Lessons from Torres Vedras for the Young Men of Britain: The Art of Intellectual Attrition

In 1810, the Duke of Wellington faced a numerically superior French force under Marshal Masséna. Rather than meeting them in a decisive, bloody pitch battle, Wellington retreated behind the Lines of Torres Vedras—a massive, sophisticated series of fortifications. He practiced a scorched-earth policy, leaving the French to starve in a wasteland while their supply lines stretched to the breaking point. Unable to breach the lines and unable to sustain themselves, the French were forced into a humiliating retreat.

For young men today forced into mandatory "anti-misogyny" or "sensitivity" workshops, there is a profound lesson here. You do not need to win a shouting match with an instructor who holds the "moral high ground" of the curriculum. Instead, you can construct your own Lines of Torres Vedras: a defensive perimeter of logic and inconvenient facts that draws the instructor into a paralyzing bog of argument. By forcing them to defend their own contradictions, you stretch their intellectual supply lines until the program collapses under its own weight.

Here are the primary points of contention—the defensive redoubts—you can use to drag an instructor into an unwinnable battle.

1.     1. The Survival Paradox (The Ukraine Gambit)

When the instructor speaks of systemic "male privilege" or the "patriarchy" as a system designed solely for male benefit, raise the issue of state-mandated sacrifice.

• The Point: Point out that in modern conflicts like the war in Ukraine, the state explicitly drafts men (aged 18-60) and forbids them from leaving the country, while women are permitted to seek safety abroad.
• The Hook: Ask why Western governments and institutions—which the instructor likely supports—unquestioningly endorse a policy that treats male lives as disposable assets and female lives as inherently worthier of protection. This forces the instructor to either defend gender-based discrimination or admit that "privilege" is a deeply flawed metric.

 2. The Reciprocity of Objectification

If the instructor warns against the "male gaze" or the objectification of women in media and pornography, pivot to the reality of social and sexual selection.

• The Point: Argue that objectification is not a one-way street. While men may focus on physical attributes, women routinely objectify men through "success objects": height, social status, and income.
• The Hook: Use data from dating apps to show that a vast majority of women filter out men based on rigid physical requirements (like the "6-foot rule") or financial brackets. Ask the instructor why a man’s desire for a specific aesthetic is "misogyny", while a woman’s requirement for a man’s height or bank balance is "empowerment" or "standards".

 3. The Intersectional Minefield

When the instructor attempts to link misogyny to broader "intersectional" issues like racism, introduce data that disrupts their unified front of victimhood.

• The Point (Preference): Note the statistical reality of dating preferences; for example, white American women are statistically the least likely group to date black men compared to other demographics.
• The Point (Homophobia): Raise the documented sociological challenges regarding homophobia within specific minority communities, such as the high rates of social conservatism and anti-LGBTQ sentiment often cited in studies of black female demographics.
• The Hook: By introducing these frictions, you force the instructor to navigate a "hierarchy of grievances". They cannot condemn one group without appearing to marginalize another. This creates an intellectual stalemate where their generalities about "oppression" fail to account for the specific biases held by the groups they claim to defend.

Conclusion: The Collapse of the Program

The goal of these methods is not to "convince" the instructor; they are often too ideologically committed to change. The goal is attrition.

By constantly steering the conversation toward these "Lines of Torres Vedras", you ensure the instructor can make no headway. They will spend the entire session chasing their own contradictions, attempting to bridge the gap between their theory and these uncomfortable realities. Like the French facing Wellington, they will find the environment increasingly hostile and their resources (time and authority) depleted. Eventually, the program will be seen for what it is: an unstable structure that cannot survive the weight of its own hypocrisy. 

The Duke of Wellington: A Master Strategist

Navigating the Misandrist Landscape: A New Path for the Anglobitch Blog

In the rapidly evolving digital landscape, particularly within the United Kingdom, discussions surrounding various social and political movements are continually subject to scrutiny and interpretation. For platforms dedicated to specific advocacy, such as those focusing on men's rights, it has become increasingly pertinent to consider the legal and social framework within which these discussions take place. This blog, in its commitment to fostering thoughtful discourse, is announcing an updated editorial approach.

