Saturday, 25 June 2011

Are Anglo-American 'Gay' Men just Priapic?



pri·ap·ic/prīˈapik/Adjective
1. Of, relating to, or resembling a phallus.
2. Of or relating to male sexuality and sexual activity.


In the Anglosphere, ‘gay’ culture is defined by a cloying obsession with sex. Despite their rhetoric about lifestyles and the contemplation of flowers, gay men are clearly entranced by orgasm to an extent far surpassing that of heterosexual men. Gay writers, film directors, artists and philosophers are all enslaved by their sexual urges, to the exclusion of all else.

This fact set me to thinking: are most gay men just hyper-sexualized males – a self-selecting group whose priapic urges can only be satisfied by rejecting the relative sexual deprivation inescapably attendant on heterosexuality? The more one considers this possibility, the more plausible it seems. Even some badass with the looks of Apollo, the Game of Roissy and the confidence of a warlord would struggle to enter a nightclub and say: “I want sex NOW!” and expect to get it. Yet homosexual men can enter any gay bath house in any Anglosphere city, say the very same words and expected to be sexually serviced by several men in a matter of minutes! In short, the sexual mismatch between the sexes makes the heterosexual lifestyle a poor option for any hyper-sexualized male – a non-option, in fact, if he wants to fully slake his sexual thirsts. By contrast, adopting homosexuality allows him to instantly indulge his every sexual whim in every manner conceivable.



This state of affairs is strongly reinforced in the Anglosphere, with its undertow of puritan repression and attendant pedestalization of women as ‘owners’ of sex. In our view, the hyper-sexualized adoptee of homosexuality is far more common in the Anglo-Saxon countries than elsewhere, for this very reason. Since sex is so scarce and difficult to acquire in a heterosexual context, it simply makes no sense for an Anglo-American male with priapic urges to remain heterosexual – hence the self-selection of hyper-sexualized males towards homosexual lifestyles, not to mention the hyper-sexualized nature of homosexuality itself.

Let us consider another aspect of homosexuality – the vaunted ‘giftedness’ of gay men. Short and dirty IQ tests generally suggest that gay men are the sexual orientation whose median IQ ranks highest. A self-evident observation across the Anglosphere (especially in the United States) is that women actively dislike males of high intelligence, preferring swaggering thugs and moronic misfits. Now, this offers a plausible alternative explanation for the high incidence of homosexuality among intelligent males than the pseudo-scientific explanations currently in vogue – simply put, homosexuality follows intelligence, not the other way round. Left with no other option for attaining sex, highly sexed and intelligent males adopt homosexuality as a recreational life-strategy and genes have little to do with it.

These views may not be beloved – but then, truth seldom was. As we all know, Anglo-Saxon culture reflexively exonerates females of responsibility for pretty much everything – and homosexuality is doubtless another statistic. The very notion that homosexuality may be enforced by female sexual ostracism of intelligent males would never be admitted in the legacy media, yet the evidence for such a conclusion is impressive. Indeed, very few gay men would accept such a contention, since that would redefine their hedonistic lifestyle-choice as simple, unbridled lust, not the mystic ‘orientation’ it currently presents as.

Of all the pretty lies in the Anglosphere – liberation, democracy and equality - homosexuality remains the biggest.



Of no small significance is the fact that homosexuality has advanced in lock-step with feminism. Feminism and homosexuality are usually considered to be unrelated phenomena – or at best, phenomena independently linked to the rise of the Baby-Boomers’ ‘permissive society’. However, an alternative view is that feminism – by assailing marital monogamy and allowing women to indulge their primordial attraction to dangerous thugs, moronic bullies and swaggering plutocrats – produced an unwanted ‘rump’ of educated, economically stable but sexually disenfranchised males. Given that gay males are disproportionately intelligent, solvent and educated, it is fairly obvious that members of this group have opted for homosexuality as a means of escaping the living death of involuntary celibacy, that the two phenomena are in fact closely related and that feminism is directly responsible for the advancement of homosexuality across the Anglosphere. Certainly, genetic explanations of gay giftedness remain flaky at best, while Anglo-American sociobiology remains firmly trapped in the flawed assumption that women find male intelligence attractive, despite all evidence pointing to the contrary.

