Wednesday, 31 December 2014

Deluded Definitions: ODD and the End of the Anglosphere

Richard Feynman - clearly an ODD candidate

I recently found the following definition of the latest psychiatric fad, Oppositional Defiant Disorder, on the Internet:
ODD is a condition in which a child displays an ongoing pattern of uncooperative, defiant, hostile, and annoying behavior toward people in authority. The child's behavior often disrupts the child's normal daily activities, including activities within the family and at school. 

What Are the Symptoms of Oppositional Defiant Disorder? Symptoms of ODD may include:

  • Throwing repeated temper tantrums
  • Excessively arguing with adults
  • Actively refusing to comply with requests and rules
  • Deliberately trying to annoy or upset others, or being easily annoyed by others
  • Blaming others for your mistakes
  • Having frequent outbursts of anger and resentment
  • Being spiteful and seeking revenge
  • Swearing or using obscene language
  • Saying mean and hateful things when upset

In addition, many children with ODD are moody, easily frustrated, and have a low self-esteem. They also sometimes may abuse drugs and alcohol.
… just like Van Gogh, Richard Feynman, Hart Crane, Edgar Allen Poe and hundreds of other men endowed with Promethean genius. Indeed, defiant opposition to authority is the essence of manhood. A compliant, malleable male is like a wingless eagle, a disgrace to nature.

Vincent Van Gogh: Self-Portrait of Genius

In short, Anglo-American psychiatrists have pathologized normal masculine behaviour as deviant and ‘abnormal’. What further proof do we need that Anglo-Saxon culture, with its puritanical and feminist fixations, is inherently anti-male? Far from being a patriarchy, the Anglosphere is an anti-male matriarchy in all but name. It exalts women because women are sexless and compliant; it detests men because they are virile and individualistic.

Raymond Dart: Scientific Visionary

It is no surprise that all innovation springs from the minds and hands of men. Aside from our greater imagination and intelligence, men are born to defy outworn authority. Copernicus, Newton, Darwin, Raymond Dart – without their ‘oppositional- defiant’ traits, the world would be languishing in medieval ignorance. When the Anglosphere labels the Promethean fire of male genius an ‘illness’, one senses its days on the global stage are numbered. No matriarchy has the innovative potential to survive the white heat of international competition in science, business or technology. Endowed with standardized, malleable minds that lack all originality, women are drawn to authoritarian, tram-track disciplines like psychology or law like moths to a candle-flame. Sadly, such sterile disciplines add little to a nation's strength or prosperity in the longer term.

To conclude, only outright rejection of Anglo-American culture can lead men to freedom and self-actualization. At every level – medical, legal, political – Anglo-American civilization seeks to pathologize and denigrate healthy masculinity. It has, in fact, declared war on men.

Happy New Year.

Copernicus: Defiance made Flesh


  1. Rookh wrote, "To conclude, only outright rejection of Anglo-American culture can lead men to freedom and self-actualization. At every level – medical, legal, political – Anglo-American civilization seeks to pathologize and denigrate healthy masculinity. It has, in fact, declared war on men."

    How true, the English speaking countries have declared war on men (even though the liberals say there is a war on women). Men are vilified and made fun of in the Anglosphere while women are exulted and put on a pedestal.

    Men in the Anglosphere to start moving to more man friendly countries like Brazil, Columbia, Russia, Ukraine and the Philippines. It's best to get out of the toxic Anglosphere environment altogether.

  2. Happy New Year, Rookh!

    Albert Einstein would also be diagnosed with ODD if he were alive today.

    Our culture tries to suppress everything superior and level to the lowest common denominator: another feature of matriarchial societies.

    1. "another feature of matriarchial societies."
      Except that we live under a post-industrial patriarchy which works for none but the top 1% of white men. Besides that, although most geniuses were indeed men does not indicate that most men are geniuses. There are more male murderers and rapist than there are geniuses. Would you take the credit for them, too?

    2. Regardless of if we do or do not you are going to pin it into our chests so...

    3. Plutocracies aren't patriachies, Anonymous Anglo feminist.

  3. The irony is, because feminism has pretty much wiped out all competing cultures.

    Mgtow, mra & pua will be the dominating culture of most western societies.

    The manosphere hitting the mainstream is only the beginning.

    Essentially feminism has destroyed traditionalism & marriage, this will cause feminism to be overtaken & destroyed by the manosphere, & the movements its spawned.

    Essentially secularism & feminism have destroyed all ither ideologies, leaving it wide open for the mgtow, mras & pua's to take over.

    1. Some excellent points. However, I wouldn't go overboard on the idea that MRA values are 'hitting the mainstream'. Most people see us as dangerous malcontents with small dicks who either can't get laid or are gay (or some combination of the two). That said, there is now far less acceptance of feminist rhetoric than there used to be, even in the lame-stream media. The Internet has exposed the repressive, bourgeois and racist origins of Anglo-American feminism for all to see - not to mention its elitism and hypocrisy.