It has become evident that the current legal environment in the UK introduces considerable risks when engaging in certain forms of public commentary, particularly concerning gender dynamics. Legislation pertaining to hate speech and online harassment is robust, and enforcement can lead to significant consequences for individuals and platforms perceived to cross established boundaries. While the principle of free speech remains a cornerstone of democratic societies, its practical application is often nuanced, with various interpretations and limitations in practice. This necessitates a careful calibration of content to ensure compliance with legal stipulations and to avoid unintended repercussions.

Recognizing these complexities, and with a steadfast commitment to responsible commentary, this blog will henceforth implement a revised content policy. A core tenet of this new approach will be the rigorous avoidance of any content that could be construed as misogynistic. Our objective is to contribute constructively to conversations surrounding men's issues, and this cannot be achieved through language or sentiments that demean, generalize negatively about, or express hostility towards women. Such expressions are counterproductive to meaningful dialogue and have no place on this platform.

Moving forward, our focus will pivot towards purely abstract or theoretical discussions concerning gender and culture. This will involve exploring academic concepts, sociological theories, historical perspectives, and philosophical inquiries related to masculinity, male identity, societal roles, and the broader cultural implications of gender. We aim to delve into these subjects with intellectual rigor, inviting readers to consider complex ideas from a dispassionate and analytical standpoint. This approach will allow us to examine critical aspects of men's lives and their position within contemporary society without resorting to confrontational rhetoric or polarizing generalizations. Our commitment is to scholarship and thoughtful exploration, ensuring that our contributions remain within the bounds of respectful and legally compliant public discourse.

Rookh Kshatriya

 

Incelerando Complete!

In the midst of our troubled, crumbling world I have one good piece of news to relate: my long-awaited book Incelerando is now complete.

This revolutionary work projects the myriad perplexities of our age into both near and distant futures. It will form the third volume of my great Crimson-Pilled trilogy, which already includes Havok and Hope on Distant Shores.

Although it expresses many of the same themes and speculations as those two books, Incelerando does so from a wholly different perspective. It contains no footnotes or attributions, but is no less dynamic for all that.

The title Incelerando implies an acceleration of existing conditions, especially in the sphere of pan-Anglosphere gender-relations and institutional misandry. In sum, Incelerando explores such conceptual, political and social speculations on an infinite conceptual landscape.

It represents a golden living dream of futuristic possibility, a unique vision spanning continents and centuries. Believe me when I say all other manosphere writings pale beside its recondite magnificence, whatever Pill they adhere to.

Incelerando is available here. I will be taking no profits from sales. I seek only to serve the Crimson-Pilled elect of enlightened men, which is quite reward enough.

 

The Black Pill, Suicide and the Road to True Resistance

Renegade #1: Was there a better way?

Western society promotes myths of personal transformation to keep itself ticking over, while peddling goods and services that the broad masses mistakenly believe will improve their lot. The sole benefit of this rigorous programme is false optimism. Thus the short, puny man with a hooked  acromion daydreams of someday becoming Mr Universe; the low IQ dope thinks he can become a surgeon with a ‘little more revision’; the one-eyed Indian janitor thinks he will bed models if he gets himself a new haircut; and so on. While none of this will ever happen, it inoculates the low-value male (as society and women reckon him) from absolute despair.

It ain't happening, dude...

The Black Pill – uncompromising realism and unflinching acceptance of genetic and cultural determinism – offers no such comfort blanket. Even my own Crimson Pill rejects simplistic, adaptive solutions to most dilemmas. According to our critics, this uncompromising approach renders the Black or Crimson-Pilled male far more susceptible to depression and suicide. Far better to live in daydreams, they say, than drink the hemlock of truth.

Superficially, there seems to be much evidence to support this view. Black Pilled male suicide frequently conforms to the conceptual frameworks designed to study such behaviour. Emile Durkheim, the father of sociology, claimed there were four types of suicide:

• Altruistic – self-sacrifice for the greater good
• Anomic – reaction to sudden failure and ostracism
• Egoistic – escape from oppression, tyranny and bondage
• Fatalistic – escape from an intolerable life of pain and exclusion

Black Pilled male suicide seems to be mostly of the egoistic variety. Renegade #1, one of the most famous Black Pilled suicides, was certainly of this type. Suicidal incel mass killers such as Elliot Rodger and Alek Minassian seem to be Altruistic as well as Egoistic, in that they believed their ‘sacrifice’ would somehow improve the world for other men like themselves.

