Prostitution, Post-Marriage Relations and Obama’s Unlikely Election

Obama: Elected on the back of soft polygamy, Welfare and the Marriage Strike?

Prostitution is a topic that sharply divides MRAs. On the one hand, some consider prostitution a largely benign institution that cheapens the power of sex, thus knocking Anglobitches off their pedestals of entitlement. Other MRAs point out that many feminists view prostitution as a ‘reappropriation’ of female sexual independence – making it something to be obviously opposed by MRAs. (However, yet other feminists strongly oppose prostitution, concocting bogus figures about levels of trafficking and coercion, further muddying the waters).

In short, prostitution is a baffling topic, on which there is no clear consensus among either MRAs or feminists. What is our own view?

The Anglobitch Thesis broadly considers prostitution in the Anglosphere to be quite distinct from that which occurs in other cultures. This relates to the Disneyfied, puritanical repression that undercuts sexual relations in the Anglosphere. Elsewhere, sex is viewed as a physical function, like eating, not some quasi-mystical sacrament bestowed by women on men. Hence, in the Anglosphere it is broadly in women’s interests to keep this high ‘exchange value’ attached to sex, for any decline in its value means a loss of that ‘princess’ status uniformly granted to women in the Anglosphere. That is why, broadly speaking, prostitution is opposed by Anglo-Saxon feminists like Harriett Harman, and all blame for it laid at the door of (largely imaginary) ‘traffickers’, pimps and most of all, men.

Prostitution attracts the utmost controversy among Anglo-American MRAs

However, many women also oppose prostitution for entirely personal reasons. If men can obtain a cheap, steady supply of sex, more women will end up without a mate, a mortifying fate for most females. After all, most men marry to assuage sexual needs and an endless supply of cheap young female bodies is infinitely preferable to spending half one’s life with an ageing, turkey-necked scold. Of course, the ‘Brazilification’ (socio-economic inequality) that has recently emerged in the Anglosphere also means that fewer men can can now attract a wife, anyway. In short, many women are also on Marriage Strike, in that too few Anglo-American men can now afford to keep one. Many evolutionary psychologists argue that prostitution is very prevalent in Third World countries because there, it is more cost-effective for women to prostitute themselves than marry an impoverished husband. In western countries only 1% of women are prostitutes; in African countries the proportion of prostitution-women is as high as 25%. Indeed, the ‘soft polygamy’ that is arising in the Anglosphere probably represents an expansion of prostitution in response to ‘Brazilification’ – that is, we are rapidly returning to a pre-modern, pre-patriarchal socio-sexual compact closer to the Stone Age than advanced industrial society.

So now we begin to explain the differences of opinion among gender activists of both sexes on this crucial topic. Young, attractive, lower-class women will of course favour prostitution, since they can use it to exploit male sexual needs and earn far more than they ever could in conventional employment. However, old or unattractive women will automatically oppose prostitution, for the same reason they oppose male homosexuality – it will likely leave them childless and mateless in old age, as men opt for quality sex over marital commitment. Indeed, old elite women (a la Harman) are invariably most opposed to prostitution for this very reason.

The same distinction can probably be found among MRAs. The Anglo-American MRA movement is broadly divided into conservatives and progressives. Conservatives, represented by sites like American Women Suck, tend to hold Christian beliefs and strongly oppose prostitution. Progressives, as represented by MGTOW, tend to be agnostic materialists and broadly accepting of prostitution and homosexuality. Both positions hav their problems, however.

‘Anglo-American’ conservatism is somewhat of an oxymoron, in that America is a nation forged in revolt. Moreover, Protestantism is a faith of revolt, and Christianity (sans the Judeo) is a revolutionary hotpotch of idealist eschatology, pacifism, paganism and Marxism (turn the other cheek, accept the pagan Trinity, give away all your possessions). Besides, ‘traditional’ Anglo-Saxon puritanical culture inherently promotes matriarchal values, so adhering to it is hardly likely to challenge feminism. By contrast, the progressive strand of men’s activism acknowledges some of the problems inherent in Anglo culture, even if its solutions may still be invalid.

