Friday, 29 November 2019

History's Black Swans: Why Societies Which Regulate Female Sexuality Endure



Studying our own tumbledown age with a critical eye, it is easy to think that ancient people were far smarter than we are. Above all, they seemed to understand the reality of female nature much better than we do. Although they cloaked their insight in mystical trappings for the ignorant masses of their own times, the wisest of the ancients definitely seemed to know that allowing women unlimited sexual freedom leads inexorably to the cock carousel, rampant hyper-hypergamy, mass inceldom, the proliferation of Dark Triad genes and  social decay. Most of their laws and customs seemed to focus on strict regulation of female sexuality for this very reason, although it was seldom stated openly.



However, I do not believe the ancients all had Tesla IQs. It just seems that way because the ancient cultures which still exert an influence on our own time were only a small minority of those which ever existed. In truth, the vast majority  of ancient societies died forgotten because they failed to regulate female sexuality; 'successful' ancient societies which restricted female behaviour were unrepresentative Black Swans, not the normative standard. We know very little about the matriarchal Etruscans or Carthaginians compared to the patriarchal, co-alpha Romans who conquered them; and this is because matriarchal societies lose wars, achieve little and leave no imprint on history. This uneven impact on posterity distorts our perception of the ancient past, creating the false impression that all ancient cultures shared the same insights into female nature; in truth, they did not.

The Fall of Carthage: Matriarchies leave little beyond ruins

Doubtless some men in history's successful cultures did have the Tesla IQs necessary to create robust patriarchal memes in the first place; perhaps they studied history or the dysfunctional cultures around them, or simply observed the lower classes in their own societies. Smart men in ancient Greece or Israel must have noticed that their own national underclasses achieved very little compared to social elites, just as in our modern Anglosphere. Modern underclass 'culture' (rap-babble, tabloid newspapers, Netflix, sport) will be forgotten in 40 years, while the upper middle-class academic culture in the STEM departments of elite universities will endure for centuries. That is because upper middle-class culture is still rooted in monogamy and stable family structures, while underclass culture is built on the sociopathic chaos arising from unrestricted female mate choice; that is the only difference.

British Chavs: Underclass Chaos personified

Considered as a whole, the ancients were no smarter or wiser than we are; it just seems that way because we only 'see' the 'successful' patriarchal Black Swan cultures of history.



28 comments:

  1. If you want to rule the world, you must rule over men.

    If you want to rule over men, you must control sex.

    It seems like in days past, controlling male sexuality and limiting sexual access to women was the goal.

    No different than today with one exception.

    They've pushed the control way too far.

    Now, many men are seriously pissed and rightly so.

    Most women are far too stupid to see themselves as what they truly are: bits of tail for the ruling class.

    The more liberated they think they are, the more they enforce the same worn out utter bullshit of limiting sexual access to men, and the stronger the politicians get.

    In other words, the less liberated they actually are. They're just mindless tools for the ruling class.

    And remember... Denying men sex is so spiritual.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. *The more liberated they think they are, the more they enforce the same worn out utter bullshit of limiting sexual access to men, and the stronger the politicians get.
      In other words, the less liberated they actually are. They're just mindless tools for the ruling class.*

      Jordan Peterson is always telling men to 'man up' and adopt traditional masculine values. But why and for what? In earlier times, most men were actually rewarded by society for being upright conformists. What he utterly fails to see is that women in the modern west (and especially the Anglosphere) have opted out of the social contract that makes male conformity meaningful.

      Delete
    2. ...and even if it was meaningful...why would any sane rational man want a tool - a tool that is so easily persuaded by garbage on tv she could turn on him like a rabid dog once the media changes its minds about what it is to "man up"?

      Delete
  2. Living in Toronto for several years, and being taught to 'respect women' and not look at them as sexual objects has taken a toll on my libido and fertility.

    It's I've been conditioned to go limp because of the Anglobitch, but get hard for gay sex. This is what the Anglobitch wants to happen---for me to become a homosexual fudge packer.

    When you deal with Anglobitches for several years in the Anglosphere, your body is rewired to go against nature.

    Curse the Anglobitch for making me impotent! I ain't gonna become a homo though!

    The feminist system will make you lose your desire for the opposite sex!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I struggle to get hard without porn too. I'm 30.
      In a very similar Anglo city to Toronto.

      I was an avid punter (escort connoisseur) for a couple years until earlier this year- had some good times with Asian masseuses. Now I can't even be bothered to do that.

      Even if I do get my body to peak physical condition- I will probably be 5.5 by today's standards with a very good body (would've been classified 6.5+ and handsome a decade ago), I have a 5.5 inch dick. Women today want 6.5+ inches or, apparently dog dicks.

      Don't want to be negative, but it probably won't be enough to keep a woman, who's been conditioned by the anglobitch motto of 'there's always bigger and better'.

      God damn Anglo feminism

      Delete
    2. Transforming men into eunuchs is a key focus of the Anglo-American matriarchy. If this does not occur directly, via gender reassignment, it takes place by the insidious process of desexualization described in these posts. Little by little the male libido is eroded to nothing by female sexual fascism, racism and elitism, until only the infertile husk of a man remains; a sexless serf on the Anglobitch plantation.

      Delete
    3. Yup, well put.

      Surely a new energy has to rise up though.

      Brown men contain the energy of fertility. We know how to create life.

