Wednesday, 2 May 2012
Ugly Realities: Social Media and the New Internationalism
It is fascinating how closed-circuit television, mobile phones and the Internet are bringing nations together. By this, I mean building a visceral, intimate connection between countries separated by oceans and continents.
In the age of the legacy media – TV, radio, the press – sanitized images of nations could be presented to the world without contradiction. For example, most non-British people saw this country as a huge theme-park full of castles, stately homes and private schools reaching back into antiquity. The reality of Britain – the most uneducated people in Europe, a vast underclass, crumbling cities and mass unemployment – only ever emerged by accident. Last summer’s urban riots were a good example. Suddenly, the legacy media could no longer disguise these cracks in Britain's national facade – the truth was plain for all to see.
Similarly, countries with a sunny, healthy image – Australia springs to mind – often conceal a much darker reality. John Pilger’s classic study of Australia – An Unknown Country – exposes a country damaged by race conflict, nuclear testing and an appalling male suicide rate. These pressing problems seldom find much expression in Neighbours or Home and Away, however.
Now, as we all know, Anglo-American culture has a compulsive urge to 'pedestalise' women - a function of its underlying puritanism. And of course, this obsession extends to the Anglo-American media. In TV shows and films, American women are invariably presented as nubile, friendly angels brimming over with sexual charm – a far cry from the obese, frigid, deranged harpies actually prowling the streets of America. However, as has already been pointed out, the emergence of social media circumvents the mainstream media’s concerted ‘reality blackout’. A street scuffle can be made available to millions of viewers in a matter of seconds. And predictably, this unedited immediacy reveals a much uglier side to Anglo-American women than is ever permitted by the legacy media.
Below, we see several clips of English females spouting racist abuse with little or no provocation. I present these partly to confound the old pedestalisation agenda; partly for entertainment; but mainly to build trans-national understanding of the Anglobitch phenomenon.
I wonder what Fleming and Futrelle would have to say about this expose of their precious 'angels'? Since a hysterical hatred of reality pervades all mangina thought-processes, probably very little.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Rookh wrote:
ReplyDelete"Now, as we all know, Anglo-American culture has a compulsive urge to 'pedestalise' women - a function of its underlying puritanism. And of course, this obsession extends to the Anglo-American media. In TV shows and films, American women are invariably presented as nubile, friendly angels brimming over with sexual charm – a far cry from the obese, frigid, deranged harpies actually prowling the streets of America."
How true this is! The mainstream media in the US shows woman as loving, caring, friendly and feminine. Just the opposite is true!
Women in America are hateful, unfriendly and certainly unfeminine. Most men in the US know this, so the mainstream media is not pulling the wool over anyones eyes.
Don't even get me started with how many morbidly obese women there are in America. Most anlgo-women have the charm of a poisinous snake and should be avoided like the plague!
Here in the US, women simply do not smile (instead they have a scowl on their face) and they have a deep subconscious hatred of men.
It's funny how the mainstream media never talks about the fact that more and more men in the US are getting married to foreign women. Also, the news media never brings up the fact that in America 72% of divorces are initiated by women.
In the US, women are portrayed as loving, kind, sexy, slim and loyal to their man. We all know just the opposite is true!
When I think about the idea of getting involved with an American woman, I don't know whether or not I should laugh .......... or vomit!
Rookh:
ReplyDelete"I wonder what Fleming and Futrelle would have to say about this expose of their precious angels?"
LOL, I'm sure those two clowns are penning articles, even as we speak, assuring women that 'not all men are like that.'
Actually, as far as exposes go, all them and their disciples would have to do is open their eyes and see for themselves. Like you showed, those videos were all in very public places: Tommy and Davy could see these things for themselves. I see nearly every day in America, the cold-blooded, thug-hunting 'angels'. I think these guys live in such a state of deep denial that nothing would change their minds.
James Bond:
ReplyDeleteWell-said. The media, though, can't ignore that more and more men are pursuing foreign women; so they ridicule, shame, and stereotype it. But the media blitzkrieg isn't slowing down the trend any. I read another interesting statistic from the recent US census: of married Asian women, 22% have American-born husbands!
