A horrible but instructive tale, the murder of simple-minded Michael Gilbert in January 2009 shows us where the Anglosphere went so tragically wrong in allowing women rights without responsibilities. Read the following carefully, and you will find a misandrist, matriarchal subtext of alarming proportions. As Professor Daniel Amneus argues in The Garbage Generation, matriarchy leads only to the Stone Age. The Anglosphere's decline into neolithic matriarchy is already well-advanced (at least among the ever-expanding socio-economic underclass), and misandrist barbarism is the only possible outcome:
A FAMILY of bloodthirsty sadists were facing life in jail last night for the hideous torture and murder of a vulnerable youngster they kept captive for ten years.
Tragic Michael Gilbert, taken in when he was 15, was treated as a slave by the warped scroungers who inflicted pain on him for fun and used him as a source of income - topping up the brood's £38,000 ($60,000)a year in benefits and dole. When Michael finally died from the abuse aged 26 they beheaded him, cut up his body and dumped the parts in a lake at a beauty spot called the Blue Lagoon.
Michael had led a life of misery at the hands of six abusers, family matriarch Jennifer Smith-Dennis, 58, and her sons James Watt, 27, Richard, 25, and Robert, 20. Willingly joining in the sadism were James' girlfriend Natasha Oldfield, 29, and Richard's lover Nichola Roberts, 22.
Michael, who had learning difficulties and was emotionally immature, was a strapping 6ft plus and nicknamed the Big Friendly Giant. He was taken into care aged 15 after being (falsely) accused of rape. It later emerged the victim invented her story so she would be put in care to escape her own dire home life.
While Michael was at the Brambles Children's Home in Luton, Bedfordshire, he met James Watt, then 15. Watt introduced his new pal to his family who took him in, registered him as unemployed and began taking his dole.
They then started the sickening abuse. Michael was forced to sleep handcuffed to a bed and wear just boxer shorts to discourage him from escaping. He was routinely beaten for pleasure, shot at with an air rifle and made to drink his own urine. Michael had his pubic hair set on fire, was hit with baseball bats, jabbed with dirty syringes, made to stand in boiling water and smashed over the head with snooker balls and fluorescent lighting tubes. James Watt dropped snooker balls from a height on to his testicles.
Michael was also left in agony when James would order him to lie on the floor, shove a piece of wood in his mouth and, putting a hand on each end, do press-ups over him. His tormentors used mobiles to make "happy slap" videos. One released by cops yesterday showed Michael standing against a wall while two men punched him. The family could be heard laughing. Mole grips were attached to his genitals and he was led "like a dog" around the house in Luton.
Natasha Oldfield devised a "game" where participants paid to assault Michael. Police found an entry in her diary reading: "Gilbert ends up dead", adding "£5 (10$) slap, £10 (20$) punch, £15 (30$) kick, £25 (50$)head butt". Nichola Roberts admitted stamping on Michael's chest when she weighed 21 stone (over 200 pounds). She told Luton Crown Court: "He was a bit breathless afterwards - anyone would be, having 21 stone on them."
The constant abuse left him unable to control his bowels and he was punished if he failed to make it to the toilet. He was even made to goad a bearded dragon lizard the family kept until it lashed him with its giant tail. The court heard how Michael was once asked by Richard why he put up with the abuse. He replied: "I love you lot. You are my family."
His last days were spent with a bloated stomach, unable to walk. He died on a mattress smeared in his own excrement in January 2009. When the body was found, Richard, James, Robert and Oldfield cut him up. An vehicle owned by Nichola Roberts was used to take him to the Lagoon. A police camera captured Robert, James and Richard on the way. Four months later his headless corpse was found in a bag by walkers at the lagoon in Arlesey, Beds. It had been weighted down with a stone from the Watt's patio.
Source: The UK Sun, April 2010
Michael Gilbert was in every sense a victim of the Anglosphere's burgeoning matriarchy. He was falsely accused of rape (note how Murdoch's mouthpiece The Sun tries to gloss over his accuser's malevolent intentions). As a low status male, the UK Police and other authorities were entirely indifferent to his plight (contrast his treatment with the feminist media's obsession with 'trafficked women'). He fell into the clutches of a post-feminist kinship-gaggle, comprising the psychotic, criminally-prone individuals routinely produced by such pseudo-families. In the Watt family, only Jennifer's third husband Antonio had a job, and he alone was acquitted of all charges - a tale in itself.
