The Class and Race Pills: Why High IQ Males in the Lower Classes are Forever Alone

Thick as shit and twice as nasty

This post is primarily for youngcels - specifically high IQ (110+) prolecels and ethnicels - although all dissident men will find it thought-provoking.

Any high-IQ male born into the lower classes - be he a white prolecel or non-white ethnicel - is going to have a hard time of it, sexually speaking. This is of course because lower class 'Dark Triad' women (Histrionic, Borderline and Narcissistic) want only criminal thugs and loathe intelligent men with a searing passion, although there are other factors in play. Lower class white women are the most overtly racist and hostile to ethnic males (though of course all Anglo women are racist in real if not rhetorical terms). For their part, lower class ethnic women have zero interest in males who aren't low-IQ, tattooed gang-bangers spouting ghetto-babble. Having an animal's self-awareness and intelligence, all lower class women are also highly eugenicist, instinctively shunning males who are short, ugly, autistic or in any other way biologically unfit for the crude rigours of proletarian existence. Of course, this 'sexual fascism' ensures that lower class women are also strongly drawn to the Dog Pill, the ultimate expression of female sexual animalism.

Two animals as one: the Dog Pill

Lower class 'culture' is essentially Neolithic in its socio-sexual structure, with a small minority of violent, thuggish 'players' and well-hung canines monopolising all sexual relations. Plebeian life is nasty, brutish and (by middle class standards) short. It is defined by giga-levels of male sexual disenfranchisement and Sexual False Consciousness among the many males ignored by atavistic female mate-selection. For the most part, lower class men effectively live sexless lives - over a third fail to marry or reproduce - with astronomical rates of suicide and mental illness in the process. Hysterical Sexual False Consciousness strives to conceal this arid reality, a kind of hyper-SFC in which ugly, blue collar dopes and other low-SMV males pretend that torrid affairs with models and actresses are their daily fare.

Proleworld is Neolithic, sexually-speaking

It does not take long for any high-IQ individual to work out the fictional nature of these tall tales and the all-pervasive hold of SFC on low-status men. Indeed, Sexual False Consciousness is the defining element of lower class existence; rap music and other manifestations of prole 'youth culture' are essentially institutionalised SFC, steeped in the inane fictions that 'women want sex with everybody', 'be happy' and 'everything is great'.

The MGTOW 'Pump and Dump' meme is the Red Pill variant of hyper-SFC,  since it feigns a surfeit of sexual choice that is simply unavailable to low-SMV males. Meanwhile, MGTOW's 'elective abstinence' - the pretence than inceldom is some kind of choice - is the cope to end all copes. One also thinks of the underclass sewage who join the Anglo military, who are invariably full of chirpy banter about their sexual adventures in sunny climes. This is Hyper-SFC at its finest, of course. In reality, the only females this Band of Fodder are 'pumping and dumping' are the discount hookers who haunt military towns and bases.

Low-IQ fodder weaving more SFC bullshit...

SFC has such a strong hold on most lower class males because they need it to get up in the morning; without a multi-layered patchwork of delusions to keep them on the plantation by use of false promises, vain hopes and outright lies, they would immediately rope. However, their inferior IQs and lack of culture make them particularly easy prey for the lamestream media fantasies that feed and sustain SFC in all its myriad forms. Prole 'hyper-SFC' is a kind of mental illness in which sub-5 incel men actually think they are having sex with models every night; this is the most extreme form of SFC, a kind of sexual psychosis beyond the reach of rational argument or even statistical evidence.

The amazing world of Blue Collar SFC...

The VantaBlack Conclusion?

Given the grim reality of lower class life, a high-IQ white prolecel or non-white ethnicel must resign himself to a nuclear Vantablack truth: it is very, very unlikely you will ever experience the delights of young love that other young men take for granted. The context is just not there for any other outcome. In fact, you had best be steeling yourself for a life of being Forever Alone and living off-grid in the longer term.

As a high IQ white prolecel or non-white ethnicel , you have a reasonable chance of status-maxxing via education, especially if you choose a STEM field. However, this route means you will only acquire middle class status - and freedom from Dark Triad, lower class females - in early middle age, far too late for 'young love' or even a long-term, stable relationship with a viable woman. If you then take to escort-maxxing and start laying 8s, 9s and 10s on a regular basis, these high-quality sexual experiences only make a romantic relationship even more impossible to realise or sustain in the long run.

Sorry I can't be more optimistic: but optimism and the VantaBlack Pill do not belong in the same sentence.

Happy Christmas, anyway.

The Great Adultwork Eye-Opener: Is 'The Wall' just another expression of Sexual False Consciousness?

The Wall: Does it really exist exist in the Anglosphere?

