Male Alienation Rampant in 2024: Female Conscription, Populist Politics and Passport Bros Discover the Anglobitch Thesis

We all agree that a unique ideology dominates the Anglosphere: a warped, sex-negative liberal-puritanism which worships women and all deviant, unnatural forms of sexuality. It hates men (especially heterosexual men) and is ultimately driven by a puritanical hatred of reality itself.

The Anglosphere's reflexive hostility to reality makes it the global stronghold of the Blue Pill, in its purest ideological form. This is especially true of sexuality and gender-relations, which are natural targets for Blue-Pilled Anglo-puritans. Which is why we now have 137 genders; why men are jailed merely for approaching women; why female teachers can abuse Canadian toddlers with total impunity; and why ‘trans women’ are considered a mainstream demographic.

While Anglo tradcons typically describe these conditions as an ‘aberration’, I have always labelled this madness the purest EXPRESSION of Anglo-Saxon cultural values. This is because extreme hostility to natural sexual expression ultimately leads to the worship of deviance.

Ultimately, puritanical fantasism of the type ravaging the Anglo-Saxon world can lead only to societal collapse. Why? Because fantasism prevents both effective adaptation to reality and the capacity for corrective action. And so the US and UK slide ever deeper into sexual dysfunction and social decay, becoming more morally insane with each passing year.

The Anglosphere is also weakening, in a practical sense. This is because defending fantasies takes tremendous mental and physical effort, diverting attention from the natural struggle for existence. Lions or wolves do not have 137 sexualities, misandrist laws and trans rights, because they have more urgent matters to attend. Oddly, the Anglosphere’s wealth and influence have actually fueled its disastrous slide into sexual fantasism.

Not only is the fallout from Blue-Pilled delusion now obvious to all (even women, leftists and Anglo 'conservatives'), the reaction against it is also going mainstream. For over a decade I have preached that Anglo-American men have everything to gain and nothing to lose by fleeing the Anglosphere in pursuit of sex and relationships. This is because the overt misandry of Anglo-American culture (and Anglo women, of course) have effectively forbidden normal interaction between the sexes. 

 

Even the Anglobitch is waking up... go figure.

Although many wise men have already acted on my words, the recent rise of the Passport Bros demonstrates the normalization of my values. The Anglosphere is now so hostile to men who want normal, healthy relationships that even the average clown wants out: 

For many men in the West, the prospect of dating (which hopefully doesn't end in false accusations of harassment), marriage (that doesn't end in divorce, meaning a significant long-term financial loss), and/or siring children (that are hopefully "biologically" theirs), is a significant "risky" proposition. It is for this reason that so many men have simply "opted-out" of the dating & marriage scene and have chosen to go their own way. They have realized both, the toxic nature of the current Western dating /marriage scene, as well as their real options and true value within the global dating /marriage market. Western society’s current social infrastructure is literally on the verge of collapse, and many of these men have had the wisdom and foresight to see this emerging decline and are wisely going elsewhere for better opportunities, more importantly, for a better quality of life.

With the understanding that honest discourse and open dialogue are the key ingredients needed for any productive societal change, we here at the Official Passport Bros.com look forward to positively contributing to the global Passport Bros discussion, discussing important issues that affect Men, connecting with Passport Bros, Digital Nomads, and other influential Blue Book Gentlemen from countries all over the world. We believe that building a supportive "Ex-Pat" economic infrastructure network (which financially helps the various foreign communities resided within) provides the key component needed to establish trust & build long-term relationships within these communities. 

https://www.theofficialpassportbros.com/

I suspect these guys have been studying my writings for inspiration. For example, I invented the concept of the 'digital nomad' back in 2017. 

 

Where it truly all began...

In a similar vein, most of the public want an end to the selective privilege enjoyed by post-feminist women. In the UK, where some form of conscription is being mooted to make up for falling enlistment figures, 72% of the public now think women should be conscripted into the military:

 

Should women be conscripted in the event of a world war?

Were conscription to be introduced, a new question the government would have to grapple with is whether women should be asked to go into the line of fire.

The large majority of the public (72%) say that women should be conscripted. This is comprised of 42% who think they should serve on the exact same basis as men versus 30% who think there should be some restrictions on the roles they can perform (e.g. perhaps not serving in the infantry).

YouGov

 

The fact that mass male alienation from the Anglosphere's institutional misandry has lowered enlistment rates is worth an article in itself, of course.