I've also noticed that as social networking grows, more and more younger men are pursuing foreign women as well. I've met several high-school and college-age guys over here who've told me they don't bother dating American women at all; but meet foreign women online and go out of the country during their semester breaks.
"of married Asian women, 22% have American-born husbands!"
DeleteSo Asian women prefer American men, maybe? What does this all prove really, except that we're all more geographically mobile, adventurous or bored, even.
Why do 'adventurous trends' usually tend to result in Anglo males shunning Anglo women, then?
DeleteFrom Wiki regarding 'The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie':
ReplyDelete"Feeling herself fated one way or another, Brodie acts as if she transcends morality."
Feminism, whatever its professed aims, ultimately leads its followers to a state of hubris; they become the Herrenvolk in their own minds. Hence reality becomes a source of Nemesis and betrayal for them; so they seek scapegoats.
If they live lonely lives amongst 'foreigners', then race is the scapegoat; whereas if they live 'unfulfilled' suburban lives, then men are the chosen Untermensch.
Firstly, read the book and interpret the character yourself, you lazy bastard.
DeleteSecondly, your constant employment of Nazi terminology is really quite disturbing and, frankly, mindnumbingly stupid! I would suggest you take a look at Nazi ideology concerning the treatment and uses of women.
Oh, the delicious irony *rubs hands gleefully together* See those women on public transport ranting and raving because the world doesn't look quite how they think it should? That's you, that is! She thinks white people are marginalised, you think men are maginalised - the rest of us think you're all stupid, paranoid losers. Prejudice always looks ugly and insane, remember that. Calling yourself a 'mens rights advocate' or a 'tradionalist scholar' does nothing to stop you sounding like trash.
ReplyDeleteAnon 0804:
ReplyDeleteJust because you disagree with something doesn't mean that it's incorrect. Similarly, might never equaled right. Did the sun revolve around the Earth?
Besides, what makes Rookh a 'loser' exactly?
A little mouse said:
ReplyDelete"the rest of us think you're all stupid, paranoid losers."
How do you know what others think? Do they 'speak' to you from the nacht und nebel of your inner thoughts?
*That's you, that is!*
ReplyDeleteNot really. I don't rant or rave at anyone on public transport.
*Prejudice always looks ugly and insane, remember that.*
A message misandrist Anglo feminists would do well to take to heart.
"Not really. I don't rant or rave at anyone on public transport."
ReplyDeleteOh dear, Rookh, no! You see her medium is public transport, yours is a public blog. She is like a deliciously shorthand metaphor for you and your kind. It is perfectly succinct! Do you understand?
To Jimmy-'How do you know what others think?'-Giro, you too would benefit from not taking everything so literally. Also, referencing the Nazis in order to defeat an argument is about as cheap and nasty (and impotent) as it gets! By the way, I meant 'impotent' in the non-literal sense, OK? I'm not in anyway suggesting you can't physically satisfy a lady.
Oh dear, Rookh, no! You see her medium is public transport, yours is a public blog.
DeleteYet Rookh comes off as measured and sensible, while she comes off as a horse's ass. Go figure.
"Oh dear, Rookh, no! You see her medium is public transport, yours is a public blog. She is like a deliciously shorthand metaphor for you and your kind. It is perfectly succinct! Do you understand?"
ReplyDeleteWell, the difference between the two is that, whilst the woman is venting her views to an audience that doesn't necessarily want to listen, Rookh is posting his views on a blog which nobody is obliged to visit if they don't want to.
Exactly right, Rick. The ranting woman seeks to impose her views, I merely offer mine.
ReplyDeleteJimmy Giro:
ReplyDeleteIsn't it funny how these liberal feminists and Socon Anglo-Puritans always get defensive whenever Nazis are mentioned? Maybe the comparison hits a little too close to the truth for them!
'The rest of us all think you're stupid, paranoid losers.'
ReplyDeleteWhich pretty well describes the rest of the civilized world's attitude towards Anglo- American culture. So who are the real 'stupid losers?' LOL
It is true that Indian men (from India) like you, have the record in minimum average penis size in the world?