One of the main Manosphere debating points is SMV (Sexual Market Value): in particular, the respective SMVs of men and women in relation to ageing. Broadly speaking, MGTOWs and PUAs maintain that male SMV peaks somewhat later and that this gives men a certain advantage over 'post-Wall' women in adult life. Meanwhile, Incels and TFLers maintain that the Wall is a myth created to palliate the Anglosphere's growing army of sexless men. 

The chart below is widely used to support the MGTOW/PUA/MRA perspective, although it is often cited by both sides of the debate:

An obvious problem with this chart is that Female and male SMVs are clearly not equivalent, even at their respective peaks. Using the same measurement scale, male SMV is at best a 4 relative to the female's 10 because male and female SMV have nothing like the same value. There are very few male escorts catering to women (if any), while thousands of women sell sex to males every day. Moreover, virtually all young women enjoy the benefits of high SMV compared to a tiny minority of males. These objections aside, it does seem fairly obvious that a middle aged woman is far less attractive to men than a 20 year old.

Doesn't it?

When confronted with theoretical disputes like this, my own approach is to seek out evidence. In the case of the Wall, this is not too difficult. The Adultwork prostitution site - the UK's most popular - lists the profiles of 20 000 British escorts and these can be easily searched in terms of age, location and so forth. The results were extremely interesting.

My Adultwork search showed 500 women over 55 successfully selling sex to men in the UK. A further search showed 42 profiles of women over 65 successfully selling sex. By contrast, the few males 'selling' sex at that (or any) age were clearly catering to sexual deviants or simply paying for the services of female escorts (obviously major Sexual False Consciousness at play here). By contrast, almost all the post-55 female escorts were successfully selling sex to a wide range of male 'punters', with feedback to prove it.

Naughty Cougar was still notching up reviews at 70, although she also combined chat and webcamming with her escorting service. Scottish Kat was doing even better. She had 870 reviews (many very recent) and only offered sex to her clients. She is 55, an age with almost zero SMV according to exponents of 'Wall Theory'. At 60, Monica had 181 reviews, all recent sexual encounters. Her profile makes a point of saying she sees no one under 25, although all males over that age are welcome. All these 'ladies' were charging 200 USD (or more) for half an hours' 'work'. So much for The Wall...

Scottish Kat: 870 reviews at the ripe old age of 55 

At 60, Monica does not see males under 25; is the demand too great?

At 70, Naughty Cougar has no problem selling sex to thirsty males.

With all this remunerative exploitation of male sexuality by elderly women, how can MGTOWs and PUAs seriously maintain that women hit some 'Wall' at age 35?  Yes, online sex workers are not representative of all women but these ageing British escorts still make a laughing stock of the whole MGTOW/PUA agenda. There is clearly no Wall when women over 55 can make a full time living selling sex to men, many far younger than themselves, for a handsome profit. 

Although I must apologise for the sordid nature of this post, even I was staggered at these results. Is the Anglosphere's problem of sexual repression far, far worse than even I envisaged? I am starting to wonder if a large majority of young Anglo-American males get any free sex at all. But if not, why are so many young men buying sex from women old enough to be their grandmothers? If elderly British women have a higher SMV than men in their prime, how much greater is the SMV of females in their teens and twenties? To quote my Millennial friends: Like, what the fuck....

In reality, the 'Rational Male's' SMV chart should look like the one below:

Clearly, discrete male SMV never surpasses female SMV in the UK. Even when female SMV begins to decline at 23, it remains infinitely more powerful than its male counterpart. Indeed, it remains at least twice as high when women reach old age. What conclusions can we draw from this?

First, it is obvious that the distinctive sexual repression of Anglo-American culture artificially raises female SMV to abnormal levels; which is why Anglo-American feminists remain such vociferous opponents of prostitution and all other manifestations of heterosexual freedom. In addition, the Anglosphere's distinctive hyper-hypergamy and institutionalised misandry mean men have almost no sexual value at all in the UK (and by extension, the Anglosphere). In the light of the foregoing discussion, it seems obvious that the best option for Anglo-American men is simply to depart the Anglosphere and seek relationships abroad. 

Because distant shores are always waiting...

Is this movement completely deluded?

Untimely Meditations

Greetings, friends. Here, I unburden myself of various thoughts that have been building up a head of steam in me, as it were, in a spirit of complete honesty.

Why Are Women not Attracted to Intelligence?
This is much discussed on a variety of mra blogs and other fora. Indeed, their attraction to moronic sociopaths is even more significant as it helped create the dangerous Anglo-American underclass. As a medical Doctor, I have come to believe the answer lies principally in genetics. The male contributes an X or a Y chromosome to his offspring, which determines its gender. The X makes a girl (XX) the Y makes a boy (XY). So far, so good. The problem with the Y is that it is a stunted, error-prone chromosome that is largely reconstituted by the X. This is why males tend to exhibit more extreme characteristics than females - this reconstitution process produces an individual with greater variance potential. This is also why males take after the mother more than the father, or why females take more after the father - his genetic contribution to a female child is more complete, being derived from his X chromosome. Though intelligence is of primary adaptive value to males, intelligence is unlikely to pass down the male line (in that the male's Y chromosome carries little genetic data to his male children, while his X carries far more to his daughters - where it is 'wasted' in the case of intelligence, and regresses in subsequent generations). This could explain why females eschew intelligence in men - while of value in his own life, it is of no value as a heritable trait.

