Friday 8 November 2019

Making Societal Waves: Female Sexual Fascism is the Anglosphere's Watergate



Anglo-American culture typically strives to hide its own historic crimes (slavery, genocide, oppression) and internal problems (economic inequality, institutional racism and educational dysfunction). Usually, this process involves criticising other cultural blocs, as if the Anglosphere – with its prison-industrial complexdivorce industry and mass male alienation - were somehow perfect. However, mainstream Anglo-American culture also strives to suppress its internal critics. Ever noticed how 'mainstream' male spaces on the internet are heavily censored and policed in order to banish dissent? On the Ask Men website, sexless males are systematically banned by the moderators. Simply by existing, such men are challenging the Anglo-American perception of women as flawless, liberated, semi-divine beings.

However, the Manosphere goes much further: we consistently point out that Anglo-American women are sexually racist and elitist, actively confounding the Anglosphere’s core memes of female infallibility and sexual liberation. By creating societal ‘waves’ of this nature, we are proffering a direct challenge to the Anglosphere’s international image as a transcendent social entity – and such a challenge must be forcefully repressed. This is because exposing the reality of widespread Anglobitch racism or ‘sexual fascism’ not only shreds the key Anglosphere myths of moral supremacy, sexual liberation and female infallibility; it reveals the racist and puritanical roots of Anglo-American civilisation, including its left-liberalism. While Anglo tradcucks spuriously try to link Anglo-American feminism to Marxism, its intellectual DNA – like that of the Anglo left in general – really originates in imperialistic Victorian Christian Evangelism. This is why both Anglo-American feminism and liberalism retain such puritanical memes as sex-negativism, racism and woman-worship, none of which are present in classical Marxism (although neo-Marxists have appropriated them, of course).

With all these troubling memes being exposed and challenged by the Manosphere in general (and the incelosphere in particular), it is any surprise the pan-Anglosphere Deep State is knocking out our strongholds one by one? Such is the inevitable price for creating a cogent counter-narrative to Anglo-American propaganda.

Above all, exposing the reality of female sexual fascism is hugely problematic for the Anglosphere’s imperialist project. If the world at large became aware that white Anglo-American women saw non-white males as disgusting sub-humans unworthy of sex, it would halt the Anglosphere’s globalisation programme in its tracks. As Richard Scarecrow once said, Anglo women exploit sex in the same way hoarders exploit food during a famine; although they have food aplenty, they begrudge undesirable males the smallest sexual morsel. Yet gulled by the myth-peddling Anglo-American media, non-white males around the world honestly think ‘liberated’ Anglo women are clamouring to give them free sex; in reality, the Anglosphere’s mass inceldom falls heaviest on ethnic males.



But of course, exposing this cruel reality would simply create too many ‘waves’ in the global culture for the Anglo-American Deep State to countenance. Such disruptive 'waves' would not only harm its international image; they would also refute the carefully-cultivated Sexual False Consciousness which holds the Anglosphere together like a flimsy old boot lace. Let’s face it: if non-white males in the UK or North America realised Stacy, Sharon or Becky considered them to be sexual untouchables – subhuman pieces of dog shit – there would be spontaneous riots in the streets. Indeed, this ‘forbidden’ knowledge extends to low SMV white males, too. The average blue collar white chump lives in a world of self-deceit, pretending his inceldom is a ‘lifestyle choice’ or temporary ‘dry spell’; but if the scales of Sexual False Consciousness were removed from his eyes, he would immediately join the sexless non-whites at the barricades.

So what is our best course of action?

Simply to keep pumping out our message of truth in the teeth of all resistance. It is obvious that the Anglo-American Deep State and its feminist allies are on the run; and we must KEEP them running with all the might we can muster. These are great times, days of legend, and we are privileged to be living at such an hour. In the end, our relentless truth-saying will provoke our foes into a hysterical counter-stroke – thereby forcing a decisive confrontation between our light and their darkness.




47 comments:

  1. Feminism is only for white women, and only for white women. No one else!

    And after the feminists destroy the host nation, they flee to their ancestral homelands where foreigners are treated with contempt and outright banned from those countries.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Based observation. Anglo feminism is intimately related to Anglo-American cultural imperialism and despite its 'radicalised' rhetoric, is not revolutionary in any sense.

      It IS the Anglo-American establishment, as I have been saying for many years, now.

      Delete
    2. Feminism is White women beefing with white men for power.