In sum, the issue of prostitution is complex, and opinions on it are formed by personal circumstances, politics and culture. That the West is changing, moving away from Marriage towards ‘soft polygamy’ (another form of prostitution, after all) is impossible to doubt. This is shaping new cultural trends – increased rates of singleness, the Marriage Strike, more use of hired sexual services and a rapid expansion of alternative sexual lifestyles. What has not been noted before is that these trends are starting to influence mainstream political events in the Anglosphere, as can be seen in the election of President Obama.


The great unstated truth about Obama is that young, single women made him President. There is something about being a young, single woman that makes someone strongly enamored of generous Welfare programmes. The fact that most young, single women earn little, tend to study non-renumerative subjects at college and have a pronounced sense of entitlement in Anglo-Saxon societies all disposed them to vote for Obama in droves. Of course, the crucial factor in their situation is singleness- specifically, singleness occasioned by the Marriage Strike. Simply put, in the ‘Post-Marriage’ era, an elaborate Welfare State is essential for such women. Since men still earn more, yet no longer trust them enough to marry them, young single women must necessarily look to the State for survival provision. Of course, the Welfare State inherently favours women, anyway – just look at Britain, where men pay most taxes but get little Welfare help - which further explains these women’s electoral choice.

Theirs was a vote for misandrist matriarchy, and long will American men rue their present political administration.

John Cleese Cleaned Out by Anglobitch Divorce Settlement

The legendary British comedian John Cleese is returning to work after a grossly unfair Divorce settlement orchestrated by the matriarchy's legal lackeys. At 70, he is on tour again. It is said that the Samurai were encouraged to think of death in battle every morning, to prepare them for the day ahead. Anglo-American men need to contemplate Divorce settlements like this every morning, for the same reason...

The Oscar nominated comedy actor is giving his former wife £8 million in cash and assets which include an apartment in New York, a £2 million mews house in fashionable Holland Park in west London, and half a beach house in Santa Barbara in California which is yet to be sold.

Ms Faye Eichelberger, an American psychotherapist, will also receive £600,000 a year for seven years. The papers to finalise the financial settlement were lodged in the courts in California last week.

Cleese, 70, who is in the New Forest writing a barbed one man show to be called Alimony Tour Year One, has revealed his anger at the size of the divorce settlement which will make his former wife, who he was married to for 16 years, richer than him.

He said: “What I find so unfair is that if we both died today, her children would get much more than mine.” He added: “At least I will know in future if a I go out with a lady they will not be after me for my money.” When he met her in 1990 she was living in a third floor council flat in London with two sons from a previous marriage.
His former wife, who is 64, was represented in the legal negotiations by Fiona Shackleton, who is known as the Steel Magnolia because of her sharp negotiating skills. She also acted for the Prince of Wales and Sir Paul McCartney in their respective divorces.

In her divorce testimony, she claimed Cleese was a “world-renowned celebrity” and she was used to “being entertained by royalty and dignitaries in castles”. She claimed half the Monty Python star’s earnings since their 1992 wedding, half his nine properties, and £900,000 a year to live on.

In March a judge in America declared her claim was “excessive” and reduced the interim payments he had been paying from £106,000 a month to £57,000.

Michael Winner, the former film director and acerbic restaurant critic who has been Cleese’s closest friend for 30 years, said: “It is an extraordinary world which means John is left with much less than his former wife even though he is the star who did all the work. The settlement defies human belief. John is extremely cross about it and I don’t blame him. The settlement comes after two years of harrowing legal argument.”

Mr Winner, who accompanied the couple on their honeymoon to St Lucia in 1992, said: “John has worked all his life and will now have to continue working because he has seen a huge chunk of what he has worked for going to his former wife who he rescued from a council flat (Housing Project).”

Cleese, who is also working on a film script, added: “I got off lightly. Think what I’d have had to pay Alyce if she had contributed anything to the relationship.”

In a recent interview the actor said: “In my 70th year I will still be spending two months a year doing work that is of no interest to me and which is probably slightly spiritually depleting in order to feed the beast.”

He has remained friends with his first wife, Connie Booth, who co-wrote and starred in Fawlty Towers and the American actress Barbara Trentham. He has two grown-up daughters with his first two wives. Last year he sold his ranch in California to help pay for the divorce.

