Untimely Meditations: Beards, X-Factor and the Anglobitch Makeover

FIRST MEDITATION: African Babies - The Ultimate Anglobitch Makeover


In recent years, the celebrity Anglobitch has taken to adopting African babies. Now, we all know what that represents, don’t we? A demonstration intended to present the Anglobitch as some kind of pleasant, 'nurtering' female. Such a demonstration is necessary because 'the game is up': the vast majority of Anglo-American men now know exactly what the Anglobitch is all about: feeding her narcissistic neuroses. The race to adopt an African baby is a conscious attempt by the celebrity Anglobitch (supported, of course, by the Anglo-American mass media) to disguise the true, abject nature of Anglo-American females.

Nowadays, the Anglo-American media are ‘bending over backwards’ to insinuate that Anglo-American women are ‘caring’, selfless and humane. Obviously, this represents an unconscious need to rehabilitate Anglo-American women in the public eye, so tarnished is their public image as grasping, evil harridans. All those Eighties ‘Material Girl’ videos have wrought a corresponding distaste for the Anglobitch among American men verging on mass hatred. As with VAWA - a naked attempt to deny American men access to foreign women - this projection of ‘caring’ Anglo women represents a conscious desire to redefine the Anglobitch as a viable partner across the Anglosphere.

SECOND MEDITATION: Pogonological Investigations - Beards and the Declining Anglosphere

"How womanly it is for one who is a man to comb himself and shave himself with a razor, for the sake of fine effect, and to arrange his hair at the mirror, shave his cheeks, pluck hairs out of them, and smooth them!...For God wished women to be smooth and to rejoice in their locks alone growing spontaneously, as a horse in his mane. But He adorned man like the lions, with a beard, and endowed him as an attribute of manhood, with a hairy chest - a sign of strength and rule." - St. Clement of Alexandria

What can one say of beards? They are the supreme expression of masculine potency. Only old women with hormone disorders can grow beards among womankind, and they are rightly derided. As a stag has antlers or a lion his magnificent mane, so men and billy-goats have beards. It has been said that MRAs concentrate far too much on women and their faults, neglecting to create or resurrect dynamic archetypes of manhood. In truth, the beard is one such potent, positive symbol and needs to be recognized as such.

It is interesting that in the Victorian era - the last era with some remnant of patriarchy - the beard was almost obligatory among males. Indeed, it seems to have been much more prevalent among the higher social strata, those who defined the shape of that era. The ancient Greeks considered the beard to be an indispensable badge of virility. In many ancient cultures, the beard was held in such veneration that its full or partial removal was accounted a most severe punishment. It is notable that, since the Anglosphere lapsed into absolute matriarchy, the beard has lapsed from the former ubiquity it once enjoyed among the Anglosphere’s greatest men to its present parlous condition, patronised only by hippies and scientists. During the American civil war, every major figure sported a magnificent growth of facial hair. Even Generals without full beards still cultivated alternative facial displays, for example exotic moustaches and lyrical sideburns.

Bluntly, male facial hair urgently needs to come back into fashion all around the Anglosphere.

General Stonewall Jackson: A beard to be reckoned with!

General Lee: A beard of quiet, but unquestionable authority!

One for the Union: Abraham Lincoln at his Confederacy-Beating Best!

THIRD MEDITATION: Rage Against the Machine and the Rise of the New Media



The following article raises important issues about circumventing the Anglo-American media (and its inherent misandry) from a dynamic MRA perspective:

In recent years, it had become as predictable as elections in North Korea – singer wins X Factor, singer's debut single goes to No 1. So when Joe McElderry won the TV talent contest, he was no doubt confident he would celebrate Christmas at the top of the charts.

Alas for the 18-year-old from South Shields, it wasn't to be: a song almost his own age denied him the top spot after a successful online campaign. Killing In The Name, an expletive-heavy rock song first released in 1992 by the Californian rock band Rage Against the Machine, won the battle for Christmas top spot on the basis of downloads only. It sold about 500,000 copies last week, about 50,000 more than The Climb, McElderry's earnest ballad.

