Let us consider the various ‘pills’
that rule contemporary Manosphere thought:
The Blue Pill: The world of
comforting illusion. In the MRA Manosphere, it has come to mean the fictional ‘mainstream’
narrative that women are all oppressed and all men advantaged, or that only men
can be racist or elitist. In the Incelosphere or PUA community, it is synonymous
with various romantic delusions: for example, that race, looks or height do not
matter to women or that there is ‘someone’ for everybody. The various Blue Pill
fictions are promoted to keep the broad masses cocooned in a comforting world
of self-delusion, thereby making society function from day to day. Sexual False Consciousness – the absurd fantasy that ‘all’ men are having sex with models every
night – is a perfect example of this.
The
Red Pill: The world of (often bitter-tasting) reality. In the MRA Manosphere,
it has come to mean the suppressed truth that law, healthcare, education and
the media all favour women over men in contemporary society. In the Incelosphere or PUA community, it has led men to pursue a
variety of self-maximising strategies in order to trigger the innate (but socially repressed) female desire for psychopathic, socially dominant/indifferent or
physically attractive males.
The
Black Pill: The world of absolute truth in all its unending and inflexible
horror. In the MRA Manosphere, it means rejecting activism for a MGTOW or
renegade lifestyle on the fringes of society. In the Incelosphere or PUA
communities, it has come to mean that factors like autism, looks, race or
height are fixed and unchangeable, and that men who are ‘challenged’ in these areas are
doomed to a life of involuntary celibacy. What defines the Black Pill is its immutability,
its nihilistic acceptance that many
features of life cannot be changed despite one’s best efforts.
For me, it is obvious that there is truth in both the Black and Red
Pills. While certain features of personal identity (looks, height, ethnicity)
are fixed and predetermined, other features (economic status, location, culture) are
open to manipulation. Therefore, serious and objective thought requires a new
pill which integrates the wisdom of both the red and the black: a pill I will
call the Crimson Pill.
Obviously, the Anglobitch Thesis is in essence pure Crimson Pill: by
rejecting or departing the Anglosphere, a man immediately solves the problem of
entitled, misandrist, sex-negative, overweight Anglo-American women who use sex
to manipulate and exploit men. That is, the Thesis focuses on a factor –
namely, cultural location – which can be changed. It does not pretend that
every male can looksmaxx to resemble the young Elvis Presley, or that midgets
can become giants, or that autistic misfits will ever be the ‘life and soul of the
party, or that hunchbacks will ever win female affection with ‘charisma’ or ‘personality’.
Rather, it focuses on the one factor which any solvent man can change for the
price of a plane ticket: namely, the culture he resides in.
I am aware that many in the Manosphere view the Anglobitch Thesis are
a ‘cope’, offering false hope to romantically disillusioned (or sexually disenfranchised) Anglo-American men. However, I have never been
under the illusion that all women outside the Anglosphere are angels or that
marriage is ever a totally risk-free proposition. Simply relocating to
another culture will not guarantee romantic success, a happy, stable marriage
or any other factor a man might desire for personal fulfilment. No society is perfect, or ever will be.
As the Manosphere has developed in depth and scope, embracing perspectives
from a wide range of cultures, unexpected issues have emerged. Foremost of these is the issue of Canadian misandry. In the wake
of his 1989 massacre, most observers considered Marc Lepine an anomaly rather
than a true gender-warrior. However, as ever more Canadian males snapped and ‘went
postal’ in violent revolt against the misandrist culture-war being waged
against them, I began to realise that Canada is just as misandrist as the US,
UK or Australia, if not more so. Further, non-Anglosphere
cultures with an active or residual puritan
element have similar issues with institutional misandry and strained gender-relations. Obvious examples would be Japan
and some parts of the Islamic world.
Despite these observations, the personal evidence of my many correspondents demonstrates that leaving the Anglosphere can definitely improve a man’s
romantic chances in the absence of obvious physical deformities or extreme psychological disorders. And when we
turn to issues like divorce, the case for Anglo-specific misandry becomes even stronger. Various learned
correspondents have demonstrated that the Anglosphere countries are defined by several legal/cultural
features which make it uniquely difficult for men to form healthy, safe or
stable relationships. I have defined
these features as the Five Pillars of Anglosphere Dysfunction:
Class Distinction
Social Isolation
Materialism
Puritanism
Common Law
The Five Pillars are comprehensively described in my most recent book, Hope on Distant Shores. However, the experience of a correspondent who has actually
lived and successfully formed relationships outside the Anglosphere sets out the case in
plain English:
And the
different, more freewheeling attitudes of Europe towards sex and sexuality are
truly a lot different, which probably steers the culture sharply away from
Anglo-style feminism, even among the feminists there. Before my fiancée joined
me in France—and I’ll admit it here, even after we got married—one of the
places I loved to go was up In NE Germany. Tbh German, Polish, Czech, Swedish
and Finnish girls are sexy as hell in general, something about that Baltic area,
and these gorgeous ladies never have
hang-ups about being sexy, attracting men, even being nude or out in thongs in
public. When you talk to them, many will say they’re feminists, but
their coziness and lack of frigidness around being sexual totally changes what
feminism means to them. FWIW I see the same kind of thing down in South America
when I’ve been there, particularly down in Brazil, which is the one country I
would have chosen if I didn’t wind up in Europe. Crazily hot women,
independent, often say they’re feminists
but it all means something a world away from Anglo feminism. (In Brazil,
when a girl says she’s feminist what she really means is she likes to be the
one in control in bed). So from that observation I think you guys are right, the way that Anglo feminists have been
conditioned to view sex itself as dirty and nasty, a hang-up from our Puritan
tradition, may contribute a lot to the nastiness and misandry of US and Anglo
feminism.
For the simple price of a plane ticket, any solvent Anglo-American male can simply wash his hands of repression, sex-negative feminism and shrill, overweight women. If that does not increase his romantic chances by several hundred percent, nothing will. By directing all his efforts on a fluid, Red Pill factor - namely, his cultural location - it becomes possible for a Black Pilled man to transform his life for the better.
That is the wonder of the Crimson Pill.