ReplyDeleteLook. If you don't like whites, don't come to OUR LANDS.
And, if you ever go to my country, Uruguay, I have a rope for you.
Fucking non-white.
Bow to you superior caste, untouchable.
Only non-whites comments here.
ReplyDeleteIf you don't like Caucasians, or Europeans, or the name you want to use, DON'T COME TO OUR LANDS.
Or are you masochists?
The evil White men is going to haunt you, bitches. Like always. We have plenty of genocides to prove it.
We have won battles with 1 to 10 ratio. Like the battles Conquistadors won to the Aztecs.
You are nothing.
Only Chinese and Japanese men can compare to us.
Anders Breivik is a Hero.
ReplyDeleteAnd I don't even have a single drop of Viking blood.
But I'm a typical Western European Man. With a R1B1 genetic marker and all. And Western civilization es MY civilization.
You aren't a Western men. You are only a guest.
Every time that you call yourself a "Western Man", the world laughs.
Look at Bollywood. The Hindu Hollywood.
ReplyDeleteLook at their women stars. Their actress. The bunch of whores all try to look "whitish". Yea. Even have a cream to look more white, to fair their skin.
haha. You are hurt, non-white. Perhaps our women have been intelligent enough to reject you all your miserable life.
In Uruguay we know how to treat scum like you.
And if an Anglo man or woman want to live here, you are welcome. Also, Argentina is a god option too.
And... even South Brazil is a good option too, Anglos.
ReplyDeleteThe most developed part in the fucking country. Overwhelming White, of course.
And Brazil is more... well... no so "rainbow democracy, peace and flowers". In 130 years of Republic, Brazil NEVER HAVE HAD A NEGRO PRESIDENT LIKE THE MONKEY IN CHIEF, OBAMA. Even if the country is 51% non-white.
Look at the Brasilean fashion models. All overwhelming European in aparience. Or the Brasilean Senate.
THATS IS THE FUCKING REALITY. A CASTE SOCIETY, LIKE IN INDIA.
And, of course, Anglos, leave the non-whites vomit their anger for no getting White women. 90% of commenter's in this pathetic site are ENEMIES and want our destruction.
ReplyDeleteYou are a white man and hurt? Well, nobody say that women are easy. And the most desirable race of women... well.... it's logical that they have a inflated egos. Males of all the races in the world look at them aand desire them. And hate them if they don't want to pollute their blood.
Get past you bitterness, and be a man. Start joining us in
www.stormfront.org.
The stormfront guy says:
Delete"Bow down to the white goddess"
And so ends his genetic line.
I bet 1 peso to this:
ReplyDeleteThis guy jerk-off to porn with "blondes anglobitches" every single day of his miserable life.
It's a shame that you don't have the genetics to generate this beauty, no?
You need a White man and a White Woman for that.
Uruguay Nitwit:
ReplyDeleteThanks for posting these. Now I understand why Uruguanian women want nothing to do with the males in their own culture and marry out of it as soon as possible.
I doubt that you can locate my country in a world map, so talking about the women in my country is risible.
DeleteI don't know where are you. But i can tell you this: I. A south American man, I'am more Westerner than you. That is what every person outside the western world are going to tell you if they see.
You can say the same? I know you can't. So, get out of our countries, bitch.
I am more westerner living in my little south american country than a Paki born in London can ever be.
ReplyDeleteAND THAT IS THE FUCKING TRUTH.
You understand, Rook bitch, and the other non-white bitches here?
What are you going to do, bitches? Crying "racism"?
ReplyDeleteMeanwhile you spit here racist stereotypes about Anglos?
Hell. I am not even Anglo and see clearly what are you doing here, bitches. An Attack to the White Race. That is it.
And... if you want war, you are going to be crushed, fucked, destroyed. And you are going to cry like little bitches, like always.
Anglos and Spanish. We kicked more non-white ass than all the other Europeans together.
And you aren't going to be different.
Uruguay Blockhead:
ReplyDeleteHow come you Nazi retards never like to talk about the latent homosexuality in your New Order? You know the Nazi Party was founded by homosexuals like Roehm.