The Aged Anglobitch: It's Payback Time!

When Anglo-American women hit thirty, they instantly transform into human beings. Prior to that age, they're essentially insane, evil, remorseless, poisonous, rapacious and entitled reptiles. They are indulged in this behavior by Anglo-American culture itself, which bends laws and traditions like paper-clips to accommodate their whims. This unlovely attitude plainly relates to their 'ownership' of sex in a repressive, 'Disneyfied' culture: since they control a scarce and valuable recourse, they have carte blanche to do whatever they want.


By their late twenties, though, their reproductive and sexual 'value' is waning rapidly. Their flesh thickens, grey scars their hair and the first wrinkles are starting to show. Unable to call on sexual allure to legitimize her atrocious attitudes and behavior, a new phase opens in her life: 'I'm everybody's friend'. Overnight, the cold-hearted Anglobitch becomes the convivial matriarch, praying the world will forget her past transgressions.


Most of the world forgets, alright: most, but not all. Many Anglo-American men cannot forget years of sexual disenfranchisement and emotional abuse. And now the pudgy, butter-faced sow is weak and vulnerable, a victim ripe for vengeance. She will typically have a gaggle of psychotic, low-IQ kids on her hands, born to some bullying psycho in her early twenties. All washed up, her ass spreading like a bush fire, she needs a good man's help. Unfortunately, Mr Psycho is usually laid up in jail - or at least, long departed.

This where you come in: guys, it's payback time!

The whip has changed hands. You hold all the cards, now - the money, the job, the nice home, the high performance car - while she's just a turkey-necked loser skulking home from life's poker table. Her life is in ruins, and you are her only hope. She has absolutely nothing you want, you are her potential salvation.

Now, remember one thing, guys, before you embark on your ruthless campaign of sport-fucking and misogynistic abuse: they want your prosperity. Remember that, and harden your hearts. It's payback time!

The Girl Guides: Anglobitch Incubators

The Girl Guides are one of the most fascinating of all official English societies, in that they exemplify the crass social dysfunction at the heart of Anglo culture that has shaped the rampant Anglobitch. Like the Boy Scouts, that Anglo-American prowling ground for homosexual paedophiles and other misfits, the Guides partition the sexes into separate realms from their earliest years, leading ultimately to a riven society wherein the sexes view each other as rivals or even enemies.


The Guides are divided into Rainbows (5-7); Brownies (7-10); Guides (10-14); and Seniors (14-26). Girlguiding ‘enables girls and young women to fulfil their potential and to take an active and responsible role in society through its distinctive, stimulating and enjoyable programme of activities delivered by trained volunteer leaders.’

The Guide promise, no doubt sworn with all the sneering fervour of an SS oath to the Fuhrer, runs thus:

I promise that I will do my best:
To love my God,
To serve the Queen and my country,
To help other people
and
To keep the Guide Law.

When we get to The Guide Laws, certain problems emerge:

• A Guide is honest, reliable and can be trusted.
• A Guide is helpful and uses her time and abilities wisely.
• A Guide faces challenge and learns from her experiences.
• A Guide is a good friend and a sister to all Guides.
• A Guide is polite and considerate.
• A Guide respects all living things and takes care of the world around her.

Point number four in particular shows that Guides are systematically taught to value their bonds to other women above those with anyone else – particularly men, implicitly. This impression of arrogance and exclusivity is strongly reinforced by the listed aims of Guiding, which provide opportunities for girls and young women to:

• be challenged by new adventures and experiences and achieve a sense of pride in accomplishment
• develop self-awareness, self-respect and self-confidence
• develop a personal faith and values to give life meaning and direction think for themselves, govern themselves and make their own decisions
• make friends and have fun in the family of Guiding
• develop a sense of tolerance, justice, kindness and honour
• learn teamwork and acquire leadership skills, working with and for others
• appreciate the environment and how to live in it
• understand and learn about the world, its people and cultures

Nowhere is there any sense of obedience to men, to fathers, husbands or brothers. The Anglobitch Me! Me! Me! philosophy is here enshrined on an official basis. If anyone still doubts that Anglo-American feminism is in fact an extension of the existing Anglo-Saxon cultural template, just consider the warped values of these ‘traditional’ Anglo organizations.