Depending on your view, the Rage victory was either a delicious dismantling of the X Factor Christmas No 1 juggernaut or a cynical assault on the festive charts. There was, though, some indignation when it emerged both records had links to Simon Cowell, the entertainment industry's favourite pantomime baddy. With the Rage track having been released by Sony, and McElderry's by Cowell's Syco, a Sony subsidiary, some claimed the high-waisted X Factor judge would emerge triumphant whichever act won the chart battle.

But arguably the real victor here was a rock fan from Essex who started a Facebook group a month ago with the (then) pie-in-the-sky idea of usurping the X Factor winner from the no 1 slot.

Jon Morter, 35, a part-time rock DJ and logistics expert from South Woodham Ferrers, near Chelmsford, decided it would be a bit of a giggle to start a campaign to encourage people to buy a record with pretty much the opposite vibe to the X Factor winner's ballad. While McElderry urges listeners to "keep the faith", the Rage track is best known for its now-ironic refrain: "Fuck you, I won't do what you tell me."
He had tried a similar wheeze last year, when he attempted to get Rick Astley's Never Gonna Give You Up to the top of the Christmas charts. Alexandra Burke, the 2008 X Factor winner, won that battle, but having succeeded in propelling Astley to "the lower echelons of the chart", Morter was emboldened to try again. This time, he was helped by the comedian Peter Serafinowicz, who on 15 December urged his 268,000-plus Twitter followers to join in, and it snowballed from there. By the time Paul McCartney and former X Factor winner Steve Brookstein had pledged their support, poor McElderry seemed doomed.

When the Guardian broke the news to Morter that he had won, he was initially lost for words. "Oh bloody hell," he said, as the consequences of what he had done became clear. Composing himself, he said: "I think it just shows that in this day and age, if you want to say something, then you can – with the help of the internet and social networking sites like Facebook and Twitter. If enough people are with you, you can beat the status quo."

SOURCE: Guardian

This result should give all MRAs hope. Although we are weak in terms of the MSM (Main Stream Media), we are strong (and waxing ever stronger) on the Internet. If an Internet campaign can defeat a massive multinational backed by the mainstream media, then we can beat the mainstream matriarchy, also. This is the clearest proof that the world is rapidly changing, throwing up an entirely new paradigm of media manipulation. And there have been other signs, some of them tangential to our cause, but nonetheless important. The increasing coverage of female paedophiles in the pan-Anglosphere MSM shows that our campaign is now starting to bite. And in the States, overturning the MSM and its reflexive misandry should be much easier, due to the pluralistic nature of the American media.

How are we to maximize this opportunity? Simple: we must make the Internet our own by controlling its 'reconnaissance space'. General JEB Stewart, the Confederate cavalry commander was instrumental in his country's early military successes. Stewart recognised that the old, Napoleonic use of cavalry as shock troops was irrelevant in the era of long-range musketry and effective anti-personnel artillery ammunition. He did, however, see a new and revolutionary use for his horsemen: as a force to occupy the 'reconnaissance space' between two armies. With this space occupied by his cavalry, it meant that all initiative lay with his own side.

In short, Stewart's use of cavalry pre-empted the modern significance of air power as the ultimate arbiter of conflict. In the same way, MRAs have to make the Internet our own in the battle against Anglo-American feminism – an MRA mare nostrum ('our sea'), as Rome dubbed the Mediterranean. We must reach a situation where ALL feminists are automatically and decisively challenged/crushed whenever they venture into cyberspace. Some MRAs have intuitively understood this - but far more need to 'grasp the nettle' and impose action upon themselves, attacking Anglobitch feminism whenever it appears.

More Untimely Anglobitch Meditations

The Anglobitch Poll: More Votes for Mackinnon, Please!
Thanks for your votes on the 'top Anglobitch' poll. One thing surprises me though - no votes yet for Catherine Mackinnon! This evil piece of repressive Anglo shit has done her utmost since the Seventies to advance her twisted Anglobitch 'rights without responsibilities' agenda. Worse yet, she yearns to ban pornography and prostitution, reducing all men to the level of denatured eunuchs. Of all women cursed with the name 'Anglobitch', this one deserves roasting over a slow fire above all others.

