The Case of Stephen Curry: Rampant Hyper-Hypergamy in Action

In America, even ugly old boots think they're 'it'

Sometimes we have to get back to first principles.

For me, the first principle of my thought is that Anglo-American culture is essentially puritanical and inherently misandrist, since puritanism reflexively loathes male sexuality. Because of this, Anglo-American feminism has a potent misandrist element which is fairly unique, although it is rapidly spreading via cultural contamination. Anglo feminism is also predictably sex-negative, since sex-negativity raises the scarcity-value of sex. Not only is Anglo feminism antagonistic to prostitution and sex tourism,  the fact that 28% of American men had no sex in 2018 demonstrates that a female 'sex strike' is already in full swing across North America.

Further, Anglo-American feminism receives unstinting support from the cultural establishment, since it shares most of the same goals and values. At a personal level, the mass sexual scarcity reflexively associated with puritanism imbues Anglo-American women with an extreme form of hypergamy which I call 'hyper-hypergamy': an inflated and 'hyperreal' form of hypergamy which no real-world male can ever satisfy. Of course, this is why so many Anglo women 'hold out' for imaginary Sir Galahad figures into late middle-age and fail to reproduce.

In short, Anglo-American women don't like men, alpha or otherwise. Essentially misandrist and homosocial, they view men - all men, however high value - as disposable resources to be dropped as whim or the situation dictates. In the video below, VVS describes a famous basketball player who - despite good looks, height, fame and millions of dollars in the bank - is being derided by his substandard foid for not giving her enough 'attention':

There it is: if Stephen Curry can't satisfy his ageing foid, what chance have ordinary males got? While such Alpha males can attract women in the first place, the hyper-hypergamous Anglobitch hind-brain is never truly satisfied with any man, however high-value; when his lustre fades, the Anglo-American Divorce Courts are ready and waiting. And in the modern Anglosphere, many solvent and personable middle class men are single or even incel, in any case. Which reinforces my main point: at heart, the modern Anglobitch does not want an alpha, high value male: she wants a fantasy figure from Game of Thrones or Tennyson's Morte D'Arthur, someone who doesn't exist. Given this insane gynocentric reality, no wonder all reasonable men are deserting the Anglosphere for love and sex on distant shores.

The Chateau has Fallen

Sad to hear that Chateau Heartiste's famous blog has been shut down by Wordpress. His first mistake was thinking that Anglocunts want short, bald, ugly men with flashy hats instead of hyper-hypergamous fantasy figures or handsome criminals. The whole PUA agenda began to ring false about eight years ago, when even Roissy's fan base began to admit PUA techniques were completely ineffective. MeToo, Timesup and other misandrist agendas were the last nails in its coffin, together with the emergence of Tinder and other dating apps which elevate physical appearance and gift women boundless male attention for free. From that time on, PUA began to be replaced by the Black Pill and my own theories at the cutting edge of Manosphere thought. The old order changeth, and all that.

Roissy's second mistake was turning his anodyne PUA blog into an Alt-Right, white power nexus in the midst of a fierce culture-war for America's future. I personally thought this phase of his operation was infinitely more interesting than his PUA work; it was certainly far more honest and revolutionary. But did he really think the Anglo-American authorities would stand for such revolutionary honesty? The obvious fact is that ((they)) are losing control of the narrative and want North American men back on the plantation. This is why ((they)) are pushing tradcucks like Jordan Peterson to the fore, fools who tell men to 'man up' and become disposable post-divorce cash cows for Anglobitch convenience. Unfortunately for these simps and shills, a whole generation of young men raised on Manosphere wisdom are wise to their nonsense. The horse has bolted: male dissidence is taking off like gangbusters in the US and soon the whole Anglosphere will follow suit. 

So even though his blog is gone, Roissy can take some pride in girding a whole generation of young men with a certain level of insight which will serve them well in the years to come.

Hope on Distant Shores now available!

Hope on Distant Shores: How Awakened Men can Escape the Anglosphere's Toxic Women, Sexual False Consciousness and Institutional Misandry - the book I have been working on for the past five years - is now available.

Unlike the books and kits of PUA hucksters and con-men, Hope on Distant Shores will be sold without a penny of mark-up profit. The idea is to offer a constructive social critique while providing advice and guidance to men seeking love, sex and relationships outside the Anglosphere. However, it will only be available in paperback; digitisation would grant  free universal access and I do not want to be targeted by the British authorities for promoting 'Hate Speech' and 'terrorism'. Restricting access will somewhat neutralise the risk of such charges.

Hope on Distant Shores offers lifestyle guidance to the following groups:

• Men tired of entitled, selfish Anglo-American women
• Men who want a better, safer, more fulfilled life outside the Anglosphere
• Men who do not want to ‘adjust’ to a culture which views them as third class citizens
• Men who do not wish to squander their hard-earned dollars on derisive strippers or punitive divorce settlements
• Men who want slim, warm, attractive women unsullied by sex-negative, misandrist Anglo-American feminism 

When I started this blog ten years ago, it was my intention to create waves and cast shadows across the Internet. I knew my key insight – that Anglo-American culture’s mistrust of male sexual freedom had created an especially misandrist, belligerent form of feminism – demanded global dissemination. Far from being ‘revolutionary’, as conservative Men’s Rights Activists believe, Anglo-American feminism springs right from the frigid heart of Anglo-American civilization. This explains the unstinting support feminism receives from the state in all Anglo-Saxon countries, and why all attempts to resist it have proved so utterly futile. There never was a ‘golden age’ of gender relations in the Anglosphere; the puritanical Anglo-Saxon cultural bloc has been pedestalizing women and vilifying men for centuries.

