The Anglo-American Manosphere: The First Trans-Generational Conversation Between Men Since Prehistory

Studying the contemporary Manosphere, one cannot help noticing that a lot of young men's ideas about women are mature beyond all expectations. When I was young, adult men never spoke to younger men in a serious way. Older men had nothing meaningful to say, it seemed. The mainstream media filled that communication vacuum with its 'Yeah, Yeah, Yeah'  fairy tales about women being perfect angels offering free sex to everybody: little wonder our formative years were so bruising and difficult, continually struggling with these deluded fantasies.

The cucked horseshit we were raised with

Yes, we went round thinking that our young adult lives would be a dizzy reel of ecstatic trysts and love affairs with giving, nubile goddesses: in short, a living James Bond movie. There were a few 'men's rights' publications like Male View in the UK (for which I wrote a few things), though these were hopelessly calling for Tradcuck counter-revolution and the restoration of pre-Boomer gender-relations. In sum, there simply was no elaborate Red Pill toolkit to discuss gender-relations back in the 70's, 80's or 90's; no conceptual shorthand, if you will. Concepts like The Wall, SMV, the Sexual Marketplace, AWALT, Gynocentrism, the various Pills, MGTOW and the rest had simply not been framed. Even I - yes, I - believed that all women were more or less the same in different countries and cultures; that Anglo-American civilisation was not tainted by residual puritanism; and that everyone over 16 was bouncing around in bed with models and film stars. When life did not match these lofty expectations, we thought it was just 'us'; that everyone else was having a great time, an elaborate fiction sustained by the still-potent mainstream media.

Awakened younger men might laugh: but that is simply what mainstream society told us. And at the time, the mainstream media was our only source of information beyond personal experience. Other than celebrities with wildly unrepresentative lifestyles (extensions of the mainstream media, in other words), older men did not really contribute their experience to our lives. They seemed to be from a different and largely irrelevant world of organised religion and unrewarding hyper-conformity; and consequently shunned and ignored. Fathers could not talk meaningfully to their sons about any serious issue; at best, they offered lame-ass advice that meant something when gender-relations (and society in general) were completely different.

When it happened, the all-conquering Internet immediately obliterated this dysfunctional model. For the first time in centuries - in fact, the first time since prehistory or remote antiquity - older men could communicate directly with younger men, sharing their experience in a clear and unobstructed way. With some caveats, the current state of the Manosphere is a direct reflection - indeed, expression - of this 'communication revolution' across generations. In the Manosphere, the physical boundaries that divide different generations of men no longer exist. Like ancient Macedonia, where anyone could speak man to man with his chief and any chief with his king, the Internet is a true democracy. Doubtless the anonymity of the internet helps in this regard. When young men can't see a doddering old sucker, they can listen to his words without prejudice; when older men can't see some shabby NEET, they are far more likely to talk honestly with him.

And the Manosphere is the direct product of this unprecedented engagement. Out there on YouTube, there are a whole bunch of excellent commentators - VVS, Undead Chronic, The MGTOW Monk or Sandman - and all are young men. For though they face the most misandrist culture in history, no mainstream media exists to gull them into cuckdom: in particular, no coherent youth culture exists. And this curious collision of circumstances has produced men who are infinitely more enlightened than I ever was at their age; and I am now an acknowledged leader of Manosphere thought. In youth, I did not even consider concepts like the Wall, hypergamy, SMV, the Sexual marketplace, misandry, hybristophilia, looks-maxxing, gym-maxxing, sex-negative feminism or all the other issues awakened men now take for granted. Yet these young commentators are mostly 18 to 25 (or younger) and they are fully conversant with all these ideas! Yes, they build their arguments on concepts created and developed by dissident anti-feminists from older generations and modulate them to meet their own needs; but the fact is, these young fellows more or less KNOW what is going on. And they know because they grew up with an exciting, empowering online conversation about the reality of gender relations in the Anglosphere buzzing in their ears; a conversation provided by us. We, by contrast, grew up hearing rock stars, parents and academics telling us that all women are flawless, wonderful angels handing out free sex to everyone. And we only learned Red Pill truth the hard way: through long, hard, bitter experience.

Power to these young fellows; they are surely cutting a lot of crap out of their lives by seeing women for what they really are. Indeed, many older TFLers/MRAs/MGTOWs surely envy their youthful knowledge and insight. Sometimes, though, I worry that these young men have been robbed of their youthful idealism by the Manosphere; they talk and think like divorced guys in their forties and fifties, not youths in their teens and early twenties; and that is hardly natural. But then I watch a MGTOW video about evil Anglobitch feminists like the one below, and know my time building the Manosphere was time well spent:

The Dog Pill: Ultimate Expression of Anglo-American Sexual Misandry?