Above all, the girl guides reinforce the exclusivity of Anglo females in typical puritan fashion. Girls Only! trills the blurb on the website. Nor is this some marginal, bourgeois organization: 600, 000 girls are members in the UK alone.

The Brownies, Girl Guides and so on are a fairly unique Anglo-Saxon phenomenon. They provide a semi-lesbian induction into social life that precludes normal contact with the opposite sex. When one considers this with an eye to psychological development, it is plain that here is the origin of the universal ‘existential abnormality’ that so characterises Anglo-Saxon women. English women exist in an insular world of religion, feminism and snobbery in the case of the middle class, celebrity trash culture in the case of the lower orders. In the onerous official examples of these strange, women-only organisations we see plainly the origins of these attitudes. When one tries to talk to any English woman about anything beyond their parochial, gender-specific obsessions, a look of blank incomprehension sweeps her face. The origins of this lie in the puritan-driven division of the sexes into two separate races by semi-official edict in Anglo-American culture.

Chavs, Neurotypes and Anglobitches – The Death of Our Civilisation

The New Sociopathic/Narcissistic game of low-IQ life in the declining Anglosphere

Autistic traits were once - if perhaps not normative - much more widespread than they are today. Hence many traditional institutions have well-integrated autistic traits (formal academic education for instance, which is now entirely irrelevant to the narcissistic majority); since they date from an era when autistic traits (marginalized today) exerted a more central social influence.

The intellectual, abstract type complains much about lack of relationships and personal failure (especially men, who bear the brunt of reproductive competition). However, they are just maladjusted to a new 'neuro-reality' unfolding around us. For good or ill, this new reality - which extols (and promotes) low abstract intelligence (IQ) but high social intelligence (sociopathy and narcissism) - will ultimately be incapable of sustaining the core functions of civilization. This is why western (especially Anglo-Saxon) countries increasingly have to employ people from non-narcissist cultures (especially the Far East and India) to do the mental spade-work required to keep things ticking over.

Social change is caused by cyclic waves of neuro-genetic re-population and we are living through a massive one now; perhaps the biggest since the industrial revolution, when autistic genes began to proliferate. Today, however, narcissism (and to a lesser extent psychopathy) are now the prevailing values. Look at any Anglo-Saxon country: it is quite obvious that narcissists with the attention-spans of goldfish are breeding like rats. The Flynn Effect reached a peak in 1990; and the subsequent decline of the western IQ is intimately associated with the rise of the narcissistic sociopath in every Anglophone country. By contrast, high functioning autistics are a dwindling group because of their low birthrates and general lack of success. They adhere to the old post war consensus and its values, increasingly meaningless fossils in the new narcissist empire.

The key to this ‘neuro-takeover’ is Anglo-American, or 'Anglobitch', feminism. Because women 'naturally' eschew males of high intelligence or emotional stability and prefer low IQ thugs (a demonstrated fact), female emancipation of sexual choice instantly boosted the narcissist/sociopath population from the late 60s onward. And this in turn led to the creation of a narcissist/sociopath culture to placate them, the American Idol 'instant fix'. This is why the ancients insisted on strict regulation of female sexuality, they knew that unchecked female sexual preference was inconsistent with civilization. These factors may be implicated in the rise and fall of civilizations (or phases in the same civilzation):

•Advanced industrial society emerges, leading to wealth and lifestyle decadence.
•The old autistic skills of hard work and abstract intelligence used to create the industrial society are eclipsed by social intelligence and the narcissist media culture locks into place. Now everyone is 'special', 'chosen' and a 'star' - no matter how ugly, stupid or talentless.
•Women are sexually emancipated, boosting the narcissistic population with their Thug Preference. Matriarchy becomes dominant among the burgeoning urban underclass; women from this class produce dangerous tribes of low-IQ, dysfunctional children using a polyandrous gaggle of shiftless fathers.
•The Flynn Effect reaches a peak. Then IQ rapidly declines. There is permeation of society by unstable Chav/Wigga dummies and universal social/cultural decline. Mass immigration further weakens what remains of cultural cohesion. This is our present situation.

