Friday, 20 November 2020

Salvationism, Treadmills and Forrest Gump: Why the Authorities Hate the Black Pill


A farrago of Blue-Pilled Boomer bullshit...


Forrest Gump is the ultimate Blue Pilled film from the ultimate Blue Pilled decade: the 1990s. Broadly, Forrest Gump seeks to normalise the most ludicrous fiction imaginable: that some retard can make millions in business and acquire peace and plenty after years of abuse and ridicule. In reality, retarded people seldom reach the age of forty. When they do, they usually end up institutionalised. Yet this farrago of filmic nonsense won 6 Oscars – only highlighting the dominance of the Blue Pill in lamestream cultural discourse.


Forrest Gump also shows how the authorities use Blue-Pilled ideology to keep the broad masses committed to society; it convinces them they have ‘skin in the game’, however hopeless and disenfranchised their actual situation. Variants of this ‘Gump Delusion’ exist everywhere in the modern Anglosphere, as we all know:

 

‘Looks don’t matter! Just take a shower, bro!’

‘It’s what’s inside that counts!’

‘With hard work alone, anyone can do anything!’

‘Education can turn a retard into Einstein!’

‘By lifting weights, anyone can be Mr Universe!’

 

Okay, you get the picture. However, these delusions work for the vast majority of the population. This brutal fact is often underplayed or even denied by the manosphere. That is a cardinal error: because the average dolt laps up such delusions like a thirsty dog, in the vain hope of a better tomorrow.


Forrest Chump

 

Turning to our own sphere – gender-relations and sexuality – we see exactly the same principles at work. Trapped in a web of media-induced Sexual False Consciousness, the average male schlub seriously thinks models and actresses will fuck him if only he gets a new car, job or haircut. And this sexual fiction keeps the schlub ‘onside’, toiling away at his mundane trade or profession in the futile expectation of priapic adventures: a kind of ‘sexual heaven’, if you will.

 

Given the foregoing facts, we can see why the authorities seek to discredit the Black Pill at every turn. Because  - in its purest form - the Black Pill takes a blowtorch to the various fables that bind the broad masses to western society. Obviously, the western elites are not going to take kindly to Black Pilled dissidents attacking the fairy tales that sustain their profits and advantages, generation after generation. Atop this, the broad masses themselves are strongly averse to Black Pilled truth: after all, delusion is their primary life-fuel.  If SFC and other ‘Gump Delusions’ were removed from their hollow lives, what else would they have?


As if this hypergamous Anglo cunt would even talk to a retard...

 

It is doubtful whether a fully Black-Pilled society could function, especially one with the mass inceldom and socio-economic inequalities that define the Anglosphere. Think about it: if sexually-disenfranchised North American men knew their sexless condition was permanent, how long would Canada or the USA exist? By my estimate, the United States has an army of ten million sexless men, at least (many more if we include escortcels in their number). If I were a member of America’s Power Elite, keeping those men from the Black Pill would be my primary agenda.

 

In fact, I would concern myself with little else.

 

Now do you see why the Anglo-American Power Elites hate the Black Pill and all expressions of our Dark Enlightenment? Everyone has to be 'jollied along' and made to think they are living in the best of all possible worlds. If this deluded belief-system breaks down for large sections of the population, society ceases to function. It really is that simple. This is why the lamestream media reflexively quashes incel, Black Pill (or even Red Pill) voices by omission or ridicule; as props of the state, it is their duty to do so. Their other approach is to present dissenters as marginalised eccentrics on the fringes of society, implying that everyone else is happily banging models all day. This crudest of fictions is typically aimed at the uneducated classes, whose ability to deconstruct mainstream narratives is much weaker than that of other social groups. 


This aspect of the Blue Pilled narrative is extremely important. All evidence shows that low status males are far more likely to be suicidal, single and sexless than other classes of men. If such facts were to become widely known, it might create destabilising Black-Pilled 'waves' in society. The average sexless schlub wanders about thinking that 'everyone' (except himself, of course) is banging models on a daily basis. Why would he think otherwise, when the lamestream media promotes this fiction everywhere he looks


Remove that delusion and he might start to see the world very differently, however. 


Think about it. Most awakened men will have experienced the lower-class male rage that inevitably erupts when the myth of sexual liberation is even questioned. Imagine their rage if these dumb clowns ever realised that millions of low-value men are sexually-disenfranchised, not just themselves? And that Anglo-American inceldom is a deep structural problem, not to be fixed by a pay-rise or shower?


 



I have always maintained that the Anglo-American elite - the genuine elite, not their upper-middle class functionaries - are strongly Black-Pilled. The devilish cunning of the Anglo-American state and its institutions of oppression strongly confirms this analysis. For all that, in us they are facing opponents no less determined, brilliant and ruthless. For all their wealth and power, they are sitting on a Black Pill powderkeg. One spark and their rotting, gynocentric, misandrist system will explode with Vesuvian force, destroying their profits and exalted lifestyles in a matter of moments.

That is why they fear us.



121 comments:

  1. Toronto women created Alek Minassian:
    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/ont-alek-minassian-trial-1.5808708

    ReplyDelete
  2. The Pussy Bubble has even infiltrated YuGiOh card games:
    $4,000 for a Dark Magician Girl! How much is a Dark Magician? $Less than $100
    www.ebay.com/itm/Yugioh-card-collection-Dark-Magician-Girl-MFC-000-1st-Edition-English-Ver/303693651615?hash=item46b58d5e9f%3Ag%3AyPYAAOSwWWFfYlrT&LH_BIN=1

    ReplyDelete
  3. Alexandre Alexandre20 November 2020 at 20:25

    Canada, EUA, México, Brasil, Argentina, Suécia, Finlândia, Espanha e França são países aonde a misandria está em um nível alto e a tendência será aumentar cada vez mais e se alastrar para outros países em um rápida proproção.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Interesting take on the movie. I had a much different take. The men in the movie who weren't retarded were all shown as villains - the sexually abusive father, the sexually blackmailing school teacher, the physically abusive boyfriend etc...

    The retard was shown as being the most noble (except maybe lt. Dan) - feminism to the core...

    ReplyDelete
  5. You know Rookh, I was just thinking about this movie today. I guess great minds really do think alike... ;)

    Anyway, I have various interpretations of Forrest Gump:
    - It seems like a parody of the American Dream, rather than a homage - I agree with Rookh that the idea that an intellectually impaired man could seriously become a world-famous multi-millionaire is prima facie ridiculous and could only be seriously entertained by delusional ideologues and unthinking nitwits/midwits.

    - To a large degree the film is a nostalgia trip for older, out-of-touch folk (especially Boomers) - the intellectual blank slate that is Forrest represents a vehicle from which they can relive their most memorable collective experiences. That the past never really occurred in the way that nostalgists often imagine is of no import.

    - The movie artfully juxtaposes the bright side of America's past (progressions in civil rights, far more classlessness, equality and optimism than we see today), with its darker side (racism, drug abuse, disease, wartime deaths). Forrest symbolises the lighter side; Jenny the darker side.

    - In many ways the movie is indeed a blue-pill fantasy, not least in how we see a guy chase after somebody who really ought to be beneath his notice. You see that sort of idiocy in the Anglosphere all the time, with relatively fit, solvent, childless men chasing after overly-picky single mothers (partially for paucity of choice, but still).