Recent research revealing that 28% of American men under 30 have not had sex in a year has shaken America to its foundations. While this statistic is shocking enough, it only scratches the surface of male sexual disenfranchisement. How frequently were other American men having sex and with whom? If - as one strongly suspects - other males were only having sex a couple of times a year, or paying for sex, or engaging in deviant sex of one kind or another, the true proportion of sexually disenfranchised males would be far, far higher than 28% (which is quite high enough).

But those familiar with the Anglobitch Thesis will not be at all surprised by those figures. Residual Anglo-American puritanism (#metoo, #timesup, prohibition of prostitution, institutional and legal misandry) has long been masked under widespread sexual false consciousness (the media-induced delusion that America is sexually liberated at a mass level). However, the rise of the Internet has exposed this lie as never before, revealing the Anglosphere for the repressive and misandrist dump it truly is.

Even the most famous Anglo-American PUA writers - Roosh and Roissy - have come to accept that 'the juice is no longer worth the squeeze' in relation to PUA; that the meagre returns are no longer worth the effort, in other words. This is why these writers have shifted their efforts to promoting alt-right politics, in recent years. So with PUA defunct and male Incel rates soaring across North America - together with the triumph of #metoo and transsexualism - the Anglo-American male's sexual star has never sunk lower.

And the Dog Pill represents the ultimate, hideous expression of the Anglosphere's anti-male animus: the notion that men are less valuable than animals in the sexual hierarchy. Broadly speaking, the Dog Pill is the startling revelation that many (principally white, American) women prefer to have sex with dogs rather than human males:

“When women openly value pets over men, it makes sense why so many of them engage in bestiality.” This is a common rejoinder in conversations about dogpilling, with this particular one coming from the Reddit forum dedicated to Men Going Their Own Way, r/MGTOW.

“Why bother masturbating when you have a loyal sex slave that'll lick your pussy on demand as long as you have peanut butter and can't knock you up when they dick you? It'll probably be openly celebrated soon as the female ‘counterpart’ to MGTOW.” 

Other posts argue that the dogpilling supports the foundations of incel theory – that women won’t have sex with “nice guys” (not really - it shows women don't want sex with human guys in general - RK). One post on r/MGTOW from February tells a story of a friend, Sam, who is classed as a “solid dude”, who walks in on his girlfriend with her “Great Dane tied to her with a big puddle of cum and a jar of peanut butter next to them”.

“Ever since Sam told me about that shit while he was drunk, it totally changed my perspective of women who interact with dogs,” the user wrote. 

On this same post, many people joined in to say they had heard similar stories. “I knew a girl in high school that did this shit… I think a lot of these girls now a days are fucking their dogs,” one user replied. “When man and male dog become interchangeable, society is fucked,” replied another.

SOURCE: New Statesman, 2019

As usual, the mainstream media tries to downplay the extent of the problem. And as usual, the mainstream Anglo media is trapped in its 'all women are perfect' narrative. Yet a cursory glance at the uncensored British 'local' press (which is relatively free of overt political agendas) suggests a widespread Dogpill problem, replete with parties and a whole 'Dogpill culture' embracing many willing female participants and male voyeurs:

Woman who had sex with THREE dogs claimed she didn't know it was wrong: Carol Bowditch was filmed having sex with three different breeds of dog

A pensioner who had sex with three different breeds of dogs claimed she did not realise it was illegal. Carol Bowditch, 64, was filmed having sex with a St Bernard, a black Labrador and an Alsatian. Her activities were exposed as a result of an RAF Police investigation which centred on a man identified as organising a bizarre sex party at which owners watched their dogs having sex with women. Details of the event were later posted on an internet forum specialising in bestiality. Ultimately the investigation led police to visit Bowditch and when her home was searched officers found a dvd and a usb stick which both contained film of her with dogs. Victoria Rose, prosecuting , told Lincoln Crown Court "When the dvd was analysed it was found to contain extreme images. Those images portrayed persons committing penetrative sexual acts with dogs.

Also included were images of this defendant herself carrying out sexual activity. Included was an eight minute and 59 seconds video of Mrs Bowditch engaging in vaginal and oral sex with a St Bernard dog named Oscar. When the defendant was interviewed she admitted she had penetrative sex with dogs. She accepted it had taken place over several years. She was unaware it was illegal. She identified the dogs. She said she had penetrative vaginal sex once with a Labrador and twice with an Alsatian. She recalled she had vaginal and oral sex with a St Bernard."