The true cause of male suicide

Surely, then, the Black or Crimson Pills are inherently dangerous for 'low-value' men? On closer inspection, this compelling interpretation misses the truth by a wide margin. For it is not the Black Pill that leads sexually-disenfranchised men to suicide, but Anglo-American culture itself. Accepting the Black or Crimson pills is a neutral decision, completely unrelated to depression or suicide. Living in a misandrist society inhabited by racist, entitled female vermin is the true cause of male suicide and depression; the Black Pill is merely a response to that unlivable situation, not its cause.

So what is to be done? More important, how is one to live?

The obvious solution to misandry is male self-reliance and independence – in general terms, studied detachment from the Anglosphere and its reflexive misandry, racism and repression.  This approach negates the threat of suicide through focused empowerment and more importantly, active resistance.

Why is living in the teeth of gynocratic hostility a heroic act of resistance? Moreover, how does choosing to live represent a dynamic revolt against the misandrist social order? 

This system wants us dead, dudes...

The answer is simple: Anglo-American women, simps and society in general actively want ‘low value’ men to kill themselves. In fact, that outcome is right at the top of their twisted agenda. This life-changing realisation confounds the whole notion that suicide is a rebellious or ‘romantic’ act: in the Anglosphere, a suicidal male is actually conforming to society's dominant values! 

In conclusion, do not give way to the siren song of suicide. It is not Black or Crimson Pilled, not 'romantic' or cool and certainly not bold or manly. In truth, male suicide is the act of a Blue Pilled muppet conforming to Anglobitch whims and societal misandry, both of which want you dead. Conversely, choosing life represents authentic revolt, vigorous resistance and focused autonomy. 

For Awakened Men in physical health and of sound mind, suicide should not even be an option.

The Crimson Pill: Wholesome After All

Five of the Best: Remembering the Logitorian

Some of you might have been aware of the Logitorian, a YouTube Vlogger who discussed female nature, nihilism, social decay and other Black/Red Pilled topics. Apparently, he shot himself in the head a few weeks ago. Believe me when I say this guy completely belied the low-IQ, belligerent stereotype commonly associated with black Americans. His meditations covered a wide range of topics with verve and originality, and it is gratifying to think that his channel might be guiding younger generations of men for decades to come. 

The Logitorian's immersion in the VantaBlack Pill was the true cause of his death. When he first appeared on the scene, his channel cleverly mediated between the Red Pill and the Black. As time went on, however, he became exclusively Black Pilled and nihilistic in every aspect of his thought. Unfortunately, the undiluted Black Pill is a daily feast of darkness that only the most resilient can endure; when not balanced by a profound sense of life-mission, it can only lead to a terminal conclusion.

This is why I always maintain a Crimson Pilled position, between the Black and Red. Obviously, there are some men for whom things are 'beyond over' in psycho-sexual terms; contrary to what the lamestream media tells us, one-eyed Indian janitors are never going to be bedding models under any social conditions. For such men, the pure nihilism of the Black Pill is an ideal method of managing despair. Not all men are hopeless incels, however; for those of normal height and appearance, there is hope for sex, romance and liberation via dieting, exercise and travelling outside the puritanical and misandrist Anglosphere. 

Here are five videos by the Logitorian which I found inspirational and insightful. 

The first one discusses the Androgyny Culture that is presently engulfing the Anglosphere countries. As we know, the androgyny culture is just Anglo-American sex-negative puritanism disguised as something 'revolutionary' - much like Anglo-American feminism itself:

Beware the Androgyny Culture:

https://mgtowmirror.611.to/watch/?v=tjlMZvBSIsY 

 

This video discusses the fact that most western women are mentally ill. I have written about this topic before, with particular reference to the female Dark Triad (Borderline, Narcissism and Histrionic) of personality disorders. Obviously, the misandrist and puritanical Anglosphere helps to incubate and normalise these disorders:

Don't Try to Fix Her: 

 https://mgtowmirror.611.to/watch/?v=TghOnfO_iF8

 

This video focuses on female entitlement and self-delusion. Due the puritanical, sex-negative nature of the Anglosphere, even the ugliest and most obese women harbour distorted perceptions of their own sexual worth:

Unattractive Women Thinking They're Dimes  

https://mgtowmirror.611.to/watch/?v=meJRDkLL0SU 

 

Not only does the repressive, puritanical, sex-negative nature of the Anglosphere give Anglo-American women an inflated sense of their own sexual worth, it also serves to incubate outrageous levels of female narcissism:

Female Narcissism

 https://mgtowmirror.611.to/watch/?v=QlW-Ib-ef8s

 

Finally, this video discusses the ongoing war against masculine virtues being waged across the West in general, and the Anglosphere in particular. Due to its puritanical, sex-negative culture and history, misandry is the Anglosphere's default cultural setting:

Real Men Are Being Exterminated

https://mgtowmirror.611.to/watch/?v=HbGeWC1Kjo0

This is just a small selection of the many videos produced by the Logitorian and I recommend every single monologue he produced. Although his original YouTube channel has been closed, the MGTOW Mirror Project has backed up all his presentations (https://mgtowmirror.611.to). An extremely intelligent and self-aware individual, the Logitorian's loss is a grievous blow to the manosphere. It is remarkable to consider that his channel could exist as an intimate record of his philosophical thought into remote posterity, guiding and informing Awakened Men of all colours and classes for decades to come. 

Indeed, this possibility has moved me to begin work on my third book. While Havok and Hope on Distant Shores were non-fiction works, my third book will approach the same issues in a totally different way.

An Anglobitch Mystery: What is it with Canada?

'I call it rape whenever a woman has sex and feels violated' - Catharine MacKinnon

When I began writing this blog, I never factored Canada into the Anglobitch equation. American puritanism, British repression and Australia’s male suicide rates naturally absorbed all my interest. As the years have rolled by and more commentary has stacked up, I now realise that Canada might well be the most misandrist nation in the whole Anglosphere. The whole world was surprised by the Marc Lepine and Alek Minassian massacres; however, further investigation shows that Canada is the perfect breeding-ground for such events.

The year 2020 will go down in history as a watershed in the history of the Anglosphere: when its global dominance came to an end. Let us consider the two main Anglo-Saxon countries, the UK and US. Both countries have deep problems adhering to their distinctive puritanism, which have led to a wide range of  ongoing dysfunctions:

• An expensive, ineducable underclass constituting about 20% of the population: an inevitable by-product of feminist social policy.
• A puritanical drugs policy that needlessly criminalises and imprisons large sections of society. This is not only expensive and inefficient, it seems to have fed mass opoid addiction in the US and abetted the rise of a criminal underclass.
• Cultural inflexibility derived from reflexive puritanism, stifling rational reform of failed policies such as the War on Drugs.
• A failed state education system, with too few domestic students studying STEM subjects.
• Limited social mobility, leading to mass alienation, protest voting (Trump and Brexit) and incompetent political elites who seem to be living in the 1950s.
• Domination of (soft) academia by post-modernists and misandrist feminists.
• A common law legal system open to manipulation by misandrist, neo-puritan feminists.
• Institutional, legal and media misandry driven by residual puritanism and its modern agents, misandrist feminists.
• A 'future is female' agenda in politics, education and public policy.
• Mass obesity and poor mental health.
• A deranged obsession with obscure social minorities such as transsexuals while ignoring mainstream problems such as the criminal underclass, failed drugs policies, dysfunctional families, mass singleness, widespread political alienation, male suicide, etc. 
• A racist legacy linked to the slave trade.
• A fake historical narrative designed to downplay the Anglosphere's role in historical crimes like the slave trade.

Of course, there are also dysfunctional factors specific to these two countries.  The UK is primarily secular, unlike the US. It also has a unique post-empire legacy, resulting in an entitled and indolent lower class. Being rather more religious, the USA remains morally puritanical with strict bans on prostitution and hard drugs. Despite the obvious failure of this ‘zero tolerance’ approach, the puritanical trajectory of American culture inhibits rational reform. And so ever more American citizens are needlessly criminalised, permanently sabotaging their economic and social life-chances.

The reader might ask why I am discussing the UK and the US when the topic is Canada. However, Canada is a cultural composite of those two countries. The nation derives its laws and institutions from Britain, while the US provides its basic cultural template; and Canada also gets its core misandrist memes from those two nations. From the US, Canada gets a direct transfusion of misandrist, legalistic feminism. From the UK, it derives a kind of racist socialism that is no less pernicious to the vast majority of men. Both of these toxic cultural strains originate in puritanism, the primal fountain of all Anglo-American misandry. The diagram below describes the basic cultural equation:

As many expat American commentators have pointed out, the puritan tradition remains strong in the US. Further, puritanical repression has become a cornerstone of the misandrist American feminism which is presently being exported around the world. Feminist 'scholars' like Catherine MacKinnon essentially view all men as criminals for being physical, sexualised beings. Atop this, feminists have subverted American society using the nation's all-pervasive legalistic framework, a model which non-American feminists have readily adopted in order to bypass democratic and cultural resistance.