      It's between a struggle for power between white men and white women. Everyone else is excluded.

      If ABC (American, UK, Canada) feminism really cared for women, they would stop sex workers from being treated as pariahs in the real world. Instead, feminists are against sex workers.

      Feminists are also against objectification, yet encourage old hags to show their boobs and front holes to school children as sexual education.

      Feminism is a white woman's source of power, and her kryptonite will likely be the sexless immigrants that she supported to use as wage slaves in this Anglobitch plantation, and also further her feminist cause by brainwashing the female migrants.

      A day of reckoning is coming, but when?

      Delete
    3. Sometime in the early 2020s the Anglosphere's dysfunctional contradictions will have to be addressed. I don't know what will happen or who will win but expect some real action. I can feel it in my bones.

      Delete
    4. I agree the first half of the 2020s will be interesting Rookh.

      I notice more white men feeling utterly negative toward white women. Anglo women have nowhere else to go- how much more degenerate and hateful can they get? How much more of a miserable, antagonistic society can they create.

      The migrant brothers in my area (Indian, Chinese and Middle Eastern) are a little less self conscious than us 2nd generations. They walk around expressing themselves however they want, and the Anglo women don't seem to have the balls to say much.

      Immigration in my city is exploding, and the next 5 years should be interesting indeed.

      Delete
  2. Vishal Sharma
    9 reviews
    a week ago
    If there is a option of zero star. I would give them 0. Not worthy. First, you need to pay them front 50$, then girl will ask you $ 140 only in the room. Even, if you will pay them $ 190 total, the girls will again ask you more money. If you are not agree, then theu will try to insult you during session so you can go out asap.
    There are many good spas around that area where in $160 you can get good service.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The pussy scarcity is bad for Brown men in the Anglobitch plantation!

    $190 and the bitches still won't do anything!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I doubt it's just a problem for brown men, though probably somewhat worse for them. Even Anglobitch hos are hypergamous, sexual fascists...

      Delete
  4. For decades feminists have been fighting against the legalization of prostitution in America. It's funny, feminists say they are all for women being able to do whatever they want with their bodies (abortion) but when it comes something like prostitution, the feminist are vehemently against it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anglo-American feminists only like freedom when it involves increasing the scarcity value of sex and killing unborn children.

      Delete
    2. James Bond,
      The typical cunt from the States or Canada would rather fuck a dog or a pre-teen school bully than to even let a man look at her accidentally while crossing the street.

      Delete
  5. It is probably futile to try and unite with Anglo males and incite them to oppose the feminine imperative. Anglo males will always white knight, supplicate and simp at women as it is their basic nature to do so. And doing so is a form of competition against other males.
    I have seen so many middle class educated Anglo males chase, simp and beg at Anglo women who are not interested in them, often carrying on for years, and believing that the scraps of attention they get in return are a sign that they are getting somewhere. And who do you think pays for all these e-thots on the web? Mostly Anglo males.
    There is no point in even encouraging Anglo males to leave the country and go elsewhere as they will just take their supplicating ways with them. And when these men go abroad, they actually believe that they are better than the local men, due to being some kind of liberator (i.e. a white knight), when in reality they are merely richer.
    Anglo males will only question the feminine imperative when they have been incelled for years on end. Even then, the minute they think they are getting somewhere with a woman, they will start white knighting and pulling other men down. It is probably atavistic.
    I don't believe however that Anglo women are simply racist against ethnic males, at least not in a straight forward manner. I suspect ethnic males don't do worse with Anglo white women than white males do, except for reasons such as social segregation, not getting enough opportunities to meet Anglo women, not being invited to parties etc. Indeed Anglo white males will often restrict the access of non white males by keeping them at arms length from the social scene.
    Many Anglo women will prefer non-Anglo men to Anglo men. This is why Salsa dancing is so popular in the the Anglosphere, because Anglo women actually prefer the darker skinned Latin male. Many Anglo women actually dislike the supplicating Anglo male.
    If you are an ethnic male in the Anglosphere, it is best to lose any preconceptions about your status (based on education, job etc), improve your physique and personality and try and improve your game with women. For some ethnic men, this will provide results.
    Anglo white guys will keep quiet about their failures and inceldom, while Indians will often complain after making a few inexperienced approaches at women and not getting any results.
    Indians feel let down by rejection because they have a hierarchy in their head, which just doesn't apply in the Anglosphere, and often the education and qualifications and job do not make a man more attractive in the the West (whereas in Asia and especially the subcontinent, it undoubtedly does), whereas his personal charm and life experience and knowledge and level of articulacy will have a much bigger impact.
    Sometimes, the gynocracy will be an advantage to the ethnic male. It is usually the Anglo male who tries to restrict the ethnic male. However, as Anglo Women have a great deal of independence from Anglo Males, and often live quite independently, it is not difficult for ethnic males to get together with these women, though of course they do need to still make these women attracted to them. It is not like say, a Middle Eastern society, where the local women will simply not be available for an Indian immigrant to even talk to, let alone try to get into a relationship with.
    Ethnic men should try and improve their attractiveness in the Western context, and use what advantages they have to get Anglo women. As with white men, they will face rejection on the way to success. But there is no point in hating Anglo women. Instead it is better to forgive and accept the fickle and erratic nature of Anglo women, and the reality of the sexual market place and lose any old preconceptions about your own pre-existing status within it and try and reinvent yourself to succeed within it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. An ANGLOBITCH wrote this comment. Nothing to see here, folks!

