|What women want: Jeremy Meeks|
The recent rise of ISIS in Syria and Iraq is typically analyzed through the prisms of politics, religion and economics. However, there is also a sexual dynamic to the current conflict between Islam and the West. Indeed, it could be argued that the whole conflict is driven by conflicting sexual agendas. On the one hand, Islam seeks to police and regulate female sexuality. By contrast, the West (and especially the Anglosphere) grants women free reign to indulge their preference for thugs and misfits (see convicted felon Jeremy Meeks, below):
|Click for more pics of Jeremy!|
Stated in such clear, direct terms, it is little wonder Muslim males will do virtually anything to resist such a dysfunctional and misandrist sexual ideology. It is, as they say, a 'no-brainer'.
However, this analysis raises many tangential questions. Why did western men allow women such 'sexual freedom' in the first place? Probably the West's puritan-christian tendency to pedestalize women played a significant role. At the time of emancipation (what sociologists call 'the long Sixties'), men did not yet fully grasp the true nature of female sexual preference. Nor did they appreciate the social or political implications of indulging such a preference (massive welfare bills, rising crime and declining social stability, to name but a few).
|Why resist sexual disenfranchisement? Why not?|
But with the evidence of escalating social dysfunction all around us, it becomes ever harder to grasp why so many western men still support the war against Islam. Having been shafted by female emancipation, low-status western males still rail against Islam even though its sexual philosophy would serve most of them far, far better. Perhaps the 'sexual false consciousness' that pervades the Anglosphere can best explain this crazy phenomenon. After all, many truck drivers and garbage collectors seriously think they have a chance with models and actresses, courtesy of the mainstream media. And if they will believe that they will believe anything.
The final question is: why are Western nations so insistent on exporting psycho-sexual anarchy to traditionalist cultures? Having experienced the various problems associated with unfettered female sexuality at first hand, why does the Anglosphere wish to export them? Or even impose them by force? Again, perhaps sexual false consciousness is the best explanation. Maybe the Anglosphere elites actually believe their own rhetoric. Perhaps they truly believe that crime, social disorder and massive Welfare bills somehow serve the social good.
Weird or what?
|Convicted felon and beneficiary of female reproductive freedom.|