    - However, in other ways it is a red-pill one. We've see a trope that we've seen played out a million times in real life - the 'good guy' ultimately DOESN'T get the girl, at least not until she requires his assistance (financial, physical). We also see the 'good guy' STILL wind up alone. Moreover, we see the girl reject the 'good guy' in favour of deadbeats and abusers. The movie does soften it a bit by implying that she has low self-esteem, and as Richard pointed out, the movie doesn't portray most men in a very good light (arguably not even Lt. Dan in some ways), but given how misandrist America was in the early 90's, it's nonetheless surprising (and heartening) that Forrest Gump contains any red-pill content at all.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Da Rick - how did you know I wrote the comment above?

      Delete
    2. C'mon Richard, surely give me some credit after all these years? ;)

      Your analytical, informative writing style readily identifies you.

      Delete
    3. There is definitely an anti-male, feminist vibe to the film; Forrest himself is descended from the villainous Nathan Bedford Forrest, almost an archetype of male evil: a slave owner, confederate general and founder of the KKK. Forrest has to 'atone' for this 'crime' via a specific form of masculine suffering (war service, violent abuse, romantic failure). It is a conservative perspective but also deeply misandrist.

      There is also some Red-Pilled content, as you say. A truly Blue-Pilled movie would see Forrest 'stepping up' and marrying the post-Wall thot who scorned him in youth and living 'happily ever after' (carefully omitting all mention of the divorce courts, penury and jail that so often awaits the White Knights who do this).

      That said, it is easy to look back on cultural products through a Black Pilled lens in 2020 and think of them as 'ironic' or post-modern or something like that. That is, we cannot believe anyone took statements like 'life is a box of chocolates' at face value from our present perspective. However, most people at the time thought the film a serious social commentary and 'conservative classic', showing how small town American values could triumph over adversity.

      Similarly, statements like John Lennon's 'Imagine no possessions' or 'All you need is love' were not meant ironically but as truthful, viable statements. It is hard to believe people seriously believed or uttered such garbage - but they did.

      Delete
    4. "That said, it is easy to look back on cultural products through a Black Pilled lens in 2020 and think of them as 'ironic' or post-modern or something like that. That is, we cannot believe anyone took statements like 'life is a box of chocolates' at face value from our present perspective. However, most people at the time thought the film a serious social commentary and 'conservative classic', showing how small town American values could triumph over adversity.

      Similarly, statements like John Lennon's 'Imagine no possessions' or 'All you need is love' were not meant ironically but as truthful, viable statements. It is hard to believe people seriously believed or uttered such garbage - but they did."

      It is indeed very true that the wear and tear of time can make the most earnest statements look faintly ridiculous. That said, one should note that most people are by definition either delusional ideologues or nitwits/midwits. Such individuals will always take such sentiments at face value, regardless if they were made 50 years ago or 50 minutes ago.

      You and I both know that the regulars on the Anglobitch blog altogether fit neither category. No, I'd like to think that we are better than that - more self-aware, more insightful, more analytical, more knowledgeable - the whole nine yards and all that.

      Speaking of "life is like a box of chocolates", one must bear in mind that the phrase ends with "you never know what you might find." Beyond midwits being midwits, one can understand why your average Boomer could have interpreted that statement in a positive light - many of them did live out a lesser version of Forrest's experience wherein it was possible (and reasonable) for them to keep dreaming for a better outcome even when they endured setbacks.

      However, I would argue that the movie gives that phrase a double meaning - one blue-pilled, one red-pilled. The blue-pilled one is fairly obvious, but the red-pilled one is less so. The 'good guy' ultimately 'finds' a relatively successful, rewarding life, while his 'bad girl' love interest ultimately finds a premature death after being beaten and hooked on drugs. This shows that the box of chocolates one finds can be poisonous. Granted, the movie again softens this by implying that the 'bad girl' was driven to this lifestyle by child abuse, but given the context in which this film was released, one cannot help but be mildly surprised that Forrest didn't die in 'nam while she 'somehow' inherited everything that he had and lived it up with a coterie of drug dealers and assorted scum for the rest of her days.

      Delete
    5. You're a little harsh to NB Forrest. While it is true that he traded in slaves before the war, we have to remember that this was honest and legal at that time. Yes, he helped to found the KKK, but it was founded to assist Confederate veterans back to civilian life. In 1869, he called for it to be disbanded as it had gotten too violent. I hate KKK people and that really gets to them. He was a self taught military genius. WWII German general Heinz Guderian Studied him to good effect. While he fought his men as mounted infantry, I prefer to think of JEB Stuart as finest cavalry officer our country has seen.

      Delete
    6. @DaRick - i was worried i was getting predictable... Confirmed :)

      Delete
  6. Ten million incels in the US? Presuming a twenty percent rate among single men in a population of 320 million with half the adults married would be twenty million, had to factor in kids, and that is a guess. We then have to consider all the men living in sexless marriages and at twenty percent, that would be another twenty million. If the truth of the depth of this hit the general consciousness, the lid would blow off the pot.
    At some time, it will happen.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It was a conservative estimate because the exact figures are hard to define. For example, do we label escortcels true incels or something else? If we did, the figure would of course be far higher.

      Delete
    2. Imagine a New York Times headline reading:

      '50 Million American men are incels!'

      Now that WOULD create a lot of waves.

      Delete
    3. When you consider that only forty percent of men who have lived have passed on their genes while eighty percent of women have, we start to see how big this is.The Blue Pill solution is to ignore it. That is not going to work as it is getting worse, much worse, with Tinder.

      Delete
    4. The problem is not so much the men, it is the women and their ridiculous standards. We may see mass migrations of men to greener pastures. This has happened before. Why did the Vikings colonize Greenland, Iceland, the north of England, and a lot of Russia? Someone looked at the genetic history of Iceland. While the men came from Norway, the women came from the north of England.

      Delete
    5. Canada is a shit feminist country. Man falsely accused of a crime and didn't know who, what where or when of the allegations that led to the smear campaign and resulting job loss:
      https://montrealgazette.com/news/local-news/mcgill-university-student-sues-school-newspaper-associations-and-accuser

      Delete
    6. The whole 40/80 thing was mostly caused by war.

      This is something else.

      Probably the most notable example of what we're seeing here is the Roman Empire (too many men, not enough women), and Caesar had to personally intervene to stop the issue from destroying society. Eventually, however, apathy and alienation destroyed the Roman Empire anyway.

      Delete
    7. At times, the the 60/40 reproduction ratio has been much more extreme. 8000 ya, 1 man reproduced for every 17 women:

      https://psmag.com/environment/17-to-1-reproductive-success

      Perhaps Tinder is having the same effect as early agriculture?

      For the elite, keeping this knowledge from the broad mass of males is absolutely imperative.

      Delete
    8. The Liberals in Canada are planning to increase the immigration quota to 1 million migrants a year. Guess how many will be men? 850,000. 850,000 men added to the dating market in Toronto every year. It is a mouse dystopia. Immigration is bad during the economic recession, but Canadian women, the landlords and the oligopoly love mass immigration.

      Delete
    9. Rookh, I wish that we knew more about what happened eight thousand years ago. How could things bottleneck so radically when agriculture is so labor intensive?
      As for the elites keeping the truth from the masses, that can only be temporary.

      Delete
    10. This article argues that modernism was an anomaly and that our high incelibacy rates (30% as they figure it) are merely a reversion to historical norms:

      https://unherd.com/2020/11/the-age-of-the-middle-class-is-over/?=frlh&fbclid=IwAR2h1iYMJvPqUZHL1Mye1SMgpjpwBK8pUsMULHkbzPmBhwM86fWOe6w7mAo

      Generally a very interesting article that seems to acknowledge the sexual realities we in the Manosphere have known about for decades. Maybe the lamestream world is waking up at last?

