Tuesday, 26 January 2010

Women, Self Awareness and the Guillotine of Bitterness


Women are absurdly naive. Since the female sex drive is so miniscule compared to that of males, women typically mistake masculine admiration for meritocratic assessment of their own abilities. Many good examples can be found in the field of employment. Most young, attractive post-feminist women like to believe that their pay-rises and promotions are the fruits of talent and industry. One even hears models describing their wealth as the result of ‘talent’, as though being born with alluring physical traits were some product of stupendous toil. However, we all know that these things are typically gifted young women by men in authority who want to have sex with them. Alternatively, their sexual power over men gives them lucrative careers like modelling, ‘acting’ and pop music, where physical charm is the pivotal ingredient.

Post-feminist women have been so indoctrinated by specious polemics extolling their (largely imaginary) talents, that they truly believe their ‘achievements’ are somehow self-determined. This is why the loss of their physical charms wreaks such havok on them. Having been nurtured on feminist pipe dreams, the cutting realization that their youthful ‘success’ was entirely due to sexual allure must be galling indeed. This explains ‘The Guillotine of Bitterness’ that afflicts most Anglo-American women in their late twenties. After 28, their true worth (or lack of it) stands exposed, stripped of all cerements of sexual power.

The foregoing leads me to a profound consideration: by definition, women lack self-awareness. As Alexander Pope opined,

The plainest truth is what we first let fall,
Most women have no characters at all.


A classic test of self awareness involves painting a cross on any animal’s face and observing its response to its own reflection. An elephant, for example, will probe the cross with its trunk, revealing advanced self-awareness. Lions, by contrast, cannot recognise their own reflection. Women – especially young, attractive women – more closely resemble lions than elephants, at least psychologically: they truly believe that men admire their ‘abilities’, not their sexual charms. Other manifestations of female self-delusion can be observed when obese females call themselves 'Big and Beautiful', or creaking crones kid themselves that men like 'the older woman'. Hence the onset of early middle age is not merely the first ‘crisis of senescence’ they must endure – it is a painfully late introduction to self-awareness.

From infancy, right through their teens and tweens, Anglo women are insulated from objective self-realization by the sickly ‘Princess Syndrome’ that pervades the Anglosphere. This explains the common observation that young women are somewhat ‘soulless’ – hollow, programmed beings with little psychic autonomy. By contrast, adolescence is a cruel rite for most Anglo-American males. The stark fact of their ‘social unwantedness’ becomes obvious, along with the realization that achievement alone can cement their status as worthy citizens. Interestingly, anthropologists have noted that the adolescent males of other primate species also experience a ‘crisis of consciousness’ in adolsecence, quite possibly for the same reasons. The adolescent male knows he will flourish only through his own abilities – his intellect, physical prowess or social guile: he has no ‘pussy pass’ to life. Little wonder that acute self-awareness comes so early to men. Notably, there is no female equivalent of Ray Bradbury’s Dandelion Wine, James Joyce’s A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man or Yukio Mishima’s Confessions of a Mask, simply because adolescent females have no need for acute self-enquiry of the type explored in these distinctively ‘masculine’ novels.

Armed with objective self-awareness, however, the male is well-equipped for adulthood. It is a common observation that, while females flourish in youth, males reverse those advantages in maturity (for example, while girls outperform boys at school and college, adult males still earn considerably more). By contrast, advantaged young females who mistakenly believe themselves ‘smart’ and ‘gifted’ are doomed to a harsh awakening when The Guillotine falls. Indeed, the staunch bitterness of middle-aged Anglo-American women can be entirely attributed to this realization:

It wasn’t your 'talent' and 'intelligence' that men admired: it was your sweet young pussy. That pussy-pass departed with your first wrinkle: live with it, bitch.

23 comments:

  1. "It wasn’t your 'talent' and 'intelligence' that men admired: it was your sweet young pussy. That pussy-pass departed with your first wrinkle: live with it, bitch."

    Very well put! It's funny to see women in their 30's (who are no longer "hot") become angry and bitter towards men because they no longer are getting the attention from men that they got in their 20's.

