Covid-19 Jams the Signal: The Incel Decade Unfolds

May 2020: The Anglosphere is sick and burning...

Taking a look back at my seminal January article on the development of the 2020s - which I dubbed the Incel Decade - are my predictions unfolding according to plan?

Why is Sexual False Consciousness such a modern - in fact, late twentieth century - phenomenon? Answering this question not only sheds much light on SFC, it also shows why the 2020s will be the decade when the Black Pill eclipses SFC as the dominant paradigm of western sexuality. 

Big words, indeed; but is there any truth in them?

Although the mainstream media originated in the nineteenth century as printed newspapers and journals, it only acquired total hegemonic dominance over the western masses after world war two. This stranglehold only began to loosen in the late 1990s, although it fundamentally remained in place until around 2009. That momentous  year began to see the introduction of social media into every aspect of life, obliterating the mainstream media consensus that had dominated mass thought for the previous sixty years. The subsequent election of Donald Trump, the UK's vote for Brexit and the West's nationalist resurgence are all manifestations of this process; and without sounding too pretentious, I think the rise of the Black Pill and the Manosphere in general are also part of this 'reclaiming reality' agenda.   

As I have often written, the conceptual key to understanding any social bloc is hegemony – the unseen ideological cement that makes things ‘what they are’, thereby binding the broad masses to the social order. Traditionally the lamestream media has been the primary hegemonic tool, although language, place names, education, organic mass culture, religion and subcultural traditions also play a role. The hegemony maintains the Overton Window – the frame of what is ‘reasonable’ or ‘sane’ in any society – however dysfunctional or irrational that might be.

Obviously, the rise of social media and the decline of mainstream media have greatly weakened the Anglosphere’s traditional hegemony. The rise of Black Lives Matter, Incel culture and ‘offbeat’ politicians like Trump or Farage all demonstrate the extent of this change. Mainstream commentators can no longer deny the existence of incels, lookism, The Black Pill, white women’s historic (and ongoing) racism or even the the Dog Pill; and long may that trend continue.  

The Dog Pill is becoming common knowledge

However, it is difficult to deny that the 2020s have already seen a massive acceleration in this process of hegemonic collapse.  Personally, I believe the Covid-19 pandemic is exposing fissures in Anglo-American culture which have lain dormant for decades. As Nathaniel Rothschild once said, 'Great fortunes are made when bombs fall in the harbour, not when violins are playing in the ballroom'. The ongoing pandemic has sparked this mass ‘Awakening’ for several reasons:

• Due to CV-19, there is added fear and paranoia throughout society. This is exposing deep rooted fears, prejudices and tensions which are normally dormant or suppressed. The case of Amy Cooper (see video clip below) is a good example; when confronted with a black male bird watcher, she was unable to control her inborn Anglobitch hatred of black men.
• The fact that many of the middle classes can work from home while other workers are expected to brave an unsafe working environment is exposing the profound  inequality, racism and injustice that define the Anglosphere. In fact, the disastrous mismanagement of the crisis by the UK and US sprang solely from their miserly Anglo-Saxon instinct to prioritise the economy over people.
• Due to Lockdown, people have had more time to reflect on their miserable lives. Free of the daily grind, people are also free to fixate on things that inspire or anger them. The cases of racist Anglobitch Amy Cooper and murdered George Floyd are good examples. The Devil makes work for idle hands, and all of that.
• Cooped up at home for months on end, the masses are highly frustrated. This makes them all the more likely to respond with violent action when confronted with injustice. The race riots presently engulfing many US cities are an exquisite example of intense frustration finding violent expression.
• Sheer uncertainty about the future is also stoking tensions. Despite various empty claims and promises from non-medical authorities, there is presently no Covid-19 vaccine and no hope of one until 2021 (at the earliest). President's Trump’s stand-off with China, Twitter, mainstream media and the Deep State are also adding to the mix. Many workers will lose their jobs and face poverty when governments stop propping up businesses and paying workers in the coming months. When anything could happen, anything will.
• Covid-19 Lockdowns around the globe have greatly strengthened the power of social media. In Lockdown conditions, people are using Discord and Zoom without the mediating influence of the lamestream as never before.
• Covid-19 might well extinguish the Boomers, chief proponents of Sexual False Consciousness across the Anglosphere. After all, it is not called The Boomer Doomer for nothing. With these clowns removed from the equation, an honest and constructive discussion about western gender relations can actually begin. No longer will we hear that all women are oppressed 'saints' or that 'everyone' (and it really is 'everyone', people) is bouncing around in bed with models all day; after sixty years of Sexual False Consciousness, the Black Pilled reality will finally prevail.  