      Bit late now, of course.

      Delete
    11. The article forgot to mention that both lower class men and women were the serfs, and militant man-hating feminism wasn't tolerated in the serf class.

      Today, a 4 foot 9 obese whore will not settle for less than a blond, tall, rich and handsome Chad of Harvard or the elite of the City of London aristocracy.

      Delete
    12. I agree that dissolving traditional class barriers to dating and mating via dating apps has greatly fed female hypergamy. When lower class females knew their place, hyper-hypergamy did not exist (except in fairy tales like Cinderella).

      Delete
    13. I think that internet dating is responsible for a lot of that. It made women available to more men than they could begin to meet and class was not that much of an issue.

      There is something else. Women came to believe that temporary enhancements, like makeup, actually improved their sexual market rank.

      Delete
    14. *There is something else. Women came to believe that temporary enhancements, like makeup, actually improved their sexual market rank.*

      It wasn't just a belief. Such temporary enhancements actually do.

      Delete
  7. I believe this C-19 was deliberately done to us to execute this agenda. Justin Castro is planning a Great Reset to starve the Canadians while the public sector workers, police and feminist teachers and think tanks get overtime for walking at Pride parades.

    It’s to form a One world feminist-coporatist government which is biblical. It’s referred to as the Beast system in scripture.


    I always wondered how this would be accomplished, well maybe not, thought it would come after a big war. A global pandemic.... wow!

    I’m glad I know God and trust Him and His plans for us. Prayers up for everyone, draw near to Him. YWHW ����


    Btw, it’s the spirit of the anti-christ (Jezebel and Chanty Binx feminist) that entered their minds to do this, the same thing the happened with Judas when he ate the bread at the last supper and then betrayed Yahusha (Jesus). Just in case you wondered how people can become so feminist and evil.

    ReplyDelete
  8. What effect does the rising tide of death caused by Corona have on the Anglo-Puritanism in the Long-term

    If it continues indefinitely?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It only benefits women. Canada and Australia are giving away billions of dollars to women, while men get fuck all. $5,000 is given as a relief package for women in Australia, but not for men.
      Men are becoming a lower class than stray dogs in Canada, Australia, New Zealand and the UK.

      Delete
    2. In the Anglosphere, everything is designed to benefit women.

      BTW, is this the famous Winston Wu? If so, we are honoured.

      Delete
    3. @Rookh Kshatriya
      Winston Wu? Never knew him.

      The Anglosphere and the disappearing male syndrome.

      Maybe they will be given what they really wanted all along.

      Absence of Men and males altogether from their lives more and more.

      Cats and boxed wine. More and more women and their maleless lifestyle.


      Delete
    4. I have had some time to think about all the favors government heaps on women. It is going to backfire. Men will toughen up and be independent while women will become vain, entitled, and dependent. Add to that, the men with "Get up and Go" will get up and leave. That is a terrible thing to do to the demographic that produces.

      Delete
    5. Winston Wu is a Chinese American who runs the Happier Abroad website, which is dedicated to expanding American men's dating options.

      He does a great interview with Steve Hoca about the misandry and racism of American women and the better options for them abroad:

      https://youtu.be/kiYqgnKUKOE

      Delete
    6. *The Anglosphere and the disappearing male syndrome.

      Maybe they will be given what they really wanted all along.

      Absence of Men and males altogether from their lives more and more.

      Cats and boxed wine. More and more women and their maleless lifestyle.*

      A world without men is the logical outcome for a misandrist civilisation. This is what most Anglo-American women want, in the last analysis. The Anglosphere promotes a kind of hyper-hyper-hyper-hypergamy that eliminates men altogether.

      Delete
    7. Dr. Rookh if you ever visited Birningham, the young men have mostly converted to Islam. Their religious scholars tell them that in the Last Days there will be more men than women, but the women will be following the anti-Christ devil. I'm guessing that MGTOW and the opioid crisis in America and Canada are causing a drastic reduction in men marrying, which is why Trudope wants to import a million male migrants a year this decade to supplicate the feminist.

      Delete
    8. @Rookh

      I think that means those Anglo women will be dying out. And only a minority that is more resistant to sexual puritanism will survive.

      And will make up the remainder.

      Delete
    9. John Rockwell: Filipino girls have femininity that is lacking in the Anglobitch countries:
      https://youtu.be/vntTGYbokz4
      The video saved the lives of many Toronto men who were condemned to a sexless life of post-feminist persecution in that hellhole. Manila is a paradise for middle class men compared to post-feminist shitholes like NYC or Toronto.

      Delete
    10. "A world without men is the logical outcome for a misandrist civilisation. This is what most Anglo-American women want, in the last analysis."

      I certainly agree that Anglo women are the most misandrist on God's Green Earth, but I think it's more the case that most Anglo women are too petty, small-minded and short-sighted to understand the consequences of the sort of society they're going to bring forth - one in which men will at best be indifferent towards them (Australia) and at worst be outright radicalised and violent (USA).

      Anglo women want many things, but I doubt that most of them truly WANT reproductive failure, or to deal with the difficulties associated with being single parents, or to be cat ladies from 35 onwards. However, that's the fate that awaits many of them.

      No doubt that many of them will try and rationalise their predicament by saying that they never wanted children or male companionship in the first place, but I think that's mostly a cope. Even if I think their motives in this regard are often less than altruistic (i.e. financial or looking for someone to help raise their kids), that doesn't mean they don't want male companionship at all.

      Delete
    11. Girls from Kindergarten are taught from their feminist teacher that they should be independent and don't need a man; except when needing a MALE COP to arrest virgins, or a MALE JUDGE to enforce the law, or a MALE SUGAR DADDY to help them pay dem college bills sista.
      They say that in Toronto, 99.9% of Anglocunts in college have a MALE SUGAR DADDY while HATING MEN ON CAMPUS.

      Delete
    12. *Girls from Kindergarten are taught from their feminist teacher that they should be independent and don't need a man; except when needing a MALE COP to arrest virgins, or a MALE JUDGE to enforce the law, or a MALE SUGAR DADDY to help them pay dem college bills sista.
      They say that in Toronto, 99.9% of Anglocunts in college have a MALE SUGAR DADDY while HATING MEN ON CAMPUS.*

      Anglo-American feminism is all double-standards. Anglo feminists (in fact, women in general) want equality where and when it suits them, but revert to tradcon values where and when it doesn't.

      Delete
    13. *I certainly agree that Anglo women are the most misandrist on God's Green Earth, but I think it's more the case that most Anglo women are too petty, small-minded and short-sighted to understand the consequences of the sort of society they're going to bring forth - one in which men will at best be indifferent towards them (Australia) and at worst be outright radicalised and violent (USA).*

      One thing you miss out is that women cannot foresee the secondary or structural repercussions of their personal life-decisions because their intelligence is generally lower (about 5 IQ points lower, on average). Allied to this is the fact that female existence is divided into three stages, all of which are sharply distinct: childhood, pre-Wall and post-Wall. Pre-Wall women are poorly prepared for post-Wall existence, partly because it is so different but also because the 'female mass media' offers them no realistic guide to post-Wall existence.

      Obviously, coherent life-stage guidance for males is also remiss (bang models, settle down with The One, raise a family and get buried with her under the greenwood tree) but less damaging due to the more 'sexually consistent' nature of male existence across the whole lifespan.