    Check out this great clip from Tom Leykis on women who are "over the hill."

    http://www.youtube.com/user/cushingpushing#p/f/50/FOezYzK3yck

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hehehehehe. There are some realistic women, you just have to insult them from birth when they act really stupid, instead of kissing their ass. Hehehehe.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Great post! I have nothing more to add ...

    ReplyDelete
  4. It is a very good idea, when outrage and indignace is called for as a response to institutional malignancy, to explain to people why or not, they should be outraged and indignant. This is in order that people are'nt misled into contradicting themselves or denying their very own beliefs, when confronting the authorities for such and such revelation concerning the sexes, which everybody knows of and already agrees with accordingly.

    Because ... ... in respect of the official treatment of intimate partner abuse, dependant on the sexes involved, most people will come to realise that the inherent bigotry and discriminatory standards of the official method, are things they themselves implicitly support and accent to.

    And such people will only be told so wherever and whenever they confront their representative congressioner, senator or legislative delegate without first understanding that all violations of the constitution and law of the land are natural and inexorable consequences of the genderised state. A genderised state structure, with which such persons have obstensibly agreed with and hitherto supported.

    You cannot have law and order, fairness, justice, equality, liberty or simple morality in a state structure that recognises, as the highest common denominator and most surpreme logos around which the whole universe revolves, gender and only gender. And nothing but gender.

    So that if YOU are a man whom accepts that it is right and proper for the sexes to be treated differently or to a double and separate standard in law, in custom, in procedure and in policy, YOU have no grounds of complaint. And your outrage or indignance is misguided.

    If YOU are a man whom accepts that it is right and proper for other men, elected, nominated or appointed, to assume or usurp undue authority over other mens persons, property or progeny, with the good excuse that it is only for womens and childrens interests, YOU have no grounds of complaint. Again, your outrage and indignace at the inexorable and nescessary consequaces of discrimination is misgiuded.

    If YOU are a man whom, but instead of challenging the assumption of undue authorities by men over men, whatever their excuses, spends his time begrudging the beneficiaries of such usurped authority, YOU have no grounds of complaint. Your indignance and outrage is rightly directed at the theives of stolen authority and not at the benificiaries to whom it is cheaply sold.

    A link is provided below, just as a reminder to all those whom would be outraged or indignant at the way allegations of abuse or violence are treated. Because it is as clear as crystal that it is not only the discrimination per se, that should vex them, nor the pump-priming and manipulatory skullduggery officials employ. Employ that is, to keep up the charade of female victimisation and male perpetration.

    No. What should be most vexing of all is that such levels of extreme and open sexual bigotry, discrimination and genderist chicanery is official, lawfull and standard practice. Because thousands upon thousands of people, not least men themselves, are in full suport of it and accept such institutional behaviour with equanimity. Hence its shameless explicitness and blaise openess for all to see.

    Even the given heading alone, in and of itself, shuold set off alarm bells ringing in the minds of right thinking persons of good morals and good ethics ... whatever their politics !

    http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij/topics/crime/intimate-partner-violence/practical-implications-research/ch3/gender.htm

    ReplyDelete
  5. BIG OOPS !

    Sorry folks, the above post of mine oughtn't have gone in under this topic.

    I'll accept its removal or attatchment elsewhere.

    ReplyDelete
  6. “the female sex drive is so miniscule compared to that of males”

    Where do you get this from, bro? Ever hear the Islamic saying “nine parts of desire"? Quoting Ali Ibn Abu Taleb (founder of the Shiite sect of Islam and also the husband of Mohammed’s daughter, Fatima):

    ”Almight God created sexual desire in ten parts; then he gave nine parts to women and one to men.”

    Here’s my take on the reason why women’s nine parts of desire go unnoticed. It’s because women, traditionally, are shielded and protected from birth through to infancy through to adulthood through to old age, and therefore ("traditionally" speaking) they are rarely put into the position of having to test their sexuality, to explore it. So they go through their shielded lives never knowing their true selves… they are in a perpetual state of virginal babyhood. But once they discover their own little secret, oftentimes there is no turning back, and this gives us a sense of where chivalry, and the impulse to "save" a damsel in distress comes from… she needs to be saved from herself.