Carol Bowditch: Dogpilling Anglohag

Miss Rose said that at least eight photographs were found of Bowditch having sex with dogs and 30 moving images. Bowditch, 64, of Evedon, near Sleaford, admitted a charge of having sexual intercourse with an animal between 13 November 2011 and 25 November 2014. She also admitted possession of 37 extreme pornographic images on 21 March 2016. Daniel Galloway, 65, of the same address, admitted aiding and abetting Bowditch to have intercourse with an animal. He also admitted charges of making indecent images of children, possession of a prohibited image of a child, distributing 1,861 indecent images of children and possession of extreme pornography. His sentence was adjourned to a later date.

James Gray, in mitigation, said "She is 64 and has no previous convictions. Both she and Mr Galloway have suffered considerable public humiliation (my heart bleeds - RK). They have been ostracised by their friends and family. They have suffered that added element of punishment which in less salacious cases would not be present."

Bowditch was given a community order with 12 months supervision and a 16 week night-time curfew (i.e. no punishment at all - RK). The maximum she could have faced for having sex with a dog was a two year jail sentence. Judge Michael Heath, passing sentence, told Bowditch "What you engaged in was first of all unlawful and secondly disgusting. I am told that you have received public humiliation as a result of the publicity that this case has attracted. That does not surprise me."

Source: Lincolnshire Live, 2017

So there we have it. While Anglo-American women have near total sexual freedom to abuse brute creation, men across the Anglosphere are gelded by #metoo, #timesup and a host of other memes and laws designed to curtail their sexual freedoms. But why should we expect any different? When a culture allows women to do anything, anything will inevitably happen. This is especially true in a culture with reflexive puritanical tendencies to pedestalize women (no matter how base) and vilify men (no matter how noble), such as that of the ailing Anglosphere.

Moreover, is not this burgeoning Anglobitch preference for dogs merely the supreme statement of their demented and all pervasive misandry? As a young American fellow once said to me in the earliest days of the Manosphere: 'These (American) bitches now think they're too good for guys - ANY guys'.

How right he was.

Women and Sexual False Consciousness Podcast by Male Defender

Sexual False Consciousness Made Flesh

I published an article called 'The Riddle of Female Sexual False Consciousness' on Relampagio Furioso's New Modern Man site in 2017 and 'Male Defender' has done a good podcast of it entitled Herd Instinct and Sexuality. It makes a good addition to my canonical work on Sexual False Consciousness. Male Defender has a great reading voice and makes some witty comments on the article:


Male Defender's article can be read here:

http://www.maledefender.com/women-sexual-consciousness-podcast/

The rest of his site is pretty good, with lots of good links and resources:

http://www.maledefender.com/

Shadows, Fake-up and Subterfuge: Is the Transsexual Movement a Brilliant Subversion Tactic?

Everywhere one looks, the trans movement is marching on apace across the Anglosphere. Trans rights, trans marches, trans lobbies, trans philosophy, trans everything...

Although the transsexual movement is a defensive response to pan-Anglosphere misandry and heterophobia, it has proved incredibly effective at highlighting the intellectual absurdities and hypocrisy of modern Anglo-feminism. Since feminists think gender is a 'social construct' and completely unrelated to hormones, chromosomes and other organic differences between men and women, they necessarily have to accept the transsexual agenda. However, in doing so they merely highlight the absurdity of their own position: since the practical application of their crazy ideas means hulking rapists undergoing 'transition' now have the right to use female washrooms and changing rooms, merely because they decided they were 'female'  or 'non-binary' during their last jail stint. However, when feminists protest against this insanity they automatically contradict their own anti-essentialist agenda. A brilliant ruse! Either they defend their own ridiculous viewpoint and admit rapists into washrooms, or they invoke reality and transform into oppressive, essentialist gender-fascists of the type despised by the liberal establishment: a pincer movement worthy of Napoleon.

Why Are Some Feminists In The UK Freaking Out About Trans Rights?

The protesters who hijacked and led the London Pride parade over the weekend represent a worrying trend of anti-trans feminism in the UK

While anti-trans sentiment from within the lesbian and feminist communities has continued to be a problem in the United States — anti-trans protesters recently crashed Baltimore Pride — it’s reached particular heights in the United Kingdom. Anti-trans sentiment among feminists here in the UK has long been a problem, inflamed by the popularity of affluent white columnists like Julie Bindel and academics such as Germaine Greer, and taken to dizzying extremes by users of popular online parenting forum Mumsnet. While second-wave feminism has largely lost its luster in the United States, prominent second-wave academics like Greer maintain a strong hold over feminist thought and politics here in the UK. Plus, it seems that all sides of UK media are intent on taking a swipe at trans lives — with even progressive publications like the Guardian giving platform to anti-trans fearmongering. And this isn’t the first time anti-trans bigots have derailed a pride celebration in London, either — they previously attacked London’s Dyke March in 2014 for including a transgender speaker. 