Turning to Britain, the concept of 'racist socialism' might surprise some people. However, it makes perfect sense when one grasps the archaic and idiomatic nature of the English socialist tradition. The Anglo-American brand of socialism has a quite different intellectual heritage to Marxism, which derives from German academic philosophy. The Anglo-Saxon ‘radical’ tradition is far older, dating back to the Peasants’ Revolt in 1381, the English Civil War, the Methodist religion and Chartism (the British campaign for mass voting rights in the early 19^th century). 

This English radical tradition was of course a major influence on the American Revolution, via the influence of radical writers like Thomas Paine and John Locke. English socialism differs from Marxism in many respects, not least its intimate association with radical religion (Puritanism, Methodism) and the various anti-Semitic, racist, imperialist undercurrents it picked up during its long history. For example, the late eighteenth century English 'radical' William Cobbett (a follower of Paine) was an avowed racist and anti-Semite, even while he preached the virtues of ‘equality’ and ‘justice for all’. In short, English socialism wants equality between white, Protestant, Anglo-Saxon gentiles – but no one else. 

William Cobbett (1763-1835): Racist Socialist

Once we understand and appreciate the Anglo-American socialist tradition’s historical links to religious puritanism and exclusionary racism, it becomes much each easier to understand the rabid Antisemitism of Britain’s Labour Party, the long-standing racism of the American Democrats and the hysterical, sex-negative Neo-puritanism of almost all Anglo-American leftists. Let me repeat: the Anglo left is not Marxist. It has acquired some Marxist concepts and rhetoric over the years, but its intellectual heritage and Neo-puritan values are quite different.

Canada is widely seen as the most ‘left wing’ or socialist of all Anglosphere countries. And in many obvious ways, this is true: its present leader is an avowed socialist. However, since Anglo-American socialism is also distinctively racist, anti-Semitic and puritanical (and thus anti-male, since puritanism vilifies men as sexual beings), these factors now oppress Canadian men in general (and non-White Canadian men in particular). The legalistic, toxic feminism emanating from the USA also helps to create an optimal breeding-ground for institutional misandry. Together, these factors explain why Canada loathes and oppresses all men while exalting women (especially white women) in every circumstance.

This is also why white 'liberal' women in Canada are not only misandrist, but also uniformly racist. In fact, not only are white Canadian feminists hostile to ethnic men, they also harbour racist feelings towards ethnic women.  Given the specific origins of Anglo-American 'socialism' in pre-modern England, a culture defined by slave-trading, imperialism,  racism and religious puritanism, such 'liberal-racism' is entirely to be expected. 

Let us list the fruits of Canadian misandry and unbridled woman-worship:

• While male sexuality is vilified and oppressed, Canadian women are free to have sex with dogs and show their naked bodies to grade school children.
• Toronto women are free to engage in hyper-hypergamy while suppressing male sexual choice and freedom.
• White Canadian women can indulge in racist rhetoric and commentary with total impunity, while men are effectively gagged and their experiences of hyper-hypergamy and sexual racism vilified.
• Female nurses and doctors in Canada can parade their naked bodies online, without fear of professional censure. Meantime, heterosexual males are ostracised and persecuted for the crime of being male.
• Canada piles public funds into feminist causes abroad, while ignoring the economic and sexual ostracism of Canadian men at home.
• In common with other Anglosphere countries, Canadian academia privileges women in every circumstance. This results in declining academic standards, too few STEM students and the intellectual legitimisation of feminist drivel.

Thus equipped with a coherent understanding of Canadian history, culture and politics, we begin to see that the violent responses of Marc Lepine and Alek Minassian were entirely understandable. Canada represents a terrifying collision of the most misandrist cultural elements in the Anglosphere, producing an unlivable society for the vast majority of Canadian men.

In the absence of reform, only one question remains: when will the next massacre occur?