      *Anglo women want many things, but I doubt that most of them truly WANT reproductive failure, or to deal with the difficulties associated with being single parents, or to be cat ladies from 35 onwards. However, that's the fate that awaits many of them.
      No doubt that many of them will try and rationalise their predicament by saying that they never wanted children or male companionship in the first place, but I think that's mostly a cope. Even if I think their motives in this regard are often less than altruistic (i.e. financial or looking for someone to help raise their kids), that doesn't mean they don't want male companionship at all.*

      The UK lower-middle press (Daily Mail, Daily Express) is full of stories of 'successful' post-Wall women who are childless (or single mothers), manless and ageing, all whistling Dixie and pretending they 'never had it so good'. A sad sight to see, tbh.

      It is also interesting to note that female suicide rates are starting to rise.

      Delete
    14. I'll drink a bottle of Johhny Walker once I get a link to the rising female suicide rates. Only if the females are from college age to pre-retirement.
      We should be glad that adult feminazis are committing suicide. It's justice for society and men.
      Australia is giving $5000 for free to women, and Trudeau plans to give $100 billion more to women and get the national deficit as high as $500 billion to appease the feminist cunt. Men are gonna pay for the austerity in Australia, UK, Canada.

      Delete
    15. In the UK, female suicide rates are rising for under 25's. However, male suicide rates are also rising and men still make up 75% of all suicides. So the Johnny Walker will have to wait, although there is some cause for joy:

      https://www.bmj.com/content/370/bmj.m3431

      Delete
    16. *Anglo women want many things, but I doubt that most of them truly WANT reproductive failure, or to deal with the difficulties associated with being single parents, or to be cat ladies from 35 onwards. However, that's the fate that awaits many of them.*

      It sure is:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VNvlvxI0X0c

      Delete
    17. @Rookh Kshatriya

      Its actually normal for women in Western Europe:
      https://hbdchick.wordpress.com/2014/03/10/big-summary-post-on-the-hajnal-line/

      In the Middle Ages in Western Europe. Many women didn't marry.

      Let the Anglo women be without Men or males in their lives the more the better. Since that is the endpoint of misandry.

      But unfortunately they want to spread the disease to other cultures.

      Delete
    18. Hajnal Line was pretty interesting, but aspect of that do not ring true to me. If Caucasians are so smart, how come Asian immigrants do so much better economically and academically, dominating all the most difficult subjects at Anglo-American and European universities? Also, western 'achievements' in STEM were often the work of genetic outsiders, such as Jews, not native Europeans.

      Genetically, the English are more related to Southern Slavs rather than Germanic peoples, in any case. 3/4 of British DNA dates back to ancient migrations 6-12 000 years ago:

      *Stephen Oppenheimer’s groundbreaking genetic research has revealed that the ‘Anglo-Saxon invasion’ contributed only a tiny fraction to the English gene pool. In fact, three quarters of English people can trace an unbroken line of genetic descent through their parental genes from settlers arriving long before the introduction of farming.*

      http://www.bradshawfoundation.com/stephenoppenheimer/

      So the British (including the English) are strongly distinct from other Europeans, in genetic terms. Perhaps this explains their idiomatic, anti-life worldview?

      It is also debatable whether Anglo-European countries are particularly democratic, in real terms. Prior to the 20th century, most western countries were plutocratic oligarchies with virtually no mass participation in politics. Indeed, relatively few poor people vote now and most politicians still hail from upper-middle class backgrounds (although they try to hide it).

      Interestingly, the UK is in some ways outside the hajnal line itself. For example, it has the lowest marriage rates and highest teen pregnancy rates in western Europe. These figures are driven by the native underclass, not by immigrants. Mass discontent with the political order is also stronger in the Anglo nations, as was born out by Brexit and the election of Trump. Many mainland Europeans complain about the EU, but none have left it yet.

      Delete
    19. White woman walk naked on the street opening her pussy for Lil Tyrone is "democracy" in the Western European nations, yet there are hate speech laws if you point that fact on your social media.
      The democracy index is a lie. The UK and most Western European countries are not free for men; it is feminist.
      The white woman walk naked on the street in London or Toronto and the white man flees to Manila or Bangkok to live in overcrowded slum to get away from white woman who walk naked on the street. White man use the low profile and lack of laws to post Islamic Bobs and Vegan tropes to vilify the non-white men and their countries that the white man seek refuge in. Such a pity. White woman pussy stink and they fuck dogs!

      Delete
    20. @Rookh

      "Interestingly, the UK is in some ways outside the hajnal line itself. For example, it has the lowest marriage rates and highest teen pregnancy rates in western Europe. These figures are driven by the native underclass, not by immigrants."

      The thing is that historically strong Christian Norms ensured that out of wedlock births are heavily penalized.

      And children outside of marriage were
      "bastards" who didn't fare so well.

      Adulteresses went around with a Scarlet letter.

      Which contributed the the marriage pattern of the Hajinal Line.

      Its not like that those teen pregnancies were with well established Men with good Careers who would protect and provide for their families with those women and invest in their children.

      That just doesn't happen in the Anglosphere in modern times as well as being socially acceptable.

      Take away the Govt Welfare and teen pregnancy will plummet given the norms of the Anglosphere.



      Delete
    21. @Rookh
      "Hajnal Line was pretty interesting, but aspect of that do not ring true to me. If Caucasians are so smart, how come Asian immigrants do so much better economically and academically, dominating all the most difficult subjects at Anglo-American and European universities?"

      Tests as in being good at paper pushing doesn't necessarily translate best to real world results.

      For whatever reason Western Europe had preconditions that made it possible for them to dominate the world.

      No. 1. Access to the Atlantic Ocean enabled the Anglosphere and Northern Europe to get very rich from Naval trade with the Americas and Africa, and Europe and hence fund their overseas ventures.

      It trained them in Naval Warfare since they had to fight over trade routes.

      No. 2 Mechanization was already underway by the decline of slavery in Europe by creating a shortage of Labor.

      During the 12th Century extensive use of Waterwheels and Windmills to perform various repetitive tasks went underway:
      https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/800007.Medieval_Machine

      The Black Death in creating a shortage of Labor accelerated this trend.

      Plus the notion of God as a Rational Creator that set forth Laws helped lay the philosophical framework for European Science.

      Delete
  9. If it is Winston Wu, I am very glad to hear from him.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Canada, and feminist states like Wisconsin and New York, Michigan have extremely cold winters. Men can't afford to live off grid in -30C weather.
    Sweden, Denmark and Russia also have extremely cold weather and feminist, or hypergamous women like in Russia.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Great Reset Trudope plans to import half a million of male migrants, but if a fairly (better looking than Canadian cunt) Roma lands in Canada, she is denied entry:
    https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2020/11/23/they-were-coming-to-canada-to-care-for-a-relative-after-her-surgery-they-say-discrimination-stopped-them-at-the-airport.html?li_source=LI&li_medium=thestar_canada

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Female fears about sexual immigration are always acknowledged in the Anglosphere; male fears about sexual immigration are always ignored.

      Delete
    2. Anglobitches turn a blind eye on millions of male migrants, but if ONE, just ONE woman who looks feminine, sexy and young attempts to enter cuntries like Sweden, Canada, USA or Britain, she gets deported like a Trump Muslim ban.

      Delete
  12. Feminism the end of human trust, human love, human culture and overall human civilization. We are living in the Last Days. Men are slowly becoming a extinct species. Dharma will eventually take care of the feminist virus from the Western world countries of Canada and America.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Winston Wu is living in paradise:
      https://youtu.be/vntTGYbokz4

      The Filipino girl has a femininity that is lacking in the AngloBitchCanadian and EU countries.
      Let's hope that Chanty Binx and Anita Sarkessian don't infect Asia.