Why Women are attracted to Moronic Thugs
Juvenile delinquents typically have IQs of 80, in the semi-retarded range. These 'live wires' are, in fact, mentally dead. And this explains why women are attracted to them. According to sociobiologists, 'like marries like' in terms of height, weight, ethnicity, race, IQ and general coloring. Given that women's IQs are typically lower than those of males, women find violent delinquents attractive because their semi-retarded levels of intelligence are naturally closer to their own. Women feel little attraction to men of eminently superior intelligence since their own IQs are so much lower. Research indicates that most people marry/date those within 5 IQ points of themselves. This goes a long way to explaining why men of great brilliance such as Newton, Sidis, Beethoven or Kant found it impossible to form relationships with women.

Declining Male Fertility and the Rise of the Anglobitch
Over the past thirty years, the male sperm count in most western nations has steadily fallen. In the UK, for instance, almost 30% of males now cannot father a child without medical intervention. No doubt pollution and other testosterone-reducing factors in foodstuffs and the built environment have contributed to this sad state of affairs. However, an interesting tangent is the perfect correlation between falling sperm counts and the rise of the Anglobitch. Could this Medusa have arisen had men been strong, virile and at the peak of their manly powers?

Little Princess Syndrome and the Decline of the Anglosphere
The most devastating proof of Anglo-American gynocratic supplication to the Anglobitch has to be the Little Princess cult that has turned nearly all young Anglo-Saxon females into venomous, entitled young reptiles. Read more about it here.

If women truly wanted equality, no one would mind. The problem is, they only want equality when it suits them. The rest of the time, they want to 'play Princess' - especially when it comes to draft registration or healthcare equality.

The Perils of Chauvinism: Eschatological Assumptions Rampant
Eschatology is broadly the study of 'end times', the notion that we are living on the last days of the Earth. Many theologians argue that the early Christianity of Jesus and his disciples cannot be understood without reference to eschatology; for example, Jesus' wildly impractical injunctions to give away all one's possessions. In the modern context, chauvinists like Dick Masterson have seemingly adopted the same Neo-Christian 'eschatological consciousness'. How so, and why is this dangerous?

Chauvinism can be an amusing approach to challenging Anglo-American feminisms, but in some ways it is fraught with peril. The problem with most chauvinists is that they operate with an eschatological consciousness; that is, they tend to assume that women are in (or will shortly assume) traditional roles. Unfortunately, Anglo-American women are now dominant, such that Anglo-American cultures have to be considered matriarchies; and there is no evidence that this is going to change in the immediate future.

Given this reality, the perils implicit in chauvinism become clear. When chauvinists call for women to be kept out of the Army and return to the kitchen, they play right into the feminist's hands. Why? Because it allows Anglo women to cherry-pick rights, while eschewing responsibilities. Women certainly don't want to join the Army, but the reality of their position is such that they can still collect inflated salaries in public sinecures.

The point is, chauvinism assumes that women's rights have been dissolved in the here and now, when in fact they ride the crest of a wave of enormous privilege that is most unlikely to be reversed. Adopting a chauvinist outlook with female entitlements in place just leaves men with obligations, while women continue to bask in rights and privileges. This is the primary danger of chauvinism.

New Videos Added!
I have added to (and upgraded) the videos on my Anglobitch YouTube site. You can find these by just searching for 'Anglobitch' on YouTube. More often than not, you will find links to them at the foot of this page. Happy viewing!

Untimely Meditations

Greetings, friends. Here, I unburden myself of various thoughts that have been building up a head of steam in me, as it were, in a spirit of complete honesty.