My first book ‘Havok’ (2009) focused on the condition of gender-relations in the contemporary Anglosphere. My conclusions – which have since taken root all over the English-speaking world, were that residual Puritanism has imbalanced gender-relations in favour of women, reducing Anglo-American males to disposable stooges, walking ATM machines and vilified deviants. Meanwhile the same secular Puritanism has, by sacralising sex as an elusive commodity, set Anglo-American women atop pedestals as exalted goddesses. Despite claiming to be a ‘revolutionary’ movement, Anglo-American feminism is in fact an extension – indeed, amplification of – existing values: Anglo feminism is sex-negative, misandrist and racist, just like Anglo-American society. In this view, conventional Men’s Right’s Activists who invoke ‘tradition’ against Anglo-Saxon feminism are completely deluded: for Anglo feminism springs straight from the Anglosphere’s repressive, puritan soul. Indeed, it will be noted that conservative MRAs have achieved precisely nothing in their 30-odd years of existence. Similarly, the PUA or Pick-up Artist community are merely playing a game they can never win. The puritanical reality of the Anglosphere renders their various ‘approach’ techniques moribund at best and potentially dangerous for men in the #metoo era.

Further, feminism now serves as a smoke screen to disguise the real problems afflicting Anglo-American civilization – namely, socio-economic inequality, corrupt governance and racist policing. Additionally, the Anglo-feminist narrative which presents white women as oppressed outsiders also serves to mask white women’s endemic racism and long-standing affiliation to the Anglo-American establishment. Not only is sex-negative Anglo feminism an exaggerated expression of Anglo-American values, it helps to insulate those values from positive reform.

The movement that emerged from my first book is best called pan-Anglosphere Dissidence: the systematic rejection of repressive Anglo-American values. This rejection is associated with a yearning for the relative sexual freedom waiting outside the Anglosphere. Pan-Anglosphere Dissidence is predictably strongest in the puritanical United States, with its entitled women, institutionalised misandry and fanatic aversion to prostitution. Building on those insights, Hope on Distant Shores offers lifestyle guidance to Anglo-American men who want slim, warm, attractive women unsullied by sex-negative, misandrist Anglo feminism.

Unlike Havok, Hope on Distant Shores contains only a few references from ‘canonical’ historians, economists or philosophers. Like Saint Paul or the Buddha, I am fashioning something completely new and a completely new conceptual vocabulary is necessary to contain it. Therefore, most references are taken from the extensive correspondence to my blog which began in early 2018. All the postings of these experienced and learned correspondents, some of them containing over twenty thousand words, are included in a remarkable series of appendices which will doubtless be cited and studied by awakened men for decades to come.

Deluded Shooter - the Target Brenton Tarrant Missed

The Man and his Work

While NZ shooter Brenton Tarrant's manifesto raises some valid points, it completely omits all mention of feminism - especially the overtly misandrist Anglo-American variant of it. This is astonishing, given that Anglo feminism is intimately implicated in all the social ills he enumerates: unrestricted immigration, environmental degradation, mindless consumerism, social collapse, falling white birth rates and much else besides.

Let us break it down:

• Women, like children, are completely unfit for positions of leadership and responsibility. Yet because puritanical Anglo-American culture exalts them and artificially inflates their abilities, they now occupy far too many leadership roles. Observe everywhere the calamitous results.
• Because white women abort millions of prospective citizens every year, the western birth rate has slipped below replacement levels. This is obviously most true of white Anglo-American women, who seem to consider killing unwanted children some kind of political statement. 
• Because Anglo-American women are mindless consumers, their contribution to environmental degradation is vast. In fact, it would be fair to say that western consumerism is built entirely on the Anglo female's vacuous addiction to unnecessary trinkets and branded rags, and the male need to satisfy it in order to gain reproductive access.
• Because low value women prefer physically robust, sociopathic males with low intelligence (and because feminism has permitted them to pursue such mate choices with full societal support), the quality of the white working population has dipped sharply in recent years. A proud, industrious working class has rapidly been replaced by a drug addicted, idle underclass which has no interest in education, training or work. Check out this documentary, where British workers fail to compete with eastern European workers doing the same jobs. 
• Because Anglo-American Common Law is uniquely susceptible to feminist manipulation, and because the puritanical nature of Anglo culture inherently exalts women, awakened Anglosphere men now know that misandrist divorce settlements can lead to penury and even jail. This is leading to MGTOW, emigration and other forms of mass male dissidence, causing both white birthrates and white population quality to fall yet further.
• Because women in a post-feminist and puritanical culture have to be palliated, yet most lack any real ability, a host of ludicrous non-jobs have been artificially created to accommodate their absurd ambitions. These include teaching assistants, social workers, human resource experts, administrators, divorce lawyers, counsellors and other 'human-interest' sinecures that frequently command huge salaries. Not only do these drain the west's ailing economies for no meaningful benefit, the vast student debt associated with such pointless roles is also calamitous for the economy.
• Because Anglo-American culture is ruled by the residual, secularised dregs of religious puritanism, it not only exalts women but informally hates and criminalises men for being active sexual beings. This is experienced by marginalised males as systematic contempt, exploitation and exclusion in every sphere of life. Male unemployment, mental health issues, suicide rates, addiction problems and social exclusion are viewed as laughable interludes in the feminist-deviant group-hug that is contemporary Anglo-American society. Though Tarrant himself experienced this oppression, he was unable to identify its true origin: his own culture - or at least, the puritan-feminist currents within it.
• Because Anglo-American culture is ruled by secular puritanism, its culture and institutions hate reality itself. This is why the many social and environmental problems Tarrant describes are never addressed in a rational or honest manner. The cuck-brained Anglosphere prefers infancy to manhood, fantasy to thought and delusion to honesty.
• Because of secular puritanism and its exaltation of women, their dysfunctional behaviour goes unchallenged and unpunished. Indeed, the Anglo-American world bends over backwards to indulge it at every opportunity in the workplace, in divorce courts, in the media and in society at large.
• Because Anglo-American women are defined by hyper-hypergamy (an attraction to impossible ideals derived from residual puritanism, colonialism, social media and extreme economic differentiation), vast numbers of Anglo-American men are now sexually disenfranchised and trapped in Sexual False Consciousness or other forms of existential despair. Deprived of masculine function and direction by post-feminist society, low status white males have become incel whipping boys and pariahs for the new gynocentric order. The only redemption offered is 'transition' into a pseudo-female, thereby atoning for the 'crime' of being male in a sex-negative, misandrist culture.

And yet our man Tarrant never mentions feminism once! Is he suffering from Down Syndrome, or something? None of the problems listed in his manifesto is directly connected to 'foreign' elements or conspiracies. All the maladies he lists spring directly from Anglo-American feminism and the institutions which support it. 

Lot of slogans and culprits - but no mention of feminism

Mouse on a Pedestal: Jordan Peterson, Anglocuck Supreme

Jordan Peterson: Anglocuck Supreme

Jordan Peterson - a man who teaches the quasi-science of psychology at declasse Canadian universities - is all the rage among tradcon males across the Anglosphere. His books, televised debates and utterances are extolled as 'revolutionary conservatism', a much needed antidote to the slack minded Social Justice Warriors who presently dominate Anglo academic life.

However, like all Anglo cuckservatives, Peterson is just telling men to return to the plantation. He is just Tommy Fleming lite, a pitiful Anglocuck who thinks men should accept traditional duties while women do as they please; a clown living in the 1950s, telling men to 'man up' and join the ranks of castrated cuckdom in the Anglo-American Matrix. The central problem with his position is that the Anglosphere has moved beyond his tradcon values, never to return. Peterson is still hung up on marriage, 'honour' and fidelity in a world where such things are scorned or ridiculed by women and society at large. Indeed, being an 'honourable man' is now a one-way trip to financial rape in the frivorce courts of the Anglosphere. Here is one of my correspondents, Lawrence, on the reality of the situation in contemporary America:

At one point in my corrections officer job, the incarceration of men for child support and alimony arrears got so bad that a group of us prison guards came to the warden, complaining that we were being unethically ordered to guard men who really weren’t a threat and who should have never been sent to jail. Once imprisoned, they usually lost their professional licenses, their driver’s licenses, became unemployable so they just wound up back there again. The warden just shook his head, he knew how corrupt the system is, how the US family courts, media, politicians, universities, feminists and the prison execs all work hand in glove to profit off the US slave economy fueled by all the husbands and fathers tossed into prison. How it creates sick incentives that encourage divorce and profiteering. (This is another reason the US divorce rate is by far the highest all over the world, so much money is made from it). But the warden knew he was powerless to reform it. Just like we were as guards. The vultures of the Anglosphere want their prison slaves, and husbands and fathers are an easy target.

Like I said, every man in the Anglosphere is a target of this machine, but wealthy American and Canadian men are the hardest hit, because the US legal system gives family court judges wide latitude, which really can’t be appealed, to place arbitrarily high demands on the incomes of men who have been wealthy at any point. This is why Robin Williams committed suicide. At one point he was a very wealthy Hollywood A-lister. But after his two divorces, he was no longer pulling in that kind of money. The family courts didn’t care. They said he once made big money, and in the fantasy unicorn filled land of US family courts, that meant he could just click his feet together and make the same money again. So they made Robin pay out the nose for alimony. By this time he was sick with Parkinson’s Disease he couldn’t make anywhere close to that amount of money, and his lawyer was warning him that prison time was likely coming. So he committed suicide. Here’s another famous case, a guy in New York with same sort of situation, once made a lot of money on Wall Street and became upper class, told to pay alimony every year after that at insane high levels, lost his job in recession== then off to prison when it became impossible.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-08-26/jail-becomes-home-for-husband-stuck-with-lifetime-alimony Brendan Fraser has been hit with a similar judgement, tens of millions of dollars in alimony.