      Delete
  13. Winston Wu knew of the Anglobitch theory a decade ago:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fb9a8mcSeT4

    Thanks to the Canadian government and Anita Sarkessian in the USA, the Anglobitch agenda is infecting every country which depends on foreign aid. Canada does not give funding to countries unless those countries accept the feminist agenda. The day will come when starving girls living within insular and autocratic countries demand their rights to oppress boys and men, while the African and Middle Eastern dictators are pressured to enact feminist laws, lest they get invaded for weapons of mass destruction. Bush did the same thing with Iraq and Afghanistan to enlist men to fight wars while Chanty Binx and feminazi cunts enacted laws to oppress men.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Absolutely. The Anglosphere countries don't give foreign aid because they care about poor people - it's all an underhand strategy to infect other countries with their hideous, destructive brand of misandrist, sex-negative feminism.

      The recognise that women the world over are susceptible to anything labelled 'feminism'. Foreign aid is the 'Trojan Horse' the Anglosphere uses to infiltrate and destroy more functional traditional societies.

      Delete
  14. The American Dream is dying.
    The Anglosphere government deliberately let COVID-19 go out of control to enact perpetual lockdowns.
    The day will come when the only employers who are hiring are the Big 5 corporations.
    However, the bureaucratic feminist jobs will remain, and the feminist police and prison system josb will increase. The feminist teacher will show her pussy to your child, and as a parent, you will be sent to concentration camps for being a misogynist or enemy of the feminist state. Your death will be just a result of your own misfortune. We are living in the days of Brave New World.
    As young, white men we are being targeted. After the white men are gone, the rest of men will end up dying, including the homos and men who identify as transgender.
    Look no further to Canada to see the concentration camps that they are building in Toronto and Manitoba. Hell awaits men.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Very interesting. My third book elaborates on many of these themes.

      Delete
  15. Eton teacher dismissed amid free speech row
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KT7eDqaI1Zo
    ...................................
    Victoria Bateman shows her pu$$y to minor students at Cambridge though!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I just looked Victoria Bateman up. What does that have to do with economics?
      They be wacko!

      Delete
    2. Yes, I noticed that. The UK is rapidly sliding into a feminist dictatorship at least as bad as Canada or the US.

      Delete
  16. Anglobitch acquitted for sex with 14yo:
    https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/k5gx65/uk_mom_reportedly_had_sex_with_boy_14_after/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. voice of eu, Chelmsford, United Kingdom, 14 minutes ago

      So she picked him up in the playground but though he was older. Unbelievable

      Delete
    2. You're not going to like this, but the problem with rape is that the boy can't get pregnant. That is where all this advantage to female pedos comes from.

      Delete
    3. *You're not going to like this, but the problem with rape is that the boy can't get pregnant. That is where all this advantage to female pedos comes from.*

      Absolutely. In fact, contraception gave women all the vast power and privilege they now enjoy, in a practical sense. They have absolute control over reproduction, while men have no reproductive rights whatsoever. Prior to contraception, sex pretty much meant conception. This limited female opportunities for prostitution, sexual manipulation and riding the cock carousel. The same kind of dynamic is at work in female child abuse: by retaining the option for pregnancy, female abusers obscurely remain guilt-free in all circumstances.

      Delete
  17. The life of a Canadian feminst cunt is worth more than a baby. The lying feminazi cunt falsely accused the man of a crime for child visitation issues:
    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/kawartha-siu-opp-baby-man-dead-1.5827000

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not only that, but it could only be that police killed the baby. Who else was shooting? This is negligence that would not be tolerated in civilians, but the cops will be held blameless. No justice for the baby.

      Delete
  18. 4 foot females want 6 foot boyfriends

    ReplyDelete
  19. Mark Lepine day is on December 06. Does this blog celebrate that holiday? There is a cult which believes that Mark Lepine was a prophet sent by God to let the world be aware of the feminist new world order.
    In other words, Mark Lepine is considered a Jesus-like prophet to certain factions of the MRA.

    ReplyDelete
  20. I remember that December day in 1989 as if it were yesterday. It was obvious that a line of resistance line had been crossed.

    TBH, I would not post an article celebrating Marc Lepine Day since it might lead to a ban in Canada. That said, Canadian readers are free to post their eulogies and other meditations.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Alek Minassian and Dr. James Sears are being touted as the new Marc Lepines of the 21st century. However, Alek Minassian copycatted the ISIS van attacks, and Dr. James Sears was emulating Adolf Hitler.

      Why does everything have to be about Toronto women in Canada?

      Delete
    2. It wouldn't be, if you got out of Toronto. Stop supporting this with your presence. Don't let them live rent free in your head.

      Delete
    3. I'm not from Toronto or Canada.
      The feminist virus from Canada is infesting Brazil. Today the media is using Marc Lepine to vilify machismo and blame every man for favela gang femicide.

      Delete
  21. Something different, an Edmonton woman. I hope this backfires on her and her patron because it is a violation of the right to a free press.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9tC61NHHvgE

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Is Alberta the oil-rich version of Toronto? WTF why would cops stop a Rebel Media from using a tape to record Rachel Notley?

      Delete
    2. Edmonton is the provincial capital and Leah Ward is a political apparatchik. They tried to set Keean up for some false accusation and ended up covering themselves in manure. Rachel Notley does not like Rebel News. They are partly responsible for her party's fall from power, however, the credit for that really belongs to her.

      Delete
    3. Feminist approached the Rebel News reporter, and she told the cops that he harassed her.
      Thank God for cameras. If the feminist was naked, she would complain that she is being videotaped sexually though her nudity is not sexual she contends while showing her punani to a kid.

      Delete
    4. She tried something very much along those lines. It is good that Keean covered himself and it is good that her accusations went down in flames. I wrote the Premier asking that he censure Rachel Notley over this. They had to cook this up in advance. Men have had enough.

      Delete
  22. Many men in America and Canada are taking the Black Pill in the form of drug overdoses. Feminist society wants the bottom 99.9% of men dead, and the remaining men as worker bees. The rest of jobs are going to feminists.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I sincerely hope that women come to regret that they treated men so badly. It is a long time from forty to eighty.

      Delete
    2. That won't worry them if they have all the best jobs (which they do). They would rather be single than have anything to do with a low value male.

      Delete
    3. The problem is that they have devalued all men. Their equals have become untouchable in their eyes.

      Delete
    4. If they have all the best jobs and are in charge, then, we are going to hell in a handbasket. They are going to make a mess of it.

      Delete
    5. You made me see something. Women crave status. Now, that there are avenues for them to get it on their own, they feel they don't need men and will not tolerate one at lesser status than their own. It does make things hard for men, since women are being promoted ahead of men.

      Delete
  23. Toronto feminist teachers are protected by publication bans wen they give the junior elementary football team blowjobs!
    https://www.thestar.com/politics/provincial/2020/12/11/ontario-bureaucrat-who-was-fired-in-11m-covid-19-fraud-probe-had-id-from-panama.html

    The man's Panama ID is a legal document why is the Toronto media releasing the info?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He was probably planning on retiring there. However, they do like to cast aspersions on men for visiting what they think are sexual vacation destinations. Notice that both documents list his nationality as Canadian. It is on the up and up.

      Delete
    2. He robbed the feminist state, but that doesn't mean that his ID card and passport be released for the world to see.Releasing a passport on media is strange. White woman in Canada have Toronto Police arresting men who post complaints about them online. There are feminist laws in Canada which were resurrected from feudal British laws which were abolished after slavery. Criminal blasphemy and criminal defamation are examples.