Not to mention your obsessions with creating 'the perfect man' and goose-stepping around in your tight uniforms in your all- male dormitories LOL.
Did you know that your Nazi salute was meant to be a copy of a penile erection? Your Master Race seems to turn on quickly to MALE authority figures. Probably why the SS had to have 'breeding farms' it was the only they could get them to interact with women at all.
The only 'Stormfront' seems to be the one going in bath-houses.
In reality, Anglo women are not 'wanted' by anybody on account of their obesity and propensity for costly divorce. That is why Anglo males are clamouring for non-Anglo women. This is not an agenda promoted by foreign interests; rather, it is a lifestyle choice Anglo males are being forced to take for sheer survival. The fact that you do not live in an Anglo country is telling. I suspect you know next to nothing about life in the real Anglosphere, mistaking reality for the idealized version you encounter on TV (assuming you have a TV, you underclass sap). I suppose you think all American women are the slim, friendly goddesses you see in sitcoms and films! Not one Anglo woman in ten thousand looks or acts like that.
ReplyDeleteBy the way, many historians and economists do not consider South America to be 'Western', at all. The American 'far right' - a bunch of homosexual misfits - hates Hispanics and other South Americans as 'non-Aryan', anyway.
Rookh:
ReplyDeleteIt's not widely advertised by Anglo apologists, but Sir Oswald Moseley, the founder of British Naziism, was quite a partisan of the 'Pedestal Syndrome'. Unlike his German, Italian, and Japanese counterparts, Mosely held that the veneration of the English female was an integral part of British culture.
The British Nazis had a huge female following. The British had probably a larger percentage of female Nazi activism than any other country.
Similarly, here in America, the Southern culture of the old Confederacy considered itself (and still does) a bastion of American chivalry. During the Civil War, racist Anglo-American women were among the strongest supporters of the Confederates. Even today, southern US women are conspicuous for their bigotry, even towards American men from other parts of the country.
Is it me or British women are devolving into feral creautures?
ReplyDeleteAnders Breivik put some mother fuckers in the gggrrroouunnd.
ReplyDeleteHe was drinking all night and someone said "oh so you didn't take the bribe but you did take a few cases a wiskey eh?!". He got mad: "ILLL PUT YOU IN THE GROUND BOY!"
And he did. 167 times.
Sup Adolfsama.
ReplyDeleteThe trolls are back in full force LOL
ReplyDeleteanon1203:
ReplyDelete'Where can I go to marry a cute sweet little girl?'
I think you should go to Norway. When the Norwegian police lock you up for being a pervert, request to have Anders Brelvik as a cellmate. Tell your troubles to him; then he'll lynch you in the cell; the Norwegians will hang him; and then the world will be rid of two blots on society in one throw.
Anon 0236:
ReplyDelete(Somewhat regrettably) Norway lacks the death penalty.
These clips prove that the UK has what we call in the US, "Poor White Trash."
ReplyDeleteOn the other hand, these women are simply verbalizing the hostility that many more think, but do not overtly express.
Their accents shout Barking and Dagenham to me!
Deleteanon0127:
ReplyDelete"That's what I'd like a sweet little girl to marry who'd not make rational choices."
That sums it up perfectly. Nobody capable of rationality or making choices would voluntarily live with a dolt like you.
"I do hope they get to have little girl slaves &c."
The only kind of world that people like you are fit for is a world of slaves.
As a feminist, I am genuinely interested (no sarcasm) in the rules anti-feminists would impose - given the chance - in order to make life better for men.
ReplyDeleteFor instance, would you allow husbands to physically punish their wives or have sex with her without consent? Should only men initiate divorce? Would you have 'date rape' decriminalised? Would you ban women from education, driving, voting, drinking or working in certain spheres (or altogether)? Should abortion be banned? If yes to any of the above, then why?
Do you think non-western countries/ cultures/ religions treat women and girls fairly, for example, what are your views on female circumcision, female-specific Sharia laws, forced marriage etc?
Are women inferior to men or simply different? Why do we deserve less freedom than men are given?