      Delete
    2. It should be obvious that the comment was written by an Ethnic Male to give encouragement to other Ethnic Males, and not by an Anglobitch.

      Delete
    3. Your comment intends to placate and give false hope to the bottom 80% of men by trying harder like a donkey chasing a carrot on a stick.

      The only way that the bottom of 80% will ever get sex, much less a woman to date and respect him, is if the current structure collapses and the feminists are no longer in power.

      Delete
    4. *There is no point in even encouraging Anglo males to leave the country and go elsewhere as they will just take their supplicating ways with them. And when these men go abroad, they actually believe that they are better than the local men, due to being some kind of liberator (i.e. a white knight), when in reality they are merely richer.
      Anglo males will only question the feminine imperative when they have been incelled for years on end. Even then, the minute they think they are getting somewhere with a woman, they will start white knighting and pulling other men down. It is probably atavistic.*

      I think this obviously relates to the latent imperialism which inflects the Anglo worldview (including, interestingly, the Anglo 'left'). I would suggest the artificial sexual scarcity engendered by residual Anglo puritanism is the major factor underpinning these issues, rather than just genetics (although I think that genetics definitely plays a part). It is fairly obvious that non-white women become strongly entitled when raised in an Anglo cultural environment, while even white women become somewhat more affable when removed from the Anglosphere. My correspondent Brian (a white American married to an American white woman) saw this when they moved to France. There is a real difference between Anglo expatriates who move to European countries and those who go to non-white regions like SEA; the former genuinely want to 'go native' while the latter (as you say) seek to impose the White Knight meme on their adopted country and its non-white menfolk. This probably relates to the different types of expatriate as much as the different types of country they relocate to.

      Delete
    5. As a middle eastern Male, I like Anglo/white guys and see their predicament.

      Sure, on average they have higher smv than most groups of ethnics, but that doesn't mean too much in this dating market. The women today submit to no man.

      It's hard for them to side with immigrant men- many of whom would be hostile to them.

      I really do believe white guys are bowing out quietly in society- in terms of having a cultural influence in the future.

      It really is up to ethnic men to reinstill gender roles and patriarchy.

      After all, as Jack Donovan has said, it is always the barbarians, the low status men with nothing to lose, who storm the doors down and (re)start civilization.

      Delete
  6. This is why Salsa dancing is so popular in the the Anglosphere, because Anglo women actually prefer the darker skinned Latin male. Many Anglo women actually dislike the supplicating Anglo male.

    It's because Latin music is popyular, and Drake is on the bandwagon. Nothing to do with Latino men. Anglobitches would reject Latino men on the basis that they are 5ft6 and 5ft 7, and if they are more European 5ft8-5ft 10 such as in Colombia.
    If you are an ethnic male in the Anglosphere, it is best to lose any preconceptions about your status (based on education, job etc), improve your physique and personality and try and improve your game with women. For some ethnic men, this will provide results.

    It's like chasing a carrot on a stick. If Rookh can't get a white woman, what makes you think that the 5ft 5 foreign student from India has a chance?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Actually I have been told by women who do Salsa that the reason women like it is partly due to the fantasy of the Latin Lover. I suspect they are dreaming of the Antonio Banderas type of man.
      Why do you say that Rookh can't get a white woman. He may not like the quality available but has he said that he can't get one?
      A foreign student from India who is inept and awkward will struggle with women, but if he practices, learns from his mistakes and keeps at it eventually he will become successful. Indians fail with women because they make a few inept attempts and then give up, not because they are Indian. Go to any university in the West and you will see a few Indian guys with white girlfriends. Some of these relationships end in marriage. Being 5ft5 is not a deal breaker. Most women are around this height, and you will see plenty of men of this height with girlfriends if you look around you.