    2. I wouldn't exactly say that "MRA is taking off" because most men still subscribe to false sexual consciousness and feminism is law of the land more than ever.

      Most guys "can't get laid" least in the way they claim guys do "in this day of age." When I look around most of the guys I've known have only had a handful of relationships with very average girls whom they had to jump through all kinds of hurdles to get into bed. Maybe guys like Pitbull get all these strangers to jump into bed with them but that isn't the norm for most men. Yet no man is willing to call Pitbull out and say the lifestyle he sings about is only available to millionaire pop singers, not "us." (Yes, the guy seriously has a song claiming that the easiest place for a guy to get laid IN THE ENTIRE WORLD is Miami USA) While I would NOT say that most women are swooning over the dangerous types and jumping into bed with them, I would say that most EASY women (sluts) ARE in fact swooning over a handful of dangerous Alphas and fucking them at the drop of a hat. And those sluts are the ones that post modern mythology claim are waiting for the average guy at "club" for one night stands the way they really used to be before Anglobitch moral reform programs shut down the brothels a couple generations back.

    3. Absolutely right about the mass sexual false consciousness. One of the major issues I have with PUAs is their assumption that plain/ugly women are intrinsically easier to fuck than attractive ones. They forget that there are simply far more 2s, 3s and 4s than 7s, 8s and 9s, which gives that misleading impression. In fact, many plain, obese or even ugly women in Anglosphere countries are extremely reluctant to engage in recreational sex, perhaps because their SMV is so precarious.

      The sexual false consciousness you describe is especially strong in reference to the 60s and 70s. When rock stars like Led Zeppelin were having sex with hundreds of girls, this has translated into: 'all males were having vast amounts of free sex in the 60s/70s'. But Led Zeppelin were millionaire rock stars on world spanning tours at the very height of the rock era: hardly demographically representative of men in general at that time. And of course, the sexual anecdotes of Plant and Page have passed into posterity, creating a wildly distorted picture of mass sexual experience in that era. Guys that had little or no recreational sex have been forgotten, and their testimony ignored. Indeed, only with the rise of the Internet has the issue of sexual false consciousness been raised at all. Even 'revolutionary' academics like Baudrillard, Reich and Foucault have generally given the issue a wide berth.

    4. Rmax:
      I tend to agree with Rookh and Sebastian. SOME Manosphere concepts are being more and more covertly accepted by average Anglo-American men; they being exposed to them via the Internet. However, the Mainstream cultural elites still oppose it.

      There's also been a lot of co-opting of the Manosphere by vested interests. It's up to men to separate the wheat from the chaff.

  4. There is no doubt in my mind, that this new "mental illness" ODD came from a psychiatrist listening to the complaints of single mom's who have no idea on how to raise male children or deal with them.

    I have met women like this - they are clueless bimbos.

    Hence, instead of fixating on the disease, the doctor describes the symptom...

    Like that bird analogy.

    1. ALL women are clueless bimbos and stunted, stupid, wretched creatures. Deep down they know they worthless.

      I feel absolutely no pity or compassion towards a woman/women being raped or murdered. They have taken everything from the men and turned MALE inventions against men, and now they want sympathy?

      Not gonna happen.

      Sadly, against every brave and brutal ISIS fighter there is a legion of white knights and manginas, mainly from the West and anglosphere in particular.

    2. What have women taken from men? Name something.

      Men do not own other men's discoveries and inventions simply because they too lack a womb and ovaries.

      Did you build or design the smart phone, pc or tablet you wrote that lame message with?

      Name everything you personally have achieved, invented or discovered - those things and only those things belong to you. Everything outside of that you pay for like the rest of us!

    3. ODD - just another symptom of entitled, molly-coddled, spoiled, man-child.

    4. Absolutely right, it is yet another way of helping women in brainwashing their own kids. I find it funny how they see drugging their kids and inducing an antinatural state of mind in them as totally normal, healthy and possitive.

      There is a monster in every human, but only the one living in every female is being celebrated.

  5. When any system of power tries to control nature, it provokes the natural cussedness of nature itself, which, like Le Chatelier's Principle, will result in nature opposing the perturbation.

    As Western governments become ever more perverse, they will expose themselves by their choices of remedy. If children need to be cured of their nature, it's time to abolish the government.

  6. So, throwing temper tantrums, being spiteful, blaming others etc etc etc is 'the essence of manhood' and 'normal masculine behaviour', is it? Well, let's just remember it's you who said it!!!!

    1. Hey Feminism is quite masculine under that definition. Afterall it tries, succesfully, to masculinize women.

  7. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.