Finally, the rabid female hatred of male homosexuals ‘seals the deal’ on this issue. As we all know, women seek to control men by limiting sexual supply, be it representational (pornography) or actual (prostitution) – and that feminism is, essentially, an institution created for that purpose. Women who like gay men are a tiny, unrepresentative minority of the educated middle class inflated by the legacy media – the vast majority of Anglo females detest gay men as vehemently as they hate men in general. The present author recently heard a discussion about homosexuality on BBC Radio Five. One gay youth described being savagely attacked by a girl wielding a cricket bat. That sums up the real link between pan-Anglosphere feminism and homosexuality: the latter is a reaction to the former, which hates it with boundless counter-reactionary zeal.

28 comments:

  1. Rookh:
    These are some excellent observations. Dr. Albert Ellis, a leading pre-feminist researcher came to many of the same conclusions. He roundly disproved the myth of genetic predispositions to homosexuality in his 1965 book 'Advances in Sex Research'.

    Ellis also commented that the homosexual men he'd treated in therapy were largely products of a culture that encouraged female frigidity towards males, and that sex was the primary motivation behind most male homosexuality.

    Of course, most of Ellis' research is hardly spoken of in academia today...

    ReplyDelete
  2. LOLOLOLOLOL some of the most uninformed drivel I've ever read.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I guess you are just so dumb you didn't understood any of it.

      Poor thing.

      Delete
  3. OK... so where are these hetero nightclubs where men can say, "I want sex NOW!" and expect to be immediately serviced by five nubile females? Only in your fevered imagination, I expect.

    Male sexuality has a strong malleable component. Consider the widespread homosexuality in prisons and British boarding schools. Are all boarding school boys or prisoners genetically disposed to homosexuality? I would say that 'some' male homosexuality is innately determined by factors like birth order, brain structure and so forth - but not all, by any stretch of the imagination. And it is the latter form - culturally-determined homosexuality - that is being discussed here.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Foucault claimed that Homo-Sexuality did not exist until the Nineteenth Century when the concept was created by Doctors and then promptly banned by Governments. Now, so it seems to me, it is a bone that has been tossed to men, as compensation for the increased privileging of women, caused by the ease of Divorce, the criminalisation of sex in marriage, the rise of the Cougar etc.

    Before the Nineteenth Century, (and this is what Foucault meant) The Church took the view that such things were aberrations. I think that was a very wise attitude, for I have long suspected that a lot of Homo-Sexuality is a life-style choice, even if Homo-Sexuals themselves are in denial of the fact.

    Even the most successful of pick-up artists have to put some work in, to score with a woman, and for the rest of us a studded indifference (Game) seems to be our best chance of occasional success with women. This is, of course, not the case for Homo-Sexuals or for that matter women who choose to sleep around, where sex is readily available.

    I suspect that a lot of the male dislike of homo-sexuals derives from the recognition that Homo-sexuality is a tacit admission of the difficulty of seducing a woman: They are failures as men (in a rigged contest) and blustering Hetero-Sexuality is a denial of failure (even if it is there for all to see).

    It is certainly my observation that women - particularily those who have well paid occupations and who thus think highly of their (limited) abilities dislike male intelligence, and are happier with the thugs and bullies (the plutocrats being bullies of another type usually and few and far between).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "It is certainly my observation that women... dislike male intelligence, and are happier with the thugs and bullies."