      Delete
    2. Rich Punjabi guys with white gold diggers don't count.

      Unless one is from a high caste Brahmin society and is 5ft 10 minimum, no white woman would even want to be near such a man.

      Delete
    3. *Rich Punjabi guys with white gold diggers don't count.

      Unless one is from a high caste Brahmin society and is 5ft 10 minimum, no white woman would even want to be near such a man.*

      This.

      Delete
    4. * Rich Punjabi guys with white gold diggers don't count.

      OMG I lol'd so hard!

      Delete
  7. But there is no point in hating Anglo women. Instead it is better to forgive and accept the fickle and erratic nature of Anglo women, and the reality of the sexual market place and lose any old preconceptions about your own pre-existing status within it and try and reinvent yourself to succeed within it.

    Why do you sound like an ANGLOBITCH?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't think the answer lies in forgiveness. We need to take this personally.
      -Fuzziewuzziebear

      Delete
  8. While reading this blog, I can't avoid being reminded of James Michener's novel Texas. While all sorts of barriers were put up to prevent men leaving Germany, none worked.They came here to own the land they intended to work. How much stronger is the motivation for present day men?
    As for Rookh's prediction, the longer it is put off, the more explosive will be the result. It is not going to be pretty.
    For those who have not read the book, it is a great and easy read.
    -Fuzziewuzziebear

    ReplyDelete
  9. The Anglobitch has waged war against the bottom 80% of men, and the Anglobitch now expects us to forgive them while she is posting anti-male content on Buzzfeed and her dog is licking her peanut butter coated roast beef!

    ReplyDelete
  10. The Anglobitch has waged war against the bottom 80% of men, and the Anglobitch now expects us to forgive them while she is posting anti-male content on Buzfeed and her dog is lycking her peanut butter coated roast beef!

    ReplyDelete
  11. "Let’s face it: if non-white males in the UK or North America realised Stacy, Sharon or Becky considered them to be sexual untouchables – subhuman pieces of dog shit – there would be spontaneous riots in the streets."

    This should be told to every prospective man who wishes to immigrate to Canada, America, UK or Australia.

    Non-white men have to face hate from both the left and right political spectrums. There is just no winning unless there is an Incel revolution and clash of civilizations.

    While Rookh's counterpart Roosh V supports the Alt-Right which hates him because feminists also too, there is no one else who could represent non-white and immigrant males who are more likely to be adversely affected by the hypergamous and eugenic behaviour of the Anglo-bitch.

    As one subscriber has alluded, white feminists only want to control white men, but they don't have contempt for them as they have for non-white men.

    Likewise, if white feminists dropped their feminist ideas, the white nationalists would forgive them in a heartbeat. But the hate for non-white men remains the same.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I am reasonably decent looking brown man (only 5'8), and brown immigrant women in the west used to hit on me a few years ago. Now they even look at me like I ain't shit!

      The anglobitch has conditioned our own women against us. They want us to fail.

      Another story-my 5'6 brown uncle was once on a date with an Anglo girl. They were dancing at a bar, and another Anglo girl came up to her and asked her loudly 'is he paying you?' Reducing my uncle's date to tears!

      I agree with Rookh's assessment of what they think of us.

      Delete
    2. The Anglobitch despises all men as her inferiors; and puritanical Anglo culture (as well as misandrist, racist Anglo feminism) both exert a potent influence on immigrant women, instilling exactly the same misandry/sexual fascism.

      This is why men should only pursue relationships outside the Anglosphere; an immigrant woman within the Anglosphere will soon be infected by institutional misandry.