Wealthy men across the US, Canada, UK and the Anglosphere generally are hit hard like this. And yes, a lot of them wind up in prison. The incarceration rate in Canada and the UK isn’t quite as bad, but this happens there too because the misandrist structure of the laws and family courts is as bad as in the USA, and the legal systems share the same insane practice of imprisonment after court-ordered impoverishing of a man. I found this out ironically after I expatriated and was working as a Web and database planner, when my previous experience led prison systems in many countries to contract me to help with their intake software and legal briefing documents. This imprisonment of men for marriage or kids (or in these #metoo days, just for “harassment” that in reality is “any interaction with women”) really is an Anglo phenomenon uniquely. Whatever stupid idiosyncrasies the rest of the West has with feminism, they don’t throw men in prison for this.

The very worst case I saw as a prison guard was a surgeon, yes an American surgeon who was one of the most respectable guys I ever met, hard working, worked until 2 a.m. 6 days a week to save people’s lives. With all the work hours, his wife got “lonely” and started sleeping around, eventually having 2 kids that weren’t even his as he found out later. And then she filed for divorce so she could take the surgeon’s money, blow it on cocaine and stupid luxuries for herself without doing any work herself (that’s the real destination where the “child support” money goes) and sleep around with her favorite Chad of the week, all on her hard working surgeon ex-husband’s money. She won an insanely high judgment in a US family court, millions of dollars in child support and “alimony” that the poor surgeon would have to pay. Since by the court’s judgment, “she should be entitled to maintain the same standard of living after the divorce”, even though this greedy gold-digging Anglobitch is the one who filed for the divorce to steal from her hard-working husband who was actually saving people’s lives. 

After a few years of doing this, and losing his house and his nice car, the poor surgeon threw out his back while helping a patient onto an operating table. He had to cut down his hours as a surgeon, and went to the divorce court asking for a reduction in the support demands, and ask that his lazy, spoiled brat bitch ex-wife get a damn job herself. But the court refused using the same delusion filled imputation bullshit they pull on other ex-husbands, claiming he could somehow make millions of extra dollars using his surgical wizard skills somehow. Which he couldn’t do in reality with his injured back, something the family court judge couldn’t or wouldn’t even try to understand. So then now the alimony and child support were demanding 120% of his income. You see, the family court system will never let you off the treadmill once they target you, especially if you earn a lot of money. Eventually he drained his savings and retirement, couldn’t make the payments at all—and he wound up in the prison where I was a corrections officer. 

The corrupt American family court-media-feminist-academia cultural Marxist-big business-prison industrial complex had worked perfectly to ruin this poor man, and what a prize they had. A dedicated, hard working US surgeon, saving lives every day, drained of his money and reduced to poverty by a gold-digging, spoiled greedy bimbo who divorced him due to his very dedication, had kids with other men to force him to pay bullshit “child support” in addition to never-stopping alimony, his assets taken by his gold-digging ex wife and the state to grease their own corruption, the “child support” in actuality supporting the ex wife’s corrupt, hedonistic lifestyle after divorce. And then the poor surgeon himself made a literal slave in a US prison, stripped of his license and made a perpetual debtor, worked to the bone but never allowed to profit from his own efforts or hard work. That really is how it works in the US family court and prison system. That poor surgeon was the worst case we ever saw, made us so mad we were talking about how we were going to “free the Bastille” and start a revolution ourselves to stop all the corruption, Robespierre style. And free all the innocent men, and even some women, who were imprisoned this way, to feed more slaves to the machine.

Because if you’re an American man, particularly a rich, well to do, middle class or upper class man with skills, saved money, assets, wealth and a good job, that’s what you really are. Fresh meat for the Anglosphere family court meat grinder machine. Like Legal Eagle said, you are literally a slave with marriage or child-bearing in the US or the greater Anglosphere, from that day on, the state and officials have full purview over all your assets and unlimited ability to seize them. Legal Eagle saw this from the legal debate and court side, I saw the horrible result from the prison side, where men were sent after all their assets had been stolen by the family courts and their only further “value” was as slaves to the prison-industrial complex. This shit’s real, guys.

And now, in the ugly aftermath of #metto, #timesupand #nameandshamehim, you don’t even have to get married or have a kid in the Anglosphere to become a slave. Any interaction with a women, even something as casual as a glance or an innocent conversation, opens you up to charges of harassment and sexual misconduct. And given that as much as half of young white women in America find even innocent male female interactions to be harassment, you’re in great danger at any moment. Many harassment and misconduct changes now are being assembled by our corrupt legal-prison-industrial complex system to become prosecutable offenses. But even short of that, the witch-burning in social media means that any vague accusation, whether recent or months or years ago, will make you unemployable and a social pariah. You’ll lose your health insurance and ability to earn a living, and then the state will have all kinds of additional ways to brand you a criminal and toss you in jail.

https://kshatriya-anglobitch.blogspot.com/2018/01/the-wardens-tale-why-expatriation-from.html
https://kshatriya-anglobitch.blogspot.com/2018/01/the-wardens-tale-why-expatriation-from_31.html

Peterson tells men 'to be men' - in other words, try to live up to traditional male responsibilities - in a world which despises them, getting nothing but penury and imprisonment in return. Meanwhile, single mothers with four thug-babies live happily on taxpayer handouts across the Anglosphere while Peterson's 'responsible' men foot the bill.

