White working class men are hated by the Anglo-American political establishment (the natural heirs to British Victorian paternalism) because they can’t be easily bracketed and patronized. Above all, they have shown a long-standing tendency to reject elite values and culture, and this non-malleability is the true source of the elite's antipathy. Though this piece is tangential to the Anglobitch Thesis, it offers some insight into why misandry now characterises the whole Anglosphere.
He was white, Anglo-Saxon, heterosexual and fed up of being told he was shit (John King, The Football Factory: 116).
In New (read matriarchal) Britain, the raw, instinctive masculinity of white, working class men has been vilified by the new Anglo-liberal matriarchy while women’s idiotic quiescence to the meaningless hoops of a degraded State education system has been unstintingly lionized.
Why is this? The Anglo-elite promote a specific form of paternalist liberal neo-Christianity distinct from authentic radical political traditions, which has a natural alignment with Anglo feminism. Its first instinct is to assume the cultural inferiority of its ‘charges’; hence it favors malleable social elements like women or blacks, whom it perceives to be without a pre-existent culture that might deflect their attempts at paternalist manipulation. Of course, this favoritism is informed by a convoluted racism and sexism; but it clearly explains why Anglo women and blacks have been unstintingly lionized for the past 30 years or more. By contrast, the white working class has been instinctively loathed by the same limousine liberals, because it refuses to accede to this agenda. This is more intense in Britain than anywhere else, no doubt an expression of paternalist British Exceptionalism, but the same attitude finds expression across the Anglosphere (not least the United States).
This is because the British white working class has a long history of rejecting the cultural ‘gifts’ of the Anglo-British elite, above any other excluded social group. Foremost of these gifts was the Christian religion, instinctively loathed by the English working class for its milksop morality, intellectual idiocy and cringing hypocrisy. Mass rejection of Anglican Christianity remains THE key source of the long-standing antipathy between the white working class and the Anglo elite in Britain – the REAL reason why white working class race-crime victims are ignored, or why they are generally banished from the media and politics. A potent proletarian tradition of mass emigration, autonomous community schools, refusing to vote, rejecting Christian values, school truancy, robust Trades Unions and sturdy hostility to mass immigration – all represented a coherent rejection of paternalist culture that still makes the Anglo elite seethe. By contrast, blacks (not Asians, Jews or the Irish, who all retain coherent cultural traditions) and women are the darlings of the Anglo-American elite, in both Britain and America. This is partly because they are perceived as more malleable, without a culture of their own – and thus easier to coerce and manipulate.
Having failed to delude the white working class of the benefits of Christianity, the Victorian Anglo-American Missionary movement turned to Africa where its Gamma-milksop delusions could be imposed with no cultural opposition. This goes some way to explaining why the British ruling elite were so keen to end slavery (typically for Black Africans) while remaining indifferent to the appalling working conditions experienced by the white working class in unregulated early capitalism (children up chimneys, and so on - read Corelli Barnett's The Collapse of British Power). Simply put, the Black slaves were malleable targets for Anglo-American elite paternalism, while the white working class was already beginning to resist its coercion and thus persona non-grata.
This is why the Anglo-American elite have tried their damnedest in recent years to transform the proud, autonomous white working class into a Welfare dependent underclass (with no small success) – because an underclass is infinitely more malleable and easier to patronize. The same can be said of women. Reams of psychological research show women to be far more pliant to authority and public opinion than men (read Glenn Wilson's The Great Sex Divide). And women have positively waxed under the NAMWO (New Anglo Matriarchal World Order) – been shown preferential treatment in healthcare and education, lionized in the media and generally exalted on pedestals. In other words, women are easy to patronize – and thus benefit from a plethora of preferential treatments.
In short, everywhere we look the Anglo-American elite has recently done everything it has to promote groups it perceives to be malleable - and denigrate, erase or ostracize those with autonomous cultural traditions. In a complex, convoluted way, this is a kind of racism/sexism that assumes blacks/women to be intellectually and culturally inferior. Since black America recently found its own voice and identity distinct from liberal expectations, one would expect the long-standing love affair between blacks and 'Limousine Liberals' to wither. After all, the same process occurred in Britain during the Victorian era, when the white working class eschewed the drivel proclaimed from Anglican pulpits, for which the Anglo elites have never forgiven them.
From this perspective, the BNP (British National Party) is the product of a long-standing conflict between the autonomous English working class and the outraged Anglo elite – and the same essential conflict is reflected throughout the Anglosphere. The real hatred of the BNP from the British Establishment hails not from its policies – many Conservatives are just as racist – but because it represents an autonomous working class (and largely male) organization outside paternalist control – not unlike football hooliganism:
With football you make a choice. It’s no easy option. You don’t want to bottle out in front of your mates, and the more your reputation develops the more pressure there is to perform. Still, it’s freedom of choice because I’m doing it for myself, not because the wankers in power tell me. That’s what they don’t like (King: 105).
The charge of 'racism' serves as a useful smokescreen for simple antipathy towards autonomy of thought, deed and association by the disenfranchised – an unforgivable sin to Anglo-American paternalists.