      Delete
  24. Feminist white lady gets $100,000+ a year job as a Toronto teacher to Snapchat nudes to Grade One-Six students, but Toronto wants to shut down Pornhub:
    https://www.thestar.com/business/opinion/2020/12/12/government-must-take-immediate-action-to-protect-the-rights-of-victims-exploited-via-unaccountable-porn-sites.html?li_source=LI&li_medium=thestar_recommended_for_you

    ReplyDelete
  25. What happened to theantifeminist.com?

    Man disappeared.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It is a pity, his commentary was excellent. His basic idea was that feminism was driven by a cartel of old, ugly women who sought to quarantine (or persecute) the male's natural attraction to attractive young girls: a simple and truthful interpretation, which dovetails neatly with my own theories.

      Since he was 'getting on' in years, as we say in England, it is not impossible that he simply died or became incapacitated.

      Alternatively, he might have just 'given up' in the face of British SJW Blue-Pilled nonsense, which goes from strength to strength on a daily basis.

      Finally, he might have been shut down or 'nobbled' by the authorities. Americans need to remember that the UK does not have the same legislation protecting free speech as the US.

      Delete
    2. Sure. What he is missing the mark about is that feminism acting with Anglo Puritanism was able to redefine the morality of the West.

      So his arguments and Belfort Bax fell flat on that front. No headway whatsoever.

      They failed on the power of Morality. On what the culture defines as Good and Evil.

      Why did Men not "Stick up for themselves" because doing so is Evil and tantamount to justifying wrongdoing.

      And to victimize the innocent.

      Delete
    3. The feminist police got him like this Canuck:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1s3bj22BYrc

      Delete
    4. *What he is missing the mark about is that feminism acting with Anglo Puritanism was able to redefine the morality of the West.

      So his arguments and Belfort Bax fell flat on that front. No headway whatsoever.

      They failed on the power of Morality. On what the culture defines as Good and Evil.*

      Very profound observations and totally correct. Feminism in the Anglosphere became far more virulent, more quickly, because it was exploiting the puritanical dynamics already present in Anglo culture. Feminism elsewhere in the world can never achieve the same 'moral dominance' because it is not built on misandrist, puritanical cultural foundations.

      To be fair, the Anti-Feminist did grasp this fact. Maybe his understanding led to him dropping off the scene; it is a pretty hopeless realisation, after all.

      Delete
    5. @Rookh Kshatriya

      If you have read through the Old Testament and the New Testament what is your impressions on Christian sexual morality?

      Delete
    6. I have read both, and am much more sympathetic to the Jewish perspective found in the Old Testament. Despite its faults, it is at least socially rational and above all, 'practicable' (as is Islam, more or less).

      Christianity - specifically, the teachings of Paul and Jesus - are neither socially rational or practicable. It is not possible for a normal man to look at a comely young woman and not want to have sex with her - yet Jesus equates such desires with adultery, as if the thought were as bad as the deed. Firstly, the thought of doing anything - murder, rape, anything - is obviously not as bad as the deed. Most of us want to rape and murder people every day, but doing that would prevent civilisation from functioning at even the most elementary level. Secondly, it is simply not possible for a normal man not to be stimulated by the sight of beauty; so the Christian injunction is simply impracticable. To be functional, a moral system has to be practicable: a non-practicable moral system might as well not as exist.

      This irrational, impracticable Christian perspective was cleverly modulated by the old Church fathers (Augustine, Aquinas, etc.) who welded a workable Euro-Catholic culture together from various classical, Indian and biblical elements, which lasted until the Reformation. The Reformation was morally disastrous for the West, since it returned to the original ideas of Paul and Jesus: impracticable, unworkable and basically deluded. The Anglosphere's Puritan strain is essentially the most potent expression of those crazy values. As Nietzsche said, Judaism and Islam are at least designed to regulate the behaviour of real human beings, unlike the teachings of Paul (in particular) which refuse to accept the practical realities of human social, moral and sexual existence.

      SJWs and misandrist feminists are not 'revolutionary' at all; their views are essentially secular puritanism, the Pauline views rehashed and reserved in 'revolutionary' guise. The feminist loathing of gender difference, of natural instincts, of natural desires, of sexuality in general represent a reversion to the irrational, impracticable Pauline beliefs that the Church fathers necessarily manipulated in order to create a viable European civilisation. Catholic Medieval Europe was rationally tolerant of human needs, with brothels in every town and city (yet also with reasonable legal protections for whores and women in general). Repression only emerged with the rise of Protestantism, with its insane and unworkable views of human nature.

      Essentially, the whole SJW-feminist-trans lobby are restating the unworkable teachings of Jesus and Paul in secular guise; they are in no sense revolutionary, just secular puritans with a loathing of natural life. Without modulation, their insane and unworkable beliefs can lead only one way: to social chaos and collapse, which is already well on the way across the west.

      Delete
    7. "It is not possible for a normal man to look at a comely young woman and not want to have sex with her - yet Jesus equates such desires with adultery, as if the thought were as bad as the deed. Firstly, the thought of doing anything - murder, rape, anything - is obviously not as bad as the deed. Most of us want to rape and murder people every day"

      To lust after something or to hate and having already committing a murder in one's own heart.

      I think is about nursing said thoughts and developing on those temptations. I think the passage said: "looking upon a woman in order to lust after her" talks about a deliberate action to nurse the temptation and to deliberately entertain thoughts about her.

      So to lust is not only to desire a beautiful woman but to a deliberate fantasization about fulfilling the deed and the same is true of hatred that is deliberate fantasies of scenarios of which the person you hate dies".

      The message is that evil begins in the heart. And even in God's eyes counts as a form of evil even when it doesn't translate into action per se.

      Of course there is also theological implications that I would not want to expand on.

      In regards to St Paul please expand.


      Delete
    8. I suppose you are suggesting that feeding the thoughts and developing them into a persistent mode of being via acts of conscious will is distinct from merely having the thoughts unbidden. I agree there is a difference, but one can still nurture (or even savour) thoughts of rape or murder without acting upon them (in fact, the vast majority do); they still do not have the same deleterious impact they would have from enacting them. There is also the benchmark problem with this brand of 'subjective' morality: with the bar set so impossibly high, moral failure is inevitable. Nominally Christian countries such as Brazil, Mexico or the US are full of crimes and murders for precisely this reason. Since the moral standard is so unrealistic, people dismiss it altogether. Because it is not practicable, it might as well not exist.

      There is also an imbalance in this approach to morality, with no mention of structural or economic factors in human moral decisions. Jesus never once criticises the institution of slavery, which was all around him in the ancient world. Are we supposed to think slavery was the slaves' fault? It is almost as if the external socio-economic world does not exist in Jesus' worldview (or at least has no impact on human morality). This is obviously nonsense, at every level; a starving, oppressed man cannot be held to the same moral standards as someone who lives in luxury.

      Paul was an interesting man with a variety of problems. I follow Nietzsche in seeing him as a tortured homosexual, also as suffering some kind of neuro-developmental disorder (probably grand-mal epilepsy). Now all that is problematic, right there, given that he was the conceptual architect of Christianity. His are 'small world' teachings aimed at a tiny and oppressed community, which only work within a shared social framework with the same beliefs ('be a nice guy' morality, in short). Paul is the first modulator, who was trying to weld Christ's impracticable moral teachings to the needs of the early church. Clearly, Paul thought this would happen in the first century (it didn't, of course; Christianity is a failed religion, in that sense). Paul brilliantly welded the plain Christ story (Jesus explicitly said he was not God to his followers) to the pagan Mystery religions of his day (Attis, Osiris, Mithras), which typically worshipped a resurrecting god-man who took on (and atoned for) the 'sins' of mankind. Because of his self-loathing, Paul created an 'unnatural' morality which excoriated virility, health and manliness in favour of weakness, impotence and degeneracy.