The point is, Anglo conservatives like Peterson have not truly grasped the reality of contemporary gender relations. At heart, they believe we are still living in the pre-feminist era where men are coming home to smiling housewives and discussing the Bible around the kitchen table before a roaring log fire. In truth, the fact that western women are no longer economically dependent on men has entirely obviated those assumptions. With the rise of sperm banks and other post-male reproductive technologies, women don't even need a man to have children. Besides, the Calvinist misandry of the Anglosphere remains unchallenged even while female rights and opportunities advance apace in every sphere - education, the media, reproductive technology and jurisprudence.

This is partly generational; but mainly because Peterson, Tommy Fleming and other 'conservative' Anglocucks are academic fantasists with scant knowledge of contemporary social reality. Boomer academics like him need to leave their post-War ivory towers and do some volunteer work in a hospital or prison to gain some understanding of how the world actually works. Academic Anglocucks like Peterson or Fleming are dangerous because gullible young males listen to their inane opinions, or even base important life-decisions on them. In the 1950s, that was no great problem; in the 21st century, with its #metoo hysteria and no fault divorce-epidemic, such 'advice' should be cursorily dismissed as the rantings of madmen.

Anglofoids Deface War Memorial Bench with Crude Graffiti

Anglofoid Handiwork...

Conservative Anglocucks like Jordan Peterson and Tommy Fleming are forever telling Anglo-American men that if they 'man up' and 'accept responsibility' then women will respect them. Let's see how this sage advice actually works in reality. Two underclass British foids were so impressed by such White Knighting that they recently desecrated a memorial to World War 1 soldiers:

Two mothers have been slammed for vandalising a bench commemorating World War I heroes while their little children watch on. 

The pair were caught writing their names - 'Shell' and 'Jane' - into wet concrete setting beneath the new memorial bench in Horncastle, Lincolnshire. Locals have branded them 'disrespectful,' an 'absolute disgrace' and 'disgusting' on a local community page on Facebook.

The women can be seen leaning over the cordoned off area at the base of the bench, with one of the little ones watching over, to bend down and scrape their names in. Their prams are standing close by and another child appears to be standing behind one of the women.

The park bench was installed on February 18 according to the Sun, to mark the centenary of the end of WWI. The next day it had been tarnished by the two women. The back of the metal bench shows soldiers and a warhorse silhouetted next to poppies, and the immortal words: 'Lest we forget.' 

Helen Lea initially brought people's attention to the awful act by posting on the Horncastle Community Facebook page.

Julie Goy wrote online: 'I walked past this bench earlier, 12.15 today with my granddaughter who is nearly two and we stood and admired it, she liked the red poppies. It was fine then and no damage. What a dreadful shame, should be ashamed of themselves.' 

Yes, this is how modern Anglo-American women reward and respect the men who 'manned' up and fought for their country: by desecrating their humble memorial. And still the Tradcon clowns wonder why Anglo-American men are withdrawing their consent from society... go figure.

Fat Anglofoids Desecrating the Memorial

Same Shit, Different Shovel: Shemale Spokespeople and the New Gender Caste System

In the contemporary Anglosphere, a cultural bloc in its death throes, the underlying caste system has become painfully apparent over the past four or five years. In a puritanical society with a reflexive revulsion of the male sex, women are at the top and heterosexual men at the bottom. In between are various types of pseudo-female, who are now the official spokespeople for masculinity:

The Pan-Anglosphere Caste System

Rulers: White, Anglo-American Women

Sub-Rulers: Non-Anglo Women

Administrators and Apologists: Gay and Transsexual 'Men'

Slaves: Cucks / White Knights

Outcasts: Heterosexual Men

There it is, in five lines: a neat summation of the contemporary Anglosphere. The whole culture exists to serve white, Anglo-American women who are viewed as faultless deities and the existential benchmark to which all all others must aspire. In the Anglosphere, only female sexuality matters: straight males are tacitly viewed as destructive interlopers and their sexuality vilified. Female wants and requirements transcend all other considerations; in sum, society exists to serve them.

This gyneocentric agenda is absolutely dominant in the lamestream Anglo-American media, where straight men are routinely depicted as criminals, abusers or dangerous incels. Outside of professional sports, the heterosexual male viewpoint has been largely banished from the media. Gone are the days of Walter Kronkite: newsreaders, talk-show hosts and even weather reporters are now typically female, usually heavily sexualized and indoctrinated by sex-negative misandrist feminism.

So total is this gyneocentric fixation that the new spokespeople for 'men' are either castrated, whining Anglocucks or the new breed of transsexual 'hyper-cucks'. Authentic heterosexual men are ostracised from public discourse in the Anglo-American world: of course, this is why the manosphere has expanded to fill the gap. This was never more obvious than in the wake of the Alek Minassian massacre, where 'lamestream' media discussion was dominated by absurd cucks such as Mack Limoureux and David Futrelle, deluded Boomer women and lesbian deviants (like the fabled 'Alana' who supposedly founded the incel movement in 1993). The few 'males' consulted were transsexuals who 'ascended' to surrogate female status in the Anglosphere's gender-caste system.