With the GRA consultation set to continue into the fall, the anti-trans protesters holding up Pride in London are surely only the beginning of a new wave of hostility sweeping across the nation toward vulnerable trans communities. In such a heated climate, one would assume that LGBT organizations like Pride in London would take a firm and unequivocal stance in solidarity with the trans community.

Morgan M Page, Buzzfeed, 18th July 2018

The success of transgender athletes renders the feminist perspective even more ridiculous. Again, trans athletes place Anglo feminism into an impossible position: either it acknowledges that gender is not a social or psychological construct, or trans athletes win all the medals. However, such acknowledgement immediately taints feminists as 'gender-fascists':

Trans athletes make great gains, yet resentment still flares: “As soon as they start winning, that’s when the vitriol comes out about how they’re really still a man."

Overall, supporters of increased trans inclusion are heartened by the pace of progress for trans athletes. A growing number of state high school athletic associations in the U.S. enable them to play on teams based on their gender identity, and the NCAA has trans-inclusive guidelines for all its member schools. 

The International Olympic Committee has allowed trans athletes to compete in its affiliated sports since 2003, but until 2016 it required them to first undergo sex-reassignment surgery. Under the new rules, which resemble the NCAA’s guidelines, transgender male athletes can enter men’s competitions without restrictions, while transgender female athletes need to demonstrate that their testosterone level has been below a certain point for at least a year before their first competition.

Associated Press, February 2019 

While we might laugh, this strategic infiltration demonstrates the absurdity and hypocrisy of Anglo-American feminism far more effectively than a million words by Warren Farrell, Angry Harry or the 'old school' Men's Rights crew. The puritanical hostility with which the Anglosphere views men means that MRA arguments are reflexively ignored, however rational or well-evidenced. However, by imitating women these trans males have effectively bypassed institutional misandry and entered the innermost sanctum of Anglo culture, where their views necessarily have to be acknowledged. It is a brilliant Trojan Horse strategy akin to the British Army's infiltration of the Irish Republican Army in Northern Ireland. Despite their skill and motivation, the IRA was eventually unable to function due to the huge numbers of British Army informers infiltrating their ranks.

Unwittingly, the trans movement has opened giant cracks in the edifice of Anglo-American feminism like a wrecking ball. In doing so, it has shown there is more than one way to resist the feminist juggernaut, for those who wish to resist it; subterfuge and infiltration can be far more powerful than debate or argument. Most important, it shows that such resistance can be fun (or at least amusing). One problem with the Manosphere is its relentless lack of humour and over-reliance on rationale; irony and wit are not just equally valid tools of resistance and subversion, but much more enjoyable to deploy.

Sexual False Consciousness Rampant: Blue Collar Chumps, Incel Tears and the Great 'Trickle-Down' Delusion

Underclass loser: Doubtless banging models all night...

My concept of Sexual False Consciousness is gathering pace and traction across many different Manosphere channels. Youtube, blogs and other fora are clamouring to discuss the concept. One of the most interesting is VVS, whose latest video makes interesting viewing. In this, he dissects the recent finding that, contrary to the mainstream media myth that the US is a sexual Wonderland, half of all young Americans are now single:

One of the funniest things is the way American cuckservatives ascribe this sexual drought to 'choice' or the re-emergence of 'Christian morality' among the young. The real answer - as we all well know - is the well-described cocktail of residual puritanism, sex-negative feminism, homosociality, misandry, racism and hyper-hypergamy that governs Anglo-American gender-relations. With the rise of social media, the impact of these forces has wrought terminal damage on male-female interaction.

Despite this obvious truth, the mainstream media spin on the study referenced above is riddled with evasion and denial. The usual self-appointed 'experts' are wheeled out to cloud the real issues in time-honoured fashion. Aside from the robust statistical evidence indicating widespread repression and male sexual disenfranchisement is the baffling lack of common sense underpinning these denials. Do mainstream media people really think that the average Joe working a blue collar job is bouncing around in bed with models every night? Given the obvious hyper-hypergamy of most Anglo-American women - and their withering contempt for the bottom 80% of males - is it not entirely obvious that male sexual disenfranchisement is a modern pandemic? A person with Down's Syndrome ought to be able to see that the 'mainstream' narrative - that 'everyone' is having orgies with models all night - is complete nonsense.