 

Another expression of popular backlash against the Anglosphere’s slide into madness is the rise of politicians who are normal human beings. Boris Johnson and Donald Trump might be deceitful and incompetent but they are also relatable human beings, not the repressed, cardboard constructs that dominate Anglosphere politics. Bemired in puritanical delusion, the Anglo-American lamestream is completely blind to the fact that ordinary people want leaders of flesh and blood, not joyless eunuchs.

 

As this existential gap between the elites and mainstream experience yawns ever wider, expect to see more social unrest, male defection and political upheaval. The old Blue-Pilled ‘everything is perfect’ voices of David Futrelle or Tommy Fleming are irrelevant in the face of Anglosphere dysfunctions like mass male sexlessness and disaffection, normalised sexual deviance and widespread child abuse. The fact that even regular males are voting with their feet in pursuit of foreign women has already marginalized the Blue Pill and its deluded apologists.

 

 

The delights of distant shores...

Apologies for not Posting

As you can see, the blog has been restored. Good news, because it now has 1.3 million views and many people clearly like the arguments presented here.

I have not been posting as regularly as I used to, for a number of reasons.

Firstly, the rest of the Awakened or Red-Pilled world has caught up with my perspectives. There is now mass discontent with gender-relations, male sexual disenfranchisement, female abuse of minors, and the general direction of society across the English-speaking world (especially the US, UK and Canada). Many of these issues are just common knowledge, now: only Boomers, women and the utterly stupid still think that the contraceptive pill and Tinder unlocked a trove of free sexual delights for most males; or that women aren't obviously advantaged in most spheres of life; or that underwear models are regularly banging one-eyed Indian janitors. Paradoxically, this 'insight revolution' makes it much harder to write profound or original articles on these issues, since the ground is 'taken'. This is testament to all the hard work I and others have put in over the past decade, I guess; but it does not make my task any easier.

Secondly, I just don't get the same insights I use to. Revolutionary concepts like the Crimson Pill or Sexual False Consciousness just don't spring into my mind any more. This is partly because a lot of younger writers and commentators have flooded social media with excellent blog posts, webcasts and podcasts, saturating the field. It is also because there is only so much one can write about a certain topic, before exhausting its conceptual possibilities.

Thirdly, the death or displacement of various people who posted or commented here from the beginning has neutralized my energy and resolve. Although younger people have introduced powerful new perspectives about female child abuse, someone my age also likes a certain social continuity with his generational peers.

Lastly, I think my mental abilities are simply in decline. I'm just not as sharp or insightful as I was. This is just a natural feature of ageing, not a specific condition: so nothing to worry about.

Anyway, it's good to be back. 

War on the Horizon? Watch the Feminists throw ‘Social Constructs’ Out the Window

During wartime, this critter is suddenly more 'valuable' than the average male

I apologize for my tardiness in writing. At last, the Russian invasion of Ukraine is confirmed and settling into a regular pattern, as is the west’s response to it. Since the invasion was the focus of this post, I now have all the ammunition to make my general case.

So Russia invades Ukraine for whatever reason, Ukrainian women are permitted to flee the country while all men under 60 are expected to remain as a reserve-pool of potential cannon-fodder to resist the invaders. Now, this sounds pretty sexist and traditional to me. Yet nowhere have we seen or heard any opposition to this outrageous ‘sexism’ either from feminists or the ‘progressive’ western media. In fact, all we hear is unstinting and universal applause for these policies. Predictably, the west's tradcuck conservatives haven’t had much to say, either.

Despite the rhetoric espoused by feminists and their various 'progressive' apologists across the Anglosphere, these same apologists never propose that women should take an active role in the military or any other dangerous occupation.

Despite their chatter, the Anglosphere (and indeed, the west in general) accepts the following policies without a moment's thought:

• Only women and children are allowed to leave Ukraine.
• All men under 60 have to remain in Ukraine.
• All men under 60 remaining in Ukraine will be expected to fight.
  

How interesting that the same countries which were recently arguing that gender is a 'social construct' now happily embrace Ukraine's overtly 'sexist' policies without a moment's demur. Indeed, the lamestream media is already promoting biological females as more 'important' than males with 'trafficking' rhetoric, in time-honoured Anglo fashion. The only concern they register for men is for the few hundred trans women living in the Ukraine. As Vice puts it:

One trans woman said she is “terrified” of being stopped trying to leave Ukraine, and being forced to join the Ukrainian army “as a man” – especially because authorities are stopping men aged 18 to 60 from leaving. Another Ukrainian trans woman is too scared to leave her accommodation in fear of transphobic attacks. She’s the only person left in her neighbourhood.