Why Are Women not Attracted to Intelligence?
This is much discussed on a variety of mra blogs and other fora. Indeed, their attraction to moronic sociopaths is even more significant as it helped create the dangerous Anglo-American underclass. As a medical Doctor, I have come to believe the answer lies principally in genetics. The male contributes an X or a Y chromosome to his offspring, which determines its gender. The X makes a girl (XX) the Y makes a boy (XY). So far, so good. The problem with the Y is that it is a stunted, error-prone chromosome that is largely reconstituted by the X. This is why males tend to exhibit more extreme characteristics than females - this reconstitution process produces an individual with greater variance potential. This is also why males take after the mother more than the father, or why females take more after the father - his genetic contribution to a female child is more complete, being derived from his X chromosome. Though intelligence is of primary adaptive value to males, intelligence is unlikely to pass down the male line (in that the male's Y chromosome carries little genetic data to his male children, while his X carries far more to his daughters - where it is 'wasted' in the case of intelligence, and regresses in subsequent generations). This could explain why females eschew intelligence in men - while of value in his own life, it is of no value as a heritable trait.

Indeed, these claims might not go far enough. The British neuroscientist Susan Greenfield alludes to evidence that the central nervous system and neurological conditions like epilepsy descend almost perfectly through the female line. This is almost exactly what we would expect if the foregoing discussion were true. Indeed, Schopenhauer supports these claims with reference to German folk-knowledge in his famous essay On Women: that intellect descends almost totally through the female line.

And this explains why women show little interest in intelligent men. A man like Einstein would not pass his intellect on to his male children, where it would be of primary adaptive value. And apart from his intellect, he was in every other sense a Gamma Male - of no interest to women. In any case, if the central nervous system is only descended from the mother, the father's intellect is entirely irrelevant to his breeding fitness. And this, my friends, is why women prefer morons.

How the Internet is Changing Men's Lives
There is an academic at the University of Bristol in the UK who says some interesting things about male underachievement. Broadly, he says that young males seldom really talk to adult men in the way young females talk to adult women. Consequently, they tend to be more influenced by the media in their goals and aspirations - wanting to be rock stars and professional athletes rather than pursuing realistic, middle class career paths.

However, one is continually struck by the profound observations of young middle class males in online mra fora. Apart from a few manginas, they are infinitely more clued up about women that us oldies over 28 ever were. And this is because the Internet is allowing males of different generations to communicate properly for the first time in decades (if not centuries). The young male can, with a click of his mouse button, communicate with males across the Anglosphere of all ages and classes. He can hear from guys living in trailer parks in Montana or slums in Manchester or Melbourne who were divorced by some bitch and taken to the cleaners. In short, the wily old boars can show their young brothers the pitfalls of consorting with the Anglobitch.

There can be little doubt this is shaping the Pan-Anglosphere Marriage Strike. And long may it continue.

The British Political Crisis
Britain is falling apart. The MP's expenses scandal, the recession, the rise of the BNP and Prime Minister Brown's grotesque social incompetence have created a situation unknown in living memory. However things go, what we are witnessing is a 'crisis of hegemony' as described by the Italian political philosopher, Antonio Gramsci. What this means, in short, is that the ideological 'cement' that binds Britain together is starting to crumble. As Britain is the ideological nexus of the Anglosphere, this crisis will be reflected from Alelaide to Calcutta, from Quebec to Miami, in various ways. The old ideological sureties are falling away. My friends, this is the time to advance our cause as never before and programme the Anglobitch meme (and the mra meme in general) into the new hegemonic structure that will emerge from this time of chaos. It is truly an exciting time to be alive and at the height of our powers.

'A Generation': The Weasel Words of Anglo-American Feminists
I think it is the Chinese who say, 'defeat is an orphan, while victory has a thousand fathers'. And so it is with feminists: women's rather measly contributions to civilization are enormously inflated and always proclaimed as exclusively female achievements. However, they are very quick to mask exclusively male losses/experiences/sacrifices using a variety of weasel words. For example, consider how often Western liberals/feminists describe the First World War as a disaster that befell 'a generation'. In fact, the ten million dead, and the many millions more maimed, were almost exclusively men. So, it wasn't 'a generation' at all: it was men who experienced/suffered in World War One, exclusively. The same with D-Day: it wasn't 'a generation' who liberated Europe from tyranny, it was men. There probably wasn't a single woman on those beaches, in any capacity. Men, keep alert to the weasel words of Anglo-American feminists and their underhand attempts to distort history, reality and everything else.