In the coarsest sense, Gilbert was also physically attacked by misandrist underclass women, both of whom actively contributed to his tragic death. As we all know, women can attack men with near-absolute impunity in the post-feminist Anglosphere, as this tragic tale proves (indeed, Natasha Oldfield was actually smirking and laughing in court while discussing her hammer-attacks on Gilbert's stomach. It was, to her, a joke). Finally, the inane institutions of post-feminist civilization (and we use the term loosely) directly contributed to his death, since Oldfield evidently considered his torture a kind of 'game show'.
On analysis, what initially appeared an idiomatic expression of British underclass savagery is revealed to express the core themes of our unravelling culture: institutionalised misandry, matriarchal barbarism, rampant Murdochracy and legally-empowered feminism. Watch well, friends, for the idiomatic events of today can so quickly become the norms of tomorrow.
Posts
As usual, another profound observation on the state of Marxist feminism throughout the world of Anglo-Saxon matriarchy. It's disturbing what women are allowed to do and get away with in the pitch darkness of this female-dominated liberal multiculturalist tyranny, where one is demonized and even persecuted for being male. Whither the civilization of the Occident? Perhaps a reversal of sex roles, methinks, given the pussification of the Western male and the masculinization of the Western female; and then, perhaps (and mercifully) the disintegration of the West, as it is gradually swamped by hordes of Third World foreigners who breed like vermin and despise the effeminacy of this supposedly compassionate liberal multiculturalist ethic which has allowed them to infiltrate the West in the first place.
ReplyDeleteMuzalon, the whole world is going to hell in a hand basket and it's a beautiful sight, to tell you the truth. If one can acknowledge Spengler's idea that civilizations pass through transitional stages of growth and decay, then maybe we can hope for a new order, a glorious summer of youthful vitality, arising hundreds of years from now upon the ashes of the ancien regime, which is now in the winter of its life. But perhaps I am being too optimistic. Spengler did say that "Optimism is cowardice."
Agreed, the Anglosphere is in 'the winter of its life', and the whole West too:
ReplyDeleteTurning and turning in the widening gyre
The falcon cannot hear the falconer;
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.
On a more practical note, I'm sure all American readers will be utterly astonished that people found guilty of such atrocities are not executed. America is often decried for retaining the death sentence, but its abolition in Britain and the Commonwealth was a crucial Marxist-femininist blow against patriarchal values.
For all its faults, capital punishment represents a masculine clarity of moral perception sharply opposed to the slovenly, imprecise femininity of laxer penal alternatives. The famous British hangman Albert Pierrepoint said that most prisoners approached their execution with a kind of resolute peace, tacitly recognising their punishment as both essential and appropriate.
We can also be sure the Americans can hardly restrain themselves from taking the first flight over and blowing these animals away - a bad if noble idea, since they are safe in the 'secure' wings of undisclosed British jails and no doubt heavily guarded for their own protection, at enormous public expense.
That's, uh, the awful patriarchy for you. Go figure...
This indeed is a tragic story, and one possibly predictable from the work of Zimbardo's 'Stamford University Prison' experiment; cut short due to his girlfriends worries over the ethics of the procedure.
ReplyDeleteNot only tragic from the victims point of view, but a dire warning regarding methods of solution. Since the perpetrators have gone beyond human responsibility, their ilk can not be negotiated with by any human conditions. It follows then, that if the Marxist-Feminist system engenders such behaviour, then its elimination from natural spontaneous society, must include the total removal of Marxist-Feminism.
The students in Zimbardo's experiment, that became brutes, did so due to being given carte blanc. Similarly, Marxist-Feminism gives women and queers the security in law, to disregard the rights of men; with inevitable consequences.
When people are free to respond in kind, then and only then will society form naturally; replete with natural hierarchies, natural diversity, and natural justice. No wonder the 'state' makes anarchy seem an heretical nonsense, because if people realised just how needless government is, we'd burn the lot of 'em.
