Male Alienation Rampant in 2024: Female Conscription, Populist Politics and Passport Bros Discover the Anglobitch Thesis

We all agree that a unique ideology dominates the Anglosphere: a warped, sex-negative liberal-puritanism which worships women and all deviant, unnatural forms of sexuality. It hates men (especially heterosexual men) and is ultimately driven by a puritanical hatred of reality itself.

The Anglosphere's reflexive hostility to reality makes it the global stronghold of the Blue Pill, in its purest ideological form. This is especially true of sexuality and gender-relations, which are natural targets for Blue-Pilled Anglo-puritans. Which is why we now have 137 genders; why men are jailed merely for approaching women; why female teachers can abuse Canadian toddlers with total impunity; and why ‘trans women’ are considered a mainstream demographic.

While Anglo tradcons typically describe these conditions as an ‘aberration’, I have always labelled this madness the purest EXPRESSION of Anglo-Saxon cultural values. This is because extreme hostility to natural sexual expression ultimately leads to the worship of deviance.

Ultimately, puritanical fantasism of the type ravaging the Anglo-Saxon world can lead only to societal collapse. Why? Because fantasism prevents both effective adaptation to reality and the capacity for corrective action. And so the US and UK slide ever deeper into sexual dysfunction and social decay, becoming more morally insane with each passing year.

The Anglosphere is also weakening, in a practical sense. This is because defending fantasies takes tremendous mental and physical effort, diverting attention from the natural struggle for existence. Lions or wolves do not have 137 sexualities, misandrist laws and trans rights, because they have more urgent matters to attend. Oddly, the Anglosphere’s wealth and influence have actually fueled its disastrous slide into sexual fantasism.

Not only is the fallout from Blue-Pilled delusion now obvious to all (even women, leftists and Anglo 'conservatives'), the reaction against it is also going mainstream. For over a decade I have preached that Anglo-American men have everything to gain and nothing to lose by fleeing the Anglosphere in pursuit of sex and relationships. This is because the overt misandry of Anglo-American culture (and Anglo women, of course) have effectively forbidden normal interaction between the sexes. 

 

Even the Anglobitch is waking up... go figure.

Although many wise men have already acted on my words, the recent rise of the Passport Bros demonstrates the normalization of my values. The Anglosphere is now so hostile to men who want normal, healthy relationships that even the average clown wants out: 

For many men in the West, the prospect of dating (which hopefully doesn't end in false accusations of harassment), marriage (that doesn't end in divorce, meaning a significant long-term financial loss), and/or siring children (that are hopefully "biologically" theirs), is a significant "risky" proposition. It is for this reason that so many men have simply "opted-out" of the dating & marriage scene and have chosen to go their own way. They have realized both, the toxic nature of the current Western dating /marriage scene, as well as their real options and true value within the global dating /marriage market. Western society’s current social infrastructure is literally on the verge of collapse, and many of these men have had the wisdom and foresight to see this emerging decline and are wisely going elsewhere for better opportunities, more importantly, for a better quality of life.

With the understanding that honest discourse and open dialogue are the key ingredients needed for any productive societal change, we here at the Official Passport Bros.com look forward to positively contributing to the global Passport Bros discussion, discussing important issues that affect Men, connecting with Passport Bros, Digital Nomads, and other influential Blue Book Gentlemen from countries all over the world. We believe that building a supportive "Ex-Pat" economic infrastructure network (which financially helps the various foreign communities resided within) provides the key component needed to establish trust & build long-term relationships within these communities. 

https://www.theofficialpassportbros.com/

I suspect these guys have been studying my writings for inspiration. For example, I invented the concept of the 'digital nomad' back in 2017. 

 

Where it truly all began...

In a similar vein, most of the public want an end to the selective privilege enjoyed by post-feminist women. In the UK, where some form of conscription is being mooted to make up for falling enlistment figures, 72% of the public now think women should be conscripted into the military:

 

Should women be conscripted in the event of a world war?

Were conscription to be introduced, a new question the government would have to grapple with is whether women should be asked to go into the line of fire.

The large majority of the public (72%) say that women should be conscripted. This is comprised of 42% who think they should serve on the exact same basis as men versus 30% who think there should be some restrictions on the roles they can perform (e.g. perhaps not serving in the infantry).

YouGov

 

The fact that mass male alienation from the Anglosphere's institutional misandry has lowered enlistment rates is worth an article in itself, of course.

 

Another expression of popular backlash against the Anglosphere’s slide into madness is the rise of politicians who are normal human beings. Boris Johnson and Donald Trump might be deceitful and incompetent but they are also relatable human beings, not the repressed, cardboard constructs that dominate Anglosphere politics. Bemired in puritanical delusion, the Anglo-American lamestream is completely blind to the fact that ordinary people want leaders of flesh and blood, not joyless eunuchs.

