Saturday 27 August 2016

Above the Parapet: What Happens to Men who challenge Anglosphere Gender-Relations

British MP Phillip Davies speaking at MRA Conference

Recently, a serious attempt to challenge the rampant gynocentrism that rules the UK justice system has been made by a British politician. The hysterical response only demonstrates the futility of MRA ‘activism’ in Anglo-American nations; however, it also suggests the correct male response to the misandry currently dominating the Anglosphere:

A Tory (Republican) MP has spoken at a men’s rights conference hosted by an anti-feminism party, telling the audience that feminist zealots really do want women to have their cake and eat it”.

Philip Davies, the Conservative MP for Shipley, delivered a 45-minute speech at the International Conference on Men’s Issues, organised by the Justice for Men and Boys party (J4MB). Davies, who sits on the Commons justice committee, told the conference at the ExCel centre in London that Britain’s justice system was skewed in favour of women and discriminated against men. 

J4MB is led and was founded by Mike Buchanan, a former business consultant who retired at 52 and launched campaigns such as the Anti-Feminism League and the Campaign for Merit in Business, which actively fights against initiatives to improve gender diversity in the boardroom (i.e over-promote female buffoons in order to satisfy arbitrary gender quotients - RK). After thanking Buchanan at the conference, Davies delivered a speech on “the justice gender gap”, arguing that the justice system in Britain actively favoured women and discriminated against men.  

“In this day and age the feminist zealots really do want women to have their cake and eat it,” he told the conference. “They fight for their version of equality on all the things that suit women – but are very quick to point out that women need special protections and treatment on other things.” 

J4MB issues awards for “lying feminist of the month”, “toxic feminist of the month” and “whiny feminist of the month”, and promotes inflammatory articles on its website including a piece titled ‘13 reasons women lie about being raped’. The party pushes for a greater number of male teachers in schools because they claim female teachers habitually award lower grades to boys than to girls. 

Its 80-page 2015 election manifesto suggested women should stop being appointed as senior company directors, that the Equality Act 2010 should be scrapped and that men should claim their pensions before women because they work harder and die younger. 

Davies told the conference: “I don’t believe there’s an issue between men and women. The problem is being stirred up by those who can be described as militant feminists and the politically correct males who pander to this nonsense. 

“It seems to me that this has led to an ‘equality but only when it suits’ agenda that applies to women. The drive for women to have so-called equality on all the things that suit the politically correct agenda but not other things that don’t is of increasing concern to me. For example, we hear plenty about increasing the numbers of women on company boards and female representation in parliament; however, there’s a deafening silence when it comes to increasing the number of men who have custody of their children or who have careers as midwives. In fact, generally there seems to be a deafening silence on all the benefits women have compared to men.” 

Davies raises the issue of prison uniforms being compulsory for men but not for women, a policy he has raised in parliament in the past. “Men and women are different, it’s a fact,” he said. “Yet this is not allowed to be a reason to prevent equality in the fields where men are better on the whole – for example, when it comes to jobs that require great strength. Ah no, that would be sexist. A woman must have equality and do whatever she wants, except, when it comes to wearing a prison uniform, obviously. 

In one section of his speech, which was delivered in July and appeared on Buchanan’s YouTube page two weeks ago, he suggested women were treated more favourably in the family courts, which often deal with child custody.

SOURCE: UK Guardian, 2016

...or maybe because they are cake-eating hypocrites?

Despite the veracity of his claims, Davies was showered with mindless invective in the British media. There were calls for him to be suspended, calls for his resignation, even the usual shaming language about his penis size – all for telling the truth. Yet Davies quoted detailed government statistics proving that when men and women are arrested for the same crime, and they have similar criminal histories, then British women are favoured at every step in the legal system:

Women are less likely than men to be charged after being arrested
Women are more likely to be bailed after being charged
Women do not have to wear prison uniform
Women are less likely to be convicted than men
Women are less likely than men to be given a jail sentence if convicted
Women are given sentences approximately 40% shorter than men, on average
Women serve 5% less of their jail sentences before being released than men do
Women are often allowed to leave prison and return home for weekends, a privilege denied to men

Yet citing these inarguable facts had no effect at all – the Anglo feminist narrative prevailed, as usual. What does this tell us about the state of ‘men’s rights’ in the Anglosphere?