As promised, here is the video showing the 'oppressed' and 'downtrodden' white cunt Amy Cooper. While taking her dog out for a sex session in the woods walk in Central Park, she called the police on an innocent black male who asked her to control her canine sex slave mutt:

To conclude this short thought-piece on the unfolding Incel Decade, it has to be said that my January article was startlingly on-target. Under the stress of Covid-19 and the associated Lockdown, the Anglo-American hegemony is unravelling fast. Under unprecedented pressure, our many foes - racist Anglo feminists, Baby Boomers, the lamestream commentariat - are either crumbling or playing into our hands at every turn. 

Instead of sucking false consciousness from the lamestream media, more sexually-disenfranchised and socially-victimised men are poised to escape their Blue Pilled state than ever before. The Anglosphere's Blue Pill 'consensus' is a vast fraud led by soy-fed poltroons who need to keep subaltern males hoodwinked about the hideous truth of the Anglobitch and her exalted, dog-fucking, arrogant nature. 

But those lies have never been more vulnerable. Now is the time to throw all our efforts into this corridor of unprecedented opportunity, spreading the Black Pill as never before.

George Floyd: a tragic but useful Martyr

Are Men and the Manosphere Evolving Away from Sexual False Consciousness?

As I have explained in detail elsewhere, Sexual False Consciousness is the widespread male delusion that young, attractive women hand out sex for free. Moreover, not only do they spend every hour of every day handing out free sex, they give it to ageing, blue-collar schlubs in pick-up trucks. All utter nonsense, of course: and yet such delusions are ubiquitous among blue collar males, who truly believe that 18 year old models are gasping for sex with mechanics and road-sweepers.

http://kshatriya-anglobitch.blogspot.com/2015/04/sexual-false-consciousness-and-blue.html
http://kshatriya-anglobitch.blogspot.com/2014/07/illusions-and-structures-how-sexual.html

http://kshatriya-anglobitch.blogspot.com/2019/08/the-great-eye-opener-are-mgtow-and-wall.html

https://kshatriya-anglobitch.blogspot.com/2019/11/making-societal-waves-female-sexual.html

Sexual False Consciousness is the erotic expression of the American Dream and it serves the same purpose in neutralising the masses as its economic counterpart. Like the American Dream, SFC encounters little resistance because most American males have bought into the delusion they can achieve it. And because the sexual rewards for success are so alluring (and the price of failure so catastrophic), they cannot accept that most of them will never have sex with actresses, models and other attractive women. Like blue-collar schlubs who seriously think they have a chance with models and actresses, the average American male would sooner wallow in delusions of sexual success than accept his sexually disenfranchised reality. In the following video, the audience readily laps up the  fiction that some fat, semi-ethnic schlub can attract the interest of a young white beauty:

There it is: clear proof that SFC is alive and well in 21st century America. In fact, only with the rise of the Internet has Sexual False Consciousness been offered any challenge since the mid-1960s. Little wonder that males from generations Y and Z are the first to begin throwing off its brain-rotting yoke.

Here's proof:

The “manosphere” is getting more toxic as angry men join the incels

Men from the less extreme end of the misogynistic spectrum are drifting toward groups that espouse violence against women, a new study suggests. 

In 2014, Elliot Rodger went on a shooting and stabbing spree, killing six and injuring 14 at the University of California, Santa Barbara. Rodger was a self-proclaimed “incel” (short for involuntary celibate)—a group of young men who feel furious at their perceived rejection by women and meet online to discuss and spread their ideology. Their toxic misogyny fuels a hatred for women that has led to several recent incidents of mass violence, with many incels citing Rodger’s own disturbing manifesto as an inspiration.

The authorities are taking note. Last month, the Texas Department of Public Safety released a report finding that incels “are an emerging domestic terrorism threat as current adherents demonstrate marked acts or threats of violence in furtherance of their social grievance.” 