      In fact, we see many of those strains in the Blue Pilled morality of Incel Tears and other feminist apologists, who are typically transsexuals or incels in denial. In fact, Paul glories in incelibacy and pretends it is some kind of 'choice' in typical IT fashion.

      Delete
    9. "I agree there is a difference, but one can still nurture (or even savour) thoughts of rape or murder without acting upon them (in fact, the vast majority do); they still do not have the same deleterious impact they would have from enacting them."

      Sure I agree. It goes to show the how moral standards that the God portrayed in Christianity would hold Men to. That it is likewise the duty of Men to police their own thoughts as much as they do their own behaviors.

      Christianity as much relies on the supernatural provision of God ie "The Holy Spirit" to help them with that kind of morality.

      It is obviously deleterious without presupposing such a thing as a reality as well.


      "Jesus never once criticises the institution of slavery, which was all around him in the ancient world."

      I agree. Its not explicity condemned by the rest of the New Testament Authors. And may even be because of heretical innovations by Men later on.



      "Nominally Christian countries such as Brazil, Mexico or the US are full of crimes and murders for precisely this reason."

      Medieval Europe was the same. But Capital Punishment also provided a impetus in reducing such crime:
      https://evoandproud.blogspot.com/2013/06/making-europeans-kinder-gentler.html

      Criminals were increasingly exterminated and centuries of that happening as well the continued cultural influence of Christianity is why Europe became so peaceful compared to those countries.

      I guarantee that if such measures were also replicated by those countries you mention it would also have the same effect over time.

      "Paul brilliantly welded the plain Christ story (Jesus explicitly said he was not God to his followers) to the pagan Mystery religions of his day (Attis, Osiris, Mithras), which typically worshipped a resurrecting god-man who took on (and atoned for) the 'sins' of mankind. Because of his self-loathing"

      That notion of the completely innocent dying for sinners was already present in the Old Testament in Symbolic Form. The Animal Sacrifice that "Cleansed" the Israelite from wrongdoing in God's sight.

      And henceforth cleanse him of the death sentence hanging over his head.

      Both the Priests and even the High Priest had to be consecrated through having blood sprinkled upon them from the death of animals without blemish that would symbolize its complete innocence.

      Before approaching the Ark otherwise they would die. For this reason they wore bells in their clothing so they can be dragged out by a rope if God happened to kill them for screwing up the rituals.

      That symbolism was all over the Old Testament.

      It does have similarities with the other religions with a resurrecting pagan religions.



      "In fact, we see many of those strains in the Blue Pilled morality of Incel Tears and other feminist apologists, who are typically transsexuals or incels in denial. In fact, Paul glories in incelibacy and pretends it is some kind of 'choice' in typical IT fashion."

      I dunno. Are the voluntarily celibate Monks of Athos in that category too?

      Delete

    10. *Christianity as much relies on the supernatural provision of God ie "The Holy Spirit" to help them with that kind of morality.*

      I suspect the Holy Spirit is just high IQ. It certainly seems to short-circuit among the low-IQ'd and uneducated.

      *I agree. Its not explicity condemned by the rest of the New Testament Authors. And may even be because of heretical innovations by Men later on.*

      Maybe they were just men of their time who agreed with it?

      *Medieval Europe was the same. But Capital Punishment also provided a impetus in reducing such crime:
      https://evoandproud.blogspot.com/2013/06/making-europeans-kinder-gentler.html*

      Criminals were increasingly exterminated and centuries of that happening as well the continued cultural influence of Christianity is why Europe became so peaceful compared to those countries.

      I guarantee that if such measures were also replicated by those countries you mention it would also have the same effect over time.*

      Other parts of the world did not practice capital punishment? What about China, Japan, India, the Islamic world?

      Also, is being turned into a race of genetic simps good? Look at how women in Europe have exploited that weakness. Sexual regulation of women is the true key to maintaining civilisation and white simps have signally failed on that front.

      *That symbolism was all over the Old Testament.*

      All over the ancient world in general. Consider Carthage. Meso-America. Iron Age Scandinavia. Everywhere.

      *I dunno. Are the voluntarily celibate Monks of Athos in that category too?*

      Impossible to say, tbh. However, handsome monks are extraordinarily difficult to find.

      Delete
    11. @Rookh Kshatriya

      "I suspect the Holy Spirit is just high IQ. It certainly seems to short-circuit among the low-IQ'd and uneducated."

      Plenty of Midwits act very foolishly also. Lots of leftist people for example are IQ 100-120 but they fall for that poisonous memeplex and self-destruct.


      Whilst there are Low IQ people who seem to succeed against all odds. Forrest Gump types who always manage to be lucky.

      Indicating that perhaps because of their Wisdom they are able to make good use of the IQ however low that may be.

      "Maybe they were just men of their time who agreed with it?"

      That is presupposing the non-existence of God and the supernatural sure.


      "Other parts of the world did not practice capital punishment? What about China, Japan, India, the Islamic world?"

      They did. But I am not sure they are as thorough as Western Europe like in killing Highway robbers, horse thiefs and general murderers.

      There needs to be stats like if lets say violent 1% of population is consistently exterminated every generation.

      Especially combining it with proper investigative techniques ie Detective work and foregoing torture which only meant that people only told what the torturer wants to hear.

      There was also Clarkian selection:
      https://www.bitchute.com/video/P78Zd8265_k/

      England and enough stability for a long enough time especially had social mobility based on its Class system combined with Capital Punishment that enabled downward mobility and mixing of the genetics of the middle class with the lower classes:
      https://evoandproud.blogspot.com/2019/02/the-nurture-of-nature.html

      The Caste System limits Social mobility in contrast.

      Therefore once 1500 came around innovation started to rise exponentially.


      "Also, is being turned into a race of genetic simps good? Look at how women in Europe have exploited that weakness. Sexual regulation of women is the true key to maintaining civilisation and white simps have signally failed on that front"

      Sure. Although capital punishment should equally apply to women guilty of the same crimes for starters.

      But even outside of the genetic simps of the white race. I don't see good indications of non-whites being resistant to the poz from Western Culture.


      Delete
    12. "All over the ancient world in general. Consider Carthage. Meso-America. Iron Age Scandinavia. Everywhere."

      Indeed. Some Christian apologists theorize that its because all of them were offshoots of the original monotheism of Humanity.

      And that complex Civilizations have changed the most from that original monotheism. Although retaining elements of that monotheism.

      Even The Temple of Heaven in China that worships Shang-di seems to forbid the use of images or statues to worship this grand deity.


      Whilst primitive tribes and Nomads like the Mongols still retain a Chief Sky Father Deity like Tengri or Dyeus of the Indo-Europeans with minimal accretions over time.

      Many Aboriginals who remained fairly isolated from the rest of the World was also the same:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b-bMgXQV7no

      You mind continuing the discussion in this manner? I could stop if you don't want to keep discussing this topic.

      Delete
    13. It is a good discussion but you seem to mix arguments from science with arguments from faith. It is impossible to verify arguments from faith, by definition. Bluntly, I do not believe Jesus was God or that Paul was inspired by God or that the Holy Spirit exists. You clearly do, and power to you, but those are just unfounded assumptions to me, ones I do not share (or even understand).