      Delete
    3. Regarding your uncle with his date, if you are an Indian man and going out with a white woman, you will get a certain amount of hate from time to time. You should get used to it and be unfazed. Have a polite or even rude retort to their animosity to hand. If you handle these types of situations well, women will respect you more. Don't wilt away because you got a bit of hate from somewhere. These kinds of experiences should make you stronger. By the way, most of the haters you will get will be white men, not women. You will get some hate from other non white males, especially groups like Arabs. Also, you will get quite a bit of hate from western Indian women. Actually, compared to some of these other groups, Anglo women are not so bad. The most hate I have witnessed is from western Indian women, who always seem to run down Indian men, especially to their white women friends. Secondly, I have had occasions when white men I know (I am South Asian), colleagues or friends, have tried to cockblock me, quite obviously because of my race. That is why I don't believe that it makes sense for an Indian man to side strongly with white males with a view to working against Anglo women. It may be worthwhile trying to defeat political feminism, but when it comes to day to day life and social interaction, white women will treat you better than white men will, white men who are always scheming to exclude other groups of men, especially Indian men, while secretly also conspiring to get non white women for themselves. If you look at some groups of mixed sex younger people, you will see the males are almost exclusively white, while there will be quite a few non white women among the females of the group. I have noticed this phenomenon in many social groups. It is how white men conspire to increase their options at the expense of non white males. It is also why you will notice that from a young age the western Indian girls always have white boyfriends while the Indian guys are incels. It is because the Indian girls are welcome with open arms, while the Indian guy is excluded from the social settings.
      On a side note, the 80/20 rule is a bit of a trope, and may be true in the nightclub context, but not on a day to day context in the real World. But even if it was true, don't assume that Indians are all in the bottom 80 percent, which is an absurdity. The main problem with Indians, especially those who immigrated as adults is their poor social skills in the western context. So Indians should work on improving their social skills and get their fair share of the feminine pie.

      Delete
  12. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Misandric gynocracy will be remembered as one of the most psychopathic systems there has ever been, it alienates attractive men, hunts down wealthy men with social status, etc.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Height and money are the only two factors that these man-hating feminist cunts ever want!

      Delete
    2. Lite Wing,
      I don't have anything to back me up, but I have the sinking feeling that humanity has been down this road before. It's not working now and I doubt that it worked then.
      -Fuzziewuzziebear

      Delete
  14. With the way things are going in the Anglosphere right now e.g. rampant misandry, excessive puritanism towards male heterosexuality by women (the heterosexual men of the top 5-20% women deem as attractive are off the hook from this puritanical oppression), demonization of men in all media outlets, Anglosphere women from all racial, ethnic and religious backgrounds revealing their true natures i.e. hyper-hypergamous sexual mercenaries, and Anglosphere women having the full force of the government and legal system behind them in having the lives and careers of innocent men destroyed outright via #metoo; expect more heterosexual men in the Anglosphere to embrace and follow MGTOW in ever increasing numbers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. How can one go MGTOW if they're not a Boomer who had decades of working age to save up cash, buy a home when it was cheaper pre-feminism, and also have passive income due to higher capital earnings, compared to a young adult who is being targeted for discrimination in the job market, and also have to pay high rent prices due to feminism making it harder for locals due to mass immigration, competition for jobs and also single females driving the demand for housing?

      Delete
    2. You'll be surprised by the growing number of younger men in the Anglosphere who are taking a strong interest in MGTOW after seeing how bad Anglosphere women really are in this day and age. One example is MGTOW's growing popularity among teenage boys in Australia over the past few years.

      No matter how much money a man in the Anglosphere makes, it's always "not enough" for the Anglobitch and she will always search out for the "bigger, better deal" and "monkey branch" to other men frequently for money and/or sex.

      Delete
  15. You'll be interested in this, people. My recent thesis on sexual equality and birth rates introducing a toll on promiscuity (Flower Power Tax euphemistically) as a means of demographic controls. For the sake of sexual equality and social justice, and with freedom of choice. It sells easily. You can understand it as a tax to polyamory. Men pay it for hoarding and woman for discriminating with their hypergamy. It will help in moderating growing inequalities in the access to sex, low birth rates, persistent violence and greed in men, obsession with looks, bloated conspicuous consumption, and debt in the long run.

    Bottom line is that sexual freedom is not equality, rather the opposite it implies brutal inequalities in the access to sex, specially among men. Sexual freedom only resembles equality among homosexuals, who nonetheless are also subject to harsh lookism and racism. They give a false impression to heterosexuals on how lightly relationships could work, but the dynamics of power among normal people is completely different. In a similar way to how we look for equality in the labor market and society, we must care for equality in the sexual market for a healthy society. My proposal sells better in more secular Europe, but it should be extended to the whole West and possibly the whole world soon. The European Parliament and Commission, the Canadian Senate and some American politicians have been informed. I'll send it to the whole US congress and senate soon.