Now a group of computer scientists have painted the most complete picture yet of the misogynistic groups that fuel the incel movement online.

The “manosphere,” as it is known, is divided into four broad groups. “Men’s right’s activists” (MRAs) claim that family law and social institutions discriminate against men. “Men going their own way” (MGTOW) take this feeling of grievance further, arguing that society can’t be “amended”; they often avoid women, blaming them for their problems. “Pick-up artists” (PUAs), meanwhile, date and harass women; they believe society is “feminizing” men. 

And then there are the incels, the most potentially violent of the group. Incels abide by the “black pill,” a belief that women use their sexual power to dominate men socially. For that, incels want revenge.

The team’s analysis found that the manosphere is evolving—and fast. Over the past 10 years, the population of men identifying as men’s rights activists and MGTOW—traditionally older and less violent—is falling while younger, more toxic PUA and incel communities have seen a spike.

Worryingly, it seems that there has been a significant migration from men’s rights groups to incel groups. Every year since 2015, around 8% of MRA or MGTOW members appear to have become more radicalized and joined incel groups online.

“The older [groups] are dying off,” says coauthor Jeremy Blackburn, an assistant professor at Binghamton University.

Indeed, it seems that not only are older, less violent groups dying off, but membership in the more violent groups is becoming more toxic. To determine the level of hate being espoused by these groups, the team used a machine-learning tool developed by Google, called Perspective, that looks for keywords in speech. It produces a “toxicity score” to give an idea of how much hate speech is being used in the forums.

The team’s analysis showed that speech in the most extreme manosphere groups on Reddit, known as subreddits, was far more hateful than the speech of a random sample of Reddit users, and more on the wavelength of fringe far-right hate groups like those that frequent the social network Gab. And it’s getting worse. Over time the toxicity score has risen across all manosphere forums. 

To keep track of the various manosphere groups, the team had to skim seven dedicated forums, along with 57 subreddits and a number of specialized wiki groups. Many of these wikis sprang up after the groups were banned from social media for their extreme views. The team built software to scrape information on threads dating back to 2015, encompassing 138,000 users and 7.5 million posts. 

The way these groups use language made the task tricky. Summer Long, a research assistant on the project, says that the extreme end of the manosphere often uses vulgarity as a self-deprecating measure, which can confuse the systems trained to look for such words. 

Incels also often use seemingly innocuous language to sidestep Reddit moderators. One term that appeared often was “smv,” which stands for “sexual market value.” And one common trope is “spinning plates,” used by pickup artists who date as many women as possible. To a casual observer, those words might mean nothing. To a wannabe incel, they are a sign he’s come to the right place. 

“It’s worth noting that this is a big challenge and that [our way of] measuring toxicity is not perfect,” says Blackburn, noting that Google Perspective has been shown to miss problematic language and might even exhibit racial bias. Still, he thinks that this is a major first step toward identifying people’s migration from less violent groups to more violent ones. 

So what can be done? One step might be to create tools to help spot and protect potential victims, along with an earlier analysis of when and how men’s rights and MGTOW groups get radicalized, says Blackburn.

Reddit has taken steps to crack down on incel-sympathizing subreddits. For example, r/Incel has been banned since November 2017, but an alternate subreddit, r/Braincels, quickly took its place, gaining nearly 17,000 followers. It was banned in October 2018. After the publication of Blackburn and his colleagues’ paper on the arXiv preprint server, Reddit put the r/MGTOW subreddit in quarantine, which means that its content is deemed “extremely offensive or upsetting to the average redditor,” it can’t generate ad revenue, and visitors must click a pop-up saying they understand that other redditors find it offensive. But this crackdown has forced many incels toward even more extreme sites, like Gab. 

Long said spending time in these forums and subreddits as a woman was “eye-opening,” and that she could see how minds are “poisoned” in an echo chamber. 

“It’s horrifying,” she says. “But you can see how it molds someone’s view into being fatalistic. [It’s] a no-hope ideology.” 

Tanya Basu, MIT Technology Review, Feb 7, 2020

Yes, it looks like Sexual False Consciousness is on the way out at last. And since SFC is the principal force binding the male masses to the existing social order, the effects of its collapse will surely be great indeed. Over the past decade, many SFC-brainwashed chumps and deluded tradcucks have laughed at me and my words. But of the many who laughed then, not so many are laughing now; and in the coming decade, I doubt many of those who are still laughing will be laughing any more.

