 |
| The Face of Evil: Anglofoid Gloats Over Lynching Victim |
Why has misandrist
feminism been so successful in Anglophone countries? This question has begun to
haunt me. Too many anti-feminists use conspiracy theories to explain the rise
of misandrist Anglo feminism. While there have certainly been a number of
social, political and religious groups promoting feminist agendas, their
writings would never have achieved mass or institutional support if such support
did not already exist. The Frankfurt School and other pro-feminist intellectual
movements can only flourish if the social soil is already receptive to their
message. For example, the Frankfurt School only adopted an infiltration agenda
when its calls for a proletarian revolution failed in affluent post-War North
America. There is also the issue of institutional compliance. Some nations or
cultural blocs have pre-existing institutions which are especially ripe for
subversion. For example, the Anglo-American Common Law legal system has proved
incredibly susceptible to feminist manipulation in recent years. Similarly,
existing historical memes or traditions can hinder or facilitate subversive agendas;
and one of these is my topic here.
A former
corrections officer gave us an extended essay in which he argued that the
distinctive cultural heritage of the Anglosphere countries had a major role in
the emergence of misandrist feminism. His view was that Anglo feminism exploits
the residual resistance of former subject races in post-colonial Anglo
countries to lever outrageous and unwarranted privilege for entitled white
women.
While this
assessment is accurate enough, I have begun to detect another pro-feminist
dynamic in the colonial legacy. This is kind of residual racist puritanism
deriving from a distinctive Anglo-Saxon obsession with limiting the
reproductive fecundity of 'subject' races or classes. It is no surprise that this
obsession is strongest in the Anglo countries with a troubled colonial past
built on slavery and genocide, such as Australia or the United States. After
all, those nations had most to gain by regulating or limiting the reproductive
fecundity of slaves and ‘subject’ races.
 |
| Aboriginal Heads on Display |
This realization
came to me from free discussions with Hondo Solomon, an insightful black
American writer who teaches the virtues of polygamy. In his view, the
Anglo-Saxon obsession with imposing sexual repression on subject peoples is
largely to keep their numbers low, thereby minimizing the threat of revolt. In
addition, Hondo also claims that Anglo-puritan monogamy was also promoted to
keep subject populations at a low genetic standard by deliberately preventing
the natural proliferation of alpha genes for leadership and intelligence: a
kind of soft dysgenics. Judging by the
hunchbacked, autistic morons inhabiting English towns and cities, this policy
has proved fairly effective in the British Isles – its original testing-ground.
Hondo also claims that the American obsession with professional sports also
derives from its colonial legacy – the obsessive measurement of physical
attributes and performance originating in the slave trade.
 |
| Wingspan: The American Sports Fixation |
Returning to The
Anglobitch Thesis, if we focus on the sexual elements of Anglo-American colonialism we see
a ubiquitous and concerted attempt to associate religious guilt with sex among
subject populations. We also see a determined attempt to replace religions
which celebrate reproductive fecundity (voodoo, Islam, Catholicism, Judaism and
Hinduism) with guilt-laden Anglican Christianity and its sickly cult of
reproductive sterility. Let us note that this insidious campaign is colour
blind: it oppresses Highland Scots or the English lower classes as much as is
does Black Americans, Aryan Hindus or Black Africans. Wherever he goes the
patrician Anglo-American tries to impose his woman-worship, guilt and latent
homosexuality with one goal in mind: to limit subject populations’ numbers and
genetic quality, thereby reducing the threat of revolt against his rule.
Even though its
original inspiration has long gone, the same repressive spirit persists as a
habitual residue in all Anglosphere countries. Moreover, it is one of the
residual memes that has contributed most to the rapid rise of sex-negative
misandrist feminism across the Anglosphere. As usual, Anglo-feminism draws
strength and succour from the very forces it claims to oppose.
 |
| Anglofoids enjoy Lynching |
Anglo feminism has
nurtured a racist seed since its very inception, so such an alignment should
come as no surprise when we consider the colonial origins and uses of
Anglo-American Puritanism. Lynchings and other Anglo-American race-crimes
typically represented a working collusion between early feminists and imperialists, typically framed as a hysterical campaign to ‘protect’ exalted
white women from the animal lusts of black slaves. This sexual Nazism still
contaminates Anglo feminism, albeit at an unstated and subliminal level
(consider feminist Reclaim the Night marches through black areas, which covertly
assume that all black men are rapists). Of course, inculcating the colonising
race with puritanical values also serves the colonial enterprise by inhibiting
interbreeding with subject peoples, with obvious benefits for the colonial
project. It is far harder to maintain a colonial culture of exploitation when
many of the exploited share genes from the colonising race. The ‘Pretty White
Girl Syndrome’ which saturates the Anglo media is entirely dedicated to
exalting white Anglo girls as unattainable deities beyond all reproach; surely another
warped legacy of colonial Anglo-elitism.
 |
| Too Good for You: Anglofoid Sexual Elitism |
My thought has
reached a crucial impasse on the issue of sex-negative, misandrist Anglo
feminism. It is no longer enough to consider the Anglosphere’s puritanical
religious heritage the only force underpinning the Anglo-feminist agenda. Other
countries have a strong Protestant tradition (Holland, Germany, Denmark) yet
still lack sex-negative feminism of the Anglosphere variety. Other factors must
underlie misandrist Anglo-feminism, while sustaining its agenda. Obviously,
malleable Common Law is one of these; other prime candidates are genetics,
empirical machine values, homosociality and class distinction.
However, the
post-colonial dynamic also serves and abets Anglo-American feminism, as we have
seen. Its legacy gives Anglo feminism its distinctive racist, misandrist and
sex-negative character, especially in those countries where colonial oppression
was strongest.
 |
| Anglofoids: Exalted Deities? |
Posts