Fortunately, the gulf between the rulers (Anglo women) and the sub-rulers (non-Anglo women) is widening into a hostile schism:

Clouded by Accusations of Anti-Semitism, the Third Women's March loses Ground 

Women across the U.S. are preparing to head to Washington, D.C., for the third annual Women’s March on Saturday, braving forecasts of bad weather and a location change due to the government shutdown. But these are the least of the problems bedeviling the march, as sponsors including the Democratic National Committee, the NAACP and the Human Rights Campaign are withdrawing their support. Ugly accusations of anti-Semitism appeared first in the online publication Tablet and then in the New York Times, and they have only been exacerbated by the refusal of Women’s March co-president Tamika Mallory to distance herself from the anti-Semitic statements of the Nation of Islam’s Louis Farrakhan. On the television show The View on Monday, Mallory pointedly declined to renounce Farrakhan, although in a subsequent appearance on the podcast “The Breakfast Club,” she spoke out against anti-Semitism. Calls for Mallory to step down are being heard, and a Change.org petition demanding that she do exactly that has nearly 4,000 signatures. 

Forbes, 17-01-2019

An expatriate American poster called Lawrence first described the post-colonial influence on Anglo feminism in his brilliant and oft-quoted 2018 essay:

Still, I think there’s something else at work in the Anglosphere which has to do with Anglosphere history. Most countries in the Anglosphere were settled by invading British colonists who pushed out the natives and took slaves. That’s the history of North America in essence. But this all changed in a nasty and bloody way for the Anglosphere that was very different from Latin America, where there wasn’t the history of open and hateful group conflict like there was in America’s civil war in later history. It just seems like the lines are more blurred in Latin American countries. So North America, in particular, has had this nasty history of rival ethnic and racial groups, displacing the natives and fighting bloody wars against each other, and never came to an understanding about it. And then cultural Marxism came, whipping up and playing on these conflicts as a wedge against the West, and it found its most fertile ground in the Anglosphere. The malicious Anglo feminists of US divorce courts and #metoo seem to borrow a lot of that group warfare language, and maybe that combined with the Puritanism has made the Anglo strain very ugly and hostile.

True enough, but while the colonial heritage might fuel misandrist white Anglo feminism, it is also a dangerous weapon for white feminists to utilise. Since deep ethno-cultural divisions undercut all levels of Anglo society, not even the dominant female caste can escape its destabilising influence. 

Another Factor in the Ascent of Misandist Anglo-Feminism: The Colonial Heritage

The Face of Evil: Anglofoid Gloats Over Lynching Victim

Why has misandrist feminism been so successful in Anglophone countries? This question has begun to haunt me. Too many anti-feminists use conspiracy theories to explain the rise of misandrist Anglo feminism. While there have certainly been a number of social, political and religious groups promoting feminist agendas, their writings would never have achieved mass or institutional support if such support did not already exist. The Frankfurt School and other pro-feminist intellectual movements can only flourish if the social soil is already receptive to their message. For example, the Frankfurt School only adopted an infiltration agenda when its calls for a proletarian revolution failed in affluent post-War North America. There is also the issue of institutional compliance. Some nations or cultural blocs have pre-existing institutions which are especially ripe for subversion. For example, the Anglo-American Common Law legal system has proved incredibly susceptible to feminist manipulation in recent years. Similarly, existing historical memes or traditions can hinder or facilitate subversive agendas; and one of these is my topic here.

A former corrections officer gave us an extended essay in which he argued that the distinctive cultural heritage of the Anglosphere countries had a major role in the emergence of misandrist feminism. His view was that Anglo feminism exploits the residual resistance of former subject races in post-colonial Anglo countries to lever outrageous and unwarranted privilege for entitled white women.

While this assessment is accurate enough, I have begun to detect another pro-feminist dynamic in the colonial legacy. This is kind of residual racist puritanism deriving from a distinctive Anglo-Saxon obsession with limiting the reproductive fecundity of 'subject' races or classes. It is no surprise that this obsession is strongest in the Anglo countries with a troubled colonial past built on slavery and genocide, such as Australia or the United States. After all, those nations had most to gain by regulating or limiting the reproductive fecundity of slaves and ‘subject’ races.

Aboriginal Heads on Display

This realization came to me from free discussions with Hondo Solomon, an insightful black American writer who teaches the virtues of polygamy. In his view, the Anglo-Saxon obsession with imposing sexual repression on subject peoples is largely to keep their numbers low, thereby minimizing the threat of revolt. In addition, Hondo also claims that Anglo-puritan monogamy was also promoted to keep subject populations at a low genetic standard by deliberately preventing the natural proliferation of alpha genes for leadership and intelligence: a kind of soft dysgenics.  Judging by the hunchbacked, autistic morons inhabiting English towns and cities, this policy has proved fairly effective in the British Isles – its original testing-ground. Hondo also claims that the American obsession with professional sports also derives from its colonial legacy – the obsessive measurement of physical attributes and performance originating in the slave trade.