Know Your Enemies: Lower-Class Blue Knights, Kings of the Azure Pill

The Blue Pilled narrative across the Anglosphere tells us that sometime between the late fifties and the early seventies, 'everything changed'; that suddenly, 'everyone' was having sex with everyone else in a dizzying maelstrom of orgiastic delight. In reality, what really happened in the 50s and 60s is that women gained the freedom to indulge their innate preference for high status males: it was a ‘hypergamy revolution’, not a ‘sexual revolution’. This is why male lower class suicide rates began to soar in the late 60s, as mateless males began to feel the psychological impact of sexlessness and singleness. It is interesting that socio-economic divides also began to widen at this time, making low-value males non-marriageable material for most Anglo-American women. What also began to arise were various 'copes' for sexless men, especially Sexual False Consciousness in all its myriad forms.

As I have already described in a number of classic articles, Sexual False Consciousness involves sexless men falsely appropriating the sexual successes of high status men as their own at a subjective, imaginary level. Because rock singers, rappers and actors are having lots of sex with models, low status losers feel the need to pretend THEY are having sex with models, conveniently omitting the fact that female hyper-hypergamy only bestows this sexual bounty on rich, famous and high-value males. We see this crazy delusion at work in the MGTOW 'pump and dump' and Wall narratives, as if the average mid to low-value male were drowning in sexual choices every minute of every day. 

Granny sells sex: the reality of the 'Sexual Revolution'

This is not to say that MGTOW does not have value; but its real value is its political dimension, not its psycho-sexual one. It is perfectly reasonable for sexually and socially excluded males to self-organise online and minimise their societal contributions. Sadly, this good work is muddied by rampant Sexual False Consciousness at every turn. 

Of all low-SMV coper males, the most duped and dangerous are low-IQ, low-income, blue collar losers. These clowns habitually talk as if there were a queue of nubile women clamouring to have sex with them. In truth, the whole blue collar, blue-pilled schtick - that women want sex with everyone - is ludicrous in a world where toothless grannies are charging young men for sex while a third of young American males had no sex at all in 2017. In fact, the same blue collar chumps swapping tall tales about their sexual escapades have swingeing suicide and addiction rates. Clearly, the only thing these shit-heels are 'pumping and dumping' in the Tinder Age are cheap hookers and blow up dolls.

He's banging models all night...

These loser dopes defend their Sexual False Consciousness with such fanatical resolve because delusion is all that stands between them and the rope. The blunt truth – that they lost out on love and sex with a prime female – would make their minds implode in psychotic rage. This is why these inane poltroons loathe the very shadow of the Anglobitch Thesis and all Red/Black Pilled thought. If they realised their real situation even for a moment – abject loserdom, wading through lives devoid of love and sex – they would instantly kill themselves. Although Game/PUA practitioners are a dying breed in the Tinder Age, they also cling to their delusions with the same fanatical resolve. 

The deluded Blue Knight

Angry and resentful, utterly gulled by the lamestream media and its cloying fantasies, it is easy to see why these 'Blue Knights' - that is, blue-pilled, balled and collared - are walking around on a 'hair trigger', waiting to explode in violent rage. Sports hooligans, violent criminals, racists and other thugs are generally drawn from this group. Moreover, lower class white 'culture' is hysterically misandrist in general, forever extolling male disposability and the endless virtues of white women as a class. This why Blue Knights have to be handled carefully, when we awakened men cannot shun them altogether; they are better left in Azure-Pilled delusion than introduced to the Red/Black Pills of liberating truth. Inbred autistics are among the most dangerous of these knaves, since their cognitive disorders inhibit understanding of their true situation and its causes. The veil of Sexual False Consciousness is essential for them to function at the most basic level, since it keeps their ugly and hopeless reality at bay for another day.