A father any child could be proud of...

Although this model is trite, is plausibly suggests how matriarchal feminism and cycling neurotypes are implicated in the process of cultural growth and decline. However, the collapse of our own advanced post-industrial civilization will have permanent repercussions on the environment; moreover, the fall of the West will see the torch of progress and endeavor pass to the East for the first time in centuries.

If only the Sixties 'progressives' had known: when men relinquish control of female sexuality, the stage is set not for Utopia but for Anarchy, Chavdom and the fall of civilization. Smart move, hippies.

They will be 'running society' in a few years - a chilling thought

Is the Anglosphere a Matriarchy? Is the Pope a Catholic?

In For Fear of the Angels (1996) English Anglican priest Charles Pickstone argues that women have come to embody the spiritual yearnings of men, yearnings that were once addressed by sermon and prayer:

Now it becomes clear that women have become an entire religion substitute (Pickstone, 1996:169).

However, Anglo culture has nurtured such atavistic, matriarchal principles from its very inception. The cult of Queen Elizabeth I, or Gloriana, came tellingly in the immediate wake of the Reformation. With the Traditional relationship between Church and Monarch severed, divinity was now embodied in the Monarch alone. The cult of Gloriana saw the first elevation of Western woman to object of worship since the advent of Christianity. The theme has continued through English history, incorporating the reigns of Anne and Victoria and reaching its recent apotheosis in the cult of Lady Diana.

When a culture has wilfully relinquished its Divine sanction, the way is paved for the worship of false idols. Anglo Saxons have taken Woman as the foremost of their graven images. When all semblance of a link to any transcendental reference point is severed, the way opens for the worship of false gods, however absurd. In Nazi Germany, the idols were swastikas, runes and 'Aryan' pseudo-science. In the Anglo-Saxon nations, and England above all, the idols are women. In Germany, the idols reflected the subterranean psychic demons of the culture. The gynophilia of Anglo culture similarly reflects the puritanical obsessions that strangle it.


The near beatification of females we find in Anglo-American culture is best represented by popular music. In reflexive opposition to all experience, Anglo-American pop musicians routinely describe females as angelic avatars of kindness, understanding and liberation. The narcissistic reality hardly reflects these ideals. In particular, the ‘revolutionary’ Anglo-American music of the Sixties is nauseatingly gynocentric: an insipid extension of existing cultural norms.

Good Vibrations (1966) by the Beach Boys is a perfect example of this puritanical tendency to idealise females:

I, I love the colorful clothes she wears
And the way the sunlight plays upon her hair
I hear the sound of a gentle word
On the wind that lifts her perfume through the air

Close my eyes
She’s somehow closer now
Softly smile, I know she must be kind
When I look in her eyes
She goes with me to a blossom world

The themes extolled in this sickly sliver of aural tapioca are purely mythical. ‘Beautiful’ Anglo-American women radiate arrogant self-love, not ‘good vibrations’. A cursory recollection of one’s youth by any honest Anglo-American will bear testimony to this.

Another famous Beach Boys song, God Only Knows (1966), expresses the numinous potency of women for the repressed Anglo-American male in baroque, almost liturgical tones:

I may not always love you
But long as there are stars above you
You never need to doubt it
I’ll make you so sure about it

God only knows what I’d be without you

If you should ever leave me
Though life would still go on believe me
The world could show nothing to me
So what good would living do me

By contrast, the views of the pre-Puritan Englishman William Shakespeare are utterly bereft of such gynocentric idealism:

I have heard of your paintings too, well enough; God
has given you one face, and you make yourselves
another: you jig, you amble, and you lisp, and
nick-name God's creatures, and make your wantonness
your ignorance.

The only distinction between these two positions is 400 years of Puritanism. Modern Anglo-American culture is subsumed by a puritan animus that affords females semi-divine status. Virtually all cultural artefacts produced in the anglosphere now deify women, be they films, novels or pop songs. However ‘revolutionary’ or counter-cultural’ Anglo-Americans claim to be, they cannot escape these gynocratic assumptions, which apply equally to hippies and Bible-belt conservatives.


