals. Faced with the choice of a sexless, low-status male life and a sterile, high-status female life, many men will opt for the latter. Even as sterile pseudo-women, they automatically acquire a ‘victimhood Karma’ which is never extended to male incels (who are merely derided as disposable scum). And the system ultimately benefits, since angry sexless males are painlessly removed from the social equation. Is it purely coincidental that ‘trans’ agendas began to be pushed across the Anglosphere in the wake of various incel massacres? 

Is this the Incel Future?

However, sensing these incel pseudo-women co-opting their pedestals, Anglo feminists increasingly view their new ‘sisters’ with growing distrust and hatred. The repulsive Australian femihag Germaine Greer is one of these, having written numerous polemics against male transsexuals. This eruption of loathing is interesting, in that it highlights the utter hypocrisy and intellectual vacuity of Anglo feminists. While they reflexively condemn the very idea of innate human difference in every other sphere, they revert to neo-fascist biological arguments when their own unique gender-status is threatened.

Ultimately, for all their self-loathing, male transsexuals will never find the acceptance they crave from women or Anglo-American society at large. They have no reproductive potential or status – the master key to female privilege in the repressive Anglosphere.

Greer: Repulsive Femihag Cunt