As most regular readers will know, it is our opinion that - being in essence puritanical - Anglo-American culture harbors a reflexive animus against all men as sexualized beings. Consequently, we should not look to 'conservative' politicians across the Anglosphere to uphold men's rights - to the contrary, 'conservatives' are men's greatest enemies, since traditional Anglo culture detests men.
The latest proof of this assertion? British 'conservative' Prime Minister David Cameron's demented Father's Day outburst against 'feckless fathers'. As per usual, this 'conservative' decries all absent fathers as villains, conveniently forgetting that large numbers of men aren't allowed to see their children in contemporary Britain. Quite aside from this, most single mothers are hardly the harassed, misunderstood angels such White Knights as Futrelle, Fleming and Cameron routinely depict them as. Indeed, the vast majority of single mothers are educationally subnormal, welfare-dependent parasites whose offspring - if Professor Daniel Amneus is correct - are far more prone to crime, unemployment and economic failure than children raised in households where a father is present.
Anyway, let's have a good laugh at 'Dave's' rant:
Fathers who abandon their families should be "stigmatised" by society in the same way as drink drivers, David Cameron has said. The Prime Minister signalled a new onslaught on "runaway dads" saying they should be made to feel the "full force of shame" for their actions.
Writing in The Sunday Telegraph in an article to mark Father's Day he said it "simply isn't acceptable" for single mothers to be left to bring up their children on their own. Mr Cameron also indicated his determination to introduce tax breaks for married couples - a Tory general election pledge which appeared to have been dropped by the coalition in the face of Liberal Democrat opposition.
"I want us to recognise marriage in the tax system so as a country we show we value commitment," he wrote.
He issued a strong defence of traditional family life - describing it as the "cornerstone of our society" and called for a new drive to "bring fathers back into the lives of all our children".
Even when parents were separated, he said, fathers had a duty to support "financially and emotionally" their children - spending time with them at weekends, attending nativity plays and taking an interest in their education. Where men were unwilling to face up to their family obligations, Mr Cameron said that it was up to the rest of society to make clear that such behaviour was unacceptable.
"It's high time runaway dads were stigmatised, and the full force of shame was heaped upon them," he said.
"They should be looked at like drink drivers, people who are beyond the pale. They need the message rammed home to them, from every part of our culture, that what they're doing is wrong - that leaving single mothers, who do a heroic job against all odds, to fend for themselves simply isn't acceptable."
Mr Cameron also described how he learned his values from his own father, Ian Cameron, who died last year aged 77.
"From my father, I learned about responsibility. Seeing him get up before the crack of dawn to go and do a hard day's work and not come back until late at night had a profound impact on me," he said.
And there we have it, pure gold. The holes in Cameron's arguments are so huge one could comfortably drive a Mack truck through them. But why bother? His views do not originate in rational thought, just the misandrist psychobabble that is contemporary Anglo-American culture.
I was genuinely pleased when the coalition ousted the Fabians from office; but instead of the repeals to all the evil laws enacted by ZanuLabour, we had U-turn after U-turn, like drunken drivers on the clown-car.
ReplyDeleteEach pre-election promise, blowing in the wind as the confetti of the civil marriage between the two uncertain genders of Cameron and Clegg.
Deadbeat Ministers, with absentee morality, off fishing for tiddlers in the barrel of blame. The feminist employment laws, left by the previous newly weds of Marxism and feminism, created unemployed men for this very purpose. And where there's blame, there's marital breakdown.
How lucky Dave Cameron was to have a multimillionaire granddad for his dad to graft for, doing a "hard day's work", sitting on a comfortable chair, gambling with other peoples pensions.
It looks like insurrection is back on the menu lads.
I posted about this here:
ReplyDeletehttp://mens-rights.blogspot.com/2011/06/happy-fathers-day-you-piece-of-shit.html
I don't know the statistics for Britain, but in the US, about 75% of divorces are initiated by women and another 15% by men acting on their wives' behalves. Why don't these Anglo-American politicians ever talk about shaming and stigmatizing 'deadbeat wives' who run out on their husbands or break up families?
ReplyDeleteOver here, men are caught in an especial double-bind when it comes to relationships. Single men are ridiculed in the media as 'losers' at the same time they are shamed for expressing even the slightest interest in sex. Men who MGTOW or pursue foreign women are lampooned worst of all. Of course, divorced men and single fathers are also treated as 'losers', regardless of who is at fault.
US laws, the same which grant women an unimpeded 'right' to abortion, are especially ruthless when pursing men for 'child support'. Just like any other 'crime' involving either sex or reproduction, so-called 'deadbeat dads' are considered worse than baby-killing abortionists.
*Why don't these Anglo-American politicians ever talk about shaming and stigmatizing 'deadbeat wives' who run out on their husbands or break up families?*
ReplyDeleteIn a puritanical society, men always have to be wrong and women always right. Objective reality has nothing to do with it. In fact, the majority of divorces in the UK are also initiated by women. Beyond that, many young women see men only as sperm doners who can give them the requisite child they need to live off the State indefinitely. Once their brief reproductive duty is discharged, they are as expendable as male ants.
I was fairly appalled by Cameron's piece, and was rather relieved to see that the readers of the on-line Mail, BBC and Telegraph felt similar contempt. To attack Fathers on Fathers Day is surely as inappropriate as attacking Christians on Xmas Day.