Above all, it demonstrates that men are still viewed as third class citizens by the mainstream media and the authorities at large. Simply put – and I have been saying this for years  – WASP culture, being essentially puritanical, automatically exalts women and denigrates men. Tradcon MRAs in Anglosphere nations like to think institutional misandry is exclusively the product of leftist, revolutionary agendas. In reality, they are expressions of ‘traditional’ Anglo-Saxon culture. This is why electoral politics never changes anything for men – at least, not for the better. Socialist or ‘conservative’, all governments in Anglosphere nations preside over societies where the legal, healthcarewelfare and education systems actively discriminate against men. A Republican vote, for example, will not eliminate the residual misandry that presently dominates American education, politics and law. Nor will a Democrat vote, for that matter.

AngloCunt with cake...

Secondly, the case shows there is no point in men trying to change things by ‘activism’.  Again, I have been saying this for years. Since the default position of WASP culture is puritanical misandry, the statistics and rational arguments presented by MRAs have zero transformational effect. Simply put, opposing misandrist feminism in Anglosphere nations is like striving to drown an ocean – after all, misandrist feminism is the prevailing ideology, and always has been. It is far smarter for men to withdraw consent from the social order than pursue a programme of ‘change’ that is doomed to fail before it even begins.

How should an enlightened man proceed with this lifestyle project of deliberate social withdrawal? The Red Piller or MGHOW, Sovereign Man or PUA: all are different forms of the Mercenary Male concept I developed several years ago. Simply put, the Mercenary Male is a man who exists in a given society without truly ‘belonging’ to it. Like a Hittite mercenary in ancient Israel, he obeys the necessary laws and makes his living without believing in the mores, customs and religion that surround him. His conformity is outward only; the wild enthusiasm of his host society for its institutions and festivals fails to move him. His first instinct is to protect himself and his own well-being at all costs; all other factors are insignificant. He has no interest in perpetuating the host society; his world dies with him. Knowing himself an unwelcome guest among potential hostiles, he hides his true values at all times. He cultivates friends in distant lands, knowing national fervour to be a relative (and largely puerile) phenomenon. Money is his only god, for the power and freedom it brings: freedom from want, freedom from sexual disenfranchisement, freedom from dependence, freedom from despair. The Mercenary Male is a thespian, playing a part; his detachment never wavers. He tastes, but does not swallow. Unbound and uncommitted, his freedom is absolute; little wonder White Knights and feminists envy, fear and detest him.

The correct response to feminist perfidy?

Saturday 20 August 2016

A Crock of Tinder: The post-Internet travails of the ‘Mainstream’ Media

The Game is up: unless you are a wealthy
celebrity, this girl considers you worthless trash
and is completely unattainable....

The mainstream media are struggling. More and more newspapers close down by the month, or are given away for free. Viewing figures for terrestrial television fall year on year. Over the past ten years alone, dozens of UK lifestyle magazines have either retreated to the Internet or closed down altogether. The rise of outsider political candidates such as Trump or Sanders suggests that representative democracy (a fancy way of saying trans-generational Power Elite dominion) is giving way to the real thing. Still, even in its present reduced condition, the legacy media plays a vital role in deluding the masses into giving their consent to the social order.

Nowhere is this clearer than in the sexual arena. The legacy media are strongly committed to presenting sexual life in Anglosphere nations as a smorgasbord of priapic vitality. A recent programme on UK television – The Secret World of Tinder – was a perfect example of this agenda. In sum, the documentary claimed that Brits in London are having lots more sex because of Tinder. It dealt with the sex lives of seven people:

  • A homosexual male 
  • A homosexual deviant male
  • A lesbian with children
  • 2 Heterosexual males
  • 2 Heterosexual females

While the footage presented to us displayed predictable Anglo patterns of rampant compensatory deviance and heterosexual repression, this truth was carefully filtered to give the viewer a misleading impression of heterosexual plenitude and prowess. And this is how Anglo-American nations maintain the delusion of widespread sexual freedom.

According to the Anglobitch Thesis, the culture of pro-feminist heterosexual repression in Anglosphere countries informally promotes a compensatory culture of male sexual deviance. Meanwhile, heterosexual men are kept continually thirsty (and compliant) by limited sexual access to women, a state of affairs decisively maintained by misandrist feminism (strongly opposed to prostitution and other forms of recreational sex) but also embedded in the residual Anglo-Saxon culture, which is characterized by centuries of puritanical repression.