The cruelty inflicted on that poor men by this tribe of ferals would probably be expected in Nanjing circa 1937. The fact that it is still happening 70+ years later, in a supposedly civilised society, is a disgrace that by itself should shame the British government. Not that it will. Anglo males mean little to either the Anglo government or women (unless they're sociopaths), except as a means of income and self-indulgence.
ReplyDeleteMore details:
ReplyDeleteWitness Colin Watt told the court how he saw Miss Natasha Oldfield (first Anglobitch, above) kick, jump on and punch Mr Gilbert.
He said: "Michael used to lie on the floor and she used to stand on him and start jumping up and down on him."
Prosecutor, Stuart Trimmer QC, told how Mr Gilbert was regularly beaten and abused and held by the family as their slave so that they could take his benefit money from him.
It is alleged that whenever he did manage to flee, he would be traced through the benefits system and forcibly brought back to the Watts' home.
Mr Watt said that by the end of 2008 he said Mr Gilbert was "getting worse and worse."
He said: "He had bruises all over his body and his stomach was swelling up."
He said beatings would take place day and night and that by January of 2009 there would be occasions when Mr Gilbert could only crawl to move around.
Mr Watt, who moved out of the family home, said: "The day before I left, I saw Michael in the bathroom lying on the floor covered in faeces. He just had a pair of boxers on and a t-shirt. His stomach was so swollen."
I wonder how Tommy Fleming would twist this into a case of male irresponsability.
ReplyDeleteThanks for posting this Rookh. Like I mentioned on an earlier post, anthropologists and depth psychologists have drawn parallels between absolute savagery and matriarchial societies.
ReplyDeleteWhen I first came to the MRM about a year ago, I was admittedly sceptical of your thesis; but more and more it's being borne out. Feminism and female supremacist movements have never taken hold in any culture where Anglo-puritanism first hasn't taken well- established roots.
The historical reasons for this are increasingly clear. Before the rise of Anglo Puritans and Saxon Anabaptists about 500 years ago, Anglo-Saxon culture was fairly similar to most others. All civilised cultures recognise a gender polarity; the Orientals with ying-yang; the Semitic cultures with the dual-pillared Cabbala; and Christianity, building on Graeco-Roman cultural traditions, had a paternalist state and a maternalist church.
Puritanism broke that polarity. Church and state were melded into a single, angrogynous unity (the origins of latent Anglo homosexuality and homosociality). Then, with Mary and the feminine element removed from the church, these same Puritans turned to their mothers, wives and lovers as objects of veneration (the origin of the Pedestal Syndrome and the Entitlement Princess).
But mortal women are far from being actual goddesses (regardless of whatever they may think of themselves!) and 5 centuries later we're seeing the dead end of this cultural experiment: a self-righteous, latently homosexual, powerless masculinity utterly subservient to an irrational, irresponsible femininity.
Making more and more men aware of this and teaching them that there's a way out is about the only hope we have; hopefully the MRM can wake up enough of them before it's too late.
I agree with that brilliant assessment. Yes, the Anglobitch Thesis has grown and grown and fine minds like yours are ready to take it in new directions. It has grown because it best explains the Anglosphere's matriarchal misandry.
ReplyDeleteRE the Gilbert case, I have looked into it deeply and it seems the killers felt Gilbert's false rape accusation an excuse for their abusive crimes. In short, they were matriarchal misandrist puritans defending Anglo womanhood (or thought themselves as such), exactly as you described. Gilbert was the tragic Anglo 'fall guy' - poor, powerless and, once falsely accused of raping an Anglobitch, a legitimate torture victim. James Watt and the two women were the ones involved in stamping him to death and all were bereft of remorse throughout the trial.
This case really drives home the hatred groups like lower class Anglo women harbour for males in the Anglosphere. The fat one jumped on Gilbert's stomach just three days before his death, while Oldfield had already been trampling him for months. Far from being deviants, they were merely acting out the core themes of Anglo-Saxon culture: misandry, matriarchy and the pedestal agenda. We need to win this fight, and soon; or if we cannot win, retract our consent and depart the Anglosphere.
"We need to win this fight, and soon; or if we cannot win, retract our consent and depart the Anglosphere."