Lower class white men are vociferous defenders of 'women’s rights' in the Anglosphere because of low IQ, their misandrist culture and limited self-awareness; but also because sexual false consciousness prevents them seeing that women's 'liberation' merely gives free rein to female hyper-hypergamy. And here is the curious thing; by pedestalising women, lower class Blue Knights only legitimise and perpetuate their own inceldom. A good analogy would be the inane tendency of low income chumps to vote republican/conservative in Anglosphere countries, thereby oppressing themselves in the most ludicrous manner imaginable. Thus some Anglocuck who hasn’t had sex in two decades rails against the 'sexual oppression' of women in countries like Saudi Arabia, not seeing that strict sexual regulation of women would be far more likely than Anglo-feminist hyper-hypergamy to secure him a breeding mate. The ultimate expression of this idiocy is lower class Anglo males joining the military to 'free' women in societies which still regulate female sexuality. 

Lower Class 'Culture' idolises Women

In the 2020s these sexually-disenfranchised, deluded imbeciles will become our direct opponents in the struggle for truth and freedom. The 2020s is the Incel Decade when various long-submerged gender conflicts will come to a head in the west, for good or ill. Expect the authorities to manipulate Sexual False Consciousness to create a Blue Knight army of dangerous Anglocucks directly opposed to Manosphere goals and ambitions. Mark my words, friends: like hired thugs paid to break up union strikes, these Azure-Pilled lackeys will be extensively harnessed to keep us awakened men on the Anglo plantation.

The 2020s: Retarded Blue Knights will be unleashed

Readers will note that I have been using the term Azure Pill as opposed to Blue Pill. The Azure Pill is a heightened version of the Blue Pill; the Blue Pill in its purest form, in fact. The Azure Pill is unique to the Anglosphere and its misandrist, gynocentric puritanism. Consequently, it is far more intense and extreme than the Blue Pill that prevails in other cultural blocs. While the Blue Pill prevails in the world at large, the Azure Pill rules the Anglosphere.

An Anglo Blue Knight swallows his daily Azure Pill

Incelerando! The impending Anglosphere Crisis: Will the '20s be the Incel Decade?

The Teens (2010-2019) were a decade of great political upheaval in the Anglosphere. Both the US and UK experienced shock election results and dramatic socio-economic upheaval, largely due to years of social dysfunction. Canada and Australia have both spent the past forty years denigrating and marginalising men with boundless misandrist zeal, creating a sizeable 'incel class' of jaundiced males in both countries.

By submitting to residual puritan narratives and declaring informal war on the male sex, the Anglosphere nations are playing a foolish and dangerous game. As the Twenties approach, I am ever more convinced that it will be a decade of unparalleled social instability for the Anglosphere. Any idiot can see that countries with large minorities (or even majorities) of sexless, alienated young men are heading for serious trouble. In particular, the United States and Canada can expect to see weekly mass shootings as incel males with nothing to lose run amok, selecting women - the sexual oppressor class - as their primary targets.

Below, I list some of the factors which will feed this conflagration:

• Anglo-American misandry. Though many regions are facing an incel crisis, the problem is much worse in the Anglosphere because of its distinctive sex-negative puritanism and sexual racism, which also determine  the sex-negative agendas of Anglo-American feminism. In the Anglosphere there will be no amelioration of misandry or inceldom, just their unremitting expansion. 

• Avoidance and apathy. The Anglosphere is reluctant to address sexual issues honestly and directly because of its puritan heritage. This means the incel crisis will have to reach critical levels before any action is taken. And by then, the problem will very hard to rectify without resorting to draconian measures.

• Fraying trust values. Decades of feminism, misandrist policy and male oppression has made the Anglosphere a dry powder-keg ready to explode with sexual repression and resentment. Expect the Anglosphere countries to become ever more like Brazil or Mexico with social disorder, crumbling institutions and casual violence being normalised. 

• The Flynn Effect. Rising IQs have made the masses far harder to fool with MSM propaganda. Only an absolute idiot still thinks Chinese guys studying STEM are bouncing around in bed with blonde models every night. Female hypergamy, entitlement and racism are now common knowledge to almost everyone with Internet access and two brain cells to rub together.

• End of social circle. Once, tribal membership of a youth culture meant easy access to members of the opposite sex. With the stealthy replacement of post-War youth culture by hypergamous social media for younger Millennials and Zoomers, such social circle game no longer exists. This will mean ever more single, dangerous and aggrieved young men in the 2020s.