    Too Long / Didn't Read (TL/DR) at the end. The structure of the document is as follows:

    1st part. Flower Power Tax (sent 07-2019)
    - Presentation
    - Intro
    - The toll thing
    - Rationale
    - Conclusions, Alternative and Food for Thought

    2nd part. Academic Supports (sent 08-2019):

    - Analysis of Women As Sex Vendors (Mary Marcy 1919)
    - Rehash with several articles and documents

    3rd part. Add-On to EU (sent 10-2019)
    - Last e-mail insisting on the application of the measure.


    Feel free to comment on it right below this comment. Cheers.




    https://www.academia.edu/40699045/Flower_Power_Tax_Academic_Supports_FULL_

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. *In today's society we are all in favor of equality in the labor market AND in favor of total freedom in the sexual market, naively thinking that freedom implies equality in this last domain. Freedom is not equality. We have been sold a lie.*

      The lie persists because its 'winners' (the sexually successful) write all the stories in the mainstream media. Only since the rise of social media have the 'losers' (incels, divorced men, poor men, ethnics in white countries) had any voice at all. Narratives are like genes, with only a small majority being successful. In the West, only narratives which broadly support the existing social order are permitted to exist in the 'mainstream' culture. The hysterical 'mainstream' need to suppress incel commentary is obviously driven by this agenda: in simple terms, they 'don't like it'.

      *Women value power, wealth and protection; and this is what they seek in a man.*

      Only when looking for a long term partner (or beta cuck to 'pick up the pieces'). In their prime teens and twenties, women want looks, height, frame and Dark Triad traits.


      *Those who still believe in their options, compete among themselves using displays of status (luxury cars, trips, clothes...), often cannibalizing one another with fights and aggressive behaviors; all of them in hopes of reaching the top of the hierarchy and gaining the precious favor of women, even if it is just for a short time.*

      London 'Gangsta Culture' in the UK is a prime example of this, with young black males casually stabbing each other for virtually nothing. This obviously relates to the breakdown of monogamy and a 'rugged' sexual market consequently arising in those communities. The West's fraying trust values in general arise from this 'cannibalisation' process.

      On the whole your paper is a good description of the situation. However, no one in authority will bother to read it because it confounds the prevailing Anglo narrative that women are 'perfect' and the Sexual Revolution works for everyone. Only when the West starts to truly disintegrate in the 2020s will the Western elites be forced to address these issues, if they bother at all.

      As a last point, I sometimes wonder if media/political elites really know what is going on but refuse to act, or if they are just completely naive about the situation. The right still seem to think we are living in the 1950s while the left cannot admit that their Sexual Revolution went off the rails due to female hypergamy and racism.

      Delete
  16. "It turns that a man who is 5.10 (1,78m) will have toearn 13.000$ more a year to be considered at the same level as a man who is 6.2 (1,88m),so the price of the cm is 1.300$ annually."

    A decade ago, Justin Beiber was only 5"3 at age 14, and even as recent as 2015, he was at 5"7. No wonder he's been suicidal lately---Being a millionaire pop star at age 25, but only at 5"7-8-ish is a sexual death sentence for men these days.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This was an old study. It would approximate values for current Spain in intuitive terms. In the US a recent study talked about 5.000$ per cm and year.

      Delete
  17. Are we going through a Dark Ages of sexuality? For thousands of years, the median height for humans was never over 5ft 10, and even Abraham Lincoln at 6ft 4 was considered a giant at the time, but females weren't drooling over him and rejecting men left right and center because of the height.

    They say that in Toronto, if a man is as handsome as Tom Cruise, but below 6ft 5, he's considered the bottom 80% of men.

    Pussy inflation is severe in the feminist cities. The more feminist a city, the more demand that foids want from men.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It is strange that feminism preaches equality between the sexes, yet in reality sets the hypergamy bar to insane levels against men. However, when you consider the puritanical, misandrist principles underpinning Anglo feminism, this deranged double-standard become far more understandable.

      Delete
  18. Cold weather (at least in Canada, UK, Scandinavia, Western Europe, and the upper states of America),

    Feminism

    Frigid women

    Growing racism against immigrants

    and you have factors which are against deathnicks (ethnic incels).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Australian women are very frigid towards the 80-95% of heterosexual men who are not part of the top 5-20% of heterosexual men they desire, and the weather is completely different i.e. warm and hot.

      Delete
    2. It's because Australian women are actually Europeans. Australia is only a "white" country because it's still a colony of England.

      Delete