Wingspan: The American Sports Fixation

Returning to The Anglobitch Thesis, if we focus on the sexual elements of Anglo-American colonialism we see a ubiquitous and concerted attempt to associate religious guilt with sex among subject populations. We also see a determined attempt to replace religions which celebrate reproductive fecundity (voodoo, Islam, Catholicism, Judaism and Hinduism) with guilt-laden Anglican Christianity and its sickly cult of reproductive sterility. Let us note that this insidious campaign is colour blind: it oppresses Highland Scots or the English lower classes as much as is does Black Americans, Aryan Hindus or Black Africans. Wherever he goes the patrician Anglo-American tries to impose his woman-worship, guilt and latent homosexuality with one goal in mind: to limit subject populations’ numbers and genetic quality, thereby reducing the threat of revolt against his rule.

Even though its original inspiration has long gone, the same repressive spirit persists as a habitual residue in all Anglosphere countries. Moreover, it is one of the residual memes that has contributed most to the rapid rise of sex-negative misandrist feminism across the Anglosphere. As usual, Anglo-feminism draws strength and succour from the very forces it claims to oppose. 

Anglofoids enjoy Lynching

 

Anglo feminism has nurtured a racist seed since its very inception, so such an alignment should come as no surprise when we consider the colonial origins and uses of Anglo-American Puritanism. Lynchings and other Anglo-American race-crimes typically represented a working collusion between early feminists and imperialists, typically framed as a hysterical campaign to ‘protect’ exalted white women from the animal lusts of black slaves. This sexual Nazism still contaminates Anglo feminism, albeit at an unstated and subliminal level (consider feminist Reclaim the Night marches through black areas, which covertly assume that all black men are rapists). Of course, inculcating the colonising race with puritanical values also serves the colonial enterprise by inhibiting interbreeding with subject peoples, with obvious benefits for the colonial project. It is far harder to maintain a colonial culture of exploitation when many of the exploited share genes from the colonising race. The ‘Pretty White Girl Syndrome’ which saturates the Anglo media is entirely dedicated to exalting white Anglo girls as unattainable deities beyond all reproach; surely another warped legacy of colonial Anglo-elitism.

Too Good for You: Anglofoid Sexual Elitism

My thought has reached a crucial impasse on the issue of sex-negative, misandrist Anglo feminism. It is no longer enough to consider the Anglosphere’s puritanical religious heritage the only force underpinning the Anglo-feminist agenda. Other countries have a strong Protestant tradition (Holland, Germany, Denmark) yet still lack sex-negative feminism of the Anglosphere variety. Other factors must underlie misandrist Anglo-feminism, while sustaining its agenda. Obviously, malleable Common Law is one of these; other prime candidates are genetics, empirical machine values, homosociality and class distinction.

However, the post-colonial dynamic also serves and abets Anglo-American feminism, as we have seen. Its legacy gives Anglo feminism its distinctive racist, misandrist and sex-negative character, especially in those countries where colonial oppression was strongest.

Anglofoids: Exalted Deities?

Scott Beierle: Another Incel Shooter Unable to Cope with the Anglosphere's Contradictory Demands

It can be horribly gratifying to be proven right. Yet in the wake of another incel shooting by Scott Beierle, it is obvious that many of my worst predictions about the Anglosphere are coming to pass. With the rise of misandrist feminism in the English-speaking world (but especially North America and Britain), males are being placed under unprecedented and unreasonable pressure. A toxic combination of residual sex-negative puritanism, rabid woman-worship, fraying economic status, sexual false consciousness, traditional expectations, sexual disenfranchisement and good ol' Anglo-American aversion to reality have conspired to produce some of the most tormented males in history.

I knew Beierle was an incel shooter the instant I heard about events in Florida. The fact that the two fatalities were middle-class white females and that the shooter was a single white male rendered his motivations almost self-apparent:

Another 'incel' shooter: yoga studio killer wanted to crucify 'American whores'

Tallahassee: The man police say killed two women at a Florida yoga studio before turning the gun on himself expressed deep-seated misogyny that he said was caused by repeated rejections from women with whom he tried to engage romantically.

Scott Beierle, 40, shot six people and pistol-whipped another after walking into the yoga studio on the second floor of a shopping plaza on Friday night. He killed a Florida State University student and a faculty member before shooting himself, police said.

Police said Saturday that they were investigating what prompted the shooting, but a series of videos he posted to the internet in 2014 paint the picture of an apparent "incel," or someone who had been involuntarily celibate, with a seething rage against women.

Beierle had been arrested twice in the past six years by the university’s police, according to criminal records. The first time was in 2012. He was charged with trespassing in 2014 and told he was banned from campus after following an FSU volleyball coach into a gym.

The same year he was detained again for trespassing in a dining hall. Charges were dismissed for both of Beierle’s university arrests, but he agreed to a plea deal after a final arrest by Tallahassee police in 2016.

According to a police report, he was living in an off-campus apartment in his late 30s – noticeably older than the other residents – and one day offered to put lotion on a 19-year-old sunbathing by the pool. When the woman declined, she told police, Beierle ‘‘slapped her butt, and grabbed it and then shook it’’.

Beierle posted 15 videos in a span of three days in August 2014. Some have since been deleted. In one video, "The American Whore Pt. 2," he discusses potential forms of "appropriate" punishment for promiscuous women.

"I would vote for crucifixion myself," he said. "The most heinous crime warrants the most heinous punishment."