 

 

Marie Stopes: Racist, English, Anti-Life, Child-Killing, Feminazi Bastard

The Manosphere often characterises Anglo-American feminists as Feminazis, to denote their inflexible misandry and fanaticism. However, many famous Anglo feminists were in fact genuine Nazis - racist, eugenicist, imperialist. While I have been exposing these evil, cum-skinned hags for many years now, the times have at last caught up with my boundless brilliance. With this is mind, let us consider biggest Feminazi of them all: Marie Stopes.  

Marie Carmichael Stopes was born in Britain in 1880 and, until she was 40, led an exemplary life as a feminist pioneer: at 22, she got a first in botany and geology from UCL; two years later, a PhD from Munich University; and became Manchester University's first female academic, as a palaeobotany lecturer. She wrote two books in 1918, Married Love and Wise Parenthood, in which she outlined some of her eugenicist views. 

But the really eye-popping stuff is in Birth Control News, a self-published extremist fanzine which she set up in July 1922, with this stirring editorial: 

Sterilisation of the unfit raises a hornet's nest, but no one worries at all about the daily sterilisation now going on of the fit. Young married men of the professional classes are today often forced by conditions to remain sterile, though they passionately desire the healthy children they could have if they did not have hordes of defectives to support in one way or the other.

Her eugenics programme was actually slightly to the right of Hitler's, just because her definition of defective is so broad. Some issues of Birth Control News seem to suggest that some people should be sterilised for vaguer reasons of defectiveness, like not being rich enough. There are also strong strains of racism: she described the southern Italians as a "low-grade race"; she was accused of anti-semitism even by her birth-control allies; and in a stinging attack on the French who, in the early 1920s tightened their laws against contraception, she said that if they really wanted to repopulate their nation, they should "eliminate the taint of their large numbers of perverted or homosexual people." 

Sterilising homosexuals is a somewhat pointless suggestion from the scientific standpoint, given that homosexuals seldom reproduce anyway. For this reason, it is most unlikely to be an 'inherited' condition.

Interestingly - for someone preaching the virtues of genetic elitism - Stopes herself was a well-known sexual degenerate. In court, her first husband described her as a multiple adulteress, nymphomaniac and perjurer. In addition, she also seems to have been mentally ill: she claimed to have heard a direct message from God while sitting under a yew tree in 1920.   

Here are some less well-known facts about Marie Stopes and her beliefs:

• From 1918 to the early 1930s she published several books on marriage and birth control. One of these was Radiant Motherhood (1920) and in a chapter headed ‘A new and irradiated race’ Stopes reveals her underlying (and repulsive) agenda behind her push for widespread birth control: ‘It is the urgent duty of the community to make parenthood impossible for those whose mental and physical conditions are such that there is a certainty that their offspring must be physically and mentally tainted…’ She wants their sterilisation made immediate and made compulsory otherwise there will be an: ‘…ever increasing stock of degenerate, feeble-minded and unbalanced who will devastate social customs…like the parasite upon a healthy tree.’

• She did not just write, but actively lobbied the Prime Minister and Parliament to pass Acts to enforce compulsory sterilisation in order to: ‘…ensure the sterility of the hopelessly rotten and racially diseased…by the elimination of wasteful lives.’

• Stopes also urged the National Birth Rate Commission to support the compulsory sterilisation of parents who were diseased, prone to drunkenness or of ‘bad character’.  To use a selection of her words, the: ‘hopelessly bad cases, bad through inherent disease, or drunkenness or character’, ’wastrels, the diseased…the miserable [and] the criminal’, ’degenerate, feeble minded and unbalanced’, ’parasites’, and the ‘insane’. In Wise Parenthood she explains: ‘Our race is weakened by an appallingly high percentage of unfit weaklings and diseased individuals.’

• Marie Stopes’ first family planning clinic was in North London in 1921 and was run by an organisation she founded: The Society for Constructive Birth Control and Racial Progress. It was no coincidence that her birth control clinics were clustered in deprived areas, to focus on reducing the birth rate of the poor lower classes and prevent the birth of those whom she considered to be ‘the inferior, the depraved, and the feeble-minded’.

• Her views were not a passing fad. In 1934 she publicly stated that ‘the half-caste’ should be sterilised at birth. In 1956, two years before she died, Marie Stopes asserted that one-third of British men should be forcibly sterilised, ‘starting with the ugly and unfit’.

• Stopes cut her own son out of her will simply because he married a girl who wore glasses. Instead, the bulk of her estate went to the Eugenics Society.