It is interesting to note that whenever Anglo women make any kind of humanitarian gesture, for example Princess Diana’s bovine appeals for AIDs and landmine victims, it is inflated out of all proportion. This is because Anglo women typically make such a minimal contribution to the lot of human happiness. Consequently, mundane women like Princess Diana have become the new Saints of Anglo-American gynocracy. When their accomplishments are examined objectively, they are positively mediocre. But within the Anglorama, the least gesture towards female altruism becomes a crowning halo and ornament of grace.

Guest Post by Monsieur Chauvin

In the history of a movement, there comes a time when the originator (if he has taught well) notices that his admirers are developing his core concept in novel and exciting ways, often displaying greater profundity and economy of style than he himself could ever contrive. The Chinese have a wonderful saying to describe this process: 'Standing on the Shoulders of the Master'. The following post on a celebrated MRA blog by one Monsieur Chauvin is a perfect example of this. Study it well, for this is the finest exposition of the Anglobitch Thesis ever yet created:

All White Anglo-Saxon Protestant Females Are Cunts And Garbage: An Introduction To The Anglo-Bitch Thesis

What is the Anglo-Bitch Thesis? Within the field of men’s studies and the male rights movement in general, a new point of view has arisen, which sees Anglo-Saxon feminism as the driving force behind the institutionalized misandrist discrimination currently being directed towards males, especially males of Anglo-Saxon race and Protestant faith. Thus, the feminism which arose within the Anglosphere during the 1960s and 70s, as distinct from the collaborative partnership feminism of Western Europe, has never been about seeking the emancipation of the human female from the shackles of patriarchal bondage. This sense of entitlement ( the so-called princess syndrome) that is diligently inculcated into the Protestant Anglo-Saxon female from the earliest youth, is directly descended from the Calvinist work ethic of the first English settlers in the New World. From the perspective of Calvinist belief and practice, women were placed on pedestals and held to a separate code of conduct and personal morality that is beyond individual scrutiny or criticism. Hence, it is because of the puritanical basis of Anglo-Saxon culture that women are granted an automatic sense of entitlement, which comes from the female being transformed into a supplier of sex through the market forces of industrial capitalism, where sex itself is seen as a scarce commodity that must be rigidly controlled so as to maintain the privileged position of the human female within all heterosexual transactions.

In other words, modern Anglo-Saxon feminism, combined with the Calvinist belief in the natural purity and chastity of the female (according to the Protestant scholastics of the late Reformation period, the human female was seen as a creature who was void of sensual passion) has granted the female a substantial number of rights, even more rights than the average male. However, what the modern Anglo-Saxon woman has been granted is a series of rights without their corresponding responsibilities, further reinforcing the automatic sense of entitlement and privilege that the overwhelming majority of women have been born and bred into since the dawn of human biological evolution. This exaltation of the Anglo-Bitch to the upper echelons of a once male-dominated status hierarchy has unleashed a wave of institutionalized discrimination against males that is unprecedented in the history of mankind; never before have men and boys been so oppressed and vilified by a medieval Christian-Teutonic code of chivalry which has skilfully been concealed under the gaudy trappings of modern ideological feminism.


Another major contention of the Anglo-Bitch Thesis is that the nations of the Anglosphere (USA, Canada, UK, Australia, New Zealand etc.) are matriarchies dominated by women and effeminate, androgenized bureaucrats. In the matriarchal tyrannies of the Anglo-Saxon world, the woman leads a life of privilege and luxury, whereas the male is confined to a life of abuse and degradation. Women are so deeply entrenched within the upper socio-economic and political strata of the Anglosphere, that to dislodge them from their positions of comfort and unprecedented freedom would require a considerable amount of coercion in the form of brute force. The problem with modern ideological feminism is that women have been allowed to retain the privileges they had before the advent of female suffrage and emancipation. For example, women wish to join traditional bastions of male patriarchal dominance, such as the military or heavy industry, while refusing to let men become fully integrated within conventional feminine organizations. Even within the judicial system, women are still given preferential treatment; they are seldom prosecuted for criminal offenses and are almost always granted favourable settlements during divorce and child custody proceedings.