      How very convenient. What you imply is you're too intelligent to attract a woman, because women are threatened by male intelligence (this is no way explains the current widespread female lust and admiration for the gorgeous, young-looking and highly intelligent Prof. Brian Cox). Look at the ridiculously successful (and stupidly saccharine bullshit)film 'The Notebook' and you will realise its success lies in its embodiment of the 'perfect' man in the still young but grown-up Noah (played by Ryan Gosling) - again he's youthful, extremely good-looking, sensitive, resourceful and strong, and certainly not thuggish. Consensus also points to Robert Pattinson, James Franco, Chase Crawford, Shia La Boeuf, Matthew Goode, Ben Whishaw etc etc etc. And by the way, no-one under 40 fancies George Clooney or Brad Pitt and even the once-beautiful Johnny Depp is looking a bit past it these days.

      What I'm saying is there has been a democratisation in sexuality - educated women who earn no longer need to choose a secure but ugly man - now we're more likely to be attracted to youth and beauty (and yes, this implies that intelligence isn't a top priority for immediate attraction because we're talking about human sexuality here).

      Only downtrodden/ uneducated/ poverty-stricken women are attracted to thugs - it's low self-esteem and what feminists have been seeking to combat for decades.

      Delete
  5. "I suspect that a lot of the male dislike of homo-sexuals derives from the recognition that Homo-sexuality is a tacit admission of the difficulty of seducing a woman: They are failures as men (in a rigged contest) and blustering Hetero-Sexuality is a denial of failure (even if it is there for all to see)."

    It may also be a form of White Knighting. Since Homos have escaped the sexual tyranny of women, one way to (instinctively) curry favor with them (women) is to declare emnity on the fugitives and hope some bitch will notice. Then, maybe the domesticated male pet will recieve a pat on the head and a treat. It's essentially a form of supplication.

    ReplyDelete
  6. That should read "emnity towards" above.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anon 1327:
    Since I mentioned Albert Ellis' research, I'll explain some of his 'uniformed drivel' to you:

    Ellis surveyed records from several hospitals of children who were born hermaphrodites and had their gender determined surgically at birth. He found that, as adults, the percentage of homosexuals among them was no higher than the general population. Hardly proof that sexual preference is innate, now is it?

    Another: Ellis treated (and cured) homosexuals in his clinical practice. One statistic that he reported was that the percentage of homosexual men who had a family history of homosexuality was also no higher than the general population. That pretty clearly rules out a genetic predisposition as well.

    Also, how do you account for the fact that both the overwhelming percentages of both homosexuals and transgenders happen to be male? That alone suggests a social cause.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Futrelle has dedicated a whole post to this article, which indicates a point of sorts.

    Something that interests me is the widespread acceptance of biological determinism by the gay community. Aside from being flaky science (not all gay men have a 'feminine brain' - some gay men are extremely logical, like the philosopher Wittgenstein), it has a whiff of Belsen about it. If new, intolerant themes were to emerge in western culture (quite possible, given its decline), totalitarians would doubtless use such pseudo-scientific ideas to liquidate gay men at or before birth. I can only conclude many gays embrace such dangerous ideas for ulterior reasons, perhaps to avoid the simple 'failed hetero' or 'sex maniac' labels presented here. These labels are quite reasonable, in that males deprived of heterosexual opportunities (prisoners and males in boarding schools) often adopt homosexuality to compensate their lack. Other things about Anglo-American gays:

    1. Their hysterical 'pride' (concealing shame and despair)
    2. Their self-proclaimed happiness (very few are, in my limited experience - rather, many are crabbed,, suicidal and bitter)
    3. Their hysterical hedonism (over-compensation for a lack of hetero sex, perhaps)
    4. Their self hatred (expressed in high suicide rates, short lives and risk-taking behavior)
    5. Their loathing of women (perhaps a by-product of sexual rejection; also, a reaction to widespread female homophobia)

    Maybe people could take their excellent insights to Futrelle's blog... in typical Manboobz fashion they have written 400 posts and said precisely nothing. Hundreds of them look at this article daily and only one of them comments...

    ReplyDelete
  9. *Also, how do you account for the fact that both the overwhelming percentages of both homosexuals and transgenders happen to be male? That alone suggests a social cause.*

    Like, men finding it much harder to acquire sex than women in Anglosphere countries? Yes, that makes sense. There will be many more male sexual 'losers' than female ones, given female hypergamy. Yes, I have often pondered this. Were homosexuality primarily biological, one would expect equal numbers of avowed lesbians, which is certainly not the case. Note also how lesbians are typically the least attractive women... very few cheerleaders or beauty queens are lesbians. Why? Perhaps they don't need to be.