• Informational threshold. The Internet permits instant sharing of knowledge and opinion, obviating the old model of top-down media indoctrination. In the 80s or 90s the MSM could happily praise Greta Thunberg as a saint without fear of contradiction. However, once social media appears and a certain threshold of informational complexity is passed, the game is up; it is no longer possible for the MSM to peddle its Blue-Pilled Disney fantasies. Perhaps widespread higher education and the Flynn Effect feed this outcome, also. Even the broad masses are beginning to reject Sexual False Consciousness for a more honest narrative. Generation Z will reach adulthood during the next decade, having been raised by an online counter-culture in which the Manosphere is a prominent force. In the 2020s,  expect undiluted Black Pill thought to become commonplace among people under 40. 

Doubtless my astute readers can add many more factors to this list. With these divisive elements already in place, the 2020s promise to be hot indeed. With the MSM in full retreat, Sexual False Consciousness is breaking down rapidly in the face of Black Pill truth and many males are realising their desperate situation. 

It does not take a genius to work out what will happen in the next decade; nonetheless, a genius has marked the way for us. In this immortal passage, Shakespeare's Richard III - a hunchbacked proto-incel - describes the damage sexual alienation can wreak on the male personality. Here, the deformed Richard surveys his limited options as a sexually disenfranchised male:

Grim-visaged war hath smooth'd his wrinkled front;
And now, instead of mounting barbed steeds
To fright the souls of fearful adversaries,
He capers nimbly in a lady's chamber
To the lascivious pleasing of a lute.
But I, that am not shaped for sportive tricks,
Nor made to court an amorous looking-glass;
I, that am rudely stamp'd, and want love's majesty
To strut before a wanton ambling nymph;
I, that am curtail'd of this fair proportion,
Cheated of feature by dissembling nature,
Deformed, unfinish'd, sent before my time
Into this breathing world, scarce half made up,
And that so lamely and unfashionable
That dogs bark at me as I halt by them;
Why, I, in this weak piping time of peace,
Have no delight to pass away the time,
Unless to spy my shadow in the sun
And descant on mine own deformity:
And therefore, since I cannot prove a lover,
To entertain these fair well-spoken days,
I am determined to prove a villain
And hate the idle pleasures of these days.


In simpler terms, let the dark times roll...

Sexual False Consciousness Rampant: Blue Collar Chumps, Incel Tears and the Great 'Trickle-Down' Delusion

Underclass loser: Doubtless banging models all night...

My concept of Sexual False Consciousness is gathering pace and traction across many different Manosphere channels. Youtube, blogs and other fora are clamouring to discuss the concept. One of the most interesting is VVS, whose latest video makes interesting viewing. In this, he dissects the recent finding that, contrary to the mainstream media myth that the US is a sexual Wonderland, half of all young Americans are now single:

One of the funniest things is the way American cuckservatives ascribe this sexual drought to 'choice' or the re-emergence of 'Christian morality' among the young. The real answer - as we all well know - is the well-described cocktail of residual puritanism, sex-negative feminism, homosociality, misandry, racism and hyper-hypergamy that governs Anglo-American gender-relations. With the rise of social media, the impact of these forces has wrought terminal damage on male-female interaction.

Despite this obvious truth, the mainstream media spin on the study referenced above is riddled with evasion and denial. The usual self-appointed 'experts' are wheeled out to cloud the real issues in time-honoured fashion. Aside from the robust statistical evidence indicating widespread repression and male sexual disenfranchisement is the baffling lack of common sense underpinning these denials. Do mainstream media people really think that the average Joe working a blue collar job is bouncing around in bed with models every night? Given the obvious hyper-hypergamy of most Anglo-American women - and their withering contempt for the bottom 80% of males - is it not entirely obvious that male sexual disenfranchisement is a modern pandemic? A person with Down's Syndrome ought to be able to see that the 'mainstream' narrative - that 'everyone' is having orgies with models all night - is complete nonsense.

Despite feminist claims, there never was a 'trickle-down' of sexual freedom into the male working class; to the contrary, feminism saw low-value males cast into the sexual wilderness. Although they bleat endlessly 'around the houses', social 'scientists' (cough) will never admit the true cause of lower class males' aggression, intolerance, suicide and violent criminality: widespread sexual disenfranchisement. It is entirely obvious that persistent sexual frustration makes blue collar chumps belligerent and sadistic: blue collar racism and homophobia also derive from the same effect.