ReplyDeleteWhat do you guys think will happen to anglo-countries in 50 to 100 years? More and more men from anglo-countries are moving to more "man friendly" countries like the Philippines, Russia, China, Mexico and South America.
Do you think that feminists and their ilk will eventually become extinct? The marriage rates in anlgo-countries is at all time lows (thank God) as men realize anglo-bitches don't make good wives. More and more men are marrying foreign women a trend that experts say will continue for a long time!
Rookh, I feel sorry for you, British men. However, as long as you continue playing ball with your conservative-Christian-misandrist culture you are going to continue suffering.
ReplyDeleteI am 31 and from Mexico. I visited England two years ago (working for a company), and let me tell you: I didn´t like your country, I felt an environment of decrepitude and misandry. Your women are simply horrible: fat, alcoholic, nagging, misandrist and old premature. I was so disappointed that even I am looking Mexican women differently. British men looked to me like hopeless teenagers without any future and resigned to be treated like second class citizens. However, the thing that shocks me more is that every time I have talked to a English man either in Mexico or the UK is the fact of how proud British men are of his country, culture and heritage. Proud of what?! Of a conservative culture that punishes and represses human nature? Of a Christian culture that vilifies male traits while glorifies female irrationality? Of a misandrist legal system? Of a parasitic monarchy? Of an authentic caste system that dooms people to live in a lower class without any hope of social mobility?
An increasing number of men are in a marriage strike in the anglosphere as you have pointed out. However, I guess it’s not enough. I guess you should strike on all your misandrist culture. Strike on Christianity, don’t attend Sunday mass, stop listen to stupidities. Stop glorifying your monarchy, what’s in it for you? Never get married under the British law, cohabitate. Don’t date British women, you can take the Eurotunnel and find better women in France, Spain, Italy, etc. Show your contempt to a culture that doesn’t like you! Good luck!
One thing you could address, Rookh, is how men have been so deeply affected by this "Great Recession" or "Mancession" as some have called it. If anything, the layoffs have affected men far more than women, and have hit male-dominated industries (such as construction and manufacturing) much more so than traditional female occupations. A woman with little education and far less to offer society has a much greater chance of earning a comfortable living than a male does, which is why working-class/blue collar males have become so much less attractive because their breadwinner status has been so gravely undermined.
ReplyDeleteSantiago;
ReplyDeleteI'm an American guy, and I started looking at Mexican women differently, too some time ago. In fact, Mexican women have made up the largest percentage of my romantic interests during the last few years, and I'll never date another Anglobitch again. What you say about British men is true of American men as well; they act around women like a bunch of abused children, resigned to receiving the next blow.
Rookh;
ReplyDeleteThanks for the positive feedback! But I think I've a lot yet to learn from the masters LOL!
I read a discussion on another MRM forum recently talking about increasing violence against men in the entertainment media, with the underlying theme that the men somehow deserved it. I think these stories dovetail into many of these recent posts: the violence against men in the media; increasing Anglobitch violence against men (and children by proxy); and the howlings among Anglo women about a non-existant man-shortage are, I think interrelated phenomena.
Karl Mannheim, an eminent German sociologist, stated that when a cultural system is in an advanced stage of collapse, the fringe elements begin to manifest themselves increasingly into the mainstream. This particular stage, according to Mannheim, is the really critical one; because the old system is irrevocably finished and will either end in profound social change or collapse completely into totalitarianism.
Which I think can be interpreted that these outbreaks of violence (and more will come) are conscious expressions of what the Anglobitch is feeling subconsciously: that Female Supremacy is on its way down and, at this point, nothing short of brute force can hold it in place. Which means, for the MRM, that the 'Marriage Strike' is probably a lot more widespread in the Anglosphere than we realized.
Historically, social changes rarely start or finish dramatically as the residual effects of the old system continue. Probably the first generation of Anglo-Puritan women felt humbly flattered by being put on pedestals; the next felt honored; the next came to expect it; the next saw it as a right; the next, an entitlement.
Today, it's reached its logical absurdity: outright idolatry---women demand worship for their own sake; unquestioning obedience from men; and the power of life and death over men and children.
So, you're absolutely correct about the need to win this fight---and soon. At this stage of feminine social decline, the next stage downwards will have stormtroopers enforcing this idolatry and the violent stories we're reading now will be official policy.