    ReplyDelete
  10. "Note also how lesbians are typically the least attractive women... very few cheerleaders or beauty queens are lesbians. Why? Perhaps they don't need to be."

    Good point Rookh. I have also noticed how lesbians and feminists tend to be the most unattractive women on the face of the earth!

    I heard a pick up artist say one time that the ugly girls are the easiest to get, because not many guys are pursuing them. The really attractive women are being pursued by a lot of guys, so naturally these women will be more "picky" about who they date.

    I realize beauty is only skin deep .......... but ugly cuts right to the bone!

    ReplyDelete
  11. I profoundly disagree with you article.
    I am a 16 years old gay guy. In my childhood I had some female admirers and had a "girlfriend", but I think I already knew that I liked guys since I sometimes fantasized about having a "boyfriend". In my early teens (12-13) I had a girlfriend who liked me and everything, but deep inside I was already feeling that she wasn't "right" for me. The first times I had masturbated myself I was thinking of males, not the sex itself as I didn't clearly know what it was. Just when I grew up and learned what sex was, I begun to search a way to get sex (with another male) but, as I was born in Italy, I became conscious that I wouldn't (and won't) get it anytime soon, because I was born in Italy: in my "dear" country, we have very few saunas, clubs and other places to meet other gays (of whose existence I learned just recently); a gay guy could guess when another guy is gay (even if it sounds cliché,from the manners, empty or spare "girlfriend portfolio" ecc), but we proceed VERY carefully, in fear of being busted, and probably hated on, bullied and ostracized. As you can see, homosexuality, at least for me and Italians in general, is TOTALLY not a shortcut to getting sex. Strangely, straight guys can openly flirt but they get sex just a little bit more easily than their gay counterparts, because of the "austerity" that my culture imposes to women. Consequently to me it seems that heterosexuality is the easiest way to get sex, and not otherwise. However, accordingly to the theory that the scarcity of willing women leads to "gayness" and because of the women's "austerity" that is present here, I should have a VERY active sex life, something like having sex with every straight-but-suddendly-gone-gay guy I know (which is obviously not happening). From another point of view, I shouldn't be gay because I always had my fair share of female "admirers", despite me having had (and having nowadays) high, and in some subjects excellent, grades.
    I have been talking about the sexual side of homosexuality, thing that might make you think of me as a hyper-sexed sub-human, but you didn't consider the sentimental side of it: as I said, even as I child I fantasized of being with a man sentimentally and from puberty, I always developed love feelings for other guys. I loved women platonically but, returning to the sex part, they didn't arouse me. I'm mostly friends with them.
    About your comment on self-proclaimed happiness: I am happy with who I am, really. I never thought about suicide. Also, where are the studies about gays having shorter lifes?
    Last thing, I have to compliment you because your theory is a little bit more complex than "Gays are perverts, full stop" and offers a different point of views. And "different" is not a bad word, I hope you got that. I also would like to know, what are your exact thoughts about homosexuality?I can't seem to fully understand your position.
    Best regards

    ReplyDelete
  12. *As you can see, homosexuality, at least for me and Italians in general, is TOTALLY not a shortcut to getting sex.*

    Something you have to understand is that I am writing about issues in English-speaking countries, which are called 'the Anglosphere' when considered as a whole. Anglosphere countries like Britain and the United States have a puritanical culture which distorts relations between men and women and leads to men being devalued in every sphere of life. What goes on in Italy bears little relationship to what goes on in the Anglosphere (and that is putting it mildly).