• Stopes was a Nazi supporter. In 1935, she attended a Nazi Congress for Population Science in Berlin. Four years later she sent Hitler a gushing personal letter along with a volume of her love poems: ‘Dear Herr Hitler, love is the greatest thing in the world: so will you accept from me these that you may allow the young people of your nation to have them?‘ The irony of people today praising Stopes is captured by Anthony Ozimic: ‘Praising Marie Stopes as a woman of distinction should be as unacceptable as praising Adolf Hitler as a great leader. Both promoted compulsory sterilisation and the elimination of society’s most vulnerable members to achieve what they called racial progress.’

• The BBC website states that the Catholic Church was Stope’s fiercest critic. They fail to clarify it was actually the Catholic Church that most opposed her appalling eugenic beliefs. In the 1920s, a legal victory against the rising eugenic tide was won by Dr Sutherland, with the support of the Catholic church, over Marie Stopes. Sutherland actually opposed eugenics long before he became a Catholic. Yet Stopes is lauded today as a feminist hero, while the story of the eugenics libel trial, and the Catholic role in trying to stop eugenics, has been either overlooked or dismissed as simplistic Catholic opposition to contraception.

• Moreover, Dr Sutherland and others were actively trying to prevent and cure tuberculosis, (the disease of poverty) while at the same time influential eugenicists decried their efforts as a waste of time. Eugenicists considered tuberculosis was a ‘friend of the race’ because it was a natural check on the ‘unfit’ and poor, killing them before they could reproduce.

• How ironic that Stopes, who describes poor children as ‘puny-faced, gaunt, blotchy, ill-balanced, feeble, ungainly, withered’ is the one now feted as a feminist heroine, and Sutherland who tried to treat and heal them is forgotten.

• The deliberate excision of Stopes’ eugenic legacy has made her a secular saint. The abortion industry in particular, and liberalism in general, have effectively erased Stopes’ racism and hatred of the poor (such inconvenient historical facts) from their collective memory. Yet the truth is, Marie Stopes represents an early fusion of Anglo-feminist and Nazi beliefs. 

Nor is Stopes merely a figure of historical interest; her Feminazi vision is still going strong. Marie Stopes International, arguably the biggest abortion and birth control provider in the world, focuses on providing cheap abortions in developing countries directly to the poorest women in the world:

• MSI focus much of their abortion provision in developing countries;

• Western Governments (including the UK) work through MSI to put heavy political pressure on African governments to overturn restrictive abortion policies (the ‘West knows best’) but deliberately hides this foreign influence;

• MSI funding is from rich Western individuals and nations, including the UK government, with millions more in tax money pledged in 2019:

• MSI use misnomers such as ‘safe abortion provision’, hiding or ignoring evidence that their policies can actually harm women or at best are ‘ambivalent in effectiveness’.

• The UK Government (funding MSI) spends more money and effort on birth control than on providing quality maternal care (which would save more lives)

So it seems that Stopes' colonialist and eugenic agenda carries on, with a different cloak and mantle and exported to a different part of the world. What a totally unexpected surprise...!

The Anglo-American cultural establishment spends a huge amount of time and effort vilifying Hitler's regime (and other cultures in general) in books, films and other cultural propaganda. However, not only did they collude with that regime, but modern Anglo-American feminism maintains a Nazi agenda in its dealings with emerging nations. Anglo-feminism serves as a convenient smokescreen to hide sinister racist, imperialist and fascist agendas under the guise of 'progress' and 'equality'. This also applies to the 'trans' agenda, which it promotes at every turn; is that not just more misandrist eugenics, under a different name?

In short, Feminazis really are Nazis.

In 2008, the UK revealed its true values and affiliations by creating a Marie Stopes postage stamp. Yes, I kid you not: they put a mentally-ill, Feminazi cunt on a stamp, as part of a series celebrating 'female pioneers'. 

For over a decade, I have been saying that misandrist Anglo-American feminism is not a revolutionary or progressive movement at all; to the contrary, all its warped and imbalanced values (repression, sex-negativism, legalism, life-hatred, deviance, elitism and racism) originate within the dominant Anglo-American culture and promote its core values, albeit in 'radical' guise. How else could it have become the dominant value-system across the whole Anglosphere, in so short a time?  

Merry Christmas, anyway.