*What do you guys think will happen to anglo-countries in 50 to 100 years? More and more men from anglo-countries are moving to more "man friendly" countries like the Philippines, Russia, China, Mexico and South America.*
ReplyDeleteI have given this much thought. In modern Britain, well over 100 000 people emigrate annually (a conservative estimate), and these are typically the most skilled and educated. In the States, in 2020 almost a quarter of men will be married to foreign women. These males are the most solvent, stable and skilled (i.e. those with most to lose by Divorce from an Anglobitch, and those most able to produce stable, successful children). By 2050 the two core Anglo nations will:
1. Have a massive white Anglo underclass, much larger and more debased than the present one. Since the most able Anglo males will have out-bred with foreigners for three generations, the remaining 'pure' Anglos will be the kids/grandkids of deadbeats, sociopaths and layabouts. This underclass will be cognitive, social and moral misfits with IQs in the sub-90 range, and heavily cross-bred with underclass blacks.
2. Have a new, hybrid elite. East Asians have marginally higher IQs than whites and this, coupled with the fact that the most intelligent Anglo males prefer foreign women will result in a transfer of cognitive power to a new sino-caucasian elite. Britain will similarly be ruled by an Asian-Caucasian elite. In our high-tech world, cognitive ability is the new arbiter of power.
3. No longer be puritanical. As Stephen Pinker argues, repression selects itself out of populations. Anglobitch hatred of men will ultimately lead feminists to genetic extinction. The white underclass remaining in their wake will essentially be animals in all but name.
4. No longer be feminist. The new cognitive elite will have no truck with feminism, since their own success depends on resistance to it. Besides, feminists are doomed to genetic extinction.
5. Will be much weaker, in an international sense. Due to the costly, feminised underclass, Anglo-American technological and military dominion will wither. Female domination of higher education just means the triumph of the liberal arts and soft sciences, essentially useless in international competition. Feminist-sponsored alienation of males from education will mean less engineers, scientists and technicians, all of which will hasten the end of Anglo military-industrial prowess.
6. Will be more dispersed as cultural entities. With the brightest and best Anglos leaving Britain and America for foreign wives and better lives, Slavic, Latin and Asiatic countries will acquire Anglicised elites of their own. Where that will end, I know not.
Santiago
ReplyDelete*However, the thing that shocks me more is that every time I have talked to a English man either in Mexico or the UK is the fact of how proud British men are of his country, culture and heritage. Proud of what?! Of a conservative culture that punishes and represses human nature? Of a Christian culture that vilifies male traits while glorifies female irrationality? Of a misandrist legal system? Of a parasitic monarchy? Of an authentic caste system that dooms people to live in a lower class without any hope of social mobility?*
You sum it up well, friend, with a foreigner's objective eye. Everything you say is true. I guess this is why conservative MRAs are so utterly mistaken: they foolishly seek to DEFEND the culture that OPPRESSES them. However hard they try they will never defeat misandrist feminism, since Anglo feminism draws its strength from the very culture they defend. This is a strange thing, since many conservative MRAs are extremely intelligent men. I suspect very few of them have lived abroad and therefore assume misandry, pedestals and Anglobitch feminism are unchanging norms, not just specific features of Anglo culture.
*An increasing number of men are in a marriage strike in the anglosphere as you have pointed out. However, I guess it’s not enough. I guess you should strike on all your misandrist culture. Strike on Christianity, don’t attend Sunday mass, stop listen to stupidities. Stop glorifying your monarchy, what’s in it for you? Never get married under the British law, cohabitate. Don’t date British women, you can take the Eurotunnel and find better women in France, Spain, Italy, etc. Show your contempt to a culture that doesn’t like you!*
I suppose that is what we are doing here. For myself, I accept all your advice and suspect that most men here do the same. One problem remains: even in the men's movement, let alone the wider Anglosphere, we men with 'Anglobitch-awareness' are really a tiny minority of alienated high-IQ males, with very limited influence. That said, I can sense a wind of change blowing through the Anglosphere, at least on the topic of Anglo women. I recently read an online debate on the NY Times website, where virtually every American male expressed disgust with the institution of marriage and feminist attempts to prevent them seeking foreign brides. It may take a long time yet, but Anglo-American feminists are becoming increasingly shrill and hysterical about their lack of willing meal-tickets... and long may that continue!