 

As this existential gap between the elites and mainstream experience yawns ever wider, expect to see more social unrest, male defection and political upheaval. The old Blue-Pilled ‘everything is perfect’ voices of David Futrelle or Tommy Fleming are irrelevant in the face of Anglosphere dysfunctions like mass male sexlessness and disaffection, normalised sexual deviance and widespread child abuse. The fact that even regular males are voting with their feet in pursuit of foreign women has already marginalized the Blue Pill and its deluded apologists.

 

 

The delights of distant shores...

Response to Thomas Fleming, Deluded White Knight and Misguided Conservative

A reader asked me to respond to the following article:

http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/2010/09/25/the-wrongs-of-womens-rights/

So I did...

Thomas Fleming seems to think that men in contemporary western societies should grit their teeth and defend women like males did in earlier, pre-feminist eras, setting them on pedestals and turning a blind eye to their iniquitous conduct. He fails to see that this is not only morally unreasonable, it is also wholly impracticable. Since the late fifties, sixties or seventies (depending on which feminist school you prefer), women have actively rejected conventional males in favor of thugs, deadbeats and sociopaths, along with other ‘cuties’ like violent criminals and swaggering plutocrats. The result is a large rump of sexually and reproductively disenfranchised middle-class males in most Anglosphere societies. These males have followed all the advice given to them by parents, schools, professors and the feminist media and ended up in the living death of involuntary celibacy (or the even worse fate of post-divorce male penury). And still Fleming expects men to view Anglo-American women as Disney princesses above all reproach, as did the bourgeois class in the nineteenth century. Is this man serious? The REAL question American men are asking in ever increasing numbers is: “WHY should I defer to women when all it leads to is false harassment charges, female contempt, involuntary celibacy and, if I’m luck, an icky divorce which leaves me in a trailer-park paying for kids I never see!”


What Fleming fails to grasp is that any complex society is an engine. If one or more components fail, the engine won’t work. Judeo-Christianity is an illogical hotchpotch of competing positions, some of which led directly to the Marxism that most American conservatives claim to excoriate. However, the ancient Hebrews DID realize that monogamy sustains civilization by giving nearly all males a genetic stake in society. This is especially important for the conceptual class, whose cognitive contributions are essential if any advanced culture is to flourish. It is crucial to civilization that genes for intelligence and deferred gratification are maintained in viable quotas, for those qualities ‘oil the wheels’ of civilization, as it were. This is why advanced nations encourage immigration only by cognitive elites – scientists, architects, engineers and other high IQ ‘betas’, seldom criminals or unskilled workers. Unfortunately, unfettered female sexuality prefers layabouts, thugs and sociopaths, leading not only to a sharp decline in collective intelligence and social capital but also a crisis of confidence among middle class males. Are they supposed to maintain their old deference for women, when this results only in female contempt and sexual failure? Are they supposed to lay down their lives for women who despise the very air they breathe? Well, since the feminist/sexual revolution that is EXACTLY what they have been asked to do and frankly, they just aren’t listening any more. In sum, feminism has sabotaged monogamy, THE vital heart of our social engine. All the other components are struggling, as might be expected. Yet Fleming persists in believing that one part of the engine should continue to work as it has always done for no benefit whatsoever, though the rest of the engine does not work at all.

To hell with that! Women cannot shirk their monogamous responsibilities and expect men to respect them on the old terms. In reality, men will only sacrifice for women if there is some genetic payback. Men on the Titanic only sacrificed themselves because their own female kin – sisters, wives and daughters – were in the lifeboats. There is no reason for men to sacrifice themselves when they have no female kin (the lot of a good many pan-Anglosphere males) and most other women actively despise them. The men’s movement has arisen because singleness permits male objectivity on the issue of women. As Camille Paglia once wrote, ‘female beauty is the world’s most potent drug’. Once the promise of sex and beauty is removed, however, men can afford to see women as they really are: grasping, hypocritical, selfish. With many more men single, childless and divorced, there is simply no REASON for widespread male self-delusion or chivalry. Men are now free to rationally criticize women without fear of censure or rebuke, since they are disenfranchised in all senses, anyway… hence, the Men’s Movement. Another interesting expression of this ‘new objectivity’ is a healthy tendency to take women to task for racism, fascism and other forms of intolerance. Until very recently, a ‘blind eye’ was habitually turned to these unlovely female traits – but no longer.

In conclusion, Fleming is suffering from a particularly virulent case of Pedestal Syndrome, a sickness that afflicts many pan-Anglosphere conservatives. Since Anglo-Saxon culture is puritanical and repressive, it reflexively vilifies men as sexual beings while idolizing women as ‘owners’ of sex. This is what renders Anglo-American conservatives so ineffectual in the face of misandrist Anglo feminism; they reflexively defend what they profess to attack, reminiscent of British psychiatrist R D Laing’s concept of the ‘Double Bind’. The reader who has followed me this far can surely see Fleming’s tired formulations as abetting and advancing feminism by vilifying men and idealizing women – in short, defending the puritan cancer that is presently rotting Anglo-Saxon civilization from the inside out. In his warped Anglo-puritan perspective, the female can jettison ALL social responsibilities to men, while men are expected to discharge ALL their traditional duties to women without genetic, social or economic benefit. I wish him luck with that.