    ReplyDelete
  7. POIUYT,

    It is a fine post, if a little perpendicular! Let's leave it here, fresh in the public gaze. I actually visited that 'official' misandrist site and gave them a piece of my not inconsiderable mind...

    *Here’s my take on the reason why women’s nine parts of desire go unnoticed. It’s because women, traditionally, are shielded and protected from birth through to infancy through to adulthood through to old age, and therefore ("traditionally" speaking) they are rarely put into the position of having to test their sexuality, to explore it. So they go through their shielded lives never knowing their true selves… they are in a perpetual state of virginal babyhood. *

    Sir, that is an interesting thesis.

    ReplyDelete
  8. 看看blog調整心情,又要來繼續工作,大家加油.........................

    ReplyDelete
  9. Rookh:
    This is an example of The Principle of Occam's Razor - the simplest explanation is the best!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Every woman should be tortured to death!

    ReplyDelete
  11. @Anonymous:
    LOL...
    Yeah - sexually tortured to death!

    Like nice and slow over a period of many years.

    I volunteer myself for that job....

    ReplyDelete
  12. White women are just pathetic nowdays, I am amazed how far they have fallen compared to white women 25 years ago. I used to wonder why white men were dating and marrying asian and latin women but now I understand.

    ReplyDelete
  13. You people are frickin cracked.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Got anything useful to contribute?

      Delete
  14. I have read this blog four times. It is so inaccurate in statements of biology, history, and out-of-context quotes that I can hardly think of an intelligent reply. Misogyny is not a rational state of mind. Seeing women as sub-human or non-human is, likewise, a pathology. I can only conclude your cheering section must be yelling from the basement of human morality.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Sol Squire:
    Does feminist misandry and seeing men as subhumans qualify as an irrational and pathological state of mind too? Or is politcal correctness simply a 'given fact'?

    ReplyDelete
  16. Anon:

    I would also note that Sol Squire does not cite WHERE Rookh has misquoted individuals, fudged his history or made incorrect statements about biology.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Rookh, you yourself display a breathtaking lack of self-awareness. I can only assume that you believe "the female sex drive is so miniscule compared to that of males" simply because you cannot turn women on. I pity you.

    You claim "women typically mistake masculine admiration for meritocratic assessment of their own abilities". Errrr, no we don't! I believe women have over millenia developed an understanding of just how incomplex the male mind tends to be!

    ReplyDelete
  18. Anon1455:
    I suppose female predelicition for bums, thugs, losers, and criminals is because of their 'superior sex drive' LOL.

    ReplyDelete
  19. I don't know who hurt you, but at least the hate it generated caused you to put your fingers to keyboard and exercise your brain a bit. The exercise doesn't lead us anywhere new or interesting, of course, rather it takes us back 100 years to ideas that have long been undermined. WHy do you imagine that being anglo american or being woman is such a deterministic reality? There a hundred ways of being both! In any case, I intended to simply write that having a hate on for an imagined community "anglo american bitches" is probably not going to be the most fulfilling life choice you could have made. And from the perspective of your death bed, when one of these anglo american bitches is cleaning your ass and giving you medicine to stop the pain, it's probably worthwhile rethinking.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hate is a reaction to something extremely unfavorable. You can't change that like flicking a switch. Just don't let it consume every moment of your life. The last part of this post is stupid. The women who wipe the old guys ass are paid after all. They're not doing it just because.

      Delete
  20. Most women suck period. Their personalities are absolute shit. They are manipulative, vampiric and lead parasitical lifestyles. There is something deeply lacking in women which I can't articulate by the time they are thirty they have a very vacant look in their eyes, it's disturbing. They are also shameless which means they have very little or no self awareness at all and this stems from an analysis by Satre relating the feeling of shame to alterity and ipseity. I also read somewhere that they can't reflect, they can't meta-reflect not even on a rudimentary pre-reflective first-order level of consciousness. Most are incapable of deep emotional connectitude with men.

    ReplyDelete
  21. In other words, they behave like little spoiled greedy kids.

    ReplyDelete