Why is Jessica Valenti so Irritating?
The most important meditation of all, since I have the answer: it's her mouth. Wet, twisted and crooked like the cunt herself. She has a certain inbred quality like the perverted British record producer, Jonathan King (his mouth is rather twisted, too). In the Middle Ages, people quite rightly believed that physical blemishes were a mark of God's disfavour - physical expressions of metaphysical taints. In the case of Valenti, when we consider her venomous views, the spiritual root of her physical disorder is entirely obvious.

Why Don't Women Post Here?
Why don't women post on this Blog? If they have rational objections to these views, why don't they come and call us out? On Dick Masterson's site, Anglo-American females are the majority of posters, continually berating their critics for being 'fags', having small penises or not 'getting laid'. OK, if they are so smart and their arguments so strong, why don't they come to Anglobitch and 'clean our dials' for us? Because their non-existent arguments would get trashed, that's why... and they know it.

Guest Post by Monsieur Chauvin

In the history of a movement, there comes a time when the originator (if he has taught well) notices that his admirers are developing his core concept in novel and exciting ways, often displaying greater profundity and economy of style than he himself could ever contrive. The Chinese have a wonderful saying to describe this process: 'Standing on the Shoulders of the Master'. The following post on a celebrated MRA blog by one Monsieur Chauvin is a perfect example of this. Study it well, for this is the finest exposition of the Anglobitch Thesis ever yet created:

All White Anglo-Saxon Protestant Females Are Cunts And Garbage: An Introduction To The Anglo-Bitch Thesis

What is the Anglo-Bitch Thesis? Within the field of men’s studies and the male rights movement in general, a new point of view has arisen, which sees Anglo-Saxon feminism as the driving force behind the institutionalized misandrist discrimination currently being directed towards males, especially males of Anglo-Saxon race and Protestant faith. Thus, the feminism which arose within the Anglosphere during the 1960s and 70s, as distinct from the collaborative partnership feminism of Western Europe, has never been about seeking the emancipation of the human female from the shackles of patriarchal bondage. This sense of entitlement ( the so-called princess syndrome) that is diligently inculcated into the Protestant Anglo-Saxon female from the earliest youth, is directly descended from the Calvinist work ethic of the first English settlers in the New World. From the perspective of Calvinist belief and practice, women were placed on pedestals and held to a separate code of conduct and personal morality that is beyond individual scrutiny or criticism. Hence, it is because of the puritanical basis of Anglo-Saxon culture that women are granted an automatic sense of entitlement, which comes from the female being transformed into a supplier of sex through the market forces of industrial capitalism, where sex itself is seen as a scarce commodity that must be rigidly controlled so as to maintain the privileged position of the human female within all heterosexual transactions.

In other words, modern Anglo-Saxon feminism, combined with the Calvinist belief in the natural purity and chastity of the female (according to the Protestant scholastics of the late Reformation period, the human female was seen as a creature who was void of sensual passion) has granted the female a substantial number of rights, even more rights than the average male. However, what the modern Anglo-Saxon woman has been granted is a series of rights without their corresponding responsibilities, further reinforcing the automatic sense of entitlement and privilege that the overwhelming majority of women have been born and bred into since the dawn of human biological evolution. This exaltation of the Anglo-Bitch to the upper echelons of a once male-dominated status hierarchy has unleashed a wave of institutionalized discrimination against males that is unprecedented in the history of mankind; never before have men and boys been so oppressed and vilified by a medieval Christian-Teutonic code of chivalry which has skilfully been concealed under the gaudy trappings of modern ideological feminism.