      Despite the hatred of brown men, I am increasingly becoming proud of being one.

      Our cultures (created by brown men) aren't superficial or empty like Anglobitch culture. Our cultures understand the inner workings of life, the spiritual elements that keep people going.

      If America, the UK, Europe and Australia turn brown, one positive will be a greater push back of masculinity. The sneers and upturned noses of the anglobitch will fall on deaf ears as it is drowned out by people actually living- brown people.

      Delete
    4. Empowered women only want to fuck dogs, the top 1% of men in wealth, 6ft+ future cancer patients, or they have sex with students under their care.

      If you're a 5ft 10 brown male, you might as well be invisible to them, because your presence to these greedy white whores offends them.

      Delete
    5. I want to kick a white Anglo bitch in the face as hard as posible

      Delete
    6. The more that white feminists rule society, the more hatred I feel directed at me for being a 5'8 brown Male.

      I never felt this way 15 years ago when the 'white patriarchy' was reasonably strong in my country.

      Funny how that works for these 'anti-racist Anglo social justice fighters'

      Just look at how Megyn Rappinoe treated that Indian boy who went up to her for an autograph.

      Classist scum

      Delete
    7. Megan looks like a dijk and dressed like a whore. She thinks the Indian boy was trying to rape her. This is how white women look at every Indian man, even the Mexicans.

      Delete
  3. I wasn't aware that Carthage was matriarchal. They were extremely successful in trade while not as proficient in war as the Romans. Practically all that we know of them comes to us via Rome. Given that they were successful, it does argue against matriarchy.
    Feminism thrives in the current day because our society is rich. It is something poorer societies could not afford and one is left wonder where we would be if it hadn't taken hold. Would we have flying cars?
    -Fuzziewuzziebear

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Carthage relied on mercenaries rather than a co-alpha citizen army, which ultimately proved its undoing. Their two principal deities were Astarte and Tanit, both goddesses. Another matriarchal red flag was their propensity to child sacrifice; while the Romans amplified this in their propaganda, it was also a reality. Funny how modern matriarchal society shudders at child sacrifice when mass abortion is little more than a sacrifice on the altar of Anglo-American feminism.

      Delete
    2. I give you the bit about child sacrifice and the parallel to modern abortion. It sounds like a sick society. Still, the Romans became too dependent on conquest. They were undone the moment they reached the limit of their expansion.

      Delete
  4. @ anon Nov. 30, 1410; Brown majority demographics in North America is already guaranteed as of 2016, more non white kids were born than white 3 to 1, plus all the immigration legal and illegal. So, 5 years or less from now.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 5ft 1 brown girls settling for no less than 6ft 5 Chads doesn't count!

      Delete
    2. They sure do. Mixed kids are not white and they don't identify as white and never will as long as white male demonization remains a popular trend.

      Delete
  5. Why I do I have that pessimsitic feeling that I'm not going to have a chance to become a husband and a father, and that I'm left behind. I have a university degree, but I dropped out recently for my Phd. I didn't want to pursue it because of the feminist and white nationalist.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Why do feminists cities have such high rent prices compared to larger-sized major cities?

    Toronto and LA rent prices are going through the roof!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Because of all the feminists with overpaid pseudo-careers. Also, because of hyper-hypergamy (which is what feminism really is), these 'high-powered' feminists often have no children on which to spend their high disposable incomes. Therefore the cost of everything rises so feminists can feel the illusion of having 'achieved' some level of success.

      Of course, their 'success' is just a function of matriarchy allowing them to play life on novice mode.

      Delete
    2. If you're considered "short" in Toronto, you're in for a life of pain and suffering like this fella. He's White, but as he lamented, he's trapped for 40 years in Canada and he's being persecuted everywhere he goes:

      https://incels.co/threads/the-future-of-shortcels-in-toronto

      Delete
  7. Toronto seems to be the few cities in the world where the cost of living is brutal, the weather is insanely cold (colder than the UK or Scandinavia surprisingly), and the job market discriminates against men who are under 6 feet.

    Factor in that lots of females in Toronto are conditioned to hate sub-8 ethnic males, please go and tell your grandmother or aunty that you refuse to migrate to Canada, because you don't want to end up like a second class citizen.

    Canada is a paradise for women, but a frozen hell for males.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Melbourne, Australia fits the same description

      Delete
    2. The best thing that men in Toronto could do is vote with their feet en masse. I did as much with the town I grew up in a while ago. The first advantage you realize is that the cost of living drops while you get paid the same. What will Toronto employers do when they see they can't hire men?
      -Fuzziewuzziebear

      Delete
  8. This is on the front page of the Canadian state-sponsored media (Trudeau's mouthpiece)

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/prince-andrew-epstein-giuffre-sex-trafficking-1.5381153

    Unlike the common man, I can guess that the accuser might be given a gag order, or literally silenced forever using the deep state. #Me Too was only a tool for the elites to put the serfs in check. #Me Too'ing an elite is something that might not be a great idea.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Epstein got MeToo'd, he was part of the elite

      Delete
  9. Fuzzie, that would be easy if Toronto men weren't discriminated in the job market.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Toronto has been awful to men for a long time. Still, a young single man can get out for the price of a bus ticket if there is a couch to sleep on at the end of it. From what I am hearing, it will come down to that.
      -Fuzziewuzziebear

      Delete