Eventually, the Protestant Anglo-Saxon female will have to choose between having unearned privileges on the one hand and having rights with their corresponding responsibilities on the other. However, this is unlikely to occur given the prevalence of Teutonico-Christian chivalry, disguised as modern feminism, throughout the Anglosphere and other Western Industrial societies.

The final solution to the central problem of the Anglo-Bitch Thesis is by having a significant majority of men refuse to marry (aka the marriage strike). When financially solvent, middle-class males refuse to participate economically and politically within the institutions of Western society, only then will the imaginary colossus known as the Protestant Anglo-Bitch be finally brought to her knees.

The male refusal to participate in the affairs of the Western Anglo-Saxon Protestant matriarchy of today will cripple feminism once and for all.

Madonna: The Material Anglobitch

In Madonna’s Material Girl video, we see the rampant philosophy of the Anglobitch in action. The painfully plain Madonna struts about while tuxedoed males adorn her with expensive jewellery and other luxury items. Males are overtly viewed as ridiculously gullible stooges and meal tickets. Females, here embodied by Madonna, are, however plain, tacitly seen as deities who by sheer virtue of being born female ‘deserve’ riches, attention and unstinting approval from males.

That this arrant propaganda should be so cheerfully received speaks volumes about Anglo-American culture. Far from being the ‘rebel’ she so often claims to be, Madonna merely enacts a heightened form of existing Anglo-American values.


Paradoxically, the mythopoietic entity Madonna projects has become a parody of the Anglo-American female outlook. This relates to the fact she is herself not Anglo-American at all. Her songs and self-presentation are turgid with Latin bombast. However, as part of her infiltration of the media she has craftily honed a heightened image of Anglobitch values with incisive appeal to Anglo-American females. Indeed, this imago has become a standard behavioural model for young Anglo-American girls, indicative of our culture’s inevitable slide towards gynocracy.

The principal myth projected by Madonna is that Anglo women are intensely sexual beings. In fact, all credible research strongly indicates that Anglo-American women are the most sexually anaesthetised in the world. Yet the Anglo media continually bombards us with a stream of palpable nonsense claiming that women are as sexually preoccupied as men. In Slander: Liberal Lies About the American Right (2002) Anne Coulter argues that this theme is a ‘liberal myth’ demonstrating liberal detachment from consensus reality.


While there is considerable truth in this, from the standpoint of the Anglobitch thesis the inane projection of Anglo females as hypersexual beings is all part of the Pedestal Syndrome. Because Anglo culture is puritanical and class-bound, sex is a scarce commodity. Anglo women as ‘owners’ of sex are thus imbued with an intrinsic status that explains their arrogance and hypocrisy. A major result of this is the deification of women on pedestals as paragons of virtue, intellect and ability. The tendency to inflate Anglo women’s sexual prowess is part of this process. Indeed, by a process of conceptual inversion, the area where Anglo women are most lacking is the very area where their prowess is most absurdly exaggerated. Madonna’s mythopoietic identity is calculated to maximally exploit this niche.


Material Girl is a term that describes most young Anglo-American females effectively. Of course, as in Madonna’s chipper video, Anglo-American women think the world ‘owes’ them something as a perpetual favour for having been born female in a repressive culture. As Adam Smith wrote, value is determined by scarcity. Anglo women, as ‘owners’ of sex, therefore acquire a sense of existential entitlement that they utterly lack in libertine societies.


However, the Material Girl is also a specific Anglobitch type with particular values. Reared in the post-Madonna era, she grew up surrounded by cultural imagos extolling the virtues of female selfishness. Consequently, she is amongst the most unpleasant Anglobitch types known to observation. The Material Girl is not only especially selfish; she also reaps the benefits of years of ‘emancipation’.

Contemporary Anglo-American teenaged girls are so insufferable because they are recipients of both enormous privilege and staggering advantage. The Material Girl resembles a lifestyle prostitute, for whom prostitution is not merely an aspect of life, but an all-pervasive lifestyle option. Since her whole status hinges on sexual barter for material reward, she is supremely mono-dimensional and utterly bereft of empathy.