*As a feminist, I am genuinely interested (no sarcasm) in the rules anti-feminists would impose - given the chance - in order to make life better for men.
ReplyDeleteFor instance, would you allow husbands to physically punish their wives or have sex with her without consent? Should only men initiate divorce? Would you have 'date rape' decriminalised? Would you ban women from education, driving, voting, drinking or working in certain spheres (or altogether)? Should abortion be banned? If yes to any of the above, then why?*
I am not a socon MRA, rather a libertarian progressive. You are trapped on the old MRA paradigm associated with Angry Harry, which yearns for a pre-70s pattern of gender relations. My own view is that Anglo culture harbours an in-built misandry (a function of its latent puritanism), so yearning for a restatement of 'traditional' Anglo values does not advantage men at all. This misandry also explains the casual hatred most Anglo women have for men, not just feminists.
In my view, men in the Anglosphere should wash their hands of Anglo-American women altogether - like MGTOW but retaining a sense of reproductive potential and purpose, if one wants. And this is happening anyway - smart middle-class American guys in particular have washed their hands of American women and this trend is spreading to other Western countries. There is nothing positive to be gained from pursuing relations with Anglo-American women. In crude pragmatic terms, avoiding Anglo women makes a lot of sense, particularly if a male wants to marry or raise a family.
*Do you think non-western countries/ cultures/ religions treat women and girls fairly, for example, what are your views on female circumcision, female-specific Sharia laws, forced marriage etc?*
Some do, some don't. Do western countries treat men fairly in terms of healthcare and divorce? And what about non-anglosphere western societies like the Hispanic or Francophone blocs? Societies can be non-misandrist without overtly oppressing women. The feminist obsession with Third World misogyny represents a 'demonstration' to disguise the oppression of Anglo-American men, I feel. And the current wave of Anglo-led wars against non-Western nations represents 'misandry for export'.
*Are women inferior to men or simply different? Why do we deserve less freedom than men are given?*
It is certainly interesting that giving Anglo-American women 'freedom' coincided with the rise of a dangerous and costly underclass across the Anglosphere. Female freedom tends to expand with the loss of financial, personal and social freedom for everyone else.
Rookh wrote:
ReplyDelete"In my view, men in the Anglosphere should wash their hands of Anglo-American women altogether - like MGTOW but retaining a sense of reproductive potential and purpose, if one wants. And this is happening anyway - smart middle-class American guys in particular have washed their hands of American women and this trend is spreading to other Western countries.
There is nothing positive to be gained from pursuing relations with Anglo-American women. In crude pragmatic terms, avoiding Anglo women makes a lot of sense, particularly if a male wants to marry or raise a family."
This is very true, I have often said that men in anglo countries should avoid anglo-american women like the plague. This is especially true if a man want's to get marrried. In the US 72% of divorces are initiated by women. Also, 50% of women in the US are overweight.
The last thing I want to do is marry an overweight, man-hating women, who may eventually divorce me and take half my assets. Then, I might have to pay her alimony and child support for years and years.
No thanks, I will continue to avoid American women like bubonic plague. Just the thought of marrying one makes me want to vomit!
"
ReplyDelete"I do hope they get to have little girl slaves &c."
The only kind of world that people like you are fit for is a world of slaves."
Is Islam the answer? Is there anywhere in this world where men (or males) get little girl slaves?
Anon0506;
ReplyDelete'Little girls aren't overweight'
Haven't seen any children in the US lately, have you? LOL
Just out of curiosity, why do you keep trolling here when it's obvious that nobody's buying your bullshit? Is this something your analysist recommended to distract you from surfing kiddie-porn sites?
Anon0624, aka Adolfsama:
ReplyDeleteNow, that explains it. You went to Afghanistan, got caught molesting little girls and was castrated by the British Army! Now, you're fixated on kids, and dream of a Master Race where all castrates have child-brides since they can't procreate naturally anyway!
Are you a member of the British Union of Fascists by chance?
hateful american feminist amanda marcotte is also a racist....
ReplyDeletehttp://theangryblackwoman.com/2008/04/25/seal-press-amanda-marcotteproof-that-feminism-and-racism-go-hand-in-hand/