    Secondly, I am aware that some men are exclusively gay from birth, although I think this group is much smaller than is often supposed. If all homosexuality were determined by genetic factors, why do so many males in boarding schools and prisons engage in it? Indeed, why was it widely practiced by whole civilizations, like the ancient Greeks? When considering these factors, the idea that all gays are created by factors beyond their control makes no real sense. Because you yourself are disposed to homosexuality by genes/hormones does not mean that ALL gay men are created in this manner. Clearly, some are created by the cultures they live in. And in Anglosphere countries, relations between men and women are so fraught that it simply makes sense for highly-sexed (priapic), intelligent men to adopt homosexuality, as it guarantees them many more free sexual encounters than they would otherwise get. Many American blogs and websites argue that American girls hate intelligent men in favor of thugs/plutocrats/sociopaths, and who are we to argue with them?

    The whole idea of my blog is that culture plays a huge role in human sexuality, especially in Anglosphere countries. It is difficult for people outside the Anglosphere like yourself to really understand things like the 'Princess Syndrome' that prevails in the United States, since you do not have it in Italy.

    I myself have no problem with homosexuality at all, since all sexual freedom releases men from women's shackles. However, I do think a lot of Anglo-American gay men are in serious denial of their true motivations, although this probably does not apply to you. In fact, I would suggest that 'lifestyle gays' are much rarer outside the Anglosphere compared to 'inherently' gay men like yourself. They are completely different types of people. I hope this clears up any misunderstandings.


    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1378096/Study-shows-gay-suicide-attempts-likely-live-Republican-area.html

    ReplyDelete
  13. Okay! I didn't understand that the post was centered on Anglo-American people. Thanks for your response, you're a nice person.
    Regarding the "gays have shorter lives" thing, I got too much carried away with my writing so I didn't do my research. You were right!

    ReplyDelete
  14. Your article is indicative of the inability of straight people to accept that being homosexual is not a choice that gay people make. You concede that some gay men may be inherently gay, but you don't really believe it.

    If Nobel Prize winners with 20 letters after their names can't figure out why some people are born gay, then you and I won't solve the mystery on a blog. I know that culture had nothing to do with it. My twin brother is straight. Our formative years didn't diverge in any significant way. So my environment didn't make me gay.

    Still, this is a jolly good read. There is nothing more entertaining for a gay Australian man than listening to straight American people trying to explain 'gayness' to themselves. Let me see if I understand you. You think that I chose to be gay because I am so obsessed with sex that I decided to reject women in favour of other uber horny dudes who are on similar quests to shag til they drop?

    I'll give you some marks for adding the bit about women rejecting me because I'm just too clever. It is still twaddle, but I like it anyway. The only part I agree with strongly is the rabid hatred that feminists have for gays. They are openly hostile towards us, because they cannot manipulate us the way they manipulate straight men. And we hate them for hating men - straight and gay.

    Gay men are gay because we are born prefering penises to vaginas. That's it. Simple. Accept it and move on. Your attempt to 'make sense' of homosexuality has resulted in you writing an article that tortures logic and common sense. The result is collection of silly assertions, which I doubt was your intent.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Femininists do not hate gay men as a rule, as far as I know - that's a new one on me! I have heard, however, that Australia is one of the most misogynistic countries in the world, so your notion of what a feminist is/ does/ thinks may be just a *tiny* bit skewed by that. There is no reason to assume that homosexuality precludes misogyny anyway - certainly not in a culturally misogynistic backwater like yours!

      Delete
    2. Australia, one of the most misogynistic countries in the world? Uh, no. Australia is part of the Anglosphere and so you'll find that the laws here enable women in family situations (divorce etc.), seeking jobs, etc. as much as anywhere else within the Anglosphere. The Anglosphere is notorious for its unequal distribution of justice among genders generally, so it stretches credibility to call Australia 'misogynistic'. I live in Australia, so I have some idea.

      I also find that Australian guys, particularly younger guys, tend to defend their female peers even when it isn't really warranted. Many also have an inordinate amount of faith in such women even when evidence suggests that they shouldn't. Older Australia men may be a bit more misogynistic due to experience, but you can't tell me with a straight face that they're comparable to say, most Arab men or even the quite chauvinistic Chinese men.