I do not blame these transsexuals, they are merely responding rationally to the fact that low value men have 'subhuman' status in the world. But hold on - what about all the non-trans men who might be forced to join the Ukrainian army "as men"? If everything is a 'social construct', without any biological or physical foundation whatsoever, why have non-trans males suddenly become legitimate cannon fodder? 

So,what lessons can we draw from this fiasco of double-standards?

• Gender equalism and the Anglo-feminist notion that gender is a 'social construct' are instantly forgotten when war or any other dangerous activity comes into view. Then, only men are expected to defend these ideas with their lives. And yet if the Anglosphere authorities truly thought gender was merely a 'social construct', they would put women and their flat heads straight into the front lines.

• In general terms, Anglo-American feminists don’t really believe a word they say or write. All their cloudy talk about 'gender-equality' and 'gender anti-essentialism' is just that: talk. When it comes down to it, they are still living in the 1950s on gender issues, male rights and everything else: exactly as one would expect from the Anglobitch Thesis.

• Anglo-American liberals still view men as ‘disposable’ even while spouting their ‘gender is a social construct’ rhetoric. One cannot make a leopard change his (or her) spots - not this one, at any rate. In the final analysis, 'progressives' are no friends to Anglo-American men. As a reflexively sex-negative and misandrist cultural bloc, the Anglosphere will always pedestalise women and devalue men; that is its default position, and it can do no other.

In conclusion, don't be fooled by all the hollow rhetoric. An Awakened Man puts himself first, second and last, in every situation. Stay aloof, stay strong and let the Crimson Pill continue to guide you.

 

Imaginary 'Trafficking' tales are stirring up Blue Knight Anglocucks

 

 

 

Old Maps and New Territories: Why is the Anglosphere stuck in 1958 on the Verge of 2022?

The 1950s ideal looks good; but don't rely on it

On the eve of 2022, it moves us to ask this urgent question: why are so many men still using outmoded information to navigate gender relations? Although most Anglocunts are either chasing tattooed thugs or angling for some Blue-Pilled beta to marry before running into the Wall, most Anglo-American males still worship them as secular deities. 

Why?

The hideous reality of the 21 century Anglobitch 

Answering this question necessarily involves addressing the whole of Anglo-American culture, of which gender-relations form but a small part. Such a timely appraisal will reveal that the same outmoded values govern politics, the media and law: a temporal false consciousness strongly akin to Sexual False Consciousness, which I will here call ‘1958 False Consciousness’. The ridiculous 'War on Drugs' is a good example, despite law enforcement knowing it to be a costly and abject failure.

There is more. In the Anglosphere, the most urgent issues are ignored while politicians and the media fixate on issues that are decades out of date (or just completely irrelevant, like 'trafficking'). While I do not rate Bernie Sanders’ policies, he deserves great credit for pointing out that most poor Americans do not vote at all. No mainstream American politician discussed this ‘elephant in the room’ until he did. In fact, Anglo-American politics itself is a ludicrous relic: electoral colleges, ballot boxes, wooden rhetoric and doddering politicians still fighting the Cold War. Meanwhile, the real issues - including mass male sexual disenfranchisement, institutional misandry, male suicide rates and the declining value of college education - are completely sidelined. In sum, the prevailing wisdom on most things in the Anglosphere is old and outmoded, if not completely useless.

On the cusp of 2022, we need to know how and why this ridiculous situation arose. Here are a few suggestions:

Boomer Domination of Mainstream Culture

The Boomer domination of mainstream media, politics and the cultural life is beginning to decline as they die off, yet remains a powerful force. For example, the Boomer assumption that attending college automatically confers 'middle class' status still governs mainstream discourse. Boomer assumptions still govern gender-relations, too; the lame Tradcuck canards that snotty Anglocunts are ‘oppressed’ or attracted to physics professors being good examples. Supposedly 'cutting-edge' commentators like Aaron Cleary and Jordan Peterson are essentially Tradcuck Boomers, in all but name. Peterson’s views are worthless to sub-8 men in the 21^st century, yet he enjoys vast popularity as a ‘revolutionary’ thinker. Meanwhile, LMS and myself are marginalised figures even within the manosphere.