Despite feminist claims, there never was a 'trickle-down' of sexual freedom into the male working class; to the contrary, feminism saw low-value males cast into the sexual wilderness. Although they bleat endlessly 'around the houses', social 'scientists' (cough) will never admit the true cause of lower class males' aggression, intolerance, suicide and violent criminality: widespread sexual disenfranchisement. It is entirely obvious that persistent sexual frustration makes blue collar chumps belligerent and sadistic: blue collar racism and homophobia also derive from the same effect.

The 'Mainstream' Media: Hallucination?

Although the Internet is inevitably more honest and objective than the mainstream media, it still contains islands of utter self self-deceit. One of these is the IncelTears Reddit, which boasts insane  levels of Sexual False Consciousness. This bizarre online redoubt spends most of its time critiquing the posts made by avowed incels on the incels.is blog. Yes - this bizarre bunch of omega males and transitioning transsexuals sit around criticising the 'truecels' as if they themselves were enjoying orgies with models on a regular basis! The only difference between the two blogs is Sexual False Consciousness: while the true incels on incels.is accept their sexual disenfranchisement, the IncelTears brigade carefully hide it behind a fake subtext of sexual bounty. This unstated narrative - that everyone is enjoying orgies every night - flickers around nearly all sexual discussion in the mainstream media and those deluded by it. Do these people seriously think that? Are they really that deluded?

Maybe they are. But here are a few alternative explanations for their studied denial of reality:

• Maybe people who deny the Anglobitch Thesis are mad? At least, are their views of social reality so deluded as to be hallucinatory? The French philosopher Jean Baudrillard argues that the mainstream media occupy a hallucinatory realm which has no reference to reality. Baby Boomers, women and others still snared in this fantasy world continually confuse it for reality itself. It is interesting that the Manosphere is largely a Generation X, Y and Z phenomenon; perhaps this relates to the fact that the mainstream media has less hold on the young?
• The Anglosphere is notable for its denial of historical, political, social and (especially) sexual reality avoidance. As I wrote at length in my first book, Havok (2009),  this aversion to reality is a  cultural expression of Anglo-American puritanism. Accepting that life is not ideal for large - in fact, very large - numbers of people means accepting reality; and that is not something the evasive Anglosphere is particularly comfortable with. When the problem is sexual - as is the case with Sexual False Consciousness - the discomfort elicits draconian repression. Hence the tendency to shout down, ridicule or ignore males who openly discuss sexual disenfranchisement - either their own or anyone else's.
• As a regular poster called Sebastian Hawkes has said, the mainstream media is dominated by unrepresentative males with enormous wealth and power. Is the popular delusion that women are clamouring for sex with everyone largely a product of the casting couch? Also, the fact that much of the sexualized media aimed at women is created by gay men projecting their own sexual fixations onto their female audience, creating the modern pandemic of female sexual false consciousness.
• Simple fear of breaking ranks and giving voice to truth plays a prominent role. One is reminded of the Emperor's New Clothes: no one dares speak the truth because of social pressure.
• Maybe SFC is just a by-product of mass stupidity? Most SFC types either study soft, non-STEM subjects or are blue collar chumps - in short, not the brightest tools in the box. In the UK, one person in three cannot divide 65 by 5 with pencil and paper. It may just be that most Anglochumps are just too dumb to see though SFC. If television told them the moon was made of cream cheese, they would most likely believe it.
• During the 60s and 70s, the Anglo-American masses bought into the notion that the destruction of monogamy would result in a lifelong orgy with thousands of warm, willing females pandering to their every whim. Well, it did: but only if you were a rich, famous, high value male. The Average Joes who cling to SFC will never admit that they were gulled by post-war 'liberation' rhetoric. At best, they cling to a 'trickle down' model of sexual relations; that they will get the dregs of the banquet, at some undisclosed point in their miserable lives. However, the grim reality of female sexual liberation in the Anglosphere is hyper-hypergamy, which almost no 'real' male (not even highly successful ones) can live up to. Accepting that you were duped is hurtful in the extreme; SFC helps men to manage the natural shame of their own naivety, stupidity and sexual failure.
• Accepting one's own SFC means accepting the reality of female nature. Because men in the Anglosphere nations are raised to pedestalise women due to residual puritanism, it is especially hard for them to accept that women are imperfect. 

However, media lies and mass self-delusion can only go so far. Given the the arid sexual reality of North American existence, the post-Internet decline of the mainstream media and the rise of our rampant, unregulated Manosphere, the dysfunctional nature of Anglo-American gender-relations can no longer be hidden. The Red Pill will never be 'mainstream' but ever more self-aware, solvent and educated men are deconstructing the Matrix.

Drunken Britscum: Is mass SFC simply a product of low IQ?