The 'Mainstream' Media: Hallucination?

Although the Internet is inevitably more honest and objective than the mainstream media, it still contains islands of utter self self-deceit. One of these is the IncelTears Reddit, which boasts insane  levels of Sexual False Consciousness. This bizarre online redoubt spends most of its time critiquing the posts made by avowed incels on the incels.is blog. Yes - this bizarre bunch of omega males and transitioning transsexuals sit around criticising the 'truecels' as if they themselves were enjoying orgies with models on a regular basis! The only difference between the two blogs is Sexual False Consciousness: while the true incels on incels.is accept their sexual disenfranchisement, the IncelTears brigade carefully hide it behind a fake subtext of sexual bounty. This unstated narrative - that everyone is enjoying orgies every night - flickers around nearly all sexual discussion in the mainstream media and those deluded by it. Do these people seriously think that? Are they really that deluded?

Maybe they are. But here are a few alternative explanations for their studied denial of reality:

• Maybe people who deny the Anglobitch Thesis are mad? At least, are their views of social reality so deluded as to be hallucinatory? The French philosopher Jean Baudrillard argues that the mainstream media occupy a hallucinatory realm which has no reference to reality. Baby Boomers, women and others still snared in this fantasy world continually confuse it for reality itself. It is interesting that the Manosphere is largely a Generation X, Y and Z phenomenon; perhaps this relates to the fact that the mainstream media has less hold on the young?
• The Anglosphere is notable for its denial of historical, political, social and (especially) sexual reality avoidance. As I wrote at length in my first book, Havok (2009),  this aversion to reality is a  cultural expression of Anglo-American puritanism. Accepting that life is not ideal for large - in fact, very large - numbers of people means accepting reality; and that is not something the evasive Anglosphere is particularly comfortable with. When the problem is sexual - as is the case with Sexual False Consciousness - the discomfort elicits draconian repression. Hence the tendency to shout down, ridicule or ignore males who openly discuss sexual disenfranchisement - either their own or anyone else's.
• As a regular poster called Sebastian Hawkes has said, the mainstream media is dominated by unrepresentative males with enormous wealth and power. Is the popular delusion that women are clamouring for sex with everyone largely a product of the casting couch? Also, the fact that much of the sexualized media aimed at women is created by gay men projecting their own sexual fixations onto their female audience, creating the modern pandemic of female sexual false consciousness.
• Simple fear of breaking ranks and giving voice to truth plays a prominent role. One is reminded of the Emperor's New Clothes: no one dares speak the truth because of social pressure.
• Maybe SFC is just a by-product of mass stupidity? Most SFC types either study soft, non-STEM subjects or are blue collar chumps - in short, not the brightest tools in the box. In the UK, one person in three cannot divide 65 by 5 with pencil and paper. It may just be that most Anglochumps are just too dumb to see though SFC. If television told them the moon was made of cream cheese, they would most likely believe it.
• During the 60s and 70s, the Anglo-American masses bought into the notion that the destruction of monogamy would result in a lifelong orgy with thousands of warm, willing females pandering to their every whim. Well, it did: but only if you were a rich, famous, high value male. The Average Joes who cling to SFC will never admit that they were gulled by post-war 'liberation' rhetoric. At best, they cling to a 'trickle down' model of sexual relations; that they will get the dregs of the banquet, at some undisclosed point in their miserable lives. However, the grim reality of female sexual liberation in the Anglosphere is hyper-hypergamy, which almost no 'real' male (not even highly successful ones) can live up to. Accepting that you were duped is hurtful in the extreme; SFC helps men to manage the natural shame of their own naivety, stupidity and sexual failure.
• Accepting one's own SFC means accepting the reality of female nature. Because men in the Anglosphere nations are raised to pedestalise women due to residual puritanism, it is especially hard for them to accept that women are imperfect. 

However, media lies and mass self-delusion can only go so far. Given the the arid sexual reality of North American existence, the post-Internet decline of the mainstream media and the rise of our rampant, unregulated Manosphere, the dysfunctional nature of Anglo-American gender-relations can no longer be hidden. The Red Pill will never be 'mainstream' but ever more self-aware, solvent and educated men are deconstructing the Matrix.

Drunken Britscum: Is mass SFC simply a product of low IQ?