Indeed, these claims might not go far enough. The British neuroscientist Susan Greenfield alludes to evidence that the central nervous system and neurological conditions like epilepsy descend almost perfectly through the female line. This is almost exactly what we would expect if the foregoing discussion were true. Indeed, Schopenhauer supports these claims with reference to German folk-knowledge in his famous essay On Women: that intellect descends almost totally through the female line.

And this explains why women show little interest in intelligent men. A man like Einstein would not pass his intellect on to his male children, where it would be of primary adaptive value. And apart from his intellect, he was in every other sense a Gamma Male - of no interest to women. In any case, if the central nervous system is only descended from the mother, the father's intellect is entirely irrelevant to his breeding fitness. And this, my friends, is why women prefer morons.

How the Internet is Changing Men's Lives
There is an academic at the University of Bristol in the UK who says some interesting things about male underachievement. Broadly, he says that young males seldom really talk to adult men in the way young females talk to adult women. Consequently, they tend to be more influenced by the media in their goals and aspirations - wanting to be rock stars and professional athletes rather than pursuing realistic, middle class career paths.

However, one is continually struck by the profound observations of young middle class males in online mra fora. Apart from a few manginas, they are infinitely more clued up about women that us oldies over 28 ever were. And this is because the Internet is allowing males of different generations to communicate properly for the first time in decades (if not centuries). The young male can, with a click of his mouse button, communicate with males across the Anglosphere of all ages and classes. He can hear from guys living in trailer parks in Montana or slums in Manchester or Melbourne who were divorced by some bitch and taken to the cleaners. In short, the wily old boars can show their young brothers the pitfalls of consorting with the Anglobitch.

There can be little doubt this is shaping the Pan-Anglosphere Marriage Strike. And long may it continue.

The British Political Crisis
Britain is falling apart. The MP's expenses scandal, the recession, the rise of the BNP and Prime Minister Brown's grotesque social incompetence have created a situation unknown in living memory. However things go, what we are witnessing is a 'crisis of hegemony' as described by the Italian political philosopher, Antonio Gramsci. What this means, in short, is that the ideological 'cement' that binds Britain together is starting to crumble. As Britain is the ideological nexus of the Anglosphere, this crisis will be reflected from Alelaide to Calcutta, from Quebec to Miami, in various ways. The old ideological sureties are falling away. My friends, this is the time to advance our cause as never before and programme the Anglobitch meme (and the mra meme in general) into the new hegemonic structure that will emerge from this time of chaos. It is truly an exciting time to be alive and at the height of our powers.

'A Generation': The Weasel Words of Anglo-American Feminists
I think it is the Chinese who say, 'defeat is an orphan, while victory has a thousand fathers'. And so it is with feminists: women's rather measly contributions to civilization are enormously inflated and always proclaimed as exclusively female achievements. However, they are very quick to mask exclusively male losses/experiences/sacrifices using a variety of weasel words. For example, consider how often Western liberals/feminists describe the First World War as a disaster that befell 'a generation'. In fact, the ten million dead, and the many millions more maimed, were almost exclusively men. So, it wasn't 'a generation' at all: it was men who experienced/suffered in World War One, exclusively. The same with D-Day: it wasn't 'a generation' who liberated Europe from tyranny, it was men. There probably wasn't a single woman on those beaches, in any capacity. Men, keep alert to the weasel words of Anglo-American feminists and their underhand attempts to distort history, reality and everything else.

Why is Jessica Valenti so Irritating?
The most important meditation of all, since I have the answer: it's her mouth. Wet, twisted and crooked like the cunt herself. She has a certain inbred quality like the perverted British record producer, Jonathan King (his mouth is rather twisted, too). In the Middle Ages, people quite rightly believed that physical blemishes were a mark of God's disfavour - physical expressions of metaphysical taints. In the case of Valenti, when we consider her venomous views, the spiritual root of her physical disorder is entirely obvious.

Why Don't Women Post Here?
Why don't women post on this Blog? If they have rational objections to these views, why don't they come and call us out? On Dick Masterson's site, Anglo-American females are the majority of posters, continually berating their critics for being 'fags', having small penises or not 'getting laid'. OK, if they are so smart and their arguments so strong, why don't they come to Anglobitch and 'clean our dials' for us? Because their non-existent arguments would get trashed, that's why... and they know it.