ReplyDeleteYou will note that although there is no reference to the sex of the Drunk-Drivers, one instantly assumes (I suggest) that they are Male, which is not of course, by any means, neccesarily the case. The analogy is false; for a drunk, drives his car, knowing that he is unfit to do so, and may as the result of inebriation cause a crash. A better analogy would, I suggest, be, of a sober driver who discovers, as he is driving along, that his passenger is severing the brakes - the driver thereafter being blamed for the resulting crash, and the (female) passenger, instead of being shamed, being rewarded with ownership of the vehicle for her own use as well as having the driver forced to pay for the repair costs and continued upkeep of the vehicle.
I should add that I do not have any axe to grind as I have never been a Father, but (as a lawyer) I undertook more Divorce actions than is good for one and concur with the view that almost all Divorces are (one way or another) female instituted and rarely for any reason other than whim or cupidity. Such women apart from advancing a 'Maria Therese' sense of entitlement frequently make contact between the father and his child nye impossible, the courts will never properly punish the women for that, and the psychological difficulties of continuing contact with the child (the woman often using contact as a device to humiliate the man) is often too much for the man.
One thing that is always missing in the traditionalist point of view - the woman herself.
ReplyDeleteI pointed this out to a friend this weekend. He watched a priest on T.V. say essentially the same thing.
I pointed out, "Notice how he places no responsibility on the woman - why doesn't he give young women the advice to 'choose your partner carefully' or to be blunt, 'pay attention to whom you are f**king'"
I think I got through to him.
I'd say the problem does not lay in "deadbeat wives", it is more a problem of "bad mate selection".
Oh, and having met many children from single moms - they may be prone to be criminals when they grow up. Studies do indicate that.
What I noticed: most of them are either fully or partially retarded (reports cards consist of C D and F grades), and had several minor or severe birth defects.
Definitely NOT the kind of off-spring that so-called "alpha males" produce.
Tom did not know where to post this excellent comment. I think it fits here quite nicely:
ReplyDelete*I don't know where to put this so I will post this here. You can move it as you see fit.
Could you comment on the skankification of native born young women. The old bag feminist say young women are actively perusing their own exploitation. This is total bullshit. Being a skank has become mainstream here in California, that is for young girls. I call the average young girl a skank because I just do not know the precise word to describe them.
I will describe a few things that I see, it is a definite change, perhaps a natural reaction to the marriage strike.
Outward signs - What is different is they have no shame these behaviors, in fact think they are "cool man cool" there is strong per pressure to behave like this. These examples are now considered socially acceptable.
Tatted up like Any Winehouse.
Weed smoking.
More into porn than most young guys - a role model for this would be Lady Gaga.
Do not expect to ever to get married.
Hypersexual, banging multiple guys.
To get arrested by police.
I know there is more things, this needs to be more precisely described. What I see is young girls are as crude and nasty as a hardened prostitute several decades ago. I don't know if you see this in the UK. It is a definite real shift in attitude and behavior, this is normal as far as young girls go here.*
The idea that women are not responsible at all for the breakup of the family is a joke! In America, 72% of all divorces are initiated by women (and some of the men who initiate divorce are told to to do by their wives).
ReplyDelete50% of domestic violence is women abusing men! How come the media never talks about that? In America, 35% of rape cases are FALSE rape charges that women accuse men of.
How about the fact that more children die at the hands of their mother than their father? Women are actually more likely to abuse their children and murder them than their father is!
Check out the lastest information on the Casey Anthony trial were this horrible young woman MURDERED HER OWN 2 YEAR OLD DAUGHTER! The evidence against this woman is overwhelming! She waited 31 days after her child went "missing" before she called the police! WTF? She only called the police because her family told her to, according to police records.
Then, she a week after her child went "missing" she was out at bars and clubs getting drunk with her freinds. This has all come out in the trial, which is still ongoing. Here is the lastest info on the case. If this woman doesn't get the death penalty, it would a slap in the face to justice!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7O0CknGwc2c
James Bond
ReplyDeleteShocking. I wonder what Cameron would have to say about that particular case?
James Bond:
ReplyDeleteHere's a related anecdote to the Casey Anthony story: I actually know a man here who did 7 years in prison for voluntary manslaughter of a 3- month old baby. How I know him is because a client of mine's fiancee abandoned him to run off with this thug; and she's since had two kids with him.
BTW, she's a corporate executive and she supports this creep too since he doesn't want to work. The guy she cuckolded is a successful entreprenuer with employees and owns several properties.
Another statistic I've come across is, besides our high divorce rate, American women also lead every other demographic--- worldwide---in consumption of prescription psychiatric drugs. And it really shows!
Rookh;
ReplyDeleteThe Murdocratic media has given the Casey Anthony story more attention than they usually give to these stories. Actually, cases like these happen fairly frequently over here, only they rarely ever make it out of the local press to the national level. The Anthony Case was initially a 'missing person' case; and the Murdocrats jumped on it like they always do whenever a (female)child or adolescent turns up missing. When the mother was charged, it was too late to sweep the story back under the rug.
"Quite aside from this, most single mothers are hardly the harassed, misunderstood angels such White Knights as Futrelle, Fleming and Cameron routinely depict them as."
ReplyDeleteTo my knowledge, Tommy Fleming hasn't devoted a single jot or tittle to the Casey Anthony story (the Amanda Knox case, while different, is also instructive and ignored). He has spent hours making Pharasaical denunciations about less important matters.
Stars of David wouldn't be a bad idea. At least then it would be harder to claim that we are the ones with all the privilege.
ReplyDeleteWe think the best option is to just escape the western world. http://www.singledudetravel.com/2011/06/now-is-the-time-to-move-abroad/
ReplyDeleteSomeone should have informed the late John Lennon in the sixties that men were to become'niggers'(by that one means non-persons)
ReplyDeleteThe writing was on the wall,even as far back as then.