I would sum it up by telling Anglo men: avoid commitment to anything or anyone unless the Anglosphere drops its misandrist agendas or, alternatively, you can live abroad. It's like boxing: stay on the outside, only throw counter-punches and always keep those feet moving... just like Salvador Sanchez.
*One thing you could address, Rookh, is how men have been so deeply affected by this "Great Recession" or "Mancession" as some have called it. If anything, the layoffs have affected men far more than women, and have hit male-dominated industries (such as construction and manufacturing) much more so than traditional female occupations. A woman with little education and far less to offer society has a much greater chance of earning a comfortable living than a male does, which is why working-class/blue collar males have become so much less attractive because their breadwinner status has been so gravely undermined.*
ReplyDeleteThere is much truth in that. However, female 'work' often seems to be in the more pointless areas of academia (sociology, counselling, anthropology etc.) and female jobs tend to be located in the public sector (education, social 'work', marketing). As the economy worsens, most of those positions will have to be shed, too, as simply unaffordable. The conservative government in Britain have recently slashed half a million public sector 'soft' jobs, and I suspect the rest of the Anglosphere will soon follow suit.
Women's work is a luxury, not a necessity. I mean, how many teaching assistants, counsellors and 'professors' of women's studies do the Anglosphere economies really need?
Rookh;
ReplyDeleteI think your future predictions are the probable outcome of the inevitable collapse of Anglo-Puritanism, but I would also add to it that the debased underclass will also likely be more violent and predatory than it is even now---both because of the nature of its paternal stock and the increasingly violent and abusive nature of its maternal one. Another factor in Anglo-America's military decline will be the need to channel resources into internal security.
You're correct in pointing out also that the main preference among Anglo-American men for foreign brides are among Asians which will likely build a huge class with cultural/ethnic ties to the Orient, that will be especially resented by the Anglo underclass too. I don't know the situation in the rest of the Anglosphere, but there are definate signs of this underclass and its latent xenophobia emerging and reflected by Anglobitch extraordinaires like Sarah Palin and her clones during the last two election cycles.
The American cultural elite, though, is a serious problem, especially in the media and academia, but since the Murdoch-dominated media is already playing to a low intellectual level, there's no reason to suppose that it won't gravitate downwards with its natural audience. What I really worry about in your cultural scenario is the potential of these cultural elites agitating the growing underclass and giving them a political direction.
Your hate-filled ranting does nothing to help the victims of brutality, such as this poor man. Every racial, ethnic group and both genders include sadistic criminals. The reason you fixate on white women is your own prejudice.
ReplyDeleteAnon 1558:
ReplyDeleteCongrats, you just missed the entire point of the article and indeed, this entire website.
The point is, most people sympathise with all races of women in the Anglosphere over their male counterparts, but especially 'native' white Anglo women, even when horrific cases like this demonstrate the folly of doing so. Anglo women were at least partially responsible for causing Michael Gilbert's death here - much at odds with Anglo puritan pedestalisation depicting them as goddesses.
That is why this website exists - to debunk that rubbish.
I wholeheartedly agree that men living in dangerous domestic situations needs to be taken more seriously by the police and the authorities. I think that this is a tragic story, along the with last story you published about the man who was murdered by his family and stayed because he wanted to to be with his daughter. I agree that this is a big problem but you are doing NOTHING to help. I think that the manosphere needs to address this issue on a bigger scale and change the way that it conducts itself in order to get things like this sorted out. Please stop attacking individual women and being classist and whatnot and focus on the real issue here. Being classist ect will not get you taken seriously and it gives you a bad image. Being a Jimmy Saville apologist and calling women 'anglobitches' will get you completely discredited, as will talking about women's physical appearances and whatnot. We live in a society that expects men to take care of themselves when in reality many of them need urgent help and support. That is the bottom line. The first story you published, the man should have been allowed to leave with his daughter and they should have been put into some kind of protective accommodation. You need to start fighting for things like this, not against one whole gender. What you are doing is harmful to men's humans rights. It is NOT helping.
ReplyDelete