Another major contention of the Anglo-Bitch Thesis is that the nations of the Anglosphere (USA, Canada, UK, Australia, New Zealand etc.) are matriarchies dominated by women and effeminate, androgenized bureaucrats. In the matriarchal tyrannies of the Anglo-Saxon world, the woman leads a life of privilege and luxury, whereas the male is confined to a life of abuse and degradation. Women are so deeply entrenched within the upper socio-economic and political strata of the Anglosphere, that to dislodge them from their positions of comfort and unprecedented freedom would require a considerable amount of coercion in the form of brute force. The problem with modern ideological feminism is that women have been allowed to retain the privileges they had before the advent of female suffrage and emancipation. For example, women wish to join traditional bastions of male patriarchal dominance, such as the military or heavy industry, while refusing to let men become fully integrated within conventional feminine organizations. Even within the judicial system, women are still given preferential treatment; they are seldom prosecuted for criminal offenses and are almost always granted favourable settlements during divorce and child custody proceedings.

Eventually, the Protestant Anglo-Saxon female will have to choose between having unearned privileges on the one hand and having rights with their corresponding responsibilities on the other. However, this is unlikely to occur given the prevalence of Teutonico-Christian chivalry, disguised as modern feminism, throughout the Anglosphere and other Western Industrial societies.

The final solution to the central problem of the Anglo-Bitch Thesis is by having a significant majority of men refuse to marry (aka the marriage strike). When financially solvent, middle-class males refuse to participate economically and politically within the institutions of Western society, only then will the imaginary colossus known as the Protestant Anglo-Bitch be finally brought to her knees.

The male refusal to participate in the affairs of the Western Anglo-Saxon Protestant matriarchy of today will cripple feminism once and for all.

Rambo: Pan-Anglosphere Archetype of Male Alienation

In Rambo: First Blood - the first, definitive Rambo movie - we see how Anglo-American society relates to men – especially white, working class men. In the first first scenes, Vietnam veteran John Rambo is seen approaching a small town.

From the first, Rambo is made to feel unwelcome by the town’s Police Chief. Soon, he is imprisoned and savagely beaten for virtually no reason and, after a daring escape, hunted down by the authorities like an animal.


If these themes were mere fantasy, they would not have stroked the deep chord they obviously did. Throughout the Anglo-American world, John Rambo became an instant, sympathetic archetype for working class, disenfranchised males. Though expressing a distinctly American experience, Rambo's impact was universal.


Rambo immediately became a mythopoietic icon of Anglo-American culture because he summates post-feminist male experience. His utter rejection by society expresses the offhand vilification of the Anglo-American male. Rambo is a fallen war hero: someone who is ‘pulled out of the hat’ when his martial valour is needed, then vilified when his immediate utility is exhausted. This ‘redundant workhorse’ syndrome characterises Anglo-American attitudes to men in general. Unwelcome in the normal course of things, men are tolerated only as a necessary evil occasionally needed as expendable cannon fodder. Moreover, the offhand contempt and even hatred aimed at Rambo by the institutions of social authority (Courts, the Police and politicians) perfectly illustrates Anglo-American attitudes to men.


The events in Rambo coincided with the Hungerford massacre in the UK, wherein a sexually, economically and socially disenfranchised male called Michael Ryan stalked the streets of an idyllic English village, shooting sixteen people down with a variety of firearms before blowing his own head off in the secondary school he had attended as a boy.

Predictably, media hacks and apologetic psychologists argued that Rambo had directly inspired the massacre. However, it is far more plausible that the movie provided an imago of identification for festering resentments that already existed in Ryan’s psyche, legitimating his grievances and easing any last inhibition to their violent expiation. Most discussion focussed narrowly on the space between Ryan’s ears, omitting the all-important post-feminist factors that might lead an Anglo-American working class male to such behaviour: sexual disenfranchisement; economic exclusion; constant vilification in the media; discrimination before the law. All of these themes are addressed in Rambo, which explains the character’s iconic power and resonance.


It is fallacious to consider myth as a dead, ossified cultural construct. Mythic narratives emerge continually from the cultural nexus. Indeed, the contemporary era must be considered especially rich in myth, since the electronic media and the Internet are ubiquitous conceptual oceans across which symbols and narratives collide with unprecedented fecundity. We live in a culture abounding with legendary riches. And John Rambo is one of the most resonant archetypal characters to have emerged in recent years: his plight highlights the ‘male crisis’ currently afflicting men across the Anglosphere.