The people featured in the show were living evidence of this. The male sexual deviant was indeed making full use of Tinder to hook up with other men interested in role-playing as puppies, as was the ‘conventional’ male homosexual. Of course, this ease of sexual access explains why so many Western males are drawn to homosexuality: it permits them to have far more sexual partners (and more varied erotic experiences) than a nominally hetero orientation. The mainstream media’s fixation with gays also helps to present Anglo societies as redoubts of liberation – after all, they really are having far more sex than most people. The woman told the interviewer she was endlessly hooking up with a string of partners and, since she was the mother of two children, we assumed she was referring to males. However, it soon transpired that she only had one partner, another woman, and everything she had previously said about her rampant hetero sex life was blatantly false.

Like, this girl would really fuck a garbageman...

The two heterosexual males were full of tall tales about their sexual escapades. One – a particularly ugly knave – claimed to be enjoying sex with eight women a week via Tinder. Smelling Anglo bullshit, and seeing no evidence for these thunderous claims, I waited avidly for the predictable revelation of his real sexual status. This turned out to be a conventional date with a middle-aged four, to whom he was clearly committed. So much for his ‘eight women a week’ – sexual self-delusion at its worst.

The final heterosexual male (a rather better-looking guy than the bullshitter) had an unsuccessful date with an entitled, uptight female. Predictably, no sex emerged from this encounter. Game over.

In short, the reality we observed differed vastly from the agenda projected – that ‘everyone’ was enjoying vast amounts of recreational sex via Tinder. Of, course, some people were having lots of recreational sex – in classic Anglo fashion, the male homosexuals. In sum, the documentary  amply demonstrated the essential truth of the Thesis, in every respect. Aside from the deviants, there was no evidence of widespread sexual liberation anywhere.

However, the producers were careful to project the illusion of universal sexual liberation despite the contradictory evidence before our eyes. And this is how Sexual False Consciousness works: a sub-textual assumption of liberation is maintained at all times, even in the face of alternative evidence. SFC is like Hitler’s ‘Big Lie’ or the Emperor’s New Clothes: the more often it is told, the more likely people are to believe it. Proof or verification matter little; mass subordination to the shared fantasy is all. Indeed, all the Anglosphere nations operate an informal system of ‘sexual reality shaming’ wherein anyone daring to break ranks from SFC to discuss sexual reality is ridiculed or labelled a deviant. For example, Elliot Rodger’s flatmates ridiculed him for admitting his Incel status; however, as Asian-American geeks they were almost certainly hardcore Incels themselves.

More unattainable unicorns...
However, the lamestream media’s carefully-maintained façade is beginning to crack. The rise of the manosphere is beginning to undercut the delusions which sustain the Anglosphere. In the UK, this can be seen in the steady decline of ‘Lad’s Mags’ that systematically sell SFC to young males. These publications now barely exist – fifteen years ago, there were over ten in circulation, selling millions of copies per week:

Loaded ended in 2014
Nuts ended in 2014
FHM ended 2015
Zoo ended in 2015

And the remainder subsist as online shadows of their former selves. Of course, the instant availability of online porn has hastened their end; but online porn is far more honest than these ailing publications. For in their heyday, ‘Lad’s Mags’ promoted the absurd fiction that famous models and actresses were sexually available to the average Joe. All utter nonsense, of course – but prior to the Internet, the mainstream media could tell the masses anything and get away with it. Now, a whole climate of online opinion has made it plain even to the stupidest man that models and actresses only want males of the highest status and view 'ordinary Joes' as disposable trash. Hell, even ugly Anglosphere women consider the bottom 80% of men as disposable trash, let alone models and actresses!

Blue collar mugs discussing hot women they will never have sex with...

In short, sexual reality can no longer be denied. Before the onslaught of the Red Pill, the sexual delusions promoted by the mainstream media are under unprecedented attack. The Anglosphere nations are not the sexual, social and economic utopias the mainstream media claim them to be; and the Manosphere is spreading this realization as never before. 

Post-Manosphere, only lobotomised imbeciles 
still think girls like this want an ‘ordinary guy’!