      One thing we both understate is the power of sheer chance, which Jared Diamond makes much of. In the Arab Golden Age, Islam was incomparably more advanced than Europe in science, mathematics, everything. But bad luck felled them, in the form of Mongol Invasion and the destruction of their vast library in Baghdad and secondly, the Portuguese development of deep water ships that could traverse Africa. This meant that the Silk Roads which sustained Arab prosperity and intellectual transmission became unimportant, leading to the Arab world's decline into an intellectual backwater. No one could have foreseen that in the 7th century. Some events have no cause but chance, if not most.

      Closely allied to this is the issue of culture. Americans generally hail from Europe, especially the British Isles. Genetically, there is little difference between most Brits and most white Americans. However, the UK is a secular society where religion is ridiculed and marginalised, quite unlike America. No dramatic genetic change can have occurred in that time, so why the difference? The difference can only be cultural, yet is already deep and definitive.

      In fact, there is a vast difference between the UK of the 1950s and the UK of today. The white population is now defined by secularism, familial dysfunction and a large criminal underclass who live on benefits, deal drugs and breed like rats. My point is, populations can change very quickly, reversing earlier trends. Clarke's 18th century developments might already have been reversed, in less than 80 years. What goes up, can also come down. And if it can, it will.

      The modern Anglosphere has a very specific issue, which I would define as secular Christianity. That is, it retains Christian values without Christian belief. When Christian belief tempered the worst aspects of Christianity (gynocentrism, pacifism, latent homosexuality, sex-negativity) with a patriarchal foundation, and female male choice was constrained by economic dependency and informal custom, a viable culture was maintained. Now literal belief has gone, only these dysfunctional residues remain. In fact, the Anglosphere now worships women directly, as many incels point out. We have reached a stage where women can do no wrong, where they control the laws, where they are even seen as more intelligent than men. The Anglosphere is now defined by a secular puritanism which could only have arisen in a Christian culture, yet which is not itself Christianity. The fine balancing act between Christianity, the classical heritage and commerce which has long sustained the West has collapsed at last. But nothing lasts forever, as the Arab Golden Age did not last forever.

      Delete
    14. *But even outside of the genetic simps of the white race. I don't see good indications of non-whites being resistant to the poz from Western Culture.*

      The Manchester bomber Salman Abedi was not a white christian, last time I checked.

      Many parts of the Islamic world remain fiercely resistant to Anglo gynocentrism, although they are under cultural attack.

      Delete
    15. "It is a good discussion but you seem to mix arguments from science with arguments from faith. It is impossible to verify arguments from faith, by definition. Bluntly, I do not believe Jesus was God or that Paul was inspired by God or that the Holy Spirit exists. You clearly do, and power to you, but those are just unfounded assumptions to me, ones I do not share (or even understand)."

      If all Truth is God's truth. Then you get where I am coming from. They are as true to me as 1+1=2.


      "One thing we both understate is the power of sheer chance, which Jared Diamond makes much of. In the Arab Golden Age, Islam was incomparably more advanced than Europe in science, mathematics, everything. But bad luck felled them, in the form of Mongol Invasion and the destruction of their vast library in Baghdad and secondly, the Portuguese development of deep water ships that could traverse Africa. This meant that the Silk Roads which sustained Arab prosperity and intellectual transmission became unimportant, leading to the Arab world's decline into an intellectual backwater. No one could have foreseen that in the 7th century. Some events have no cause but chance, if not most."

      I would agree. The Arab World is as I said elsewhere in other comment threads is largely landlocked. There is no general access to the Atlantic Sea for example that would facilitate trade far better than the Silk road is capable of doing.

      Rivers, Seas and Oceans are substantially cheaper and easier to use to transport so much wealth. Aside from the factors that you said.

      The mongols definitely did a number on the Arab World. But Europe seemed to recover to a far better extent from the Black Death.



      "In fact, there is a vast difference between the UK of the 1950s and the UK of today. The white population is now defined by secularism, familial dysfunction and a large criminal underclass who live on benefits, deal drugs and breed like rats. My point is, populations can change very quickly, reversing earlier trends. Clarke's 18th century developments might already have been reversed, in less than 80 years. What goes up, can also come down. And if it can, it will."

      Maybe. I do not know how fast this change has occurred. But I am not sure that a few decades can undo centuries of Clarkian selection.




      "Many parts of the Islamic world remain fiercely resistant to Anglo gynocentrism, although they are under cultural attack."

      Saudi Arabia and Countries like it isn't giving good indications on that front.

      So I am hesistant to believe that this resistance cannot be beaten down in the same way resistance was beaten down in Europe over the centuries since the French Revolution.

      And especially the annihilation of the flower of Manhood in WWI and WWII.

      Which laid the groundwork for the UN and other Globalist NGOs spreading their misandrous poison.

      I wouldn't rule out that Men prior to those 2 events were less simpish by comparison.

      Delete
    16. RE Clarke, this will interest you. Wild foxes were tamed in 6 generations by no more than rudimentary selective breeding:

      https://evolution-outreach.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12052-018-0090-x

      The researchers also reversed the process, making tame foxes wild again in a few generations:

      https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science/domesticated-foxes-genetically-fascinating-terrible-pets

      The Welfare state coupled with unrestricted female mate choice is no doubt beginning to 're-wild' lower-class white populations.

      Delete
  26. Earlier this year, the federal government announced Canada's feminist international assistance policy, which aims to ensure that at least 95 per cent of Canada's foreign aid helps improve the lives of women and girls. It is part of an approach that sees a critical role for women in building peace and prosperity in conflict and post-conflict zones. The Agenda talks to some of the people involved in these issues.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Dressing like a whore will invite drunk and NYSE/Wall St. men to flirt with them while the whore flirts with the NYSE and Wall St men:
    https://www.vice.com/en/article/epdada/jack-astors-employees-say-sexual-harassment-is-common-across-the-popular-restaurant-chain

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Amazing how feminists will start dressing and acting like whores when it suits them.

      Delete
  28. Toronto is a feminist hell yet Chads get away with beating women before killing them:
    https://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2020/12/18/serial-domestic-abuser-sentenced-to-life-in-prison-for-murder-of-his-new-toronto-roommate.html?li_source=LI&li_medium=thestar_recommended_for_you

    ReplyDelete
  29. On a lighter, more pugilistic note, Canelo has now whipped two Smith brothers in the ring. Is there another boxer in the family, so Canelo make make it a 'Smith Trifecta'?

    ReplyDelete
  30. Simpsons predicted Roosh Canada media smear, #MeToo and the feminist media:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-vuVjiF8Jk

    ReplyDelete
  31. Don't date thugs or mobsters:
    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/divorce-court-battered-wife-house-1.5850811
    Toronto women are two-faced, lying feminist cunts

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. #Heightpill...He was over 6 feet!
      But when he first got together with Bourdon, he came across as kind and loving. Her grandparents even called him "the gentle giant."

      Delete
  32. This doctor is sharing pix of her nude body to minors on Reddit!
    https://www.reddit.com/r/scrubsgonewild/comments/kjklek/ocf_when_someone_can_actually_save_you_aka/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3

    ReplyDelete
  33. Canadian Feminazi police threatening to use a taser on a white man playing hockey lol:
    https://youtu.be/YNnpk2PN80Q

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I have seen that video more than a few times. Female police officers are really egregious when they feel they ned to dominate situations and they are quick to turn to weapons. Still, it remains a matter of police going out of control. There was no reason to arrest this kid and the cops could not cite a law that he had broken. Calgary Police are not releasing their names, which is standard when they have to circle the wagons. This video caught them dirty, very dirty and the two female cops should be fired and prosecuted.

      Delete
    2. The cops are being protected by the feminazi Canadian government.

      Delete