It is fair to say that the Manosphere arose to fill the vacuum between the reality of life for sub-8 men and the Blue-Pilled Boomer rhetoric that still dominates films, TV shows and pop music. Indeed, the Anglosphere’s strident ‘All women are victims!’ agenda is a fifties relic; given that they are now shown preferential treatment in every sphere of life.

The Boomer garbage we were raised with

Legacy Puritanism

Some of the Anglo-American aversion to reality arises from legacy puritanism and its reflexive tendency to suppress ‘unpleasant’ features of human nature; hence the hysterical and dysfunctional 'zero tolerance' policies concerning drugs and prostitution in the USA. By contrast, the Hispanic world is comfortable with both diversions. Similarly, the Anglo authorities would rather dismiss the issue of mass male sexlessness than accept the 'unpleasant' reality of human sexual needs. Unfortunately for them, reality cannot be banished indefinitely.

Legitimate Nostalgia

The post-war era, especially the period from 1958 to 1975, was an anomaly in economic terms. Because of its relative peace, prosperity and cultural significance, it has become a permanent lifestyle template for the Anglosphere (and indeed, the West in general). This is why the post-war era continues to ‘haunt’ the Anglosphere as an ideal, preventing rational appraisal of the present in many different spheres: education, law enforcement, politics and (above all) gender relations. Putting it bluntly, many people find wallowing in a half-mythical past far preferable to confronting (or even acknowledging) urgent contemporary problems. 

Anglosphere Atomisation: Social Isolation, Homosociality, Generationalism, Racism and Class Distinction

Because of its distinctive colonial history, laissez faire economics and ingrained homosociality, different classes, races, generations and sexes share few common experiences in the Anglosphere countries. Clearly, this conflicted situation will never promote objective appraisal of reality; consider how upper-middle class white Boomer politicians remain stuck in the 1950s, completely unaware of anyone else or their experiences. Similarly, homosocial academic feminists harbour distorted views about non-white or sub-8 men as 'privileged', since they never meet any. The Anglosphere's black urban underclass lives in an insular world of rap music, bogus aspirations and drive-by shootings, as if nothing else existed. Such atomised societies can never develop common arenas of discourse, the true engines of socio-cultural development. Inevitably, this results in a kind of existential inertia with no capacity to adapt or improve.

Conclusion: How Using the Right Map Confers Success

Rampant Blue Knights = Blue Balled Losers and Fantasists

For all the reasons outlined above (and doubtless many more), Anglo-American civilisation is trapped in a prison of outmoded information. As individuals, Anglo-American men are also applying outmoded information to their own lives; in sum, trying to navigate the twenty-first century with social and mental maps from the mid-twentieth century. This is potentially disastrous, given the reflexive misandry of the modern Anglosphere; a good analogy would be a modern traveller using a map of the Roman Empire to navigate around Europe and North Africa.

So here is the great lesson of this timely post: the Blue Pill in all its forms is a redundant map that no longer reflects reality. This is why those who follow it are invariably failures: Incel Tears are sexless Simps in denial; Blue Knights are blue-balled losers trapped in the cloying fog of Sexual False Consciousness; and PUAs are regularly fined (or arrested) for 'sexual harassment' (the feminist legal term for 'cold approach'). In sum, these Blue and Red Pilled clowns are trying to navigate the 21st century with maps drawn in 1958-1975: surely the road to nowhere, if ever there was one.

However, the converse must also be true: if the Black and Crimson Pills are accurate maps of reality, surely they ought to confer success instead of failure?

As John Smith says, the Crimson-Pilled man is primed to maximise his situation: he improves what he can while accepting his unchangeable limitations. After all, a sub-8 male kidding himself that 'looks or ethnicity don't matter' is on the royal road to failure. However, if he focuses on careers based on brain power and diligence alone (computing, engineering, finance, medicine) his life-chances improve exponentially. Similarly, a sub-8 male in misandrist North America should not waste his time pursuing hyper-hypergamous, racist Anglo women; far better to relocate to regions where gender-relations are more congenial (Latin America, Western Europe, Scandinavia, South East Asia).

In sum, the Crimson-Pill's skilful balance of self-improvement and objectivity guarantees personal success, within viable limits. In the 21st century, use a 21st century map; while the 1958 map looks nice, it no longer delivers.

Happy 2022!

If you look like this, try not rely too much on your 'personality'