Male Singleness and the Rise of the Men's Movement (or, the Fringe Benefits of Sexual Disenfranchisement)

Why has the pan-Anglosphere men's movement exploded into life in recent years? Even in the late Twentieth Century, the movement was fairly marginalized, with a mere handful of male writers daring to criticize feminism.

Since about 2007, all that has changed. We have made the Internet our own, creating a potent network of blogs, sites and fora in every digital arena. We have made some legal gains (consider the limited anonymity granted to the accused in British rape cases). Many female journalists in the pan-Anglosphere press express increasing concern about the decline of masculine chivalry and the rise of Game, MRA activism and foreign dating sites.

Obviously, the Internet has had a major role in this explosion. The pan-Anglosphere 'mainstream' media reflexively project a feminist, matriarchal perspective since (as we all know) Anglo-Saxon culture is implicitly feminist, anyway. The Internet therefore represents a natural medium for counter hegemonic masculinist initiatives - indeed, perhaps the sole avenue. And of course, the 'mainstream' media are atomizing or declining, further strengthening the masculinist agenda.

A new, iconoclastic spirit is abroad. After hating on men for the past thirty years, Anglo-American women are suddenly waking up to the fact that American men don't like them very much. This explains their shrill denunciation of foreign dating sites, Game, activism, the escort industry and other dynamic masculine responses to their casual misandry. American men are saying: "Ok, Anglobitch - if you hate men, that's fine. I'll just jet off to Russia, Venezuela or Thailand to find a woman who likes men - and thinner, prettier and sexier than you, to boot."


The oddest thing about this is the Anglobitch response - when Anglo-American women have directly engineered these outcomes. Freed by singleness from any need to delude themselves about women, American men have addressed their issues with typical dynamic candor. Their reward is a cacophony of abuse from the entitled Anglobitch and her 'mainstream' media apologists, still steeped in infantile subjectivity and mouthing the same tired, feminist mantras: 'You can't handle a strong woman'; 'men are trapped in the past'; 'women know what they want'; 'men just want an unpaid house-servant'; and so on.

However, another factor is at work in this great masculine awakening, not just the expansion of the Internet and its infinite capacity for democratic, rational discourse. With various national modulations, the Anglosphere has witnessed the steady decline of stable, monogamous relationships since the mid-Seventies. Today, over 50% percent of American marriages fail and ever-increasing numbers of singletons of both sexes proliferate. In some American urban centers, most people are now single and unattached. In the UK, a third of households are now headed by single people, something unthinkable only a generation ago.


Interestingly, the men's movement has burgeoned in accord with this demographic shift. This surely relates to the fact that - without close female kin - many Anglo males can now view western women with a clear, objective eye. When men have wives, partners or daughters, they cannot afford this ruthless objectivity; they have too much personal investment in their female kin. But now, with ever more males living in isolation from females and without emotional links to them, they are free to analyze female insolence and entitlement for the first time.

Let us elaborate. When nearly all men had female partners and children, they had a biological incentive to ignore female privilege. After all, their own wives and daughters were the principal recipients of it. Once a large proportion of men no longer had wives or daughters, however, chivalry instantly lost its ulterior biological incentive. Consequently men began to see women in their true light, as state-sponsored tyrants and pedestal princesses. This, I would aver, is the major reason for the recent rise of the pan-Anglosphere men's movement. When one's wife and daughters are safe in the lifeboats, chivalry makes sense; when one has no wife or daughters, it makes no sense whatsoever. Thus the men's movement represents a conceptual revolution comparable to the European Enlightenment, with the same profound implications.


Many more men are asking: "why should I continue apologizing for women? What's in it for me?" When men are single and childless, the answer is simply this: nothing. Gender objectivity is the privilege of the single, never the sexually enfranchised. Hence, the recent explosion of single men has facilitated a heightened objectivity concerning gender-relations and, ultimately, the rise of the men's movement. I think this a very profound and overlooked fact, and one that might be manipulated to further our cause in the fullness of time. It also explains the middle-class, hyper-rational ethos of the pan-Anglosphere men's movement, since such objective self-awareness always defines the educated and intelligent, never sentimental dullards. Calls for female draft registration and an end to to pro-female educational and legal discrimination all spring from the same source: unfettered objectivity.