In another video, titled "The Rebirth of my Misogynism," Beierle says that his hatred for women started in eighth grade, when he discovered the "collective treachery" of girls his age. He lists the names of several girls who he said sparked his misogyny.

He said his feelings toward women went dormant until he went to college at Florida State University, when women already in relationships gave him their phone numbers and one woman called the police on him for visiting her at work.

"Again, this mentality (of) 'let's just run to the authorities when our feelings are hurt,'" he said. "I had committed no wrong. I was just trying to court this particular female."

He also mentions one romantic interest from his college years who he said would repeatedly cancel planned dates.

"I could've ripped her head off," he said. "The treachery that a female is capable of when her sensibilities are offended to me is astonishing. The lengths that they will go to - lying, exaggerating, outright lying."

Beierle, who served in the military and was a Florida State University (FSU) graduate, had been arrested in 2012 and 2016 on charges of grabbing women's buttocks at an apartment complex pool and at a campus dining hall. He was charged with trespassing in 2014 and told he was banned from campus after following an FSU volleyball coach into a gym.

His victims were 21-year-old Maura Binkley, a student at FSU, and 61-year-old Dr. Nancy Vessem, a faculty member and the chief medical director for a health maintenance organisation. Witnesses told police that Beierle posed as a customer to gain access to the yoga studio, which was in session when he started firing, according to the Associated Press. Police have not yet disclosed what kind of gun Beierle used.

"Malevolence can idle or it can manifest itself into something," he said in one video. "I believe in karma. I believe in what comes around goes around. And those that engage in treachery will ultimately be the victims of it."

Beierle, who posted videos under the pseudonym Scott Carnifex, also criticises the societal "expectations" of male adolescents in America, who he said are programmed into believing that sexual conquests are intrinsically linked to manliness.

"I'd like to send a message now to the adolescent males ... that are in the position, the situation, the disposition of Elliot Roger [sic], of not getting any, no love, no nothing," Beierle said in one video, referencing the 22-year-old mass murderer who also expressed frustration at being a virgin and being rejected by attractive women.

"This endless wasteland that breeds this longing and this frustration. That was me, certainly as an adolescent."

After Rodger's killings in 2014, he was idolised online by members of the so-called "incel" community. Rodgers killed six people and injured fourteen others near the campus of University of California, Santa Barbara, before killing himself. He had also expressed frustration at being a virgin and being rejected by attractive women.

One Rodger supporter was Alek Minassian, the 25-year-old man accused of plowing his van into a crowd in Toronto in April, killing 10. Minassian declared the ‘‘incel Rebellion’’ had begun. Beierle also expressed his hatred for African-Americans, whom he called "disgusting."

In one such video, titled "Dreadlocks are the Black Man's Mullet," Beierle lists six reasons why he hates African-Americans and their "thuggery" while repeatedly using racial slurs. He said dreadlocks were considered "vogue" only among the "gutter of our society," and he said the hairstyle made it "tough for me to still remain an NFL fan," referencing the National Football League.

He also rails against "mongrelisation" and interracial dating, calling black women "ugly, disgusting."

In other videos, Beierle also expresses a hatred for the police, the "expectations" for adolescent males in America and the "dangers of diversity."

"I don't think a female can ever understand the societal pressure that's put on an adolescent male to unburden himself of this stigma that has society has put on him, this virginity burden and having a girlfriend," he said. "I wish I had someone to talk to me at that age."

Sydney Morning Herald, 04/11//2018

Just one way out of impossible demands.

At 40, Beierle was the perfect age for an incel shooter: an older Millennial trapped in the contradictory expectations placed on males by pan-Anglosphere post-feminist secular misandry, there was no solution to his torment beyond murder and suicide. As he himself opined, the informal pressure on adolescent males to be sexually successful (as measured by sexual activity with sexualized young women) is incredibly intense; male virgins are seen as impotent, deviant losers (not least by women themselves, albeit at an unstated level). Sexual false consciousness - the fantasy that women are roaming around wanting sex with everybody - raises this pressure to unnatural levels: most young males still believe everyone but themselves is having sex with models all day. At the same time, Anglo-American males are castigated by 'progressive' social elements (including feminism) for any kind of sexual self-expression. This programme even involves encouraging males to 'transition' into transexual pseudo-women.

Need for Empowerment? Beierle posing with swords

Of course, other factors help explain the typical demographics of incel shooters: white, conservative and middle class. Obviously, affluent white males have a residual sense of personal sovereignty which derives from earlier phases of Anglo-American society, making them prone to revolt against their eroding status. However, since Anglo feminism is an obviously 'white' movement, white men also bear the specific brunt of feminist contempt and ridicule. This is why their targets are usually white, middle-class women - the true authors of institutional misandry in Anglo-American culture.

Predictable targets: white, advantaged and female

With an Anglo-American cultural establishment eager to advance women's rights (but not their obligations) at the expense of beleaguered white males in every situation, the stage is set for incel shootings to become a daily occurrence in North America. Couple this with mass male sexual disenfranchisement, institutionalised misandry, female hyper-hypergamy and the secular-puritanical denial of normal sexual needs, and the way ahead is clear to see.

Don't say you weren't warned.