Monday, 11 August 2014

Isis, Sex and Islam: the Rise and Rise of Jeremy Meeks

 
What women want: Jeremy Meeks

The recent rise of ISIS in Syria and Iraq is typically analyzed through the prisms of politics, religion and economics. However, there is also a sexual dynamic to the current conflict between Islam and the West. Indeed, it could be argued that the whole conflict is driven by conflicting sexual agendas. On the one hand, Islam seeks to police and regulate female sexuality. By contrast, the West (and especially the Anglosphere) grants women free reign to indulge their preference for thugs and misfits (see convicted felon Jeremy Meeks, below):


Click for more pics of Jeremy!

Stated in such clear, direct terms, it is little wonder Muslim males will do virtually anything to resist such a dysfunctional and misandrist sexual ideology. It is, as they say, a 'no-brainer'.

However, this analysis raises many tangential questions. Why did western men allow women such 'sexual freedom' in the first place? Probably the West's puritan-christian tendency to pedestalize women played a significant role. At the time of emancipation (what sociologists call 'the long Sixties'), men did not yet fully grasp the true nature of female sexual preference. Nor did they appreciate the social or political implications of indulging such a preference (massive welfare bills, rising crime and declining social stability, to name but a few).


Why resist sexual disenfranchisement? Why not?

But with the evidence of escalating social dysfunction all around us, it becomes ever harder to grasp why so many western men still support the war against Islam. Having been shafted by female emancipation, low-status western males still rail against Islam even though its sexual philosophy would serve most of them far, far better. Perhaps the 'sexual false consciousness' that pervades the Anglosphere can best explain this crazy phenomenon. After all, many truck drivers and garbage collectors seriously think they have a chance with models and actresses, courtesy of the mainstream media. And if they will believe that they will believe anything.

The final question is: why are Western nations so insistent on exporting psycho-sexual anarchy to traditionalist cultures? Having experienced the various problems associated with unfettered female sexuality at first hand, why does the Anglosphere wish to export them? Or even impose them by force? Again, perhaps sexual false consciousness is the best explanation. Maybe the Anglosphere elites actually believe their own rhetoric. Perhaps they truly believe that crime, social disorder and massive Welfare bills somehow serve the social good.

Weird or what?


Convicted felon and beneficiary of female reproductive freedom.

18 comments:

  1. In mythology, Sleeping Beauty was surrounded by impenetrable thorns; similarly Brunhilde had Wotan form a ring of fire to protect her virginity from all but the bravest warrior. So what protects the modern slag from yielding her 'virtue' to mediocrity; what is the modern day hurdle for the prospective Seigfried to jump over?

    I think it is 'political correctness' itself; in our overly safe and officious bureaucracy, women are too indulged. Their simple minded solution is to seek the forbidden fruit, and be swept away by someone who ultimately challenges the ring of the State's androgynous anti-heterosexual safety net, which maintains the sluts perpetual sleep-shag, as she avoids the responsibility of a traditional family role.

    And who is depraved enough to hack through a wall of used condoms and aborted foetuses? Say hello to the tattooed psycho-killer-rapist: "I seek to learn of fear!"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iiavg_JBGaY

      Delete
  2. Your right Rookh, the west has put women on a pedestal and they also believe that females can do no wrong.

    Here in America, when a woman has sex with an underage boy, SHE is treated like the victim not the boy! In the United States, women absolutely love the "bad boy" and hate the college educated, hard working "nice guy."

    I think puritanism and religion has played a large role in the way things are today in the Anglosphere. Thank God more and more men are waking up the fact that marriage to a western woman is a horrible idea.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Cheap birth control and eradication of venereal diseases had a lot to do with "freeing" women.

    By the way, the only women I met who thought Meeks was attractive were black, because he is a light-skinned black and has enough white in him to be high-status, looks-wise, to black women. I never met a white woman who oohed and aahed over him.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bob:
      More probably you never met a white woman who ADMITTED that she oohed and aahed over him. Ask the average Caucasian Ameroskank and she'll swear up and down that she has nothing to do with 'bad boys'.

      Delete
    2. Eric,

      How much laughter did you try to stifle whilst those Caucasian Anglo girls were declaring their 'goodness'? LOL

      Delete
  4. I don't have anything to do with the average obese ugly white woman who end up with black men because no white guy would have her. I've seen many of them.

    ReplyDelete
  5. "Maybe the Anglosphere elites actually believe their own rhetoric. Perhaps they truly believe that crime, social disorder and massive Welfare bills somehow serve the social good."

    No, I seriously doubt they even realize the connection. Charles Murray nailed it on the head with his recent analysis of the disconnect between the upper middle class and elites vs. the white working class (Generation Bastard) The former still live lives of life long stable marriages, 2 1/4 children, PTA meetings, Little League, etc The latter spew out bastard after bastard with their latest Meth Thug of the moment. They think they are "enlightening" the peasants of the world. Plus, Islam is not the most palatable culture, the orient is a far more affable experience for the western man to enjoy female companionship in. If you were a GI where would you rather get stationed? Korea or the Pilippines? Or Saudi or Iraq?

    ReplyDelete
  6. *Plus, Islam is not the most palatable culture, the orient is a far more affable experience for the western man to enjoy female companionship in. If you were a GI where would you rather get stationed? Korea or the Pilippines? Or Saudi or Iraq?*

    That is true for sex tourists. However, sex tourism is somewhat different from permanent residency. Besides, the comparison is between the West (especially the Anglosphere) and the Islamic countries, not the Islamic world and east Asia. Of course, it comes off poorly in any comparison with the latter.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Check out this story:

      http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-London/2014/08/15/Muhammad-IS-Britains-Most-Popular-Boys-Name

      It sounds like the Moslems are taking over the UK by sheer attrition. I'll bet the Islamic girls aren't spawning kids with thugs, either.

      Delete
    2. Eric,

      Well that's what happens when the dominant Anglo culture seems to be sponsoring its own demographic self-destruction by encouraging female careerism, making marriage (and thus normal fatherhood) a risk-free proposition for males.

      As for the thug part, it is harder to say. Quite a few British Muslims are in fact converts and they would have been affected profoundly by the dominant Anglo culture. It would not surprise me if they still had a preference for deviants for the most part, except of a different and more globally notorious stripe (think the internationally-known British Muslim London bombers vs your typical local nuisance that is your British chav/bad boy type) - and fame is like an aphrodisiac to those types of women.

      Delete
    3. DaRick:
      Good to see back again! Another case in point, regarding converts: the mastermind of the Boston Marathon Bombing over here actually had an Ameroskank wife.

      Relative to the other comment, after the bombing, she told the press that she 'had no idea that her husband was capable of such violence.' LOL. Let's see: he was 26 y/o; never had a stable job, no interests besides posting Jihadi BS on the Internet; was on Interpol's watch-list; used to spend months in Chechnya in training camps; was disowned by his own family for being a nutcase---yeah no indications of violent behavior there! LOL

      Delete
  7. very very nice and logically put article.
    I am really thankful that you wrote this and i reached here.
    Feminazism is parasite disease, more dangerous than islamic terrorosim. Islamic Terrorism is visible, but this feminazism is sucking all the system and spreading all over by whining victimhood and producing fake data

    ReplyDelete
  8. hmmm nice i like this thanks for sharing this.

    ReplyDelete
  9. This is one of the best articles I have ever co me across. I'd agree with the anonymous above that feminization is a parasite disease.

    ReplyDelete