      Delete
  15. hahahaha,

    so are you saying your antifeminist views are making you gayer?

    I always thought futrelle was a first class asshole.....

    another bad one is hugo schyzer......

    ReplyDelete
  16. From a chakra point of view- two masculine men can excite each other to the point of frenzy. Just watch two guys argue or duel- the energy is mutiplied by bouncing off each other constantly. Women are basically male energy vampires. How many times have you guys felt utterly DEPRESSED after sex?

    ReplyDelete
  17. I am a gay male I think much of what you write has some truth to it in regards anglo culture in general. I would just say however homosexuality is prevelant in all cultures I know I have had relations with men from even Islamic world. Homosexuality is complex creation and cannot be simply just women hating men, although that may have some part to play in it. You lose credibility in many of your comments on your blog they are to sweeping. If you would be less sweeping and more microscopic about your analysis you might be going somewhere.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Where do you get the idea that gay men hate women? Or is it a simple misunderstanding of the truism that gay men hate SEX with women?

    ReplyDelete
  19. I am now less intelligent than I was before reading this article. I demand compensation, immediately.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Just because you disagree with someone, doesn't make them stupid or wrong.

      Delete
  20. Women are scum, and should exterminated. Homosexuality is the best option for men. In fact, heterosexuality is an aberration.

    ReplyDelete
  21. update sunny leone xxx videos factory
    all videos are very delightful.

    »»-----------SUNNY LEONE SEX VIDEOS
    »»-----------SUNNY LEONE SEX VIDEOS
    »»-----------SUNNY LEONE SEX VIDEOS
    »»-----------SUNNY LEONE SEX VIDEOS
    »»-----------SUNNY LEONE SEX VIDEOS
    »»-----------SUNNY LEONE SEX VIDEOS
    »»-----------SUNNY LEONE SEX VIDEOS
    »»-----------SUNNY LEONE SEX VIDEOS
    »»-----------SUNNY LEONE SEX VIDEOS
    »»-----------SUNNY LEONE SEX VIDEOS
    »»-----------SUNNY LEONE SEX VIDEOS
    »»-----------SUNNY LEONE SEX VIDEOS
    »»-----------SUNNY LEONE SEX VIDEOS
    »»-----------SUNNY LEONE SEX VIDEOS
    »»-----------SUNNY LEONE SEX VIDEOS
    »»-----------SUNNY LEONE SEX VIDEOS
    »»-----------SUNNY LEONE SEX VIDEOS
    »»-----------SUNNY LEONE SEX VIDEOS

    hot gay to gay sex video and story
    update sunny leone xxx videos factory
    all videos are very delightful.

    »»-----------SUNNY LEONE SEX VIDEOS
    »»-----------SUNNY LEONE SEX VIDEOS
    »»-----------SUNNY LEONE SEX VIDEOS
    »»-----------SUNNY LEONE SEX VIDEOS
    »»-----------SUNNY LEONE SEX VIDEOS
    »»-----------SUNNY LEONE SEX VIDEOS
    »»-----------SUNNY LEONE SEX VIDEOS

    word top class porn sex video

    »»-----------SUNNY LEONE SEX VIDEOS
    »»-----------SUNNY LEONE SEX VIDEOS
    »»-----------SUNNY LEONE SEX VIDEOS
    »»-----------SUNNY LEONE SEX VIDEOS
    »»-----------SUNNY LEONE SEX VIDEOS
    »»-----------SUNNY LEONE SEX VIDEOS

    »------------ IMRAN HASMI HOT SEX VIDEOS

    » »-----------BOLYWOOD SUPER SEX VIDEOS

    » »-----------ASS MOUTH Sex (386)

    »»------------BBW video Sex (386)

    » »-----------BABE VIDEO Sex (386)

    » »-----------BISEXUAL Sex (386)

    » »-----------BIZARE VIDEO Sex (386)

    » »-----------ONLY BOLYWOOD HOT SEX VIDEOS

    ReplyDelete